That Does Not Mean What You Think It Means

Personalized Bible Parodies and the Problem of You-Meneutics

Hey, Scott, what brings you into the pharmacy?

I'm thinking about getting one of the updated COVID -19 vaccines.

Great. Do you know which type of vaccine you'd like? There's more than one? Yep, there are different types of vaccines available. You can learn more about them at wedovaccines .com. If you have questions or want to make an appointment, give me a call.

What was that website again?

Wedovaccines .com. Thanks, I'll check it out. This message was brought to you by Novavax. Okay, round two. Name something that's not boring. Laundry? Ooh, a book club. Computer solitaire, huh? Ah, sorry, we were looking for Chumba Casino.

Ch-ch-ch-ch-chumba. That's right, ChumbaCasino .com has over a hundred casino-style games. Join today and play for free for your chance to redeem some serious prizes. Ch-ch-ch-ch-chumba. ChumbaCasino .com.

No purchases necessary. Full word. Only limited by law. 18 plus terms and conditions apply. See website for details. One, two, three. Welcome to the Wrap Report with your host, Andrew Rappaport, where we provide biblical interpretation and application.

This is a ministry of Striving for Eternity and the Christian podcast community. For more content or to request a speaker for your church, go to strivingforeternity .org.

Well, welcome to the Wrap Report. I am your host, Andrew Rappaport, here for another episode. To join with here by my crusty sidekick, trusty sidekick bud, the wiser. Oh my goodness. You called me crusty, though.

Did I? Well, that would work, too. Yeah. I said trusty. You know, I aspired to trusty, but crusty's probably good.

Yeah, I should say, you know, I forget, someone had pointed out on one of the previous episodes, Oh, what was it that I had said? I think it was Chris Honhold. Someone had, I said something and said a completely different word, but it sounded similar.

And I was like, no, almost like, you know, I don't know if you've seen this thing with Biden where Dan Bongino made a joke that, and when you listen to it, it sounds like Biden walks up to a reporter and says, I've wiped my butt.

And it does. It literally sounds like that's what he said. I was trying to read his lips to see what he was actually saying. And I just couldn't see the angle. But Dan Bongino made a joke of it. And he goes, watch, watch the fact checkers are going to fact check this and say, that's not what he said.

The irony was, is that he was right. They did fact check it. They did say that that's not what he said. But the interesting part of the article was the fact checkers couldn't figure out what he did say.

That's so sad. We're so judged.

Yeah, it's elder abuse. Clearly elder abuse. Yeah, I mean, I don't know what to say.

Well, I think that's better than what we have to start off with here. Oh, oh, Bud, what do you know, folks, you don't understand. Let me give you a little background on how this show starts. So Bud and I will discuss things throughout the week, what we're going to talk about sometimes weeks ahead of time.

We start preparing and we research. And then when we record, we record on Saturday mornings. And when we record, I will get a list of things from Bud. And these are things that just, how else can I say this?

It hurts. It makes your head hurt. I don't even know if I want to put this in the show notes, Bud. But so this is what I get this morning just before recording. Hey, check this out, right? Your personalized Bible.

That's what he sends me. Your personalized Bible. Now, folks, if you have a Bible handy, I'm going to give you a little bit of time. You're going to need a Bible, by the way, for this episode. So if you have a Bible handy, if you wouldn't mind getting it out and reading along with me.

Well, actually, Bud, I think since you put my name in here, maybe it'd be better if you read some of these. I'll tell you what, let's do this. You read the ones you sent me on this, your personalized Bible, and then I could read what the New American Standard says for these to see how close it is.

But this is a Bible you can actually purchase, but don't. And it is interesting. Let me, you know, when you go to the about us, here's what it says about this. This is just so scary, but our vision is to help others gather a deeper understanding of God's promises to them personally and a deeper understanding of the depth of God's love for each of us because he is a personal God.

