Aug. 19, 2015 Show with Dr. Barry Horner & Dr. James M. Hamilton on “Historic Premillennialism” [End Times 6-Day Marathon]
No description available
Transcript
Live from the historic parsonage of 19th century gospel minister George Norcross in
Pennsylvania, it's Iron Sharpens Iron, a radio platform on
which pastors, Christian scholars, and theologians address the burning issues facing the church
and the world today.
Proverbs 27 verse 17 tells us, iron sharpens iron so one
man sharpens another.
Matthew Henry said that in this passage, quote, we are cautioned to take heed whom we
converse with and directed to have in view in conversation to make one another
wiser and better.
It is our hope that this goal will be accomplished over the next hour and we hope to hear
from you, the listener, with your own questions.
Now here's our host, Chris Arnson.
Well good afternoon, Cumberland Valley, Pennsylvania, and the rest of humanity living on
the planet Earth who are listening via live streaming.
This is Chris Arnson, your host of Iron Sharpens Iron, wishing you all a happy Wednesday on
this 19th day of August 2015 and today is day number
three of End Times Marathon here on Iron Sharpens Iron.
We already addressed on Monday amillennialism, on Tuesday we addressed pre
-tribulational premillennialism or distensationalism, and today we are going to be addressing
historic premillennialism and we have two different guests to do that today.
Our first guest is going to be Barry Horner.
He is the author of Future Israel, Why Christian Anti -Judaism Must Be Challenged
and he is also the host of a website on that very issue which
we will have him describe in a moment and we are also for the second hour starting
at 5 p .m. Eastern going to have as our guest James Hamilton who is
professor of biblical theology at the Southern Baptist Theological Seminary in Louisville, Kentucky.
And there is a possibility that our two guests, although they are addressing, they're both addressing and defending
historic premillennialism, they may take a slightly different spin on the topic as
with most of our eschatological views being presented there typically is not just one view.
There are varieties of views that usually fall under the heading of each and I'm
trying to do the best job as I can in six days from today through the 24th
to get a variety of views and so on and of course you have the ability as a listener
to email your own questions and so if you disagree with how any of our guests are representing
any of their respective views you can feel free to email a
question at chrisarnson at gmail .com.
But first of all let me welcome our first guest today my dear friend Dr. Barry Horner
and it's been a long time brother I'm so glad that you're on the program again.
I look forward to today.
Yes in fact regardless of your eschatological view or regardless of whether
you're a Calvinist or Arminian or what kind of a Calvinist you may be
I heartily and strongly urge you to invite Dr. Horner to your church to give his
presentation on the Pilgrim's Progress.
He is a thoroughly knowledgeable expert on the life of John Bunyan and on his
masterpiece the Pilgrim's Progress.
I've seen his presentation probably close to five times at least and I actually
organized most of those events that feature Dr. Horner discussing the Pilgrim's
Progress.
So I strongly urge you to look up Dr. Horner at
futureisraelministries .org and you also have a separate website don't you for the John Bunyan ministries?
Yes it's again.
Www .bunyanministries .org.
Bunyanministries .org.
And that has nothing to do with a foot disorder.
This is regarding the great man of God John Bunyan
author of the classic allegory the Pilgrim's Progress.
Well once again our email address if you have any questions on historic
premillennialism email them today at chrisarnsen at gmail .com at
chrisarnsen at gmail .com and please if you
ask of you to please at least give your first name.
The city and state where you reside in the country where you reside.
If you live outside of the United States and you're originally from Australia as is evident from your accent brother correct?
Yes that's right.
I'm from Melbourne.
Yes and now you are living in Arizona are you.
Still pastoring?
No I'm sort of semi -retired really.
Okay well it's an.
Honor and privilege to have you on the program again that Dr. Horner was featured as a guest
several times on the old Iron Trepans Iron between 2006 and 2011 and it's my
joy to have him back.
Now your eschatological view is known as historic premillennialism.
Obviously premillennial refers to something that is going to happen before an event called the Millennium.
So what is the Millennium.
And what exactly do you believe will occur prior to this event?
Major pass.
I know one
reforms
involves
a whole you
could
give
another name.
I sometimes used
to it in this time element
although so essentially it's
saying there's a glory which again Christ will reign from
Jerusalem personally gloriously Israel will have
been regenerate Gentile nations surrounding and
as Zechariah says in
chapter 40 the earth you know Jesus.
