A Reformed Defense of Theonomy: A Response to Theocast

Apologia Studios iconApologia Studios

4 views

We have been receiving a lot of requests to respond Theocast's, "A Reformed Response to Theonomy." We are joined in studio today by Eric Jaeger to do so. Enjoy! Check out The Ezra Institute at... https://www.ezrainstitute.com/ Check out our store at https://shop.apologiastudios.com/

0 comments

00:00
When the scribes and Pharisees asked our Lord about the greatest commandment, He replied, You shall love the
00:05
Lord your God with all your heart, and with all your soul, and with all your mind, and with all your strength.
00:10
So, why do we hear some of today's most prominent pastors saying things like this? It had everything to do with how we talk about the
00:19
Bible. And specifically, or along with that, what we point to as the foundation of faith, which for most
00:25
Christians, unfortunately, is the Bible. We need to do better.
00:31
We need to love God with all our hearts and stand unashamedly on the rock of His Word. We need to love the
00:37
Lord with all of our souls and respond to the worldview issues of our day with the wisdom and discernment that comes only from Him.
00:44
We need to love the Lord with our minds and understand the calling of God's people in every area of life in God's world.
00:51
We need to love the Lord our God with all our strength and face the work of building a life -giving
00:56
God -honoring culture. Join us for 10 days at the Runner Academy for Cultural Leadership as we consider how the gospel influences all of life and culture and the role that we have to play in applying foundational
01:09
Christian thinking to every area of life. This is the
01:25
Academy. I am Eli Ayala of Revealed Apologetics, and I will be bringing a six -part series on presuppositional apologetics.
01:33
What is this called, the Apology Academy? It's just called THE Academy. Okay. What's up, everybody?
01:39
My name is Pastor Jeff Durbin, and you're watching Collision Today. I'm gonna be interacting with an atheist on TikTok.
01:46
So here we go. Unsupervised and unhinged. Welcome back to Cultisty Aftermaths.
01:59
Hey, everybody. Welcome back to another episode of Ask Me Anything. You are watching
02:05
Apologia Radio's after show exclusively for all access. I want to sink it!
02:27
Are you gonna bark all day, little doggie, or are you gonna bite? We're being delusional. Delusional?
02:34
Yeah. Delusional's okay in your worldview. I'm an animal. You don't chastise chickens for being delusional. You don't chastise pigs for being delusional.
02:40
So you calling me delusional using your worldview is perfectly okay. It doesn't really hurt. She hung up on me!
02:48
What?! What? What? Desperate times call for faithful men and not for careful men.
02:57
The careful men come later and write the biographies of the faithful men, lauding them for their courage.
03:04
Go into all the world and make disciples. Not go into the world and make buddies. Not to make brosives. Right. Don't go into the world and make homies.
03:11
Right. Disciples. I got a bit of a jiggle, Nick. That's a joke, pastor.
03:19
When we have the real message of truth, we cannot let somebody say they're speaking truth when they're not.
03:41
He is the image of the Invisible God, the firstborn of all creation, for by him all things were created in heaven and on earth, visible and invisible, whether thrones or dominions or rulers or authorities, all things were created through him and for him.
03:55
He's before all things and in him all things hold together, and he is the head of the body. The church is the beginning, the firstborn from the dead, that in everything he might be preeminent, for in him all the fullness of God was pleased to dwell in verse 20,
04:10
Colossians 1, and through him to reconcile to himself all things.
04:16
How many things? All. All the things. Whether on earth, on earth, or in heaven, making peace by the blood of his cross.
04:25
Amen. What's up? What's up, everybody? Welcome back to another episode of Apology Radio.
04:32
This is Luke the Bear hosting today. Pastor Jeff is on his mandatory sabbatical, so leave him alone.
04:39
That's all I got to say on that. That's what I've tried to do. Yeah, thank you. Mine's coming up, so I appreciate the...
04:44
Oh, good. I get to leave you alone, too. Yeah, finally. Oh, I'm excited for today's episode.
04:51
So I'll just, I'm gonna get right into it. We got a lot to discuss, so first I got my guy, the
04:58
DOC over here. I'm trying to think of a good nickname. So far, I'm liking the DOC. Director of Communications.
05:05
We're in abortion now. Zachary Conover. Yeah, that's me. What up? What up, though?
05:11
And for the first time ever on Apology Radio... And the last. Yeah, maybe the last.
05:16
Yeah, we'll see. Eric Yeager, you might... There's another Yeager here, other than Summer. Yeah, you might know him as Summer's husband.
05:23
Yeah, that's good. It's a good thing. And or Dr. White's son -in -law. These are both true.
05:29
Very true. Yep. I just think he's a brother in Christ, but that's me. Thank you. I appreciate it.
05:34
Some grant me that title. It's just not the title of master. Neither of those are his real identity.
05:41
I mean, they're part of his identity, but that's not what he identifies in or as. Yeah. Because he identifies as a
05:47
Christian. What is my identity? Yeah, thank you. I was wondering where we were going with that one. Yes, yes. He identifies in the
05:52
Lord. I was getting to it. Okay. Thank you. You're welcome. Thank you. All right. There's a lot of things we've said true about Eric today.
05:59
They're all true so far. So far. But yes, he is a Christian first, husband second, son -in -law, even after that.
06:08
Even after that. Yes, indeed. After father. Right. Yeah, there's a father in there somewhere. But yeah, hi.
06:15
Welcome. Yeah, welcome Eric, right? Yeah, it's fun to be here. Oh, man. I can already tell it's gonna be good. It's gonna be good.
06:20
I hope so. So, yeah, so we've been getting a lot of requests from people to respond to Theocasts.
06:29
They did a show a couple weeks ago. We're going to play some clips through that and kind of respond to some of it called a reformed response to Theonomy.
06:39
So we'll get to that. They've got a series of shows we're going to hopefully get to in the future as well. Kind of along the same topic.
06:46
So, yeah, hopefully you guys enjoy this. I don't have anything else to really announce.
06:55
You got anything going on at the EAN? No, not really. I mean other than... It's kind of quiet legislatively. Yeah, so we're passing kind of into a different season now and talking about how best to steward the momentum and the resources and the connections that God has brought about in our ministry so that we can ramp up for next year in that area.
07:15
Of course, we're still doing all the usual stuff, connecting churches, equipping churches, but as to all of the activity of the first part of the year, you know,
07:24
God's done some great things, some unprecedented things in terms of how many states now are on board with this type of work and legislation.
07:31
It's really powerful to be a part of it and to get to go to these places and to stand before the common kingdom civil realm.
07:40
There you are. And command that they obey Jesus and his law. It's unbelievable. It's so funny.
07:45
I was in the state capitol in Missouri and it's, I mean, it's beautiful. Most state capitals are beautiful on the interior part especially, but this one was just huge and you go inside and you look on all the pillars all around on the interior and there's scripture everywhere.
