Keep sharing good news without ads.
No description available
Comments are turned off for this media
Webcasting around the world from the desert metropolis of Phoenix, Arizona. This is the dividing line. The Apostle Peter commanded Christians to be ready to give a defense for the hope that is within us.
Yet to give that answer with gentleness and reverence. Our host is dr. James white director of Alpha Omega ministries and an elder at the Phoenix reformed Baptist Church. This is a live program and we invite your participation.
If you'd like to talk with dr. White call now at 602 973 460 to or toll-free across the United States. It's 1 877 7 5 3 3 3 4 1. And now with today's topic here is James white. And to the strains of run from the battle.
We are returned from the battle and that is the battle at Biola University this past Sunday evening and That's what our report is going to be about today. I'm signaling for a little less than the headphones there.
Thank you, sir, and It was quite the experience. Hopefully the server will survive as we give the the report today because five minutes ago it decided to turn over and die for a few minutes, but it came back and.
I.
Was ironically over in Los Angeles at the same time the fact that I was out with some students from Biola and. We went to El Torito for dinner and there were televisions there and I noticed that the the crowds were.
The the folks there in LA were rather quiet and that they weren't saying a whole lot. During you know while we were we were having a good old time. But the people watching the game anyway, you know, there wasn't any applause or anything like that.
And so I looked over and you know I got close enough to see what the score was and I I was able to very quickly discern why they weren't overly excited because The Phoenix Suns just I mean. It wasn't even much of a basketball game.
I mean game seven, you know, it's supposed to be close it's supposed to be a nail-biter and it was a 31 point blowout and. So, you know, hey, what can I say? Five straight victories over Los Angeles teams over the past, you know week or so.
That's.
No more Lakers Soon the Clippers.
Did so that actually came up at the debates, but I didn't bring it up. I was a good man I didn't bring it up. I didn't I didn't pull that off by. I did somebody else did but I and I I laughed and applauded when They brought up.
But anyway, uh, oh man, we let anybody in studio audience. They don't wait. Wow. Man, I thought we were gonna screen people especially after debating, you know the Muslims. I thought we need some security, you know something and now the studio audience just we.
Is he looking for food? Yes, really we need we need to have a little you know a homeless pantry type thing. We can give give food to people. I came to walk in so man. I tell you anyway.
Nothing like isn't he like a vice president around here or something? I don't know.
I haven't seen him for what was last time. I saw him. I don't know what I last saw him. I I haven't a clue when I last saw him. I challenge you. Right now I challenge you tomorrow morning. Tomorrow morning 6 a .m. South Mountain Park you and me to the top and back down.
You'll be there. All right. I got you. I got you. You're lighter than I am you're still lighter than I am but not by as much as you as you were a year ago. Let me tell you something, buddy I've been up South Mountain about 25 times since last November, so I'm I'm ready to go.
So let's let's do it. Anyways, sorry folks. Everybody's going what are they talking about in there? Well, don't don't don't even worry about we this is a live webcast and we have fun and Yes, if you look on on our website, you'll see a guy named Sean Hahn mentioned and he just wandered in in to see the dividing line.
Anyway, let's talk about. Actually now I could use just a tad bit more for some odd reason let's talk about what happened Sunday night. Let's start with the fact that I don't even remember what started all this.
I remember being contacted. I think Bo Boyd contacted me and as I recall There have been some challenge in regards to bring Shabir Ali and something along those lines and I was contacted and asked if I would Be willing to debate Shabir Ali.
I had already I believe started listening to him on some level. But I and I had already made the decision. I want to debate him, but I want to debate him farther down the road. And so when the challenge came to do this before the end of this year that is in May of this year.
Very clearly and at the very beginning Stayed the fact that I could only address Christian issues. Primarily I wasn't going to do a debate specifically on the Quran. I wasn't going to debate on the Hadith or Muhammad or something along those lines.
Because I think to do justice to those areas Requires a person to be able to utilize At the very very least utilize well Lexical sources so as to be able to deal with Arabic terms terminology phrases so on and so forth if you can't necessarily read it fluently, okay.
But as long as you can Interact with it I think you need to have that capacity and so since I did not and still would not say that I really fully do have That kind of capacity. I did not want to get into those topics.
I want to instead as I did when I debate Hamza Abdul Malik I wanted to debate a Christian topic and respond from a Christian perspective. And so from the very beginning that was the intention and so when the thesis of the of the debate Came up for discussion, then I said well Here's the books.
I've written these the subjects that I've addressed before and so let why don't we start? Logically since I would like this to be one of a number of debates logically with Defending the New Testament is the New Testament we possess today inspired having listened to a number of Shabir's presentations.
I knew this would be something that he would feel comfortable with he's addressed this many times the number of different people and So that's how it all started now. I mentioned last week that there was there was some concern expressed concerning the fact I was on the defensive and there was some concern about The debate itself and I can understand that I have heard people debate Shabir Ali who never should have debated Shabir Ali.
I've heard Shabir Ali Crush people. I've heard him embarrass people because.
Especially.
Conservatives who don't interact in the scholarly realm with with liberal Scholarship are going to find him extremely frustrating. Because he's going to throw this stuff out. He's gonna be quoting from Bart Ehrman as he as he did and in our debate and he's going to be quoting from all these different sources his some of his favorite sources in the past have been like the The interpreters one volume Bible commentary or the introduction of the New American Bible the Roman Catholic leftist liberal version and A lot of conservatives don't spend much time doing that for crying out loud.