There is nothing more personal or enduring than being called by your name and a transformation taking place as you read God's word personalized with your name. Your Bible is printed using state-of-the-art equipment at satellite offices set up in the homes of homeschooling moms.

The personalized manuscript is then sent to a commercial binder that specializes in Bibles. The result is a beautiful personalized Bible that you and your loved one can enjoy for years. So it's personalized, bud.

Now this is the thing, you know, earlier this week I had someone call up to ask a question. They were kind of confused because they've always been told that everything is about having a personal relationship with God.

And they were confused because they listened to a lot of Ray Comfort and Ray doesn't talk about having a personal relationship. He talks about repentance. And this person wanted to understand why. And I said because the Bible doesn't talk about a personal relationship.

In fact, all of Israel talks about a national relationship. So it talks about us needing repentance. It talks about us being in a state of being an enemy of God and then being adopted by God. So yeah, there is a personal element to it that we can call him Abba Father, but people have gone so overboard with it.

What I had said to this person is you end up seeing that people end up focusing on the me. This is about me and my relationship with God, not my need for God. Not the fact that I'm a wicked sinner in need of God.

That's been what's been so prevalent in Christianity, and it really comes from a gospel tract that we're going to bring up later, is where a lot of this came from, which we're going to talk about. You don't get your theology from a gospel tract.

You get your theology from the Bible, and it's much better that way. Don't get it from novels either. Left Behind series is not a good theology book. Bud and I can both agree on that, even though we have differing views of end times, right?

But you look at this, and you look at this, your personalized Bible, and this is the epitome of this idea of having a personal relationship with God, that we're going to replace Scripture with your name.

So why don't you read Psalm 43, which you sent me? Psalm 43, yes.

This isn't hermaneutics. It isn't hismaneutics. This is youmaneutics. It's youmaneutics, yeah. Yeah. All right, Psalm 43, your personalized Bible. Vindicate, Andrew, O God, and plead, Andrew's cause, against an ungodly nation.

O deliver, Andrew, from the deceitful and unjust, for you are the God of Andrew's strength. Why do you cast Andrew off? Why does Andrew go mourning because of the oppression of the enemy? O send out your light and your truth.

Let them lead, Andrew. Let them bring Andrew to your holy hill and to your tabernacle. Then Andrew will go to the altar of God, the God of Andrew's exceeding joy. And on the harp, Andrew will praise you, O God, Andrew's God.

Why are you cast down, O my soul? Why are you disquieted within me? Hope in God, for Andrew shall yet praise you, the help of my countenance and my God. Psalm 43, you're really isogeted.

The thing with that is out of the three you sent me, that's actually the best one. Oh, yeah, that would be. That's the closest to scripture. I mean, it's really kind of sad, but let's, this is so bad.

This is painful. Please go to the next one, to First Chronicles, folks. If you have your Bible, turn to First Chronicles. This is one you're going to want to read along. First Chronicles 4, 9, and 10.

If you could please read this in this wonderful personalized, and by the way, folks, we did try to figure out what translation is this. And, you know, we couldn't figure it out. It says, according to the, at least a picture we see, it says it is built or based off of the modern English, was it modern?

Dr. Darrell Bock. World English, yeah. John Dickerson. The world English. I'm not familiar with the world English translation. I actually don't even have it in Lagos. The world English Bible translation, I don't know anything about that.

If you folks do, you can email me at info at strivingforeternity and tell me anything about that translation. I'm just not familiar with it. So, that right there gives a concern. But we even looked it up, and some of these aren't even from there.

But let's start with this one. Bud, I cringe, but go ahead. Your personalized Bible, First Chronicles 4, 9, and 10. Go for it.

Dr. Darrell Bock. Yeah, yeah. Now, Andrew was more honorable than Andrew's brothers and sisters. And Andrew's mother loved Andrew, saying, Because the pain in which I bore Andrew was worth every minute.

And Andrew called on the God of Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob, saying, Oh, that you would bless me indeed and enlarge my influence, that your hand would be with me, your servant Andrew, and that you would keep me from evil, that I may not cause pain.