08:01
The earth is the Lord's and the fullness thereof. All of these verses inside. It's like, where did we ever get the idea that this realm or, you know, this entity isn't accountable to the
08:14
Lord? Yeah. Where did that come from? Man. Certainly didn't come from God's word.
08:23
I mean, right. Otherwise it wouldn't be quoted on the pillars that hold up the foundations. Exactly.
08:31
My joke threw me off. Is Alabama completely dead now for this?
08:36
As far as I'm aware, yeah, it didn't get a hearing. Yeah, which is what we figured was going to happen.
08:42
Yeah, but that's how we have to start in each state and then we can expose those legislators that fail to be courageous.
08:50
Right. By their votes or lack thereof. So yeah, like Zach was saying, for those that don't know, the legislative session in most states is usually typically done by April.
09:02
Alabama was one that it went a little later. And so that's why we were still out there. Ohio, Louisiana goes a little bit later.
09:10
Pennsylvania. I think there's Tuesdays. Pennsylvania and one other go year round. But we don't have anything going on in Pennsylvania this year.
09:17
So, yep, we kind of been hitting it hard this first quarter of the year. Now we're actually almost done with the second quarter of the year, which is crazy.
09:25
Yeah. And then the rest of the year, we're going to be gearing back up to get to get going in those states again next year.
09:32
So please be praying for Zach and and those involved legislatively here and across all these different states that people were working with solid brothers and sisters.
09:44
So yeah, churches, more churches, more churches involved and the ones that are involved, equipped and trained and mobilized for the activity.
09:52
Sweet. All right. Um, okay, so I wanted to bring
09:58
Eric on one specific reason um What's a lot of there's a lot of reasons just one, but one specific, um hat for one.
10:08
It's hat. Yeah 1689, right? Yeah, actually that is very true. Yeah, um because uh
10:14
John and Justin from theocasts are 1689 federalists and There's one eric's my go -to guy when it comes to anything related to the
10:25
Baptist covenant theology and 1689 federalism all that stuff like eric's my guy So I was like, you know what why don't you come on?
10:32
Yeah, and your boss was like just take the time off. We'll even pay you. Really? Yeah. Yeah. Wow vacation time, you know
10:38
But whatever it's pto baby, but dude, you've been working your tail off. So you've earned it
10:43
I know I was telling eric before this anytime like we're messaging each other I can hear him Manually working in the background like I can hear the wrenches turning and the stuff clicking and yeah
10:54
Working on different stuff man for sure. So he's talking to me about theology while it's like doing this kind of stuff
10:59
Yeah, only you know safely though, right? Always safely, right? Yeah, we don't want to get him in trouble. No, we don't
11:04
No, it's always very safely safety first Osha has nothing to be concerned.
11:11
No, no, he works for the gas lines just you know, so southwest gas specifically, correct Uh, it is true.
11:17
That's where I work. Yep. I've never said that publicly, but now there we go. That's all right. You're okay No, we're good
11:26
They're gonna see this and be like, oh If you want the address for the studio just go to yeah
11:31
No, it's all right. That is where I work. Yeah. I know I do public utility work. Yeah Yeah, you've been working a lot of overtime, right?
11:37
It's not been bad lately, man 45 50 hours a week. We were doing a lot of overtime, weren't you? Yeah, it was crazy.
11:42
Yeah, all those kids get hungry Yeah, so yes, yes again and again all the time stop
11:48
I know yes they do so all right, so um first I wanted to before I play some clips from this first episode, which
11:59
Just for the record. We're not going to even touch a lot of it. Um, I tried to pull out some of the really
12:06
Meaty points that were really important to get to There's a lot there's just no way we can get to the whole to the whole thing
12:12
But I wanted to thank these guys because i'm assuming they're going to watch this Um, they actually mentioned jeff and apologies studios by name.
12:20
Yeah and uh, so if brothers if you watch this I wanted to first thank you for your charity and graciousness you were it was very apparent that You wanted to to be gracious and just and to raise some questions
12:35
Um without being attacking. So thank you. We don't often receive that Treatment in that spirit that brotherly spirit.
12:42
Yeah. Yeah. So thank you. Thank you very much And they were very clear. They want to try to represent us. Uh, Uh correctly,
12:48
I don't think they did a pretty decent job. Yeah, there was a couple things we'll bring up that I would Disagree with but I thought at least the beginning you did a very good job of trying to represent us appropriately
12:58
So thank you for that. Um, so anything else? I'm ready let me uh
13:06
Let me get rid of this here. Okay. Um So maybe like bring everyone into this video.
13:13
I know they've done a few on this subject theonomy Yes, so this one we're going to play like I said as a reform response to theonomy there
13:22
I think this is like The first one in the series the next one they did was a pastoral Response and they've done one on cultural engagement.
13:30
Yes, they did that as well recently. So that just dropped this Like this week today or yesterday or something really new so we'll do our best to try to get to to everything so um, so yeah, like I said, i'm going to skip through the
13:43
The niceties and the graciousness, um from these guys here at the beginning Um, so i'm going to get here
13:49
Gabe, if you want to go ahead and pull that up um And i'll go ahead and play and we'll just i'll if you guys want me to stop just tell me something
13:59
Hopefully my voice will hold up I lost it last week um We'll see so theonomy essentially asserts that the judicial laws of the mosaic covenant are normative for all geopolitical entities
14:12
So civil governments are obligated in other words to enforce old covenant judicial laws along with their penalties
14:21
And any law not included in the old covenant judicial code would be out of bounds, right? So in other words theonomy understands that god has given the universal blueprint for civil government in the mosaic judicial law
14:35
God has given us a template for how we do statecraft and it's called the judicial code of moses, right?
14:41
and so I think it's important that Before I even read bonson.
14:47
I just want to acknowledge this that like the listener needs to understand that theonomy often comes Packaged with christian reconstructionism, you know kind of the
14:56
Rebuilding of christendom or the building of a christian society It often comes packaged with a particular kind of post -millennial eschatology.
15:03
That's very optimistic Um, so in theory, it's possible to pull those things apart oftentimes practically on the street boots on the ground
15:12
It that doesn't occur. They often come together and if you If you do if you are familiar with canon press or if you're familiar with apologia, you see a lot of these things coming together
15:21
That said our aim today is to deal with theonomy historically and theologically And let me read a little bit of greg bonson again who
15:29
I would understand to be okay before we get into that Yeah, maybe we could just okay. So right off the bat. Um, I felt like that was uh, a pretty fair definition of of theonomy
15:42
Um, and so just to give a little background because we were we were just talking about this before we started the show um
15:49
And we're going to get into the different the threefold Uh law in in the old testament, which they they agree with us
15:56
Well, I don't want to get too far because this point's going to come a little bit later But we would acknowledge that there's a threefold law
16:01
There's the judicial the moral and the ceremonial um, and they're in agreement with us on that Um, and so again, that was a pretty fair definition
16:10
I felt like um And but the position we're we're arguing from because they even mentioned it may have been before this maybe after but They say basically there's christian reconstructionism and there's general equity theon
16:22
Theonomy and and they're trying to address both of them. We're coming from a uh, general equity position essentially what we're saying is that the um, the judicial law given to moses in the old testament is
16:38
God saying this is how you apply the moral law to society uh through the judicial jurisdiction, uh through crime or to punish crime and And and how do you handle things in the civil realm?