Why.
Is the word historic included in the term describing your eschatology.
Historic premillennialism?
Yes yes yes I understand.
I think the reason would be to distinguish
it
from a
and that of course then involves anticipation of then
they would not see
it that way.
The actual
premillennial view can go back even to the church
father Irenaeus but there was real revival of studying millennialism in about the 17th
century.
The army
all century that was from
Valdini
thought
was well known for the
plain exegesis
of Revelation 20 but when you enter the Old
Testament he said all the prophetic passages there and all the eschatological passages there had
to be reinterpreted and filled it through the Gospel of the New Testament so he didn't tie the Old Testament
at all really in the Revelation 20.
For that reason alone I believe he is not typical.
There's a number of probably a little more recent ones but I've quoted them in my book.
Go back to where you've got Charles Simeon
Cambridge and
yet he
doesn't
get into the rough.
His message he
makes it very.
Another one I'd add
to.
He draws on
Wesley's hymns and the number of hymns you've got there this whole collection involving Wesley's perspective and
anticipation of a millennium.
Another one.
There are other enough anyway.
These are the historical hymns you
see are definite
in Ezekiel
37 etc.
Of course the current nation of Israel didn't exist when Spurgeon
was alive in the 19th century or J .C. Ryle.
Would they view the current nation of Israel formerly known as Palestine in the
Middle East would they view today's.
Israel as a fulfillment of biblical prophecy with the promises
of the land were desperately
intended.
For is he is not
being dogmatic on this but he very much clears
happened in
1948 1967 and I'm confident they undoubtedly say surely God is
sovereignly in this.
He makes it very clear that the 67 war and
with he makes it very
clear here before he passed away.
Well I think that's it.
Yeah well I think any fact I don't think.
I know.
All Calvinists regardless of what eschatological view they have even if they're all millennial they have to
believe if they're Calvinist that God is in control over all things.
And that would include the modern -day gathering and settlement in Israel but the difference would be
do you view it specifically the modern -day nation of.
Fulfillment of biblical prophecy.
I believe the return of the Jews.
I believe that personally.
I mean the land they got that's the borders that were promised and no one would
have to be back there against tremendous
opposition
enemies for you.
As regarding their election of the love for
the says clearly that even unbelieving
Jews are God's beloved enemies.
So if you could.
Just recap of as briefly as possible how George Ladd who is known
by some as the one who really holds to the genuine form of historic pre -millennialism but that is
obviously a debatable issue.
How is he different from the Horatius Bonar.
J .C. Ryle and even the church fathers that you mentioned and I'm
getting at that when you.
Very much a literal what a split really seven on as a company so very clear.
He accepts a literal interpretation there.
The regeneration of Israel and so forth.
Ryle.
And.
But they're exactly the same.
Just read the way.
There's no question about it.
I believe that their
fulfillment now when
you come to lack
lack to me is a big
issue.
Interpretation
through the
gospel of Jesus Christ.
And so you really come up.
Then you'll come up with a sort of an Augustinian understanding of the Old Testament Messianic
prophecies there.
And that to me is where I mean these others I've mentioned to you.
They categorically would disagree with that because they see well as I too.
And Zechariah they say these are basically having a future Messianic
interpretation subsequent to.
The right return of Christ and please forgive me if I get repetitive sometimes but
I'm just trying to be as systematic in this as possible because it is sometimes confusing to talk
about in times.
But do you believe in only one return of Christ is a millennialists and post
-millennialists do or in two returns of Christ one secret and invisible to those on
earth who are lost and and one.
That will be visible to all as pre -tribulation was believe
that you're asking me basically my view of the rapture.
I'll be honest with you and tell you where I am.
Obviously there's a rapture it speaks about.
There's no question about the being a rapture.
The key question is when does it happen.
Well pre -trib view tends to give the idea.
Well we're going to be wrapped real bad.
You're going to be
raptured with a pre -wrath view.
What we're saying is at the end of the age there are going to be.
I use the word they're going to be covenant judgments now.
These are direct interventions of God for instance when God judged at
the time of
Noah
intervention.
So I call it one of a better term a covenant judge.
This is where God comes in.