I went to Fuller seminary. There wasn't anything else I could do so I'm accustomed that stuff but a lot of other folks are not and so they don't don't really know how to respond to it on the fly and discuss it in in a in a debate context and so I've seen people that have just just been run over in essence With Shabir Ali and so I can fully understand why there would be people Who didn't know who I was now the odd thing to me was?
This is a Biola University and Biola is one of the only places on the planet that has an MA in apologetics has it has a entire apologetics program and So in essence nobody except some of the students at Biola had a clue who in the world I am now.
That's fine. But it still seems a little bit odd because whether you like me or dislike me. The fact the matter is Sunday night was the 59th moderated public debate that I've done. I have debated a wide variety of people.
I've debated BYU scholars in Salt Lake. I've debated John Dominic Crossan. I've debated Gregory Stafford of the Jehovah's Witnesses and Just about every Roman Catholic apologist who's willing to debate anyways.
And so whether you like what I've done or not doesn't matter it would just seem to me That if you've got an entire apologetics program You would at least know the people who are the most actively involved in doing apologetics especially on a frontline Debate type of format, but evidently almost no one did.
Despite the books King James only controversy books on Mormonism. I've gotten Trinity justification sola scriptura.
Still.
Basically no one had ever seen any debate. I had ever done and So you put together well We know Shabir Ali is good And we haven't a clue who this guy is and so I can understand why some would be going man.
We're gonna put 2 ,500 of our students or 2 ,000 of our students and a thousand other people into our gymnasium and let a Very sharp Muslim carve them up, and then we've got to take care of the problems after that.
That's not a good thing. I understand that I you know if I was if Reversed I can completely understand all that. But it still seemed odd to me that that no one had a clue that I take debates Very seriously.
Had spent the past 11 months or more.
Very.
Seriously listening to Shabir Ali and to interacting with his his Perspectives had written a number of things on the blog. Anyone could have gone on the blog and just put in Shabir in the search gone to Google put in Shabir.
And you'd see all this stuff where I've interacted with him. I've gone into the Greek septuagint text about stuff that he said etc etc but that didn't happen so There was some concerns. And I could tell that and it Certainly made me feel a little odd.
I didn't really feel like I was the home team. I didn't feel like there was a home team to be perfect honest with you. I sort of felt like a bit of an outsider and Certainly, I'm sure Shabir did when you think about it As he showed up at that.
I don't know how many Muslims are I would say maybe 30. Many most of them were not dressed in cultural dress Shabir Ali was and if you haven't looked at the at the blog I would You know direct you to that because on the blog is a link to other Blogs that have other pictures, and so there's a fair amount of representation there.
You can take a look at so anyway, I got over there and Bo Boyd and Jer and Marissa picked me up at at the airport and met some of the other guys and we all got together and went to El Torito's and had a had a great dinner and Well I actually I Imagine a few people know us almost ate nothing other than chips and salsa because I was talking so much that happens a lot.
It's a great thing. It's called the speakers diet. It's where you're the one who's gonna be on the speaking. So you do all the talking and you end up not really doing a whole lot of eating in the process.
It's a good way to lose some weight, but we went to El Torito I had a good time together, and they took for some reason. They had to take a picture of me in a hardhat. I'm not sure if that was like you know some some initiation thing or It was where that that picture is gonna show up.
What's been photoshopped to it. I don't know it's sort of scary, but you know we do we got to do and So what we had a good good evening and then on Sunday. Then got to I'm not sure when did you got there about 3 30 something like that in the afternoon or something like that?
And the first thing the first funny thing you can see now when you listen to the dividing line you get all the Back-scenes stuff you know when you watch the DVDs and listen the mp3 that's one thing but you listen to dividing line you get all the stuff that took place off-camera or outside the range of a microphone and Before I'm while I'm waiting to get picked up at the At the hotel because I want to be there a little bit before 5 that's you know two hours for the debate I like to be at debates very very early the last thing I'd ever want to do is go rushing into a debate.
I don't know how gerrymantics does it but That's not my kind of thing so I start hearing from rich, and he says he sends me his pictures of the venue and You know pictures on a cell phone are really small.
You know they're just tiny, but it gives you an idea. It's like okay alright, so there's there's a venue it looks like Chairs set up in a large University-sized gymnasium, okay, cuz yeah, but did you see what's in the background is it well?
No, I can't see what's in the background a picture of that size, and so it takes picture of the of the of the platform and. The only way I could describe this is there's there's four chairs set up. There's there's there's flowers and two of the four chairs are the big Monty-python comfy chairs.
The comfy chair and.
You know you look like you should have like a little a footstool, and you should you should have yeah. Yeah, that's right. It's a masterpiece theater and there's they should have had a had a had a little fireplace going in the back, and I would have had a pipe and And my and my robe and my shoes and we would have should be and I would have had a nice little chat you know for a few moments before we we retired for the evening and It looked like it.
I'm just like as soon as I walk in I see that you go. Nope, nope, nope not happening tonight. No no no I.
You know.
It takes you back to the old there. There are just people that don't want to have Debates they want to have discussions, and this is California. This is Southern, California and You know this is this is the home of Rodney King can't we all just get along and Looking at this going I did see one debate one televised debate that Shabir did with Jay Smith and They had to sit in these big comfy chairs, and I hate chairs where the the the arms come up to like your shoulders.