16:53
Um, and so that's essentially all the all that we're saying is theonomy is that god has established this objective standard
17:01
Right for how you handle these things in society again taking the when we say general equity we're taking the the general equity of the uh, the principles behind these laws
17:11
Behind the punishment that god's given and so how do we take that general equity and apply it to society today?
17:19
That's essentially what we're saying and we're saying that um, yes all nations are accountable to god, um because he is our creator right, um in christ and this is what we're gonna we're gonna try to Did not get too far into the eschatological conversation today, but it's going to be hard to avoid it
17:39
Um, but as they pointed out they point out things normally coincide exactly and they're exactly right they're exactly right and And and i'll be honest.
17:47
I was watching this first this first. Um, um episode I was kind of think trying to figure out like where they were coming from.
17:56
Um, eschatologically which again we'll get into later Um, because it definitely has a major role in how you view
18:04
Um addressing the culture and Addressing. Yeah, uh the civil realm their perspective on the covenants and all of that really is the lens through which they see and interpret the relationship of god's law to civil society and You know these questions.
18:21
I think overall the definition was fair I think and they point this out as well
18:27
From our side, you know when we say theonomy we define the words underneath that God's law god's standard, but I think for the purposes of this discussion.
18:38
It's really essential to Say yes and amen to that but to go a little bit further and make sure that what's understood there is
18:49
There's the choice between theos namas and something else sure and that choice is either going to be an adherence to god's word or it's going to be an adherence or hearkening unto the word of man right or self which is where autonomy comes from auto self and so Um, I think that needs to be laid down at the front for where the discussion ends up regarding the judicial magistrate
19:22
Because the ultimate concern is that in this realm or in this sphere if you will
19:30
Is this office that god has ordained? allowed to simply go its own way in terms of What they are to enforce
19:40
In relationship to the law and in particular the penal sanctions of the law.
19:45
So the definition of theonomy I saw There's a gentleman. Um You know online that has a really good working definition of theonomy
19:54
I think and it's just god's judicial Ethical rule of men at all times by his word
20:00
That's that's I mean, that's that's a succinct summary of what theonomy is god's judicial ethical rule
20:07
Of men at all times by his word and yes, of course that extends to all men everywhere at all times that would be our position
20:14
I think like So much we can we come from our different camps or different sides on this discussion and we can get bogged down in language in particular ways that we want to express things
20:25
I think We're both aiming both at both camps are wanting to aim At kind of the same place.
20:32
Yeah, is that Not none of us are saying And I think they acknowledge this none of us are saying that we simply
20:39
Take the old testament judicial law and smack it down on 21st century america as if it's 100
20:45
Jot for like the same thing. Yeah, and nor are they saying That we're simply autonomous creatures that don't need to abide by god's law
20:53
We're recognizing there's the spot in the middle here And I think both these pastors are want to admit that hey the scripture
21:01
Is is our standard here that we need to apply the scripture, but it really does come down to an exegetical And a hermeneutical difference on how do we
21:09
Understand these old testament laws. What was the purpose for which they were given? Yeah, and how do we apply that in a faithful way?
21:17
I think they're wanting to I think they're trying to yeah But ultimately we are aiming to be faithful to the scriptures and we're having some hermeneutical and exegetical differences on how we apply
21:28
The old testament today. Yes agreed. All right, let's uh, keep playing this right here
21:34
A seminal figure In the the movement. Yeah in the the stream of thought and for my money, too
21:43
I think that he is the most Intentional deliberate exegetical guy as i've read and examined agreed
21:50
So i'm going to read a few quotes from bonson's book called by this standard the authority of god's law today he says
21:59
Quote the new testament does not teach any radical change in god's law regarding the standards of socio -political morality
22:07
God's law as it touches upon the duty of civil magistrates has not been altered in any systematic or fundamental way in the new testament
22:16
So there he's arguing For what I was mentioning earlier, right? He continues on we must recognize the continuing obligation of civil magistrates to obey and enforce the relevant laws of the old testament
22:28
Including the penal sanctions specified by the just judge of all the earth as with the rest of god's law
22:35
We must presume continuity of binding authority regarding the socio -political commandments revealed as standing law in the old testament last one
22:44
It is advocated That we should presume the abiding authority of any old testament commandment until and unless the new testament reveals otherwise
22:54
And this presumption holds just as much for laws pertaining to the state As for laws pertaining to the individual pause that real quick.
23:03
Yeah, I agreed like well, this is another one of those areas that It's important we have these discussions, right
23:12
Many will say exactly as bonson just said I think what i've heard from other gentlemen on their side is saying like we don't simply assume
23:21
This because they have this category which is an important category to understand if you're going to even begin to understand this conversation
23:27
This category of positive law versus natural law. Yeah, right and this natural law generally speaking would be synonymous with the moral law the ten commandments, uh, at least
23:38
Right and that all mankind has this all all individuals are beholden to uphold this law
23:47
But then there's also laws that are posited On top of that and where they would say that this moral law is expressed in this way at this time uh, for example
23:58
It's not innately Immoral to eat the fruit of a tree However, the moment god posits or makes a positive law that now you cannot eat from this tree it becomes immoral for you to break that law, so They want and and it's important but they want to make this distinction here between positive and natural law
24:16
And if we don't understand where they're coming from on that I think we can often hear them going like we don't apply god's law doesn't apply and I don't think that's what they're saying
24:26
I think they're saying we need to understand that the moral law is binding on all people in all institutions however
24:34
Institutions have certain tools the church has the keys us as fathers We have the rod of discipline and discipleship and the state has the sword and that's
24:42
I think what would be kind of dividing that Yeah, perfect. Do you want anything? I don't think so.
24:47
Okay. Yeah, let's keep going There's a number of things going on there theologically that we're going to try to deal with In this podcast last comment from me in terms of chalking the field.
24:57
I want to be fair here Yeah reconstructionist theonomy And a different stream referred to often as general equity theonomy are not one in the same
25:07
No, and so reconstructionist theonomy involves the establishment of christenedom in a christian society whereas general equity theonomy is going to argue for Looking to the judicial law finding the principles that it contains and then seeking to apply that In geopolitical reality today in geopolitical entities today.
25:26
I would want to ask what we're going to strike Do they agree with that last statement? Like I know they don't agree with the first statement so brothers do you agree with the second statement that we're to look at These old testament laws and and see how they apply to geopolitical reality today.
25:44
And if so, what way Do we look at that? Yeah, it's a great question What I do today is is argue against both effectively by getting at the sort of kernel of Of the argumentation, that's right.