So God granted Andrew the request. So, in Hebrew, is Jabez Andrew?

Is that how it's translated? Yeah, this is what many call the prayer of Jabez. With the actual text, I'm sorry, I'm laughing so hard at this. The New American Standard says, Jabez was more honorable than his brothers, and his mother named him Jabez, saying, Because I bore him with pain.

Let me just stop there. You know what the name Jabez means? To be born with pain. And your mother loved you, saying, Because the pain in which I bore you. So, this is like completely… Jabez, which is a text of scripture dealing with a person named Jabez.

This is probably because of that book, The Prayer of Jabez, that they rewrote this one to write you in, but the worst offender of the three you sent me. Oh, oh, bud, we have to do this, and it's painful.

Could you please read, in this wonderful translation, Jeremiah 29, 10 to 14?

Yeah, I can. And just realize, now, we didn't understand that there are all these multiple levels of interpretation that are possible with especially this scripture. Jeremiah 29, 10 through 14. Thus says the Lord God, After you have been disciplined and purged, Andrew, I will visit you and perform my good work toward you and cause you to return to my side.

For I know the thoughts that I think toward you, Andrew, says the Lord, thoughts of peace and not of evil, to give you a future and a hope. Then, Andrew, you will call upon me and go and pray to me, and I will listen to you.

And Andrew, you will seek me and find me. When you search for me, Andrew, with all your heart, I will be found by you, says the Lord, and I will bring you back from your discipline. I will gather you from all the places where I have driven you, says the Lord, and I will bring you to the place where you belong, Andrew.

I don't even know what to do with this. This is the one where he said, what translation is this based out of, because we couldn't figure it out, because Jeremiah 29 .10 makes this explicitly clear that this is not dealing with us.

This is one of the passages we'll look at later, but it says, Jeremiah 29 .10, for thus says the Lord, and, you know, in this translation, it says, thus says the Lord God, so that's pretty close. But where this one says, after you have been disciplined and purged, Andrew, what the actual text says, when 70 years have been completed for Babylon.

When were you in Babylon, Lance? Yeah. I didn't know you'd been. I went through every translation that I have here in Logos, and I can't find a single one that even comes close to the, we even looked the message.

I mean, you figure the message, that would be the most literal, right? That, even the message says, this is God's word on the subject as soon as Babylon's 70 years are up, and not a day before. So, even the message doesn't come close.

This is so. That's not an endorsement, by the way, just so I can insert that. Yeah, well, who does endorse it? Let's look at some of the endorsements. You have a Brian Houston. I'm not talking about the message.

You're not endorsing the message Bible, am I saying?

No, no, no, no. The message Bible would be, I'm saying it's about, you know, we went to the message because we thought, what would be the worst translation that they could have used? Yeah, yeah. I got you.

I was just clarifying for the sake of. But this, your personalized Bible, let's look at who does endorse it. We have Brian Houston, a senior pastor at Hillsong Church.

Oh, yeah, that's yeah. So that's a problem.

Oh, who's the second one they have on there? George Pearsons, senior pastor of Eagle Mountain International Church in Fort Worth, Texas. Well, if you don't know who that is, that is Kenneth Copeland. So there you go there.

Oh, but we have a woman. And I first thought maybe it'd be a woman pastor. No, it's a woman author. What did she write? Sex traps. Well, there's a book just from the title. I think I don't want. So this is who endorses this.

I mean, I'm sorry if this has been painful for you. This is what counts for Christianity these days. People think that this is something that is worthy of being called Christian, that this is going to help people in their spiritual growth.

This should give a true Christian a headache. And I'm sorry for giving you the headache. But I'm just passing along to you what Bud, thankfully, passed along to me this morning.

Yeah, and really, I mean, the point is not to mock. This is just an abomination. I mean, completely. But there are people out there who think that they are Christians who don't understand that this is completely egregious.