I mean if you actually put your arms on you you look like you were surrendering or something. You know because they make it look like a little kid. You know you're just sort of you just want to Wrap yourself in a blanket and go to sleep for a nice little winter's nap and and that's what these things look like it.
I'm just I'm going all right look. I'm gonna have a tablet PC, and I am going to be Scribbling notes as he's speaking and and he's gonna be rotten wanting to write notes as I'm speaking. And he's got a computer, and I've got a computer now.
This is not happening. I need a table. I this I've never ever ever done a debate where I did not have some place where I could sit down and Write something. I just it's just never happened and so very quickly I got hold somebody said mm-hmm not working for me need a table and very very quickly without any argument or anything else the the big comfy chairs went to wherever big comfy chairs go to and we had tables set up you can see these set up on the main page of the website right now.
We're doing cross-examination the first picture there on the website is Shabir. And I doing cross-examination if I recall correctly that's right at the beginning and He's he's asking me questions. And I'm responding and you can see that they first they set up the the tables with white tablecloths on them only and Then they thought that was just gonna totally mess up the camera stuff and so we had to put the little black thingy bobbies on top of it, and that's that's how that works, so anyway we got that all set up and And then the crowds are coming in and down on the bottom of the the the prime seats.
I counted them there were 600 prime seats and they were on the on the floor, and then those were 15 bucks, and then it was 5 bucks to just sit in the bleachers and Aside from the bleachers then on the far side there was what I called the nosebleed section.
Which was up above where the basket would be and I would say.
That by the by.
Quarter after seven. We got we got started the debate start about 720. It was supposed to start up at 715 got a little late start, but by the time the debate started. That last section was about 80 full so I I'm not sure how many more folks We could have gotten in there, but not that many.
It was pretty well packed out. They they said 3 ,000. I'd say 2 ,500 around there somewhere in in that. In that you know range I'd say would be where we where we were as far as a number of people there.
It was a really really good audience primarily Christians. There were some Muslims there. I had some conversations. I'll tell you about a little bit later on. With with some of the Muslims a little bit later on but anyhow I Of course was watching for Shabir, and he got there.
Would say maybe 25 minutes before half an hour 25 minutes before the debate at 7 o 'clock so around 630 635 ish or so and so I saw him coming in and I shot down there and and. Before the debate we we talked about a number of things we we talked first about.
It had been.
Mentioned to him that when I debated Hamza Abdul Malik that all the Muslims had gotten up and left halfway through my presentation because it was prayer time and So he he mentioned that one of the ways to avoid that was to Basically make sure that everybody knew that within an hour hour and a half of The sunset that we would be Taking a break so that if any Muslims who were there needed to go do their prayers.
They could do it at that time so if they knew there was a break coming Then they wouldn't get up and walk out in the middle of things and so that was announced beforehand. We also discussed the nature of the cross-examination because I don't I've not listened to every single debate should barely has ever done because I don't think you can actually obtain every single debate Should barely has ever done but in the ones that I have heard the cross-examination if there was cross-examination was not the kind of cross-examination that we did in this debate or that we like to do and that is the free-flowing cross-examination the the question-and-answer form of cross-examination that we we find to be the most useful and so there had to be some discussion of that had to be some explanation of that we did that with the moderator and And end up working out pretty well at one toward the end of his questioning period he started just talking and The moderator didn't stop him.
I Remember sort of looking over at the moderator and and he was looking at me. But the problem was if you look like it if you look at the picture right now. That's on the main page on the blog. If you're looking at from that angle the moderator is way off to the left and so since Shabir is facing me He's facing away from the moderators the moderator would actually have to speak up say something loud enough for him to hear that was another.
One of the issues that we had Was there were no fold-back monitors there were no monitors aimed back toward us. So all we had was house sound and so when someone's speaking out toward the audience, and you've just got house sound.
It can be very difficult. I had to concentrate very hard, and I'm sure Shabir did as well to Understand what the other person was saying. When they were at the podium is a little easier during cross-examination because we were close enough to hear each other just using natural sound.
But it was very difficult and there were Shabir for example told a joke in his opening statement. I didn't get the joke because I didn't hear it. Shabir has an accent. He was born in in Ghana or as a Guyana I think which one it was anyways I didn't get the joke because I didn't hear the punchline the punchline didn't work.
I couldn't hear it couldn't understand it and so There were a couple things like that that were a little bit difficult as far as being able to hear and things like that it didn't Really impact the the entirety of the debate so Before the debate started I'm starting to watch all these people coming in and we had a number of neat folks that showed up we had folks from grace community that were there and There were other other individuals who came up and Folks from the channel that were there one folk one fellow well-known channel showed up in his camo kilt and He's sitting down front and and it was hard to miss him and so we had we had a number of folks were coming up and All sorts of interesting conversations.
I like getting the chance to meet people beforehand. Of course I don't mind talking to folks and answering questions and stuff, but there's a balance you know and Later on the evening long after the debate was over.
You know when when I start saying man We I really need to get going. It's getting really late my my brains turning to mush. You know after I've been engaged in dialogue now for hour upon hour upon hour.
