What Does the + in LGBTQ+ Stand for?

Warning, the following message may be offensive to some audiences.

These audiences may include but are not limited to, professing Christians who never read their Bible, sissies, sodomites, men with man buns, those who approve of men with man buns, man

bun enablers, white knights for men with man buns, homemakers who have finished Netflix but don't know how to meal plan, and people who refer to their pets as fur babies.

Viewer discretion is advised.

People are tired of hearing nothing but doom and despair on the radio.

The message of Christianity is that salvation is found in Christ alone, and any who reject

Christ, therefore, forfeit any hope of salvation, any hope of

heaven.

The issue is that humanity is in sin, and the wrath of Almighty

God is hanging over our heads.

They will hear his words, they will not act upon them, and when the floods of divine judgment, when the fires of wrath

come, they will be consumed, and they will perish.

God wrapped himself in flesh, condescended, and became a man,

died on the cross for sin, was resurrected on the third day, has ascended to the right hand

of the Father, where he sits now to make intercession for us.

Jesus is saying there is a group of people who will hear his words, they will act upon them, and when the floods

of divine judgment come, in that final day, their house will stand.

Welcome to Bible Bash, where we aim to equip the saints for the works of ministry by answering the questions you're not allowed to ask.

We're your hosts, Harrison Kerrig and Pastor Tim Mullett, and today we'll answer the age -old question, what does the

plus in LGBTQ plus stand for?

Now Tim, as we kick this episode off, what Bible verse do you have to read for us today?

Tim, Romans 129 -30 says, They were filled with all manner of unrighteousness, evil, covetousness,

malice.

They are full of envy, murder, strife, deceit, maliciousness.

They are gossips, slanders, haters of God, insolent, haughty, boastful, inventors of evil, and disobedient

to parents.

So, I'm thinking of that phrase, inventors of evil, as it relates to this topic.

Yeah, that really is pretty applicable.

So, a big part of why we're doing this episode is this week, I

had seen on social media, I forget who posted it, I'd never heard of the guy

before, but he was posting a link to

an essay that someone had written essentially that was posted in a magazine,

arguing that it was morally permissible to have

relations with animals.

So, being intimate with animals, and

the paper is obviously arguing that this is okay.

The guy who posted it, I mean, it was seen by thousands of people,

and he's presenting it as a challenging conversation

on a topic that most people are too closed off

to ever speak about, basically trying to take something that is just so disgusting,

so gross, and try and paint it in a light of like, hey,

we need to, as a cultured society, if you can

call it that, as a cultured society, we need to be a people who have these kinds of

conversations because these are the kinds of conversations that are going to move

us forward as a society.

I mean, just totally making a fool of himself, basically, and a lot of people

really had a lot to say.

I guess people just aren't ready to have that conversation quite yet, at least the people who saw it,

but it had me thinking again on this topic of

LGBTQ and obviously our society is just so

sexually immoral at this point that really most people, when you

mention same -sex attraction and stuff like that, most people don't bat an eye at that

anymore because it's so common in our society, unfortunately.

And so, you have this LGBTQ, and it's

just a common idea that is thrown around these days, and people

identify as one of the letters in LGBTQ, and it's an identity for them, and

it's really protected by our government in a lot of ways.

You're like a protected class if you identify as gay or lesbian,

whatever.

And the thing that's always disturbed me is more and more letters keep getting added onto this thing,

and you have this plus that's essentially meant to be like a placeholder for the things to come, essentially.

And as our society spirals down and down further and

further, just towards the most ungodly things that you could ever conceive

of, you begin to wonder, like, hey, what are the things that are taboo

right now that in five years, in three years, they won't be taboo anymore?

And when you have people starting to write the magazine articles

about people trying to justify

zoophilia, bestiality is what the Bible would call it, bestiality,

you can rest assured that in the coming years, I understand there's probably a lot of people listening who are

thinking, yeah, but obviously, they got ratioed on

Twitter and everyone was making fun of them, so obviously we don't have to worry about that.

Well, the thing is, that's exactly what happened with homosexuality.

That's exactly what happened with the transgender stuff.

It's exactly what's going to happen with these other things.