You know you get it where you get men saying let
us hide ourselves from the wrath of the Lamb.
That wrath of the Lamb there is a direct intervention of the Son of God at the end of the age.
So and you've got other passages.
I think in the second it says that
God delivered a Noah.
And he
said
and that God delivered remind me of
what in his life.
Yeah just I had just had a little blank there.
And of course when God judged he got he took a lot in his family out.
When God judged the era of Noah
he God will judge.
It says that God knows how to deliver the righteous.
So my belief is that when we get to the end when you get God directly into the area into
living with judgment God will.
The words what it's saying is that just priming on mankind.
Then God will take you.
Because you.
You can't have God's children suffering double jeopardy.
You know.
You can't have people say by the Lamb seeing the judgment of the road.
And so you're saying that the
the visible.
Return of Christ is when he returns to set up the Millennial Kingdom and it's not a
secret thing that happens before the tribulation.
Is that what you're.
Saying I'm all
I'm saying
is God cannot judge them.
And then of course and Christ
will do that judgment day.
It's a vision that is not commonly seen today but it's being
of the
wrath of
the Lamb you
know men
mediator of that.
Matthew 1928 we're told there at the rich this is our Savior speaking to his own
disciples.
He says after a generation poem Guinness here is the word.
It means the rebirth the earth.
It's speaking of the radical transformation of the earth after a generation when the Son of
Man sits on his glorious throne and then he says you you will be you my disciples you my
apostles you will be sitting on 12 tribes judging the 12 tribes of Israel.
That's a good statement of what's ahead there.
It's obviously Christ returns and is a regenerated earth.
He sets at his kingdom he reigns from Jerusalem he has to
him and then the Gentile.
Okay.
And if you could go into more detail of what the tribulation will be like
okay there is that yeah this again is what
is God's intervention.
It's like Jacob's
trouble any
ID.
I'm not into
that but
I'm very much like Jacob's trouble again.
This is God's execution.
Because well not simply there may be an element of that but what I'm saying
the church now even could suffer much greater persecution even in the United States.
You know that's persecution.
But that has been going on
since Pentecost
so what.
So it's interesting that you somewhat favor a.
Pre -wrath rapture view which is our topic tomorrow we have two other ways.
Tomorrow we have Alan Kirshner.
Oh yeah I know him.
Well yes he'll smile.
And then.
Then at 5 p .m. after Alan we have pastor Vincent Sawyer who is a dear friend of mine
who was a pre -tribulational dispensationalist and became a believer in the pre -wrath
rapture probably about seven years ago or so.
I don't know I don't know exactly when but when I first met Vinnie and knew him for probably a decade or more
he was still pre -trib so it wasn't that it wasn't that long ago.
But give my regards to brother Krishna.
Yeah I will I might add.
I'm speaking at a conference he's arranged in California in Glendora California Hill
so who or.
What in your scenario of eschatology is the beast the false prophet and the.
Antichrist oh dear dear I
don't feel at the moment I want to get into that in
detail.
It's terrible.
There
are
many.
Antichrist you've
got
there that you've got
war taking place so you do you
believe that these are three separate.
Entities that the beast the false prophet and the Antichrist.
Oh yes I tend to believe that.
Yes.
Okay.
And who would.
Who or what.
Is the whore of Babylon.
Well.
It is and because
you've got the
Vatican
the
Vatican is.
What goes on there.
No
one
knows.
I have a Catholic here
loving democracy and yet the Catholic Church doesn't believe in democracy.
It believes in the reign of the Pope.
One of the earlier titles of the Pope was the king of the kings of
the earth a major role.
Tell us how you really feel
some of his beliefs.
I mean he comes from South America.
He's into what we call baptized socialism.
That's what he's into.
Really.
And I could go on more about that.
But that man I mean and I mean that's enough.
But I have no time for the Pope right.
And so if you could also I know that you've already gone into the Millennium but if you could describe
the thousand year reign of Christ in the binding of Satan where we get the concept of Millennium in
Revelation 20 how does how does your view of the Millennium differ.
From a pre tribulation list dispensationalist.
I don't know one thing.
To me
the biggest argument is
19 and 20.
Now the you get the end of
chapter 19 which clearly is
speaking
question is I'm Warren
and God's check.
Do you read on to chapter 20 in continuity or do you
recapitulate.