Still there are folks that just you know they want to come up to you at 1130 at night after you've been speaking now and addressing every subject in the Sun for hours and hours and hours on end and hit you with their biggest philosophical questions that they could ever come up with and Even after you said okay, I'm leaving now well actually could I talk to you about the trends and dental art you know and you?
Just you just want to go hello. Hello. Did you did you catch that little subtle hint there? And there's some folks that just do not get it. This it was it was odd so anyway. We we got the debate started And I had always by the way had always assumed.
I was gonna be going first I I it just seemed logical to me even though it'd be very difficult because I'm defending the New Testament, but if you're gonna be defending something you need to know what the denials of it are going to be and.
So.
It was only what about two weeks ago that for some reason even though We thought we had sort of established everything beforehand once the staff got involved they sort of took everything over and and There was new questions as to how this was going to be organized and things like that and The order ended up changing and it was a little bit odd because Shabir went first and He would also get to go last so he got the first word and last word and Some people would say that was that was not fair, but that's just sort of how it worked out, and I didn't care.
If.
Many years ago that would have bothered me. When I first started doing debates, I was really focused on that don't care anymore. You know why and anybody who is going to be so? Shallow as to be Influenced by who had the last word and it's all just a matter of what people are wearing or or you know How loud somebody's microphone is you know what.
I don't I don't debate for those folks anymore. I can't I There's there's nothing I can do about that. It I I debate for people who are going to seriously listen to both sides. They're gonna seriously weigh the evidence.
They're gonna seriously look at the arguments. Those only people that I can debate for they're the only people I can be concerned about. People who well you know I I didn't like your tartan tie. Well, okay fine not debating for you I didn't like the tone of your voice well, not debating for you either.
I Will very very quickly admit that there's only a certain group of people that that I Hello that I Know look in the channel. Thank you. There's only a certain group of people that I am I'm you know give you a dressing.
That's that's all I can do so anyway, we got started a severe went first and I All along had been wondering how Was Shabir going to start. How was I going to but what was his approach gonna be. I've heard him make?
Presentations primarily focused upon the synoptic Gospels the mark Matthew doing stuff with mark making Jesus bigger type thing. I've heard how many times he's done that that was his Primary presentation for example in England when Wasn't Manchester, but there was you know a guy was going to debate him he bagged out and so that was his presentation there.
He's used that in against J. Smith and things like that, so he's got his synoptic presentation. Then he's also got a sort of a Paul presentation. You know he used some of that against Robert Maury. He's also got a textual critical presentation.
Where you have You know alleged textual corruptions. And you know let's go after Bruce Metzger and stuff and and of course if he's got like a 40-minute opening statement or something.
Then.
In that type of a situation you've you've got you know you can put more of that together. We only had 20 minutes 20 minutes and so what do you do in 20 minutes? What's he gonna do is he going to draw from each one of those is this gonna be a scattergun approach.
Is it gonna be just you know broad? Assertions, and I'm gonna have to deal with with all this stuff. Well what I I had prepared to do was in essence to address all of those aspects. And so I had a had a pre-written Presentation.
I had timed it out very very closely. When I when I read it Thinking that there is a you know trying to do it the same way that I would do it as I was Presenting it to an audience it had come out to 19 19 minutes and 55 seconds so I no no no 18 minutes and I had a minute and five left.
Let's put that way had a minute and five buffer and I knew that meant it was going to be very very close because I've never figured this out. But I've mentioned this on dividing line before. No matter how realistic.
I try to be in private reading it. Once you get up there and once you're in front of an audience I don't know if it's you just feel you have to enunciate more clearly because you're using a public address system.
I I Have no way of knowing what it is. But I need to have at least a minute in essence to try to fit it in it just goes longer. I don't know what I guess time changes during that period of time. I don't know but when I got up there I made my presentation and I finished.
I think if I recall correctly there was a two on my timer. I think I had two seconds when I when I finished my 20-minute presentation shabir in his opening presentation Took no notes Whatsoever to the podium no notes at all.
Which I was fairly impressive given the number of references that he gives a number of citations that he uses he's obviously has all of that memorized and.
As.
I listened I Very quickly discerned that this was going to be the synoptic Presentation and it was going to be the synoptic presentation with some Bart Ehrman flavoring. He had airmen's Misquoting Jesus on his desk.
And so I knew that was going to be coming from that that direction and so He primarily focused not on the illustrations that he had used before. He focused on illustration that I had not heard him Use before.
That I had not heard him using a debate before. But and this is where the providence of God comes in. Thankfully over the past almost well three and three-quarter years now I have been teaching through a Synoptic gospel study at the Phoenix Reform Baptist Church.
I even mentioned this during the debate and we use the the parallel gospel Text published by the United Bible Society is a big the big blue one and We had already covered the one that he focused most upon and that is he specifically focused upon the story of the raising of Jairus his daughter and I was so thankful.
I mean I actually had a Smile on my face to be the perfect honest with you when he started on this because I Had already lectured through this that means I had already worked with the issue and it just took a moment to to make sure I had the right references in front of me and.
Knew that I was going to in my rebuttal period. I didn't. Like I said, I already had a pre-written opening statement. In my rebuttal period I was going to be able to very clearly. Concisely you only had I think we had nine minute rebuttal periods but clearly and concisely respond to his primary example of The alleged corruption of the New Testament text.
Who's remember his thesis. Basically as New Testament is and is not inspired it has some inspired parts to it and and the rest of it comes from mankind and.
And.
That.