26:00
Okay. Well, there's your answer In a sense. Yeah, we're going to argue against both of these perspectives
26:05
Yeah, and i'm just wondering how though because I I don't I guess What I would love some clarification on they might have gotten to it.
26:12
This was a couple hours of videos between the two but I think I think we might get into this a little bit more but I think what they're arguing is that we should um
26:23
We should come up with civil laws by Strictly through the moral law in the light of nature
26:30
That seems to be the argument they're making as informed by this particular view of this covenant, which they
26:37
Introduces the new covenant. Yeah, so yeah. Yeah, this is That's where it starts. Yeah, this is an arrangement and this informs, you know
26:46
What the role of the magistrate is in terms of providing for a harmonious society
26:51
You know, uh, you know healthy community relations uh the prohibition of of evil, but Um, you know, all of these things are are defined specifically and I think that one thing we constantly have to bring back to the forefront of this discussion is
27:10
Okay, those are the perspectives that were laid down That's what you're going to be contending against and so Again, here's the way that this is posited.
27:20
Um theonomy or autonomy uh by what standard exactly or who gets to decide what's just if we reject applying the basic moral principles of God's instruction to the modern day situation and how
27:40
Pray tell if we construct an ethical system Uh just penalties for infractions of those laws
27:48
What is that based on that is going to be or uh have an objective grounding
27:55
If not in god's law, is is it just going to be the product of someone's best guess
28:01
Is it going to be what works? pragmatically speaking from a human perspective um, what criteria are we basing that on to show that this is going to be anything other than A man's fallen reason or flawed perspective.
28:17
Yeah, because that's that's kind of what what it comes down to is What will inform?
28:23
Um the way that law and the enforcement of that law is meted out in a society
28:29
Will it be god's revelation? Or man's fallen reason like like in other words that just assuming for a second the the two kingdom paradigm
28:39
Which by the way is what they hold they hold yes Which is what they I think they call it the doctrine of two kingdoms, but assuming that for a second let's say that The civil magistrate is only to uphold the second table.
28:52
Okay, if we're going to adopt that position How what is the penology from your position?
28:57
What is the just penalty? For that even just the second table. Do we look to the old testament at all?
29:05
To inform what I just adjust penalty for breaking Commandments five through ten are or is this something that's floating in the air?
29:15
Like why the coyote falling off of a cliff, right? Is this something that's floating in the air that we grasp at? What works, uh according to our own understanding?
29:23
And I I would I don't understand how we could not look At what god has said is just a just Just penalty for even the second table
29:34
And not be informed by that so if they're informed by it how how are we informed by it and and why
29:39
Reject some of it and accept other aspects. That's the question. What's it anchored in? You know, what's it going to be grounded in?
29:46
Yeah. Yeah, exactly and I was going to say like What's important to know here is not all sins are crimes, right?
29:54
and so like even just if we're going to say that we can only Punish the second table of the law like, you know, like there's there's plenty of things that god says
30:05
This is a crime that are also sins, but not all sins are crimes if that makes any sense and so like that like you were saying like we have to have an objective standard to To be able to determine is this sin a crime if so Is it worthy of the death penalty?
30:19
Is it worthy of repaying seven? Like, you know, like where does this fall? uh according to god and his standard and that's all that we're saying is like If we're not using god's standard to deal with these sins that become crimes in society then
30:36
Who determines again? By what standard what is the standard for determining whether these are righteous?
30:43
moral ethical Punishments for these crimes if it's not god then who why why lock a thief up in prison?
30:51
Yeah, as opposed to making him pay back two or three times exactly what he's stolen. Exactly. Yeah, exactly um, okay, so let's i'm gonna skip ahead here to This is the part where we get into the threefold twofold.
31:03
Yes Super important. Let's go there Purpose which we're gonna get into just a minute, right?
31:09
Yeah. So now we're gonna get a little bit nerdy Hey, look, this is fun. But uh, justin do we want to now explain the moral and positive?
31:16
Okay. Yeah, so another Prong of our response and these are all kind of building on each other and I trust that will become plain
31:21
That's right is the distinction between moral law and positive law Or let me be clear here in this
31:28
Portion of the pod when we say moral law that should be understood to be synonymous with natural law
31:34
So we're talking about the distinction between natural law and positive law between moral law and positive law
31:39
And so what we mean by natural do not kill Yeah in this instance is this again?
31:45
It's summarizing the ten commandments But it is this law written into creation written on the human conscience that is known innately by all that's the moral
31:52
It's the light of nature that we can appeal to whereas positive laws are different They are posited
31:58
By decree or by kingly fiat. They are not dealing with things that are inherently moral or immoral
32:03
But once the command the decree is attached to them they become so examples
32:10
Eating the fruit of a tree is not inherently sin. That's right But when god says don't eat the fruit of that tree it becomes sin.
32:19
That's right circumcision Right not inherently moral or immoral to cut the foreskin
32:25
Off of you know, your eight year old or eight day old boy That but when god says you must do it that decree makes it an issue of faithfulness
32:34
It makes it an issue of morality and we can go on and give a number of other examples. I trust those two right, so that's a
32:42
Positive law can it's it's a weird way of saying it if you're not I remember the first time I heard it I'm like was there a negative law?
32:48
Correct. Maybe we can so Halt here for just a second and say this that Okay, once again grant the premise for just a second here to examine it but if man is not accountable to it until he um
33:04
Hears it right Um that that might prove too much.
33:09
I mean respectfully to these brothers. Um, you know people do not Innately know the specific will of god as it relates to these things, but that's why we have scripture
33:19
Also, like that's that's the reason why we have the word of god to tell us and so um, we have scripture precisely because We know that natural law is is insufficient
33:33
To govern these things. Yes, right. It's sufficient enough to condemn us before exactly it's sufficient enough.
33:38
It's a great To bring us underneath in relationship to god's law In condemnation, which is kind of the point is that even if humanity has not heard these things
33:51
That doesn't mean that they are outside of a covenantal relationship with god either obeying or disobeying
33:59
It seems as if either in christ or in adam. Yes, it seems as if what's being alluded to is that If fallen man has not heard this specific commandment
34:09
He's somehow exempt from being covenantally faithful or responsible to god
34:14
Whereas every single creature every man is in religious relationship to god and he is working all the time either towards faithfulness
34:26
To the image of god or unfaithfulness To the covenant, right? He's he's responsible and accountable to receive
34:35
Both the commandment and the grace that god has ordained, uh for mankind to receive and so um, you know jesus says man
34:45
Shall not live by bread alone, but by every word that comes from the mouth of god now notice
34:51
It doesn't say Christians shall not live by bread alone Man shall not live by bread alone
34:59
But by every word that comes from the mouth of god every man at all times in all realms, um in all places
35:06
Is responsible and that's that's why we send Of course missionaries to go and preach the gospel because of man's ethical relationship to god uh, but I think just just highlighting that one point is that no one's exempt from responsibility based on what they
35:23
Haven't heard now if you want to You know classify that as just purely the moral law um
35:30
All right, but I mean, I just wanted to highlight that point there. I do think go ahead pastor. I was just gonna say that There's plenty of examples.