This is not at all sound doctrine. This is not even sound reading of Scripture. So we're not mocking them. This is completely wrong.

When we look at the message, okay, why do we say it's not a good translation? It's a very, it's one man's paraphrase. So when you have a person that is translating the Bible, remember, he's translating it for his young children.

He's trying to make it as easy as possible for children to read. That's why it's an easy to read third grade level. But the thing is, it's one man's interpretation. And so you have to look at that way.

If you look at the message translation as more commentary, I'm okay with you viewing it that way. Don't think of it as God's Word, but as a commentary. It's one man's paraphrase, one man's explanation to his children.

What we just read is far worse. It's completely changing the meaning of the Bible. It's taking an actual person, Jabez, and fitting you in there as if that's for you. Putting something in for those who live through the Babylonian captivity and putting it in for you.

Now, they do that because, verse 11, and we're going to look at that, but why in the world don't, I'd love to know, Bud, maybe you could look this up while we're reading. What do they do with Jeremiah 29, you know, 17 and 18?

Maybe they read it this way. Maybe they read it this way. I'll read your name in. Thus says the Lord of hosts, behold, I am sending upon you, Bud, the sword and famine and pestilence, and I will make you split open like, or sorry, I will make Bud split open like figs that cannot be eaten due to rottenness.

I will pursue Bud with the sword and famine and with pestilence. I will make Bud a terror to all the kingdoms of the earth, to be a curse, a horror, a hissing, a reproach among all the nations that I have driven Bud.

Do you think that they did that? Something tells me that's not the way they translated that.

No, and apparently the little demo doesn't let you put in which text you want. They've got some pre-assigned text that they're, but how about this from Isaiah 53, verse 4?

No, oh no, no. Don't tell me that they're going to replace Christ with people's... Surely, no, no.

Surely, he has borne Andrew's sickness and carried his suffering, but he was pierced for Andrew's transgressions. He was crushed for Andrew's inequities. The punishment that brought Andrew peace was on him.

So they've got selected ones that they go through, and apparently 7 ,000 places in scripture you can have your name inserted. See, it's just painful.

This is painful. And folks, why would we bring this up? Because what we wanted to is go through other passages that are actually just as painful when you start to know what they mean in context. Basic hermeneutics, and hermeneutics is the art and science of interpretation.

It's how we understand things. When you hear me saying something to you, you're practicing hermeneutics. You are interpreting what I am saying and understanding the meaning because there's certain rules to hermeneutics.

And the most important rule is not to take out of context. None of you like to be taken out of context. Guess what? God doesn't like to be taken out of context either. In fact, John Calvin said, and I'm going to obviously paraphrase this because, you know, he said it in a different language and I'm going to say it in English.

But he basically said that if you take God's word out of context, you no longer have God's word but man's word. And that's the reality is when people are going to twist God's word, knowingly or unknowingly, you no longer have God's word.

You have your own. And the thing is, is you and I need to be honest and recognize we need to have God's word. We need to let him speak. The Bible is God's self-revelation. If we do not allow it to be that, then it is not going to communicate to us everything we need for faith and practice.

So let's look at some key passages that many people get incorrect. And the reason we want to do this is so that you will learn to start studying the Bible in context. You will learn some of the passages that you've often thought aren't the way you meant them or the way you thought them.

We're going to discover that those passages, even pastors will use passages, and you're going to discover today it doesn't mean what you think it means. That's going to be the theme today. So the first one is going to seem strange.

And the reason it's going to seem strange is because I am a big proponent of gospel tracts. And you know that, bud. I was just out last night, went down to South Philly and handed out gospel tracts and sharing the gospel.

But there is sometimes where gospel tracts are a problem. I mentioned it earlier. There is a gospel tract that a lot of people get this idea that God wants us to have a personal relationship with Him.

In fact, the way that the four spiritual laws gospel tract is written, if you've read it, you know, in fact, the author of that tract, who I happen to know personally, calls it the four spiritual flaws now.