Particular assertion. Leaves you wondering well. How do you know which is which. And I'll tell you how he answered that when we got into the cross-examination. So he makes his presentation. I get up.
I make my presentation as I'm walking back to my table. He gives me a very interesting look. He's smiling very gracious, but a very interesting look. I I sort of got the feeling he he. Because as we talked beforehand as we talked before the The the debate I had asked him if he had had a chance to for example see my debate with Hams Abdul Malik.
No, no, I didn't get a chance to sit. Had you had an opportunity to see any of my other debates? No, and he did have the King James only controversy on his desk. We had no other books of mine on his desk at all.
And so it was pretty clear to me. He really was not aware of. What kind of a debate he was going to be engaging in in in debating me? So once the opening statements were out of the way, then I think he started to get an idea.
Then we got up and did the rebuttal section and in the rebuttal section I went through that text and I explained what telescoping is and I explained if you're wondering what the text is all about.
In.
Matthew and in Mark's account of the raising of Jairus's daughter remember he comes to Jesus and in Mark he says my daughter is at the point of death and So they begin to go to the house and as they're going that's when the woman touches the hem of his garment.
She's healed with the issue of blood but then in Mark Men come from the house and they tell Jairus and Jesus don't bother the teacher anymore. She's already dead and Remember that's when Jesus says do not doubt only believe and they continue on you got the mourners Jesus kicks the mourners out raises the the girl to life and That's how Don Francisco got his song.
If you remember his his song got to tell somebody it was a it was a good song. I really liked that song. Now when Matthew tells the same story he tells it in a briefer form shorter form now that might surprise some of you because you're thinking well marks much shorter than Matthew and and If some reason I just at one point I when I had been studying For this debate I had asked Bible works to give me percentages because he likes to say well You know John uses son of God this number of times and that's more than Matthew uses and Mark and da da da da da but he never took into account the fact that Mark is much shorter than Matthew and That in fact Luke even though it has fewer chapters is longer than Matthew.
And so I had had Bible works Give me the number of words in each one and I would work out son of God son of man as percentages of The particular Book that that we're examining and so I had mentioned that and for some reason he found that just fascinating that I knew how many Words there were and I only approximated I rounded them off actually in each one of these books so we could work out the percentages and I remember mentioning to him that I Had also memorized the number the numbers that he had given he he actually has a presentation he only gives to Muslims.
He doesn't. I've never heard him use this in a debate against a Christian. But when speaking just to Muslims he has almost a Quran code type thing if you remember the Bible codes stuff the Quran code stuff.
He you know if you take the number of Surahs and add them up and the number of verses and each of the surahs the number of ayahs and you add them up and then you have a odd column and an even column and you add the two columns together and the numbers and 6555 and all the rest of stuff he has this presentation so I mentioned to him yeah, I even for example know you know the numbers from your your Quran code presentation like.
6555 and.
He was looking at me. And he's it took him a second to even realize what I was saying and then when he realized that he was like oh my goodness. It was the same kind of viewpoint the same kind of look that I got from John Dominic Crossan.
When he and I were talking before the debate and he'd start telling me a story and I'd finish his story for him out of his own autobiography and I said well. You know I read your autobiography. And I listened to this tape and this tape in this lecture in this presentation, and they're sort of like you did and at first.
There's you can tell they're happy that you did in fact. They consents you must respect them if you did that, but then there's also mixed with oh.
Cuz I didn't do that for you.
I have no idea where you're coming from and so if you.
Know all that about me. This might not be good.
So I sort of got the same sense that I mentioned that to him as well, so anyway.
We.
We got into the into the rebuttal section and so I got into I'm sorry I keep wandering away here. I got into looking at the difference between Matthew and and Mark and Matthew gives a Shorter version that might surprise you because you figure well Matthew's all I was gonna be longer.
No there are times when Matthew takes the same story and He what I call telescopes and now remember If you've seen the movie master and commander, okay, that was a pretty cool film all right. Especially if you like seafaring stuff, and if you remember that opening scene.
Where that first battle that they have where they're peering through the fog, and they've got their looking-glasses those telescopes. Well, why is it called telescopes? Well to see far, but it would the idea is it was you could fold it up.
You could push it inside of itself, and then pull it out from itself, and that's the telescoping effect that we're talking about and When I talk about a writer telescoping a particular story Matthew telescopes what happens in regards to Jairus's words to Jesus.
When Jesus gets to the house he knows the woman's dead. He's already had to tell Jairus. Do not be unbelieving only believe when they walk into the house Jairus believes that his daughter is dead. That's true in both stories the only difference being that mark gives us the added information that there is an initial encounter and Then the woman's healing and then the men come from the home and say she's died and Jesus still keeps coming in Mark he just simply says he's come to Jesus, and I'm sorry in Matthew.
He's come to Jesus. Would you please heal my daughter she has died and his whole point was see in Mark it's she's at the point of death in Matthew. She's died. Contradiction. Can't fit these together.
I said no, this is telescoping now interestingly enough even in giving you my report today I Purposefully telescoped one particular aspect of it so you can see an illustration of this in quote-unquote real life.
What do I mean well?
Mentioned to you when Shabir came in that he and I talked and I mentioned to you the things we talked about before the debate. I mentioned we talked about how to keep the Muslims from all getting up and walking out.