So, you might not think it's an issue right now, but I guarantee you, unless God performs a miracle, it

absolutely will be in the coming years, and probably a lot sooner than you think.

Tim, you've probably been paying attention to a lot of this stuff more than I have.

Is that something that you've seen as well?

Like, hey, sure, for a while, homosexuality wasn't an

issue until all of a sudden it was, and then transgenderism wasn't an issue

until all of a sudden it was.

And so, you know, if things keep progressing the way that God has allowed them to progress,

it stands to reason that, you know, bestiality and, you know, other things that

we'll get into in this episode, they're not necessarily a huge issue right now, but they will

be in the soon coming future.

Jared Yeah, I mean, you have the slippery slope.

Pete.

No, no, no, no, Tim, that's a fallacy, remember?

Jared.

So, I mean, but that's what they said when we were paying attention before, right?

So, when we, I mean, it was pretty funny.

I mean, like, immediately we said, hey, if the Obergefell decision happens, and we were saying this way

before that, but I mean, if the Obergefell decision happens, I mean, the next thing is the transgender stuff.

And I mean, it was like clockwork.

I mean, immediately right when that decision was made, then the entire cultural

momentum was all put on the transgender issue from that point on.

I mean, that was the decisive turning point.

But then the thing that was funny about it, I mean, you know, it's not funny, like, haha, funny, but like, funny, like, interesting, funny, was that

right before Obergefell, everyone was saying, hey, you do that, you know, this slippery slope is going

to lead to the, you know, full on transgenderism.

And it's like, oh, you're stupid.

You know, that's so dumb.

That's not, no one's talking about that.

You know, we're only talking about two consenting adults who love each other, who want to get married, you hateful bigot, and all

that.

Like, no one is talking about transgenderism.

That's what's on the table or whatever.

But I mean, it just, you can look at, the receipts are there, look at what's happening.

And it was, that was exactly what was happening, right?

So, I mean, all these other things are just, I mean, there's only a matter of time before we're there.

The slippery slope fallacy is, you know, it is what it is, you know?

So, like, that's just -.

And it reminds me of a, there's a meme that I saw, I mean, this was posted a long time

ago, at least in terms of internet years.

So, you know, like eight years ago or something like that.

I mean, we were practically cavemen back then.

You know, and it was basically like a chart or a list or something, and

it was titled, you know, things that will happen if you, if we legalize gay marriage.

And, you know, it was like, World War III will happen, you know, a

worldwide plague, you know, people will try to groom your

kids and whatnot.

And it was meant to be posted as like, you're ridiculous if you, you know, if you actually think these

things, right?

Like, it was making fun of people who were opposed to legalizing gay marriage.

Yeah, making fun of the slippery slope kind of argument.

Yeah, yeah.

And then, you know, you fast forward to now, and it's like -.

Check.

World War III looks like it is actually about to happen, you know?

You had your pandemic and COVID, right?

And people are obviously trying to groom children and

deceive them and, you know, ruin their innocence in their lives.

Yeah, yeah.

This is both not of his own volition, but he was -.

Yeah, yeah.

And it's like, oh, no.

Okay, so that, yeah, that meme you made making fun of everyone, it was just right.

It was the truth, actually.

You know, and so, you have these kinds of things, but then why is it so

true, though?

You know, people want to say, hey, the slippery slope, it's a fallacy.

You know, why has it proven to not be a fallacy up to this point?

And why is it that we can basically count on, unless there's widespread repentance in our

country, unless people turn to Christ, which can happen.

I mean, there's already moves to do these things.

So, like, the issue is, you look at, you know, I just asked

ChatGPT, what does the plus stand for in LGBTQ plus?

What did ChatGPT say?

It says, in LGBTQ plus, the plus symbol is used to represent

inclusivity, acknowledging the wide range of diverse sexual orientations, gender identities, and

expressions that are not specifically covered by the initial letters LGBTQ, right?

So, like, the idea is they've just told you the game.

You understand what I'm saying?

It says it's used to represent inclusivity, acknowledging the wide range of diverse sexual orientations,

gender identities, and expressions not specifically covered.

Meaning, like, this is Pandora's box.

It's just, there's no end to it.

You know?

So, like, the issue is, if you, it doesn't take,

so, we'll start this way.