Yeah, because what was written there is not good theology. But in there it talks about the fact that God created us because He has a need. He needs a personal relationship with us. So stopping with that, God doesn't need anything.

God did not need to create us for any kind of lack that He has. He had fellowship within the triune deity. They have three separate persons. They have fellowship. And so what you end up seeing is God did not need us.

God chose to create us. But that gospel tract would say that. But one of the other things that it does is what is very commonly known is Revelation 320. And what it talks about is, from this passage, you see it talking about God standing on the door of knocking on the heart of man and asking to be welcomed in.

And if you just open the door and welcome him in, you can be saved. And so many people use this as God knocking on the door of your heart. And a lot of this is where many people get the idea that you see more of an Arminian or semi-Pelagian view of things where it's God is just trying.

I mean, he's knocking. Hello, will you let him in? You know, he wants to come in, but no one's opening the door. You know, he's trying really hard, but just no one's there. No one's giving him a chance, you know?

And so this passage is one that's used to argue that God is knocking on the door of your heart. Well, let's look at what the passage says. This is Revelation 320. Behold, I stand at the door and knock.

Well, so far it sounds exactly like the tract says, right? I stand at the door and knock. If anyone hears my voice and opens the door, I will come into him and dine with him and he with me. So people take this and say, well, see, this is salvation.

Okay. Who's he writing this to? Well, verse 14 tells us. To the angel of the church of Laodicea. Oh, oh, wait, bud. This is written to a church. Yeah. Not unbelievers. Yeah, this, this is, this is written to those who are believers.

In fact, in fact, it's amazing that people do this. Just go one verse earlier. We're going to see this a lot, bud. One, just one verse earlier, verse 19, Revelation 319. Those whom I love, I reprove and discipline.

Therefore be zealous and repent. So those whom he loves, he's, he's, oh, so these are believers already. So this isn't knocking on the door of your heart so that you would be saved. It's knocking on the door of a believer's heart that you would repent of things that you need discipline for.

Yeah. Your sin.

You're repenting of sin. It's not salvific at all. This is not a soteriological passage.

Yeah. So this isn't us coming to salvation. It's, it's, this is the last of seven churches in Revelation 2 and 3 where he's commending some of them and condemning some of them and others, he has a little bit of a mixture.

And so what you end up seeing here is that this is a case that you have him saying, you want to be, you want your candlestick removed? Do you want to have that name that you're a church of in the name of God removed?

Or do you want to welcome God into the church? It's not talking about people coming to Christ. And so many people use this and have no idea that it comes from a gospel tract, not from the scripture. And people use it unknowingly.

And so looking at the context, we immediately see this is written to believers. So this is dealing with sanctification, not regeneration.

The tract actually says that though, and that's part of the deception. It's very common in evangelicalism at large, this notion of relationship with Christ, relationship with Jesus. But the tract says, quote, we receive Christ through personal invitation.

And then it cites that Revelation 3 verse 20. Not at all. You couldn't be farther from salvific truth than to put it in that context. Christ owns that door. If he wants in that door, he's going to blow it off the hinges and you will repent and believe.

It's not about you inviting him to do anything. He is master, Lord, king, sovereign.

Are you saying we don't need God's permission? Or that God doesn't need our permission, I should say? Yeah. I mean, that God needs our permission to do things? But, Bud, why is this a problem? Well, this is a problem because what you end up seeing is so much of our culture, Christian culture, gets their theology from things like this gospel tract.

And because it's repeated so often, this is why there are many, many people that because they got saved through this gospel tract, they look at this and start to believe the gospel tract over the scriptures.

And so they talk about their experience. And when we look at how we got saved, experientially, I chose God. Theologically, God chose me. But when we focus everything in our Christian life on experience, which is what that Bible, your personalized Bible we mentioned earlier, that's what it's all about.