35:39
We don't have time to get in all this day, but there's plenty of examples in the new testament even where the writers of the new testament or christ himself pulls in These old testament judicial laws that we're speaking of and assumes them as true like not muscling the ox for example um while he treads now, um that Is not uh,
35:59
I would not consider a light of nature command, right? It's not like it's a pretty obscure Exactly, right and there's plenty of like that and even like our laws
36:09
In our society today were written based upon the english common law, which was written based upon the laws of moses right, so like A lot of the laws we have on our land today.
36:19
These these guys would would be all for and uphold But what's the standard for those? It's god's word
36:24
It's kahn's law to begin with so like to say that we should only use the moral law And and what's revealed to us in light of nature.
36:31
It like leaves a lot A lot of things that aren't covered under that again, even if you tease that out to its conclusion
36:39
Applying, you know, don't muzzle the oxwalt treads and of course that's applied to ministers getting their just compensation for their duties, right?
36:48
Are we really going to suggest that just because that's applied to a new testament church official?
36:54
That it that's that doesn't have any bearing for the employee expecting a just wage for his efforts or an ox
37:03
Like does it just because it's applied to a minister does this mean that we don't we don't have to feed our oxen any longer
37:09
Yeah That that is still applicable and I think one of the I don't know if I heard it from it's such
37:14
It's such a true point. That's why I laugh from these brothers or it might have been from van droonen's book. Um But I don't think they're denying that every individual
37:23
Every individual is accountable to uphold god's law and that and that the light of nature is enough to condemn them and that that's the purpose of Of the gospel and I I think where I hear most of them come from is not denying that but rather saying that Jesus christ is king of kings and lord of lords in all of these areas
37:43
But the way that he exercises his kingship is going to be different and that Ultimately When the civil realm bears the sword, they only bear the sword against the love your neighbor
37:57
Portions. Yeah that they don't have an obligation and they're actually that I think they would argue that you'd actually be unfaithful to king jesus
38:05
If you were to ask the civil magistrate to uphold anything within the first table of the law and that would be where my big
38:12
Difference. Yeah with them is uh, this isn't an imposition I'm not i'm not advocating for imposing a certain religion upon society.
38:22
I don't think most theonomists are however We would all recognize that there's a vast difference between satanism
38:33
And christianity there's a vast difference between satanism and islam even uh when they're carried out
38:41
Carried out to their logical conclusion and and so we can't say that just because The civil magistrate
38:48
Isn't promoting reform baptist theology and society that they somehow get to act as if they're neutral Yeah, there's one god the triune god.
38:57
Yeah, and we need to servant. They are whose servant they are exactly, right? And when something becomes apparent if somebody is obviously publicly sinning against the one true god
39:08
That's where things the civil magistrate would have to step in this isn't sneaking into people's bedrooms or into their mosque
39:14
What they're doing in private on private property because god honors private property as well but when there's when there's public
39:23
Unrepentant sins against the one true god. That's where the civil magistrate should step in.
39:29
Yeah, so things like Pride month pride month. Isn't it? Perfect example. Yeah.
39:34
I mean i'm just thinking we're in june. Yeah right now I mean and if you don't want to say that what those people are doing is false worship
39:42
And I don't know what to tell you The reason that we know it's false worship is because men are getting arrested for preaching on the sidewalk to them the scriptures and committing the equivalent of our public modern blasphemy laws speaking against the false gods that we've come to recognize as Apparently having the authority in our land to such an extent that you know an entire people group have protected class status to worship them
40:06
Yeah So not weather but witch exactly right So i'm gonna i'm assuming we're gonna have a lot of people listening to this that are new to this discussion
40:16
So i'm gonna give you one more example of of a law that we Theonymous like to use that's a good practical law and it's the the pair put a pair put around the roof, right?
40:26
So like god's lock um Commanded that you put a parapet around your roof.
40:32
They would go up on the roof at night. It was cool up there That's where they'd hang out And if you didn't And someone fell off and died
40:39
You would be responsible for that life, right? And so like that's that's a really easy one to take that general equity and apply it
40:46
To our our culture today and like, you know, we live in arizona. They do that too in the episode Don't they did they bring they may have yeah, they use that specific example
40:54
So, you know, we live in arizona A lot of people have pools when I bought my house We have a pool the very first thing
40:59
I did was put a fence around my pool because I didn't want Any of my kids or anybody else's kids or anyone wandering in falling in the pool and drowning it's the same we take that principle we apply it and but the point is like That's just wisdom and it's really based upon love neighbor
41:17
Right, you don't want your neighbor to die You love them enough to spend some money to make it safe so they don't drown and you're on your property but again, that's not something we get from the moral or Necessarily, you know, you could this is that we apply that's again.
41:32
It's applying the moral law to society It's not something that's found in the light of nature. It's something specific from god
41:38
That's just straight wisdom and it's love of neighbor But we can't just be dependent strictly upon the moral law and light of nature in society when it comes to Applying those those principles and it's worth mentioning real quick that the police aren't going around checking backyards
41:56
For for fences around pools, right Uh, this isn't just because we apply this doesn't mean
42:02
That the civil magistrate now goes around And polices the intricacies of everybody's life and what they do on private property, but when an actual sin crime occurs
42:14
That's when the civil magistrate Gets involved not before. Yeah. Well and and with the pool one if you don't have a fence
42:21
And the kid drowns you're liable. Yep. So in other words there needs to be a victim Yeah For the police to be a crime.
42:28
Yeah Okay, let's keep going What what it means I think is a good definition
42:34
By divine fiat. It's it's being decreed. You could even say decreed law. That's right
42:40
Yeah, yeah, and that's important to understand that those two because all right i'll just kind of jump into some of the theonomy argumentation justin is that one of the biggest one is that there is a there is a struggle to believe that the
42:53
Moral law is sufficient to accomplish what it has been presented to do which is to govern the heart of men in the minds of men and This is why even the bonson's book says by this standard, you know
43:06
The question is often asked in his book by what standard do we tell someone they are right or not right before god?
43:14
If we're not using the law Is what typically has been given? Yeah, and we would absolutely say that regarding the moral law.
43:22
That's right again Known innately people know to kill someone is wrong, right people know to steal something is wrong, right?
43:29
That's what's unique about the moral law or in the natural law, right? The light of nature we can appeal to it.
43:35
Whereas when it comes to the positive laws Nobody would know Innately nobody would know
43:42
That they should obey it unless they're told to that's again Remember nobody who would know that I don't eat the fruit of that tree unless i'm told that nobody would know that I need
43:50
To circumcise my son unless i'm told that nobody would know that i'm supposed to let my you know pick
43:57
I'm kind of collapsing some categories here but in terms of positive laws Nobody would know that i'm supposed to rest my fields on the seventh year or nobody would know that this is how we're to handle an issue of a kinsman redeemer like if if I if my
44:12
Brother is married, you know under the old covenant, right? If my brother's married to his wife and they don't have children and he dies then
44:18
I as his brother him to marry her And have children for my brother's sake nobody would know that it's right, you know, unless you're told to do it, right?