Take Greg
be a picture
lights.
And when you get to chapter 20 you then have to Pentecost.
In the beginning of a church age there are many out
it.
Then you get into chapter 20.
There it speaks of those
who continuity there
takes us into Messianic age
again is
what
here shall be King over
all of the
knowledge
of the Lord.
And
there's
so many passes
these other
matters like
because he mentions you know
when we get
to that.
We're gonna be right back after these messages from our sponsors.
If you have a question for Dr. Barry Horner submit your email to Chris arms in a gmail .com
that's the HR is a RNZ and gmail .com.
Please include your city and state of residence and your country of residence.
If outside the USA don't go away we'll be right back with Dr. Barry Horner and historic pre -millennialism.
Linbrook Baptist Church on 225 Earl Avenue in Linbrook Long Island is teaching God's timeless truths in
the 21st century.
Our church is far more than.
A Sunday worship service it's a place of learning where the scriptures are studied and the preaching of the gospel is clear and relevant.
It's like a gym.
Where one can exercise their faith through community involvement.
It's like a hospital for wounded souls where one can find compassionate people in.
Healing.
We're a diverse family of all ages.
Enthusiastically serving our Lord Jesus Christ in fellowship play and together.
Hi I'm Pastor Bob Walderman and I invite you to come and join us here at Linbrook Baptist Church and see all that a church can
be.
Call Linbrook Baptist at.
516 -599 -9402 that's 516 -599 -9402 or
visit linbrookbaptist .org that's.
Linbrookbaptist .org.
I apologize ladies and gentlemen that we were having some difficulties with a couple of our ads but we will get
that God willing fixed prior to the conclusion of our broadcast.
Today we are discussing historic premillennialism.
This is this is day three of our six -day end times marathon where
every day we are featuring a different a different view of the
last days of the different eschatological view.
We've already addressed amillennialism and pre -trib pre -millennialism.
Today we are discussing historic premillennialism and our first guest has been for the last half -hour dr.
Barry Horner of future Israel ministries and bunion ministries and are
following dr. Horner.
At the top of the hour we are going to have a guest from the Southern Baptist
Theological Seminary James Hamilton who will be discussing the same issue and
may take even a different perspective on historic premillennialism because there are varying
views as we've already heard from dr. Horner historically
the differences between George Ladd and Horatius Bonar and Charles Spurgeon
and J .C. Ryle and so on and who would be more in line with the church fathers on that and so on.
So there are there are varying opinions and who differences of opinion who rightly wears
the name historic premill.
So if you have any questions you can email them to chrisarnson at gmail .com.
Chrisarnson at gmail .com.
And going back to the differences that we
have between premillennialism and historic
premillennialism and dispensational pre -trib premill views going
to what the millennium will be like.
In your view are glorified saints who were once enjoying indescribable bliss in paradise
with Christ going to once again be experiencing sorrow grief and anguish
during the millennium as they did before death.
Since they will return to a world surrounding them with mortal sinful men and will be
witnesses to sin and death even if it's to a lesser degree than before Christ's physical reign.
Well first of all I would come back and say do you think the Saints
still have emotions.
You end up sometimes when
you consider this and
well we're just going to be on clouds waltzing
around in an amorphous sort of similarity we'll all be
the same.
I mean that to me I can't accept at all one good illustration would be
the transfiguration when our saviors there I mean it
seems to me probably Peter
recognize and learn quickly.
This was Moses this was Elijah.
They were distinctive.
They had a distinctive character about them that I believe in the millennium.
Moses or David's going to be there.
Paul's going to be there and they suddenly lost all their identity just again this sort of
homogenous group without any distinctive biblical identity.
I can't accept that for a moment.
So we're going to have them there distinctively.
And we're going to have of course that
nevertheless we'll have that
there'll be business.
We won't be doing nothing there.
This is what is sometimes conveyed in especially in the millennial view.
We're just things that sort of you know doing nothing except praising.
And that's I mean it's not right.
I don't think it's.
And some mind you I gotta say this some are millennialists have seen the weakness of this and they have
admitted that it's far more the fact that we shall be there distinctively.
I I will have what will I call it a spiritual materiality.
I'll I'll have a body but it'll be a glorious spiritual body like under Christ's body.