Wisdom is the ability to recognize patterns, among other things, right?

So, wisdom involves pattern recognition, and what you have here is you have a secular morality

on sexual ethics that has taken over and is supplanting and replacing a biblical ethic.

So, you used to derive your ethics about, you know, sexuality, to use that ridiculous term.

You used to derive that sexual immorality from the Bible, meaning you would look to the Bible to define what

sex is, what's its purpose, why it's there, and then what are deviant or

abnormal perversions of it, right?

So, you look to the scripture to do that, and then there's a logic in the scripture that tells you what it's for

and why these violations are violations in and of themselves, okay?

So, but then once you've chucked that, now, what you're left with is just the secular morality on this,

on sexual ethics, right?

That's what you're left with.

So then, the issue is that at that point, I mean, like an unbelieving worldview,

it doesn't really have the categories that are necessary for morality in general.

I mean, it's just, you think about it, you're just like random stardust, man.

I mean, you're just the product of random time and chance.

You're just an evolved ape.

There's no there's no grounding for morality in an

atheistic worldview.

I mean, you just exist.

You're not accountable to anyone, right?

So, the only kind of morality that you can derive is from some sort of

mutual shared agreement that you come to in order to

benefit everyone pragmatically, right?

So, I mean, you're either adopting some sort of utilitarianism at that point that's just built on some sort of

pragmatic framework or just societal consensus, but I mean, societal consensus

is bankrupt.

It's like, what societal consensus do you want?

Do you want the cannibal society's morality or do you want the Christian

morality or which one do you want, right?

And so, there's no logical foundation for morality in

any of those things really anyways, and I mean, and they knew this.

I mean, this is what the evolution is, the basis of the whole project is might

makes right, right?

The survival of the fittest.

So, the issue is there's no grounding for morality in that

at all and then what's left is you have atheists who are basically borrowing certain principles from a

Christian morality.

So, you take the Christian morality and you throw out the pieces you don't like and then you're left with certain

principles, hey, do no harm or something, but it's like, why?

Why not?

It's survival of the fittest, man.

Why shouldn't you do harm?

Who says you shouldn't do harm?

Is it objectively morally wrong to do harm?

Well, no, it's just I don't like it or whatever else, and they're all insistent at that point.

If you ever want to test an atheist on this point, you basically

just, who's basically just saying, hey, yeah, it's subjective or whatever, just say, hey, would it be morally wrong for me to pour a

cup of coffee on your head?

Yes or no, right?

And see how that goes, but I mean, the issue is there is no grounding anymore and right

now it's, I mean, there's some sort of, hey, it's mean to do harmful things to other people,

but then they're in charge of how they're defining harm and so, it just evolves and changes and

basically, like harm is now hateful bigots like Christians who don't approve of

your morality at that point.

So basically, it's just infinitely malleable.

It's just like their world, just like they think they are, right?

They can just evolve over time.

Their morality has evolved over time and there's no breaks to the project.

I mean, it basically, like you have all the logical steps that you need

that are present in the system itself to go to

animal love, to zoophilia.

I mean, I don't understand where the objective moral grounding is within that worldview, right?

So I mean, like the moment you say, hey, I am my sexuality, whatever that

means, right?

So what you're saying at that point, when you're saying I am my sexuality, like that's who I am and I'm defining myself.

So if a person who is a sodomite is saying I'm a homosexual, if that's what they're saying,

what they're saying is that's who I am, right?

So my sexual attraction defines me as a person.

That's what they're saying, right?

And then not only that, you must affirm that my sexual attractions are legitimate

and right and fine, right?

And moral and then you must allow me to redefine marriage in order to make my sexual attractions

fit within the confines of marriage and give them legitimacy in that way.

So whenever you say that, I mean, that's what the, that's what Chad GPT is saying, right?

They're saying the plus symbol is used to represent inclusivity, acknowledging the wide range of diverse sexual orientations.

So like the issue is, okay, it doesn't take a rocket science to know where this is leading.

Where is it leading?

It's leading to say that whatever deviant perverted sexual attraction you have,

that the logic says you must be given the ability to define yourself by it, which

is why we're all the minor attracted people kind of conversations online are going, right?