God's promises for you. That's what they want. That's why they're writing this. So you, you're the center of it all. Well, when Christianity makes you the center of it all, it loses focus that God is the center of it all.

And now you're off on a bad tangent. And when people do that, they're going to focus more on their experience over the theology. And that's why there's such a struggle for some people when it comes to discussing issues of, say, Calvinism and Arminianism.

Many people struggle. Why? Because they know what they experienced. They know what the gospel tract says. They know what so many people say. And they look at a passage like this and say, well, God's inviting me.

He needs my permission. Folks, God created the universe with a word. Do you really think He needs your permission to do anything? He is the Lord. He's the King of kings and Lord of lords. He does whatever He wants.

And He will always do and is capable of doing anything He wants with, because it's going to be by His nature. So, God can't do certain things. God can't lie, because that's outside of His nature. That's what makes that a sin.

So, you look at a passage like this, Romans, Revelation 3 .20, and the way so many people use it, it's completely out of context, but they give it a totally different meaning. Now, we've dealt with this before, but it's a key thing that we have to address, the difference between regeneration and sanctification, okay?

Because when we talk salvation, that's a general term. I'm teaching in my church. I'm teaching through Peter, 1 Peter. And we had someone that commented, and they're basically saying how 1 Peter contradicts other books like, you know, from Paul or James.

There's no contradiction. In fact, what most of the passages he's struggling with is he doesn't understand the difference between salvation, past, present, future, because he's disagreeing with passages in 1 Peter that talk about glorification, which is future, but it's the word of salvation.

With the term salvation is a general term that can refer to three separate things, regeneration, sanctification, glorification. Those are past, present, future. Regeneration is that point in time when we went from being an enemy of God to a child of God.

It's when we're converted. But once that happens, the next part of salvation is our sanctification, that process from regeneration until the moment we die, that's the process we're made more in the image of Christ.

That is where works, yes, works do come in, in our sanctification process, not our regeneration process. And almost every cult, every works-based system confuses those two for that purpose, so that they can add human effort into regeneration.

There's no human effort in regeneration. There is human effort in sanctification. And the moment we die, glorification. There's when we completely change, there's no more sin indwelling within us, and we are glorified.

That's sanctification, sorry, that's salvation future. So, regeneration leads to sanctification, leads to glorification. Three separate ideas of salvation. And what you see here is people confusing regeneration with sanctification, just like the cults do when they want to try to make it works-based salvation.

What this does is confuse people's theology. And this is why so many people start to say, but I choose God, I invited Him into my life. You only did that because God worked in your life. In fact, if you look at Philippians 1 .29, it says here, for it has been granted for Christ's sake, has been granted for you, so in the personalized one I would say, for to Andrew, it has been granted, but for to you, it has been granted for Christ's sake, not only to believe in Him, but to suffer for His sake.

So, our belief has been granted. The word for granted there is the idea of being forgiven. We've been forgiven. It's been given to us, forgiven us. So, this salvation that we have when it comes to regeneration, it's been granted to us to believe.

That comes from God. But the struggle is that people have this experience, and because so much of current Christianity is focused on experience, that's the struggle. Just think about most songs. I have an opportunity, many don't, I travel to many different churches to speak at churches, and when I go to churches, I hear the songs that they sing in many churches, even good, solid churches, and yet most of the songs they sing, bud, they're all about me.

It's just like that personalized Bible. So much of the song is about experience, and even when it is about what God did, it's about what God did for me, and even unbeknownst to many, end up teaching, you know, when you have Hillsong and Jesus culture and Bethel music, they end up teaching heresy that people don't realize.

When they start teaching that Jesus on the cross had no other thought than you, that's not true. His thought was of the Father, and what he was doing is a payment for sin. It's not about you. It's about God.

The focus completely changes. Now, where does that come from? Genesis chapter 3. What did the serpent say to Eve? It's all about you, girl. It's all about you. No, we're not going to sing that song. It's not about me.