But I don't have a distinctive spiritual materiality there and I will be doing
things.
And some will have high positions and lower positions.
David will be there and so forth.
And so now the emotions what the emotions are.
I think there'll be emotions.
But we've got to be careful there again.
I refer you to read Bonar because he handles this so well it's not easy.
You can go in either direction.
You go in the direction.
Well there's no.
You end up with an emotionless sort of existence and we're all just you know
the same and there's no distinction at all.
And that's just not right.
Now if you get distinction that you get a distinction one with another doing different things interacting with one another.
And surely that will involve emotions and so forth.
I don't doubt you know again the releasing of Antichrist.
I'm not sure what's going to be like but God has a good purpose.
I am convinced.
And in 20 and that's
way ahead of us now yeah I.
Got confused there for a little bit because our millennialists and post -millennialists don't believe
that the departed Saints that live before us who are in glory in our own paradise will be
a part of the millennium with the living human beings here on earth.
So I'm not really sure what you meant by reference to our millennialists they don't believe that
in the millennium I.
Meant I'm in the I haven't I haven't won one the historic abalone ism which comes through the Catholic
Church and that you know over the centuries that's still our millennialism.
But the idea is for the Catholic you sort of up there this wispy heavenly
and that's it where there's nothing specific at all which the prophets
speak about you know.
So that's what I had in mind.
Are you speaking about in heaven as a matter of fact.
As a matter of fact I'm not a fan of empty right.
Believe me I really I have real problems with empty right however and I
agree with him thoroughly.
He was making the point that when we die we go to Abraham's bosom we go to an existence.
But that existence does not really is not the same as what shall then come when the kingdom is
finally fulfilled.
And I agree with him on that you know.
So because we since since I mean we die we go to be with Christ which is far better then we
have this messianic kingdom or millennial which then we will be participants
in.
But when we die we don't get into participation with that this moment.
So empty right was correct in saying that when we die we go into Abraham's bosom this set up position
of where we're blissfully with Christ in some way.
Then we'll when things are wrapped up then we'll come the kingdom in a fully manifest sense.
Yeah I agree with that but what I'm what I'm saying is that the millennialists and post -millennialists believe that
we will not on earth.
We will not be reunited with the Saints that departed before us until the final things when we are in
glory with them.
Not not during an earthly millennium we won't be together with them.
That's what I meant.
Well I I I I'm not sure.
I get a bit confused with some of their views.
That way.
All I'm I got to be with Christ.
Right.
And then I will probably see loved ones who are also with Christ.
I'll see people I've known who will be with Christ.
Introduction of that.
That matter of fact I've
got to mention this.
I was talking with a post
-millennialist just the other day.
He's more historic.
I said to him.
I said tell me I said have you read Lorraine Bednar's book for millennium.
Oh yeah.
He read that book I said.
Tell me I said.
In there Lorraine Bednar as a classic post mill he has a chapter called the world is
getting better.
I said tell me.
Do you believe that we can't
look at world events.
We just they're gonna look getting better.
The world's good right.
Well the the.
Post -millennialists that I've heard say that it's not necessarily a straight line that goes upward
and gets better and better and better that we could receive a century or centuries of
horrible conditions here on earth before.
We go on the rise to the millennium.
Tell me let me hear that again once once we.
Get an outbreak of nuclear war.
No right.
Well that's that's what I meant.
I don't think that post -millennium was denied that that could happen on earth.
Yeah but.
They're really dodging the issue.
I mean it's just fanciful what they're saying that what we're going to have a nuclear holocaust then the world's going to get
better.
That that simplifies
17th century in
America.
And things were good.
The Reformation with all the weaknesses.
The Reformation had brought revolution to Europe.
I mean things were going well in a broad sense you know.
So therefore we're heading toward you know this this Christianized earth and and I can understand them
thinking that way but it hasn't turned out that way.
I know that.
You have as a very top priority an opposition to
anti -semitism.
And one thing that some are millennial and post -millennial folks are confused about is
that the common view
that the two -thirds
of the Jews will be wiped out off the face of the earth in
Israel during the Great Tribulation.
And yet you have pre -millennialists joyfully and enthusiastically and excitedly.
Witnessing Jews return there.
So it seems that's a caricature.
I have to be honest with you that's a pure caricature and I
could believe that I do believe have yet
to stop.