I mentioned we talked about the cross-examination. But in reality and all of that's true, and I think if Shabir had been listening to me. He would have gone yes. Yes, that's yeah, those are the things we talked about but the fact the matter is those were two separate conversations.
The first conversation I walked to the back of the room as soon as I saw him come in I met him at the back Of the room shook his hand and that's when we talked about how to keep the Muslims from all getting up and leaving.
Then he had to go do his prayers. I didn't mention that he did at least some of his prayers before the debate started and He even mentioned the time that he has more freedom because he's traveling and so when Muslims are traveling they have more freedom as to The timing of their prayers and things like that so he went to do his prayers.
I went back down front talked with folks he came back down, and then we had the conversation still before the debate. But then we had the conversation about the cross-examination. And then the moderator was involved and so on so forth so I telescope those two things together.
There was no lie involved and we all do that every single day. And if I was only giving you a 5-minute report on the debate or a 15-minute report on debate that may have been all I ever said about it, and it would not have been inaccurate and That's what I explained about the difference between Matthew and Mark at that point now obviously to me.
He had never heard that response. He had never I Guess he has maybe he's presented this more than once to people. I don't know. But he had he had never heard that response and wasn't really sure how to all he could say in response was well.
You know people speak entire you know they preach entire sermons about what Jesus allegedly said. But you're saying just didn't really say what he said what Matthew says. I'm saying no. That's that's not what I'm saying, but I am saying that to say there's a contradiction between these two Is untrue for these reasons and I then use that to point out and this happened a lot in the conversations?
We had with the Muslims as well that they are trying to force a completely different view of Inspiration on the text of the New Testament. The Muslim view of inspiration that the Quran comes down without the touch of human hands that it is a it is a divine revelation.
It's it's absolutely dictated. You know the angel gives it to Muhammad. He repeats it, and that's that's all there is to it. This isn't Muhammad's language. This isn't. That's not how Christians view the inspiration in the test, okay?
I'll take that back there are some Christians who in error view that as the nature of Dictation theory of inspiration that's wrong. It's very easy to prove. It's wrong Muslims all the time prove it's wrong.
Well Paul says pray for me was that God saying pray for me. Did God tell us to pray for God? They will appeal to the Imprecatory Psalms they will appeal to where the psalmist said things like you know how long will you abandon me?
And that's clearly just the words of a man and and when Luke says it seemed good to me to record these things well. See that's just that's just Luke saying things I can't be the Word of God because God doesn't talk like that etc. Etc.
So is using the wrong standard is using the wrong understanding of inspiration. And so it gave me the opportunity then of explaining that as well. At the same time giving the answer to the the alleged contradiction and so on so so He said a number of amazing things during the debate to be honest with you.
He said the Gospel of Thomas was earlier than mark, and I'm like what? Where did that come from and and so I brought that up during cross-examination, and he said well, okay? Actually, it's it's sources of Thomas or earlier than mark and even at that you're there's just no way that was one of the illustrations in my opinion where where he really gave s gave gave an example of Where he will accept what one scholar says even if what that one scholar says is way way way outside of the realm of accepted scholarship well, let's put this way way way outside of Being any type of mainstream opinion, let's put it that way.
That's that's the better way to put it and.
So I.
Focused on that and then a lot of people caught two things. I've gotten a lot of really really Positive responses from the debate. But a lot of folks heard two Particular aspects they heard during the cross-examination where I caught Shabir With one of his errors.
It's an error. He's made over and over and over and over and over again I've heard him make this error in debates. I've heard him make this error in lectures. He's going through this alleged mark is changed by Matthew stuff.
And he has said that see in Matthew Jesus is called Lord more often and that's a that's a term of deity. And so they're trying to make Jesus look like a god and and mark doesn't have it that way and one of the ones he uses is when you compare mark 13 with Matthew 24 and The phrase you you know be be sober be vigilant.
You do not know when your blank is returning in Mark, it's it is in the RSV. I remember she barely does not read Greek and he admitted that in the debate in the RSV it is the master of the house and in the In in in Matthew it is when your Lord is returning and He says see mark has the lower term master the house.
Matthew has a higher term Lord. Here is evidence of that. You know Matthew is not truly the Word of God and this perversions going on blah blah blah well a long time ago I had Looked these texts up and Just just chuckled every time I heard it because in reality Mark's giving the longer phrase and it is a courteous tastes Boy kios it is the Lord of the house.
It's the it's term courteous, which is what Matthew uses the exact same Greek word. It was just translated differently in the RSV for stylistic reasons for nothing other than that and So I asked him about that during the cross-examination and it's almost like he could see what was coming.
He didn't know it was coming. He didn't he didn't know That there was this that he was wrong about that, but he is almost like he can sort of see it coming because I had my Greek text open and So when I explained to him what the reality was He said well if it's the same term in the Greek then I must concede the point and he was gracious about it.
But a lot of people caught it a lot of people heard it and I've had a number of students write to me and say Look if he can't if he if if all of his criticisms are on that level where he's only been using an English text and this.
And he's what he's one of their leading apologists. What does that tell you and they did catch that and the other thing was and then we would take a phone call here. The other thing that they heard was I repeated this my thesis kept over again.
Look, we need to be consistent. If you're going to apply a different set of standards to the New Testament, then Shabir Ali applies in his defense of the Quran. Inconsistency is the mark of a failed argument and Then I gave illustration after illustration after illustration where that's exactly what Shabir Ali does he uses one set of scholarship one worldview for dealing with the issues of The Quran and a completely different set for dealing with the New Testament.
