Gail Riplinger on the Sinking of the Titanic and the NIV

Since I did that series on Gayle Ripplinger, I thought I would take a few moments to play what has to be the most amazing sound clip

I've ever found. I haven't gone looking. I bet

I can find some worse ones, actually. But the most amazing sound clip I've ever heard from Gayle Ripplinger.

I told you at the beginning of the series that I did on my encounter with her in 1993, that from that point on, she wouldn't do debates.

And she would only basically allow people to ask her questions that she had sent in.

So I was listening to her. She's on a King James only program. And I was listening to her, and the guy asks her a question.

And she goes on for five minutes. Not only does she never touch the question at all, but she wanders all over the landscape.

And she starts off by explaining something about the Titanic sinking, and how this is relevant to the

NIV sinking. And I'll put on the screen, because it took me a while to listen to it and figure out what she was really saying.

She's actually doing a little more acrostic algebra type stuff.

And she's actually making the claim that the sixes that she mentions adds up to 666.

You don't catch that first time through, but it's there. And it is truly amazing.

But my describing it can't do anything for you. You're just going to have to listen. Well, now, one of the things that I guess some of our listeners have been wondering about,

Gail, is when did the new versions first appear in America? Are these brand new things that just came about in the last 20 or 30 years?

Well, you know, the Titanic traveled to America from England in 1912. This was the same year as the corrupt

American Standard Version. And coincidentally, it was a man named Murdoch who threw the famous Titanic into reverse, causing it to sink.

Now, scientists have just discovered that, of course, it wasn't a big gash, but as previously thought, that sunk the

Titanic, but six small slits. And today's NIV has cut out 64 ,000 words and 16 verses.

Now, back in 1912, the New American Standard Bible had Timothy Dwight of the infamous

Skull and Bones Society as a committee member. I have an educated guess about why the

Titanic sunk and why the NIV will eventually sink in the lake of fire. The Titanic was from something called the

White Star Line, owned by J .P. Morgan. And the term White Star is a code name for Lucifer.

If someone needs to document this, they could read the book Mastering Witchcraft by Paul Henson. It includes a prayer to Lucifer, which states,

Thou of the unholy trinity, help us, whose star is white, blot out the red star.

Now, they are praying that Lucifer will take the place of our precious bloodstained savior, the

Lord Jesus Christ. We remember Lucifer himself said in Isaiah 14, I will be like the most high.

Now, back at the turn of the century, Madame Blavatsky, with her newspaper, Lucifer, said on its cover,

I, Jesus, am the bright and morning star, Lucifer. She was saying that Jesus and Lucifer were the same person.

Of course, this isn't true. But her followers in the transactions of the first annual congress of the

Theosophical Society, way back at the turn of the century, said, I believe it is through the churches and not through the

Theosophical Society that theosophy must and should come to large bodies of people in the

West. The work of destructive criticism has paved the way, sweeping away certain passages which grate on the ears.

The phrase washed in the blood is one. Now, the phrase washed in the blood had been taken out of the

American Standard Version and it's still out in Colossians 1 .14 and out 40 times in the

NIV and 23 times in the New King James Bible. There's a principle in social psychology called cognitive dissonance.

And to change an attitude, they recommend bringing the person into initial exposure to a message which is only slightly different from the receiver's beliefs.

And this is exactly what they've done with the Bible versions. They get progressively worse. Now in the

NIV today, we have exactly what Madame Blavatsky's newspaper said. We have

Jesus Christ as Lucifer in Isaiah 14 .12. The King James correctly translates

Isaiah 14 .12 as, How art thou fallen from heaven, O Lucifer, son of the morning? Lucifer is the fallen angel.

Jesus Christ is never fallen. He is the son of God. God manifests in the flesh. However, the NIV says in Isaiah 14 .12,

How have you fallen from heaven, morning star? So they're saying that the star and Lucifer are the same thing.

Now, in 2 Peter 1 .19, the NIV also calls Jesus Christ the morning star instead of the day star.

But for centuries, way back at the turn of the century, once again, the Catholic Latin Vulgate said in Latin, Now that would translate as Lucifer rising.

And it strikes me as funny that in 1990, there's an underground movie called Lucifer Rising, and the soundtrack was done by that rock group

Led Zeppelin. So things seem to really come around that way. You know, the word for star in Hebrew is kokab, and it does not appear at all in Isaiah 14 .12.

God uses the word star in verse 13. If he wanted to use it, he could have used it in verse 12. In fact,

God uses the word star about 30 -some times in the Old Testament, and he does not use it in Isaiah 14 .12.

So they're really giving us something very, very bad there. As a matter of fact, there's a book on the bestsellers list called

The Origin of Satan, and right now it's on the bestsellers list, and it reaffirms this heresy. It says,

So the public is being progressively taught this, and the

Theosophical Society said they were going to do this through the churches. Now, the new versions are already having their effect on the churches,

Two so -called Christian books are introducing this lie. The first is called

The Mighty Warrior by Elizabeth Alves, and it tells Christians to rebuke the morning star, since the author thinks the morning star is

Satan. So can you imagine praying and rebuking Jesus Christ? That would be a sorry thing to do. Now, the second book is absolute blasphemy.

It's called Satan Who? It's available in Christian bookstores. It's by a gentleman named

Carl Barton, and it states that Lucifer is not Satan, and that God himself is really the dragon and the shining one, and the creator of all evil.