44:26
And I don't want to jump the gun here. We're going to get into this in a minute But we would understand that the ceremonial law and the civil law of israel are positive law right, whereas the moral law is
44:39
Moral and it is natural law in that regard. You can appeal to it as such it comes back to what you were talking about this is
44:47
That that leaves us How do we apply it then yeah if we if the civil law and and the ceremonial law
44:56
Have been abrogated except insofar as their general equity applies, right? We do How do we apply the innate moral law in such a way?
45:06
that honors god yeah, and Without a just penalty because that's part of it
45:14
It's precept and sanction Like we can't be faithful to god in the way that we construct laws without those two things
45:21
Otherwise what we're positing is just good advice, you know, like you should do this. You ought not do that Well, what happens if I don't right follow that right?
45:29
You know, there's got to be a way there's going to be a mechanism for enforcement, but I think that might be the next place to to spend just a minute here is
45:40
You know the longer we have this discussion the more Uh necessity there is to be precise
45:46
Even with these things the ceremonial and the civil law because He just gave several examples of things that would be considered both and civil and so we have to be
45:59
Judicious in the way that we examine each one of them because we would readily agree I mean, here's the thing and they say this israel had a unique status as the people of god um, you know, it was given laws concerning sacrifice and the tabernacle and the priesthood and You know holiness code and you know ceremonial
46:20
Cleanliness laws and all of those things that ultimately point forward to jesus and and are satisfied
46:28
Uh in him and that law is still very much in effect today How do we know that because there's a man reigning in heaven who?
46:35
Has transposed all of those shadows and symbols, uh in himself and now he ministers in Before the heavenly tabernacle to which we have access to so says the book of hebrews, but here's the thing we can distinguish that uh, you know the ceremonial aspects with simple justice like just because these
47:01
Laws if you want to classify them as ceremonial which is fine They did have a unique status for israel
47:08
They were relevant only for israel so that the line of the messiah could be preserved that people could learn holiness and what these things meant until The substance of the shadows had come we can't then say that justice
47:22
Is only relevant for the nation of israel These Ceremonial laws were only relevant for them in the sense that it pointed forward to christ
47:34
Of course, they're still relevant because they're completed christ completed them, right but it's it's a stretch to then say and it doesn't logically follow to me that therefore god's
47:49
Prescription of what justice is and what it looks like is only relevant for the nation of israel um excellent point and that's and i'm trying not to get too far off here, but that's one thing we discussed that I would
48:04
Like to have seen more conversation about as they kind of just make this assertion that these things Uh, the the the judicial laws no no longer apply to anyone.
48:13
They only apply to israel They make that assertion, but they don't really ever Dive in and explain why it definitely don't show from scripture.
48:20
Why yeah, they give their three main points, right? Which are the the threefold division of the law the moral positive element and then the covenantal structure.
48:29
Yeah, they're which we're probably not Getting in touch today. Um Yeah, and so like again for those that are new to this conversation
48:37
We're about to get into the like threefold Part of the lawyer. So again, it's the judicial, uh moral and ceremonial we would say it's hard for me to say
48:46
When I say it too many times, I know it's like I end up a ceremonial So the moral law obviously we've talked about is is the ten commandments, right?
48:53
um, and then the Ceremonial law we would say um where the the laws that god placed on israel to set them apart
49:01
It was a picture of christ and when christ came he says in matthew. I came not to abolish the law but to fulfill it
49:08
He didn't get rid of the law. He's saying he fulfilled that A portion of the law and then again the judicial then is how do we apply?
49:16
Those moral laws essentially to society this is really important too because so many christians even have this notion.
49:22
Um, you know There can't be it's almost like they nix civil justice in the name of jesus satisfying the law
49:29
Like jesus came to satisfy the law Uh, therefore the civil order let's just leave it to itself and it's like well, wait a minute jesus satisfied the law
49:39
Uh, yes, but that doesn't mean that we don't have such a thing as temporal justice, right? And people being punished for crimes.
49:45
Otherwise If the wrath of god was satisfied in this temporal way we wouldn't have romans 13 telling us that the magistrate is the one who
49:55
Uh bears the sword and is the wrath bearing avenger Of god that kind of goes into and stop me if you want to get back on track
50:05
Speaking of romans 13 that does kind of get back into that third point that they have.
50:10
Yeah Um, they'll want to use romans 13 they'll want to use genesis 8 and 9 and speak about the new york covenant and then
50:17
Also look at romans 13 and other sections of scripture to say here's what the scriptures tell us the role of the civil magistrate is yeah, um
50:27
And i've heard those arguments and you should look into them and read them But when you look at romans 13 in particular talking about the civil magistrate as a deacon of god a servant of yahweh
50:38
And what they're commanded to uphold there just because what we see in romans 13
50:44
The examples that are given are from the second table. That is true. Yeah, but that does not necessitate
50:51
That they are not also ministers to the entire moral law. We you would need to establish that They are not ministers for the good of people according to the entire law and I think they root that in the noahic covenant right and do a 30 second just Quick hit so at least some people that aren't familiar.
51:10
Yeah, give it to us with Why they would hold this view I believe Is that when you look at the parties of different covenants, right?
51:17
I I have a wife you guys each have wives That's a particular covenant. Mine is with me and my wife you or you and your wife
51:25
When you look at the noahic covenant the parties that are specifically mentioned there it includes All of humanity and so they would say the noahic covenant applies to all of humanity
51:35
But then when you and that's where they would establish the common kingdom when when you start getting down into as opposed to the
51:42
Sacred kingdom as opposed to the redemptive kingdom where you'd get down to abraham and moses and david and ultimately
51:48
Finding its fulfillment in the new covenant those apply to a specific Smaller subset of the larger one.
51:54
So they'd say there's this large Common kingdom governed by a covenant that had noah has its head and all of his offspring essentially, right?
52:02
But it's not just that And and here's where I kind of take issue with that is is that true is everybody under the noahic covenant?
52:10
Yes That is true But the covenant wasn't made strictly with noah if you look at the text and if we're going to allow the text to actually determine
52:20
What who the members are right? It's not just noah Yeah It's actually the animals every animal that was on the ark and you could even make an argument from the text there in genesis 9
52:28
That it's actually with the earth Itself So so we don't do anybody any favors by simply looking and saying this applies to all people without recognizing that the noahic covenant
52:39
Was implemented after noah sacrificed an animal on an altar in genesis 8 a religious function a religious function
52:47
Uh, which I would argue points right back to the covering of adam and eve in the garden.