So like what logical grounding do you have to say that their sexual attraction is wrong,

right?

So what is the grounds there?

What, what, what's the difference?

So if you don't have a standard to judge these things, then it just reduces to

whatever I feel attracted to, it must be right.

And you must affirm it and be inclusive to it and give me the ability to go with it.

Right?

So then like, who's to say that my attraction, not, you know, the hypothetical person, what's to say that their

attraction to the animal is not wrong.

What's, what's to say that their attraction to children is not wrong.

What's to say that their attraction to robots, right?

Is not wrong.

What's to say that it is wrong or it isn't wrong or whatever else, like, who are you to say it's not, you know?

So like the issue is the, the logic of the project says, whatever I'm sexually attracted

to, you must affirm and you must praise and you must validate.

And so it just, it doesn't take rocket science to see, Hey, this is going down a trajectory.

We see where this is going.

There's no internal logic.

Now, now the only thing that's holding any of it back is the idea of consent, right?

Sure.

Yeah.

So like the idea of consent, so, you know, the animal can't consent, the child can't consent, but then like, we've

done the death blow to that in transgenderism.

I mean, what do you think?

I mean, like, so if, if you are a person who has any kind of impulse

whatsoever to say that we need to be logically consistent, you're saying right now that a four -year -old boy

is able to consent to make adult decisions to transition their gender based on who

they identify themselves to be right now, right?

So you're saying they can do that.

Why can't that four -year -old identify as like, and,

you know, the recipient of a minor attracted person's affections, like why can't they make that decision when they can make a

decision that's even more radical than that?

Right?

So like, so the issue is there's no breaks to this project.

There's no logical coherence.

It's all just a bunch of, uh, incoherent mess because it's not based on a foundation, which is

why, I mean, like, you know, the trans exclusionary radical feminists are so at odds with the

transgender movement is because you have two worldviews that are not the same and they're not saying the same things and

they're at odds with each other.

Right.

And it's not coherent.

There's nothing to hold it together because it's not based on logic.

So, but then when you accept these, you know, premise one, you are your sexuality, right?

And then it's everyone's responsibility then to reaffirm who you are and praise who you are.

Well, Hey man, what are you going to say to the polygamist?

I'm a polygamist, right?

I'm a polygamist.

I'm a multiple woman attracted person, right?

So then well, I guess who are we to say anything about that?

Right.

Yeah.

You know, it's, it's disturbing and I think, you know, James

White, he mentioned this.

I know we talked about this a little bit last week, but, uh, and, and discussing his whole

breakdown of Zach Lambert stuff, you know, because that, because Zach Lambert is someone who claims to be a Christian.

Um, and you know, also claims that same sex attraction is perfectly fine.

Um, I don't, I guess I don't know exactly where he stands on the transgenderism stuff, but

I would have to assume that it's probably not a very good stance, whatever it is.

Um, you know, and something, something James White was bringing up though, which was obvious

as you were listening to Zach Lambert, it was so obvious, you know, James White was essentially saying, you know,

like with, with whatever is to come, Zach Lambert may not necessarily

support whatever it is to come.

Who knows?

You know, we, we don't know.

Um, he could be opposed to, you know, the quote unquote, minor attracted person

thing.

He could be opposed to bestiality.

We don't know.

But what does he have to form an argument against it?

We have something, we have plenty of stuff, you know, to use to form an argument, an argument against

all of those things.

But what does Zach Lambert have?

Because he's already thrown, he's already thrown out the Bible.

I mean, he, you know, he's thrown, he's waved away every verse that has anything to say about

this topic, you know, claiming that it's not in context or it's, you know, it's talking about,

um, you know, it's, it's talking about ritualistic, um,

you know, uh, uh, what, what's the word?

You know, like, um, when you, when you have like women at the temples, you know, that you're

supposed to, that you're supposed to be intimate with as a quote unquote, form of worship to a pagan

God, you know, those verses are talking about those things.

They're not, they're not talking about just any, any form of homosexuality whatsoever.

And, and, you know, it's just like, when you listen to that, when you listen to all the arguments, all I can ever

think about is like, you have no chance.