I can say that I don't
say that with any joy you know I don't say that at all.
That I believe is a head.
There's worse things to come and but yet I believe very much
that the hope of any Jew today is the gospel.
That's what the Jew needs to hear is the gospel.
And our Savior said to the Jewish people he said except you believe that I am he you will die in your
sins twice on that.
Occasion.
Yeah no.
I wasn't trying to insinuate that you were experiencing joy over the mass slaughter that will take
place in your eschatological view of the Jews.
I meant that the Jews are returning to Israel that you're rejoicing over and.
It seems yes.
I rejoice when I see scripture being fulfilled.
I don't see that return of some isolation.
I see that as something which scriptures
throughout the new
land and so forth.
I rejoice in of the Abrahamic Covenant.
I rejoice in the Jews even their unbelief going back to the land that was promised.
To them a common objection to pre -millennialism is found in Ezekiel's temple vision in
Ezekiel 40 through 48 and I'm only lists and post -millennialists argue that if this is a literal
future temple that will require a return of the sacrificial system that Christ made obsolete
since the Prophet speaks of atonement in Ezekiel 43 13 27 45
15 17 20.
Critics believe this to be a blasphemous contradiction to the finished work of Christ is
probably 50.
Times I've heard that
anyone who is in the camp where I'm at just that that to me is just a
somewhat a perversion.
But what really is involved here.
We have to face what the scripture means by what it says.
We have to go exegetically to Ezekiel there.
And 40 to 48 the attempt we've got to get what a scripture.
So now what does the army older.
What they do.
They go there and then make these broad conclusions about this long section which is very specific
and very detailed.
And I make these broad sort of conclusions.
Well it's just being about resurrection and the triumph of a church or something like that.
You know anyone who read that passage is like it's got to mean more than that.
Why all that detail.
That's anyway now what we do is we go exegetically to it and we come
to passage that speak of some sacrifice.
It would say you know I've got the final answer there.
But what I'm saying is something like that is going to happen.
It will be.
I believe I actually in the Messianic Kingdom this this kingdom of spiritual
materiality it will be a specific edifice and that I
can't avoid.
Especially in terms of the contrast.
If you come on from 36 37 you got a 39 when you come through that route when you come up to
the temple there you know and try and find that takes us back to the church age that to me just doesn't fit.
At all by the way I think I am on the borderline of becoming charismatic.
Very because because yesterday a woman emailed me who
did not know that I was interviewing you today and she emailed me and she said how can I get
a hold of dr. Barry Horner's book on future Israel.
And I couldn't believe that she said.
That yes.
I'm sorry she's probably not used to the Internet.
She doesn't she.
Doesn't know anything about Amazon or anything like that.
I guess not but I'm just thought it was uncanny that that was just yesterday that
so I was able to share with her that you were going to be on my program today.
Now what is dispensationalism and how do you differ
from it.
Well that you know.
I would need an hour.
Really find this again.
I want to say this that so much misleading comment
on what is dispensationalism someone frustrates me.
I'll illustrate this John MacArthur is dispensationalist
and his friends Mike Black who was a professor who I had on the show.
I had on the show.
Yesterday.
Yeah right Mike is dispensationalist but you cannot just
associate them with the dispensationalism that came around the time of Darby
and so forth.
You know you can't do that.
Now let me also say this for those reformed people who say oh they've changed reformed truth has
changed the idea that somehow reformed truth coming from
Augustine through to Luther and Calvin.
And now today it's the same.
I don't accept that at all.
One one good illustration of this would be the introduction of covenant theology.
You know and covenant theology is a subsequent develop within the reform
movement comes out of probably out of Europe and Dutch emphasis and so forth.
But that's a modification that's a variation on the theme of basically
reformed Calvinistic emphasis there.
Now as you say look at MacArthur and I may not agree with him in everything but but the idea that
they I know some reformed people they throw that word dispensation around a bit they try to slay you
with it.
It's a nasty word.
It's a bad word.
I won't have that at all.
I will challenge anyone who is reformed Lewis Barry
Chaffer's book he who is spiritual and read it and tell me what they think about it.
Because that book you know of course Chaffer is the founder of Dallas Seminary and very very significant in the
development of dispensationalism.