52:53
Yep, and god Promising a redeemer who would conquer sin satan and death by the seat of the woman
52:58
Yeah, noah's covenant that was god made with noah to to sustain the earth was specifically given
53:04
So that the messiah could come and take over the nations And and we can't lose track of the fact that just because it includes all people that doesn't mean it only includes people it includes
53:16
Everything. Yeah that is going to come under the feet of jesus like all like all things in heaven and on earth, it's it's so Examining that's so important because there is a recapitulation of the dominion mandate in genesis one there as well
53:30
And so god is giving these things to us. It's so interesting You said that even the earth is connected to this covenant, you know
53:39
It says in isaiah else where the earth lies defiled under its habit inhabitants The nations have violated the everlasting covenant.
53:45
So that also includes the creation itself Which makes perfect sense with what paul says in romans 8 how the creation itself is groaning with eager longing and expectation for the children
53:56
Of god to be revealed. It's longing to be revived along with the rest of us Why because it's laboring under the curse of adam's sin
54:04
Their earth itself is yeah And so for all things to be redeemed that would include not only sinners and their pretty little souls
54:11
Once they get cleaned up, but that includes all things The earth as well this fall everything touched by the curse of adam not not every individual mind you but all
54:23
Things he's bringing all realms Everything is coming under his feet and some of it will be through grace
54:29
And mercy and some of it will be through judgment exactly, but it's all being placed under the feet of christ.
54:35
Yeah, I uh I learned this from our friend andrew sandlin. Uh He talks about how christ came to Vanquish the works of satan right and he says
54:45
And and those extend as far as the curse is found. Yeah, which is everywhere just like joy to the world
54:51
Exactly. That's why we sing exactly right exactly sins and sorrow growing thorns infest the ground
54:57
He comes to make his blessings flow. So we think that every year do we understand it one and do we mean it?
55:02
Well, that's the verse we typically leave out when we sing exactly you can't leave that you can't sleep on that third verse, bro That's there's so much there.
55:09
Exactly So here let's let's finish here on this this last point here because we're running out of time
55:14
And then we are going to continue in the after show We'll try to get to as much as we can at that at that point as well
55:21
Which has a ton of implication for what is binding on people today. That's right era of redemptive history
55:26
So for those of you that maybe have lost, you know, we've been going through something we bring this back. So you understand part of the debate here is
55:35
It um should nations Right be required to live under positive law
55:41
And then be punished by their corresponding judgment that god puts upon it
55:47
That's the debate that theonomy is about so we wanted to take this time to appropriately represent them
55:53
I think we can definitively show From history as well as scripture that god did indeed covenantally hold nations accountable that were not israel
56:03
Yep, actually i've been itching to get out of you want to get I know That's why i'm like let's tear because well
56:09
This is important before you do because they actually it may be here But at some point they actually mention the theonomist will say this
56:15
But they're and forgive me if it's not the spot their their explanation. I found lacking but go ahead. So we all
56:23
Understand in leviticus 19 right? Love your neighbor as yourself right after that in leviticus 20. There's a Break here where it says the lord spoke to moses saying this starts a new section
56:32
And we what we see there is the judgment of the canaanite nations, right? Right? What were they judged for?
56:39
It was not strictly read the text. It's not strictly for violations Of the second table.
56:45
Yes of the law. Those are there right? Those are absolutely there, but there's also violations When you get into leviticus chapter 20 of idolatry
56:54
Uh, there's violations of murder sacrificing and offering your children to molex second table, but the first table there's idolatry
57:00
There's profaning the name of yahweh Yeah, that's the first table and and yahweh says that he drove these nations out
57:08
For that. Yep, and that he was going to then hold israel accountable to the same thing therefore be holy
57:14
Set yourself apart to me like these canaanite nations did not So even these these pagan nations these canaanite nations the seven nations that were driven out by the people of god
57:26
They were held accountable. Yeah, and they were judged By god, they were judged and kicked out for violating the first Table of the moral law.
57:37
We cannot say that nations and it says nations. Yeah, we cannot say that nations are not
57:43
Obligated to uphold the first table of the law when we have explicit Examples of god judging nations for violating not only the second table, but the first table as well
57:54
Which is why the prophets were sent to the foreign nations Because they were god's prosecuting attorneys
58:01
But what were the terms by which they were prosecuting the nations violation of god's covenant?
58:07
They were covenant breakers And just like god judged his own people. He judged them for the same exact things even up to and including
58:15
The penalty for the violation. What is there a different penalty for his people than there was for the nations for violating these things?
58:23
No, it's the same thing. The land's going to vomit you out It's going to expel you i'm going to expel you and all your inhabitants from the land
58:31
So it's not just that god doesn't have two sets of ethical standards, right or two moral codes um
58:38
You know, it it's also that he doesn't have two different sanctions or penalties um
58:44
In that way, of course there, you know, we can look at as we try to apply the the general equity of these things to the present day
58:50
There are you know, there might be Ways in which crimes are punished that god gives allowance for as to more than one
58:59
Sanction, right? That's not what i'm saying. But in terms of the moral codes that god gives we can't just split them up Right artificially and that seems to be
59:09
The kind of thinking even in the system is that there's a there's a division. There's an artificial division
59:15
You know the the the redemptive kingdom and the common kingdom god's law over here and god's law over here
59:21
And there's there's these differences where you know, if that's what we're going to posit It could just kind of drives a wedge between creation and recreation right a holistic biblical worldview and the schizophrenic nature
59:36
Of what we're attributing to god if we're going to hold on to that There is an appropriate distinction christ himself gives an appropriate distinction
59:44
He says love the lord your god with all your heart soul mind and strength and love your neighbor on yourself, right as yourself
59:49
He makes this distinction saying that there's these two aspects However, I don't see him anywhere
59:56
Saying that any individual or any institution? Yeah does not according to the tools and this is important According to the tools that god has given them upholding the entire moral law of god
01:00:09
Does that mean that this that the civil magistrate gets to come and discipline my children for stealing cookies?
01:00:15
No, no, it does not nor does it mean that I get to go arrest my neighbor when he committed a crime
01:00:21
However, we are both looking to the very same moral law and applying that and exercising that according to the tools that god himself
01:00:29
Has given us but it's the same moral law that applies to everybody in toto. Amen All right.
01:00:35
I'll try to get to this real quick and also set up a situation And say that okay, there's some collapsing and confusion of categories here and a really important Really important like flashing red light important thing to say at this point and it makes sense now to say it
01:00:51
Theonomists in terms of the traditional argumentation like greg bonson, for example They see not a threefold division of the law but a twofold division of the law.
01:00:59
That's right That's just simply false I don't know. He's gonna read a quote from bonson.
01:01:05
Yeah, I would just need to see what where that reference is It's just not true I that's why
01:01:11
I spent so much time trying to set this point up. It's just simply not true. I don't know any theonomist
01:01:16
I've never read a theonomist that would say there's only a twofold law i'm gonna keep playing here before and we'll
01:01:22
Address it other than seeing moral ceremonial and civil they see only moral and ceremonial
01:01:28
And what they do and what bonson says is that the judicial law of moses is moral law
01:01:35
Just illustratively applied so in that sense, okay The theonomic argument is that the judicial law is moral law and we would respectfully brother like You've posited that None of us have said that I don't know anybody else that says that.