You are not going to, if you are actually going to be opposed to this, which, you know, personally, I think

most of the, I think most of the Christians who argue for, um, who

are, who argue right now for the same sex attracted stuff to be allowed the

transgender stuff to be allowed, um, you know, they, they might

claim to be opposed to bestiality, for example, right now, but

I guarantee you the moment that it becomes socially acceptable to, and

socially encouraged to protect people who pursue

bestiality, they will jump right in line.

Jared They will.

Pete I guarantee you.

Jared Yeah, the moment it becomes mainstream and normalized, I mean, they'll be, you know, the first ones jumping in line to

go after the next, you know, popular thing.

Pete.

Yeah, and they'll claim, you know, I've been arguing this for years, you know, and it's like, come on, man.

No, you haven't.

You love the praise of men.

That's it.

That's all you want, you know, and you're certainly getting it.

Congratulations, you know, but, um, so the title of the, the

title of the episode is what does the plus in LGBTQ plus stand for?

So, we've, we've talked some about the bestiality stuff.

What, what else do you think is coming down the line?

Jared I mean, there are already, I mean, there's already articles about the minor attracted stuff.

So, I mean, that's obviously, I mean, that's there and it's being normalized.

And I mean, the bestiality stuff, I mean, that's, that's obviously upon

us too, right?

Pete Yeah.

Jared I mean, that's obviously upon us.

I mean, we, you can't worship animals like we do as a society for so long and not blur these lines.

I mean, there's, I mean, um, I say -.

Pete.

And Pete, yeah, people, people, I mean, they're not necessarily always like the mainstream kind

of, you know, communities that you'll hear of all the time, but there are certainly communities

right now that are very large.

Jared.

People on, on Twitter.

Yeah.

Even role playing as animals.

Pete Yeah.

And, and spending thousands of dollars to have animal costumes and whatnot.

Jared.

Well, I mean, they'll have like their animal avatars on Twitter because that's their whole, their whole identity is wrapped up

in like pretending that they're a certain cartoon character animal or something like that.

So, I mean, that, I mean, this is like, these, these are people

that are, I mean, it's not a small thing.

It's not like the weirdos or something out there.

This is like a normal thing people are doing right now where they're totally mixed up reality.

Um, but I mean, certainly, I mean, the AI stuff is right here.

I mean, there's already, I mean, I've already seen articles about, um,

kids preferring to talk to their AI friends at school more than they want to

talk to human beings and like teachers who, like, you know, so

basically they would rather talk to AI, LeBron James than their classmates.

And they're getting emotionally attached to their AI friends right now online.

So, I mean, this is a thing, I mean, it's upon us, like all of these things are upon us right now.

And there's no logic within the plus, I mean, the plus sign provides all the logic you need to say,

who are you to say no, bigot, right?

Just let them identify how they want to identify their, you know, they're not hurting anyone, you know, all this stuff.

So, I mean, it's like, these things are, they're already upon us and, you know, people haven't

thought through any of the arguments and the same ones that fell for the last one will fall for the next one.

I mean, there's no stopping it.

It basically, it doesn't reduce, this is not, the issue is, this is not like a logical problem.

This is a moral problem.

So, because they didn't see fit to worship God and like honor him in their thoughts, God gave them up to a debased mind to do

things that are unfitting, that shouldn't be done, right?

So, what you're talking about is you're talking about Romans 1 just playing itself out.

They're being given over to a mind that doesn't function as a mind.

It's not like, it's not governed by logic or reason.

I mean, think about the story of Sodom for a second.

I mean, a lot of people, they don't, they're not actually reading the kind of story that you see there,

the kind of things that happen.

I mean, but one of the most startling things about the story of Sodom is that they're

literally, you know, they've rejected the natural function of the woman.

So, Lot offers his daughters to them or whatever, and they've rejected that natural function.

They want the angelic guest, right?

But then they're banging on the door, trying to break the door down.

The crowd has gathered.

So, if you read the story, I mean, it's pretty stark.

I mean, young and old, like all of them are surrounding this house, young and old, all of them, right?

Like that's the level of depravity that you're talking about.

It's comprehensive.

It's all of it.

They're surrounding this house, and they're starting to beat down the door, and the

angels blind them.

And you would think that at that point, a sane person would give up, right?