I demonstrated that repeatedly over and over and over again.
So one of the.
Applications that I made of this was why should I as a Christian? Look at The writings of a man who did not have access to the Christian scriptures. He was illiterate. The the the Bible had not yet been translated into a language and he would have access to even if he could have read anyway so it's that's a double whammy at that point and.
So he doesn't have direct access to my scriptures unlike the New Testament, which is just soaked in the Old Testament. You cannot separate if you tried if you if you made all the Old Testament citations disappear out of the New Testament.
And you could no longer have access to the Old Testament the New Testament wouldn't make sense. There is there is a direct connection a lifeblood connection there. No such connection to the Quran. You could you could never read the new the the the Bible and the Quran would stand on its own.
Because it comes from a completely different culture comes to a completely different time 600 years later. Different language different culture no connection my scriptures. Why should I believe? That an illiterate man without connection to my scriptures at all what he said should supersede The testimony of the martyrs themselves in those early centuries those Apostles themselves who wrote Why should I believe that and then I turned it around?
This is what people heard. I Said and would any Muslim here this evening? Abandoned their belief in the Quran on the basis of the words of a man 600 years after Muhammad say in the middle of the 11th 12th century and.
This person comes along he has no access to the Quran in Arabic. He's never read the Quran in Arabic and yet he comes along and Says that if you're a true follower of God you're a true follower of Allah.
You should follow him and what he has to say as he overthrows the teachings of Muhammad and the Quran would you follow such a man as that and A lot of people heard that because Shabir Ali never even attempted To give a meaningful response that at all and yet It's the direct parallel the direct parallel and so they caught that and so it was a it was a wonderful opportunity in my closing statement and I'm gonna go to Tony here because Tony has debated Shabir Ali as well.
And so Tony's debates were some of the debates. I listened to to be prepared. So he got there before I did in my closing statement, I had seven minutes and I gave to Shabir a copy of the God who justifies the Forgotten Trinity and Scripture alone three of my books.
I had a copy of King James on controversy with me but I already had one so I didn't need to give him to him and Then I had talked to the folks at Lachman and they had delivered an uber Bible Which is what we have on our website there the New American Standard large print ultra thin with the super rich cover on it and I I had mentioned that I had heard him quote from the New American Bible, which is a horrific Roman Catholic translation and I wanted to get him away from that.
And so I wanted to present to him From the Lachman Foundation for which I work as a critical consultant A copy of the New American Standard Bible and so I had this stack. That's a fairly decent stack of stuff that I then left the podium and Went over and gave it to him at his desk as a part of my closing statement and there was applause.
He smiled he stood he shook my hand Accepted the gifts graciously and when he got up for his final closing statement, he he said that I was a gentleman and a scholar from whom he had learned much this evening and then very interestingly the majority of his closing statement was a cut-down version of His Why the Quran is inspired speech?
Now if he really felt that there was much he could do at this point in this debate He would have still been addressing those issues but he didn't even try and A lot of folks noticed that as well as basically is as an admission.
Okay, I Wasn't prepared for this and I and by the way, I mean I this is mentioned in on Fred Butler's blog article Which is linked on the thing. In my closing I also said I really hope that we will be able to work out a debate at the University of Glasgow next May.
And I offered I threw in there and to make it an offer you offer. You cannot possibly resist if you will say yes. Then I will promise to wear a formal kilt in the debate at the University of Glasgow. I he would have no reason to say no.
I Mean honestly, he was treated fairly. It was a fair debate. He'd have to admit that and so I'm really hoping that's in the not-too-distant future. I'll be able to come to you and say hey We've got confirmation.
Here's going to be the date University of Glasgow wherever it is in Scotland and so on so forth. And so I really hope that that that does end up taking place so with that I wasn't expecting this and we only got a few minutes left, but Tony Costa from up in Canada is called.
Hi, Tony. Hi, dr. White. How are you? I'm doing well. How are you?
I'm well, I'd first like to commend you on a great debate. The reviews have been excellent.
Bravo to you. Well, thank you. And now you how many times have you debated Shabir?
I've debated him four times up here in the in Canada the University of Toronto University of Waterloo at Ryerson University as well. So I've had a four matches with him. Mm-hmm. And what topics did you cover?
Well, we covered is Jesus the divine Son of God is the Quran the Word of God. We dealt also with Jesus in Islam Jesus and Christianity, which is the true version, right? And it's interesting dr. White that your Description is exactly the same.
It's the same thing that happened with my debates. The problem with Shabir is basically he is corrected, but he never takes the correction. He simply repeats what he's always been saying and that that's that I think is a serious problem.
Do you think?
Do you think for example? He will repeat the Matthew 13. I'm sorry mark 13 Matthew 24 anymore in the future. Well, I think he will really. My debate with him, well, but I mean from now on I mean I've he's been shown that it's the exact same Greek term.
Do you really think you. I hope he takes it to heart but from my own experience I have found that when he is corrected he simply goes on. Repeating the same mistake, but I hope that. He he's taken this to heart and that he does he does correct himself the next time that would.
I'm certainly going to be listening.
Because that would that would disappoint me a lot. I mean, you know, I would like to think that at least at that point he would go. All right. Here's here here's a clear fact he could and he doesn't have to read Greek to verify what I said.