But on the other hand what a man of God he was his book he that is spiritual let's read it
and see the spirituality of this man.
You know and and and I hope some reformed people will just use this word in a cutting
sense you know it's the bottom of the pole.
It's a you know and I won't have that.
And well actually I hope you don't think I was doing those.
It's because I have a
reformed sovereign grace background to you know I've faced it you know it's it's a nasty it's a it's not a good
word and whatever.
You get.
Okay I'll say what about reform Baptist.
Go to the form Baptist and just mention the word dispensationalism and see how they react.
Well Charles Hodge really read Charles
Hodges systematic theology the beginning there I forget what section is X he has for he mentions he believes
there are four dispensations.
I mean so.
In other words you you are not necessarily offended.
Then if somebody somehow associates you with dispensationalism is that what you're.
Saying only if they're honest in their assessment of me and put me you know I would I
suppose I might be associated
with a moderate
dispensationalist.
City and the Gentiles.
And that will be evident clear one people have gone on the Millennium
and yet there will be
the unity with diversity and that's my
dispensationalism.
And there have been.
But they
even didn't
agree.
I mean
you had a difference for Trent or Gillis and you get all this
going on there.
But I'll tell you where the
problem is and
does not.
And so where do
you find yourself in regard to be a moderate dispensationalist.
I'm happy with that.
I'm not trouble with.
That at all.
Okay.
Now in first Peter 2 9 we read.
But you are a chosen race a royal a royal priesthood a holy nation of people for
God's own possession so that you may be may proclaim the excellencies of him who has called you out of
darkness into his marvelous light.
Is this a description of the.
Church for Israel.
Okay I you know I've answered this in my book.
There's a section there about two pages in which I deal with this passage
again.
We we've got us.
You know you can read a passage out like that.
Is this a check.
No.
What you've got to do is you've got to go to a scripture at exit.
Just question who is Peter apart from that
verse.
They're speaking to let me tell you
probably the critical commentary
of good British scholar
called so he deals with
and points out this has been debated over the centuries since the time of August 10th.
Company is that there's no question.
You can look it up and you'll see.
He says.
It seems that most not August I think was he gives
a long left or
all
part of this.
But but be that as it may there's no problem.
It is running to Jewish people.
That's so.
It's the agenda to see.
This is where some of the.
Confusion with our millennialists and post -millennial.
So if the if the Gentile believers are being grafted in with the Jews the believing Jews
how could that be.
Israel of Gentiles aren't being grafted into Israel.
If Israel is not the church you know I mean isn't isn't the isn't there one body.
And if the Gentiles.
Are grafted in with the Jews.
Wouldn't that one body with distinction one body with
gifts.
There's even diversity
in the Godhead.
You've got the father
economically there you've got one God and you've got diversity within the Godhead.
It comes down through is and so forth and so you're
gonna have to vote.
There and by the way dr. Horner I forgot to mention that that sister in Christ who wrote asking about your book she
wrote she asked about it because she heard that day yesterday John MacArthur John MacArthur was
promoting it in a.
Preaching that's right.
Yeah.
Well I John MacArthur and it's not because he says nice things about my
book this is exegetical his expository ministry and I continue to do
that very all right.
And I give you repeat your websites once again for our listeners.
Yes the bunion website is
just www bunion minutes www.
Well it.
Has been a pleasure to have you back on the program again dr. Horner and I look forward to having you back on the
program to discuss John bunion and I love that that seminar that you put
on regarding that Pilgrim's Progress so I would really love to have you return to address that issue and
others.
Oh yeah.
Well God bless you brother and we're going to be beginning our second hour with James Hamilton and in a minute
so we thank you for joining us on iron.
Sharpens iron.
All right.
Well God bless you and we'll be right back after these.
Messages that don't go away.
On the day of broadcast this episode of iron sharpens iron included an interview with a second guest
dr. James Hamilton.
However because of technical difficulties the majority of the interview with dr. Hamilton suffered digital
corruption and could not be repaired.
Rather than air a very incomplete interview we made the difficult decision to leave dr.
Hamilton's portion out of the podcast.
We at iron sharpens iron would like to extend an apology to our listeners and we would especially like
to apologize to dr. Hamilton.
We hope the dr. Hamilton will be able to be on iron sharpens iron in the future to address this
topic and.
Others.