Alright, guys, let's pack it up, man.

Jared.

We lost this one, you know?

Pete.

We're going to punt on this one.

Jared.

But, I mean, the text literally says that that didn't stop them.

They still were clawing, you know, they can't even see, and they're still clawing at the door trying to get

these guys, right?

So, I mean, that tells you that there's something else going on here.

I mean, this isn't just God has given our society over

to stupidity, man.

Like, I mean, we're way past Romans 1.

Pete.

Yeah, that's what I was thinking.

I was going to make a post about this article

arguing that it's morally permissible to be intimate with

animals, to commit bestiality, and I was looking at Romans 1 because I was like, well, obviously,

this is probably going to be the most concise place to go if

I'm going to quote a Bible verse in relation to this article, and I was reading Romans 1, and it's like,

man, we're past all this.

Like, people don't, I mean, people just don't even bat an

eye at the man committing shameful acts with other men,

women committing shameful acts with other women.

People don't bat an eye at that stuff anymore, and, you know, Paul, that's what, you know, Paul

chooses to address specifically in the verses.

Obviously, he's addressing a lot of things beyond that, but then those are the things that he's addressing specifically, and

it just, I was left a little dumbfounded just thinking like, man, we are totally,

we're past all this.

We've gone beyond this into, you know, new territories, you know, that

I'm sure have been explored in the past throughout all of human history.

You know, I'm sure there's been points where they have been explored, but then to know that my own country

is past all of these things and pursuing whatever is even more vile and more

wicked than that is dumbfounding, dumbfounding.

I mean, it is dumbfounding in basically every way.

I mean, we're a society right now that is not only, you know, exchange the natural

function of a woman for a man burning with lust, you know, for our same gender and all that.

We're pretending to be opposite genders, right?

Yeah, yeah.

And not only are we pretending, like, not only does the Bible like prohibit

quote -unquote bestiality, right?

So, lying with an animal, like you would lie with a woman.

Not only does the Bible do that, we're pretending to be animals, right?

We're so pretending.

So, not only we've, you know, given up on like the natural function of the opposite

member of our opposite gender or whatever, we're pretending we're the opposite gender,

we're pretending we're animals, right?

There's, we're just, we've lost, we've lost our minds, man.

Like, in every way imaginable.

So, like, we're well past, you know, Romans 1 and I mean, it's obviously the same basic

error that's fueling it all.

We're rejecting God.

We're refusing to honor Him as God.

We're worshiping and serving the creature rather than the creator.

And so, he's giving us over to madness.

But I mean, like, the issue is, I mean, we're engaging in the most idiotic,

stupid things imaginable.

That are so illogical, man.

I mean, it's just so ridiculous, so illogical.

It's so unscientific.

I mean, there, I saw a funny post about, I think it was the Facebook AI or whatever.

They trained it in, you know, thousands and thousands of scientific papers or whatever

that they did.

And then they were horrified they had to shut the thing off because it turned into a hateful bigot or whatever.

But like, the thing is, we've lost our minds, man.

Like, in every single way imaginable, we've lost our minds.

And we -.

Petey.

That's funny that the first response went, you know, hey, we've had this thing scan

thousands of, you know, scientific papers and peer -reviewed studies and whatnot.

And it's telling us everything that we disagree with.

And the first response is, shut it off, shut it off, shut it off.

Jared.

No, but I mean, that's the thing, you know, like the people, I mean, the Bible says this over and over and over again.

Like, they stop their ears to the truth, they gnash their teeth.

These are religious responses.

I mean, when Jesus said things that they didn't want to hear, I mean, they would tear their robes.

I mean, they would literally, I mean, they're literally like sticking their fingers in their ears, you know, doing the equivalent of a

little kid saying, no, I don't want to hear it.

You know, no, no, no, no, no.

Right?

I mean, that's what we're doing.

We've stopped our ears to the truth.

And that's what Jesus says, like, the one who has ears to hear, let him hear.

We can't hear anymore how stupid we are and how insane we are.

So, that's how far gone we are as a society.

I mean, so much so that, I mean, we've, we killed, you know, 60 million babies, 70 million babies at this

point.