But isn't that what the serpent said? Oh, God is trying to keep something from you. It's about you, not God. That is, unfortunately, the same line that the current church is being taught, and it gets it right from the when people get saved, right from this gospel track out of Revelation 3 .20.

And it's everywhere. I mean, I you know, I know, I watch these things and I just grieve over pastors. I've seen one, he'll get up there to baptize someone, and, you know, this is Southern Baptist Church, and, you know, they don't believe in infant baptism.

They just practice it. So you'll see these little kids up there, and his question is going to be, every time, invariably, have you invited Jesus into your heart? Okay, yeah. Well, you know, and if it's a six-year-old, well, why don't you ask them if they invited Santa Claus into their heart?

Same kind of thing. But the fact is, this is prevalent everywhere. So we understand salvation is monergistic. God alone acts. Sanctification is synergistic. We're commanded to work our salvation out with fear and trembling.

So we are active in that. But it is interesting, and people need to understand this, even Spurgeon, quoting Whitman, or Whitefield, George Whitefield, said that we're all born-again Arminians. Because of this issue of experience, it seems like we did something, but it's actually all of God.

So what happens is that the Holy Spirit indwelling you, as you begin studying Scripture and being discipled in Scripture, being taught the Word, you come to understand all the glory is God's. All the power is God's.

All the salvation is God's. Jesus saves. I didn't do anything. In fact, I don't deserve it, because it is grace. So if you're at the point in your Christian life, and you think that you're bound by a decision that you've made, you need to be discipled.

You need to be in the Word and studying it with sound teachers and sound preaching, so that you mature in the faith. And otherwise, you're going to be tossed about. I mean, this is what Scripture tells us.

This is the reason this is so important, is your theology can be all messed up if you start taking things out of context and just basing it off what you've always heard, rather than what the Scripture actually says.

Let's look at the next passage, one we looked at earlier, and that's Jeremiah 29 .11. This has replaced John 3 .16 as the most quoted, most favored verse for many, and people know Jeremiah 29 .11. They have it on their refrigerators and their backpacks and their mats entering their house.

And, for I know the plans that I have for you, declares the Lord, plans for welfare and not for calamity, to give you a future and a hope. And people hold this as a promise, just like that, I can't even say it's a Bible that you sent, but that personalized translation where they have to totally mess this up.

Why? Because they want to make this a promise for you. It's all about you. And yet, as we looked at this already, verse 10 tells us who this is meant for. It's meant for those who live through the 70-year Babylonian captivity.

Now, no one holds verses 17 and 18 that I read earlier as a promise for them. Who reads it that way, that the Lord is sending a sword to us and famine and pestilence, that the Lord is going to pursue us with a sword and famine and pestilence?

No one wants that as a promise, but yet that's in the same context. Yeah.

Well, I mean, you can even back up further and expand your context a little bit more and go to verse 1 of the entire chapter where it says, Now, these are the words of the letter which Jeremiah the prophet sent from Jerusalem to the rest of the elders of the exile, the priests, the prophets, and all the people whom Nebuchadnezzar had taken into exile from Jerusalem to Babylon.

See, now, this is a historical narrative.

And that right there is the purpose of this, though, right? Because all we have to do is, from Jeremiah 29, 11, back up one verse, again, back up just one verse, and the context makes it clear this was not for us.

It was for those who went through the Babylonian captivity. And what you see in verse 1, what's the purpose of this? Why would Jeremiah write this? Well, he's writing this as he's saying, Hey, God gave judgment.

We're going into 70 years of captivity. The nation of Israel is going to be captive 70 years, okay? But guess what? When you come out the other side, so he's writing this to those who are going into that captivity that are being taken exile from Jerusalem to Babylon.

That's who he's writing it for. And he's saying when these 70 years are up, God knows the plan he has for you. So the thing that people have to realize is he's saying he will be faithful to those who live through the 70-year captivity, that when they come out the other side, he has plans for welfare, and he's got a future hope for them.