No, no, he doesn't. He did something similar when I debated him. He brought up the passages in Acts 2 and 3 Where the the references to the servant. Jesus is called the servant there, right? And I reform I reminded him that for the background to those servant passages is the servant song of Isaiah Which identifies the Messiah as the second servant of the Lord and he basically said well No, it means that Jesus was that was a Muslim that he was a slave.
So unfortunately what you have here is is he's reading back Islamic theology. Oh, yeah. Oh, yeah.
Well, I haven't heard a single Islamic speaker yet who was not suffering from having the the glasses of the Quran as the filter of his worldview firmly in place and Anachronistically then reading Quranic categories and Islamic beliefs back into both the Old and New Testament.
Even when it creates an absolute upside-down contradiction, there's no.
Example used about let's say someone came 600 years down the road and and attempted to to replace Islam. Well something similar happened with the coming of Baha 'u'llah the founder of the Baha 'i faith, right who could read actually was Persian but he did have a knowledge of Arabic and he claimed that That he was the fulfillment of all the all the world's religions including Islam and to this day The Baha 'is are considered a cult by Islam and so is the Ahmadiyya movement.
Which claims that its founder is actually the true prophet who has succeeded Muhammad, right? Right. Oh, yeah.
Well, there's there's no question that there's the the whole issue of inconsistency is. Where I had to start and I would like to see like I said, I would like to do the deity of Christ. I would like to do The lacrosse and the nature of the cross which you've you've done Elements of that with him as a fairly short debate as I recall, but you've done elements of that with him.
I but we had to start someplace and I would like to see those those topics addressed. Especially the deity of Christ because you've seen his little book on the deity of Christ and and most Jehovah's Witnesses that I know Go far more into depth than than he did in that particular subject.
And so that's why I would like to address that one as well but you have to start with some somewhere and this was at least at least I can Go back to this and remind him of those inconsistencies and when he then engages in them again I can refer back to that very quickly and say, you know We've already demonstrated the these inconsistencies and you can't keep going back to them, but I don't I'll ask you do you?
Do you think we're gonna have any problem getting? further debates arranged in the future.
You may depending on the response that he received. I know that when I know when Robert Maury was up here in Toronto, he debated Shabir and And that was the end of it. I don't think he ever once wanted to touch Robert Maury again with a 10-foot pole.
So it all depends on the reaction that his audience gave his Muslim audience there. They're really.
You know, even he said he didn't have a lot of connections in the LA area. So I There were some young men there they they jumped me during the break and they wanted me to quote by memory the reference to Ibn Masud and What happened with him and I you know I had to look it up and I gave I gave the reference during the cross-examination period but they're very aggressive.
But there is there is probably only about five or six of them. So I I really don't know that, you know.
It's quite possible. I I mean I wouldn't out I wouldn't Rule it out, but it's quite possible. He may have he may take you up on that debate. That'd be interesting because I'm looking forward to seeing you in the kilt as well.
Well, I happen to be looking forward to getting one so that that's that's two of us. So I'll use as an argument with my wife who continues to oppose that idea. But anyway, no, I'd like to that happen because I I have seen one of the debates at the University of Glasgow.
Of course, I'd like to see it in Manchester and Birmingham places like that where I've heard some of the debates that or Presentations that didn't go all that well for the Christian side. I'd like to hear I'd like to you know Be able to give a presentation there as well.
So we'll see.
You know, there's a great number of Muslims in England. Yes. Oh, believe me. Yeah. Yes.
I I'm all aware.
But that's why I'd like to do that over there since I've now got a little bit of a foundation amongst the folks over there. I'll be over there in July. Speaking in London, so that would be something we really need to do.
So well, thanks for listening. And I'm I thank you for your prayers and the Lord definitely did bless. All right of all the best to you. Dr.
White, thank you. Thank you to prosper your ministry. Thank you very much. God. Bye for now. Bye. Bye.
And thank you for listening to vying line. I know that we had some technical difficulties about halfway through but I guess the server came back and of course those of you who are Listening by archive have absolutely no idea that any of that happened.
But.
Appreciate your listening today appreciate especially your prayers. We prayed. We asked that you would pray for this particular event and I know many churches did many individuals did and I think that we Saw the result of that.
It was I know that as soon as we have the tapes It's going to be a high priority on the riches video editing a schedule to get that one available. First the mp3s would be available and then the DVDs afterwards.
We had a three camera shoot. So it should be one of the best debate coverages that we've ever been able to produce largest debate audience we've ever had. Put that all together with one of the best debates we ever done and You're going to enjoy it.
It's gonna be something you're gonna be able to use in your churches and have discussion groups about and put together the Hamsa Abdul Malik debate and Immediately, we'd have two two excellent debates.
You could look at there. They would also have a real contrast in the way that they were shot on video.
Thanks.
Listening to dividing line. We'll be back Thursday afternoon Lord willing. God bless.
The dividing line has been brought to you by Alpha and Omega ministries. If you'd like to contact us call us at 602 9 7 3 4 6 0 2 or write us at PO box 3 7 1 0 6 Phoenix, Arizona 8 5 0 6 9. You can also find us on the world wide web at a omen org That's a o m i n dot o RG where you'll find a complete listing of James White's books tapes debates and tracks.
Join us again this Thursday afternoon at 4 p .m. For the dividing line.