And there's the only reason God has had any

mercy on us whatsoever is according to, you know, his grace and his mercy and his kindness.

And, you know, you can imagine something similar to Sodom and Gomorrah happening where God,

you know, Abraham's begging him, you know, if you find 10 righteous there, will you not destroy it for the presence of 10, right?

And something like that has to be going on with America where God's refusing to act,

like, utterly wipe us off the face of the map because of the presence of a small minority

of Christians here.

But, you know, and his steadfast love to his people, but it's

insane.

Sure, there's -.

Petey.

Well, it certainly is, you know, as you're thinking about these things, one of the silver linings of this

is it is amazing to think, hey, this is how far we've gone as a

society, and then to think, yeah, God has shown, I mean, God should wipe

our nation off the face of the earth.

He would be totally right in doing that.

And it's amazing to think that he hasn't done that yet.

And, you know, the kind of patience and mercy that that

requires is something that none of us will ever be able to show.

None of us will ever be able to show mercy the way that God has towards our nation, you know?

And so, the silver lining to that being it should point us

back to that mercy and just simply wondering how, you

know, can a God be this merciful that he allows this to continue

so that, you know, so that his chosen might come to salvation

and not perish, you know, in his wrath, right?

So, but okay, I think that's a good place for us to wrap up the conversation on, and, you know,

a big part of this episode is just to say, hey, look, if you think it stops at

transgenderism, then you're woefully ignorant to history.

And, you know, I don't think it's just bestiality.

I don't think it's just pedophilia.

You know, I think, you know, you mentioned some of these things earlier, Tim, but I really do think it is like, yeah,

AI, it's robot, you know, robots, whatever, you know, whatever term we come up with for that,

robotophilia, or, you know, robophilia,

you know, I think necrophilia will also be one that comes along, especially I've seen

a lot of articles where doctors are suggesting, hey, we need to take, you know, women who are brain dead,

but their bodies are still functional, we need to use them as incubators for

pregnancies, for babies.

And, you know, if you're willing to defile people like that, you are certainly

willing to go further with it once it's socially acceptable.

So, I think you've got a lot of these things coming down the line, and, you know, the answer is not

try to appease the things that are okay right now and hope that that's good enough,

because it'll never be good enough, you know, it'll never be good enough.

I mean, we'll have people that are exactly like the people in Sodom and Gomorrah, I mean,

you know, blinded by the angelic light that they certainly don't understand

how can this even be happening, and yet it does not deter them in trying to satisfy

their sexual deviancy.

So, we as Christians need to be aware of these things, and we need to be fighting against these things, speaking out

against these things unashamedly, you know, with boldness, preaching the gospel,

calling people to repentance, knowing that that is the only way out of this, you know,

out of the muck and the mire and the filth that people are jumping into

gladly and celebrating and trying to get others to also pursue

as well.

So, with all that said, we appreciate all the support we get from you guys week in and week out interacting with us

online.

You can follow us on Twitter, on Facebook, and you'll see a lot of other content that we

post there that is not included in these podcast episodes, so give us a follow there.

You can support us by liking the video, commenting on the video, subscribing to

us on YouTube, subscribing to us wherever you listen to podcasts, leaving us five -star reviews, all those things.

They don't cost you anything to do other than the few seconds it takes to

actually do it, but it goes a long way in helping us and fighting against the algorithms that

certainly hate Christians and certainly hate the things that we're talking about, especially topics like this.

I mean, YouTube doesn't want this getting out at all.

They don't want people hearing this stuff.

They want to trick people into thinking that sexual deviancy is the answer to happiness.

So, those are some ways you can support us.

If you want to support us financially, there's a link to our Patreon in the description that you can follow and do

that, and we certainly appreciate all that.

Until the next episode, we'll see you.

Like and subscribe to Bible Bashed and share our podcast with your friends and on social media.

Please reach out to us with your questions, pushback, and potential topics for us to discuss in future episodes

at BibleBashedPodcast at gmail .com and consider supporting us through Patreon.

If you would like to be Bible Bashed personally, then please know that we also offer free biblical counseling which you can

take advantage of by emailing us.

Now, go boldly and obey the truth in the midst of a biblically illiterate world who will be

perpetually offended by your every move.