01:01:51
Um, So that's just not that's just not that's where I was like They've done a really good job of representing us until this point.
01:01:57
I was like Nobody says that nobody believes that no It's that sort of thinking seems foreign to us and in in his explanation of the judicial law, yes, that's true but it's still it's it's a law and Said it's it's part of the threefold law.
01:02:11
It's not simply the moral law. So there's my my timer Last thing that I would say is the article is important, right?
01:02:20
uh speaking to you directly right now pastors, uh I think you would want to make a distinction between a
01:02:27
Covenant of grace and the covenant of grace And a lot of times when people speak about moral law, there's a distinction that needs to be made between a law
01:02:38
That is moral because everything that god commands is moral. He cannot command something.
01:02:44
That's not moral there's a distinction to be made between a law that is moral and The moral law the article matters when we're having this discussion and this matters for everybody
01:02:55
I would like I guess it does seem like there's a little bit of confusion there and that's not something that anyone
01:03:00
I know personally Is I would actually advocate for the what you're saying? Yeah, that's a helpful helpful way to put it.
01:03:08
I think Yes. Okay. So, um, we're gonna we're gonna end there. I'm just sorry They just uh, gabe just pulled up the super chat.
01:03:15
So i'm trying to answer these in a second um, so we're gonna we're gonna end on this point like I said, we're gonna uh,
01:03:21
Continue this conversation into the after show and I have another like Like six points pulled up that we're not going to get to so I apologize but we're doing the best we can
01:03:31
This is a really great conversation. Um, so all that to say andy p left us Two super chat questions.
01:03:38
Thank you. He said it would be helpful if a list was written up of what law should be created And their enforcement then we can hold the legislators feet to the fire
01:03:47
I'm not really sure You have any thoughts I feel like that has been like yeah, that's what we've been talking about today
01:03:53
Yeah, he's just talking about laws from the torah essentially, right? Um, I got you
01:03:58
That's that's what it seems to me. Anyways, uh that way so I think maybe just looking for something um a reference point to say to magistrates here's what god requires of you and um, you know
01:04:12
So yeah, so i'm trying I mean there's plenty there's been plenty written on it. Um Theonomy and christian ethics, but that's a fat book.
01:04:20
I don't think there's an exhaustive list. Yeah anywhere I think as we study scripture and as we come across these things in god's providence, that's what we
01:04:28
You know put forward is like, okay. We're certain now. This is what god requires. Yeah, so If if exegetically we can make that case, um, and and suggest wisdom on how to apply it
01:04:40
Um and encourage our civil magistrates to do so Then I mean absolutely
01:04:46
I think like so Just speaking of providence, right? Uh a good list that we can have is going to be determined by the battle that's in front of us if there's a certain battle
01:04:55
That's being fought. Yeah, then that's the scripture that we bring to bear Does that mean that the rest of the scripture is not applicable or valid?
01:05:02
No, but it means listen Here's the battle that's before us. There's a lot of other battles behind us We'll address those when we get to it, but here's the one in front of us.
01:05:09
Yeah legislators. Here's what god says on this topic Hopefully we've demonstrated that with the issue of abortion
01:05:15
Yeah, I mean because that's the fight in front of us culturally speaking right at this very moment. Yeah one of them yeah, and exactly so to just Tie in what you were saying there.
01:05:24
Like I was thinking as you're answering that um Again, I mentioned this earlier but a lot
01:05:30
I would say the majority of our laws original laws the constitution the amendments all that were based upon the english common law, which is based upon the
01:05:39
Mosaic law like and so um They were good laws to begin with and you're exactly right.
01:05:47
Like, you know, basically as these things come up we should be We should be examining
01:05:53
Every law that's brought to our attention whether it's something we vote on or whether it's something that legislators vote on Or are voting on or should be voting on like We should take every single one of those laws and look at it through the lens of scripture and say does this law?
01:06:06
Uh honor god, is this a just law according to god's standards and that should really be how we should be approaching it um
01:06:13
And there was something else I was thinking I completely lost it but yeah, so there's work to be done a lot of work to be done in our area, but maybe as a a reference point too
01:06:22
I know bonson and the onaman christian ethics at the very end and the appendices has the copy of the new england uh
01:06:28
Law code basically for the colonies. Yeah, and just seeing How they treated those things and degree of you know
01:06:36
Dependence and priority and all that as it relates to scripture. I know it's helpful to see an example Historically exactly.
01:06:42
Thank you for that So I remember what I was going to say and we I was hoping to get this that's at the very tail end of this
01:06:47
Uh where they mentioned romans 13 eric touched on it briefly but really romans 13
01:06:54
Defines for us the role of the civil government It's to protect the innocent and punish the evildoer so if The legend if the civil realm is trying to do anything outside of that they're outside of their jurisdiction
01:07:09
Um, and that's just defined by that passage right there um, so hopefully that's helpful.
01:07:15
I know we're kind of rambled on there, but uh, so the other question and to be honest, I do not know the answer this says wasn't whether witherspoon a theonomist should he and The other founding fathers have pushed harder to have more in the constitution
01:07:27
Like add chapter 23 of the westminster confession, you know, we fixed the westminster. I don't know if we did you're aware of that andy uh, we did but This is where I need zach laudenschlager
01:07:39
Zach laudenschlager would would nail this question. He would I forgive me. I I don't know the answer to that brother um, that's out of my realm of knowledge, so um
01:07:50
Anyways, thank you. Thank you brother. So, okay We'll go ahead and uh in there so i'm gonna pull this out and then like I said, we'll continue this conversation into the
01:07:59
After show so as always, uh, thank you. Thank you. Thank you everyone for Supporting us.
01:08:06
You can sign up um Through apology studios .com to get all access that helps us keep the lights on that helps the gospel go forth
01:08:13
We've been adding a ton of new content to all access and there's plans to continue to do that do that throughout uh
01:08:21
As long as we can um, and um Also get your free monson you speaking of greg monson.
01:08:27
You can get your free months and you account there as well and Uh, thank you for your support for end abortion now action for life everything we're doing to try to end uh, this lot of our pre -born neighbors in this nation, um, so zach
01:08:45
Thanks, dude You got it eric, this was fun bro, we'll have to do this again, man.
01:08:50
Yeah. Absolutely. Yeah Sorry, we didn't even get into the whole reason I brought you on here, but we make it we might get my yeah
01:08:56
He's gonna be in the after show. Yeah, if you want to know what that reason is better tune in exactly marketing
01:09:02
All right. Well, we'll uh, like I said, we'll be back next week. My plan is to get into the second video next week the pastor's response with the enemy
01:09:12
And I have a guest Special guests, uh schedule for that, but i'm not going to mention it because just in case he can't come on for some reason
01:09:19
So hopefully he'll be we get to go and i'm excited for that. So, um, we'll see you next week.