Gender Inclusive Dolls, Abortion and Hate Crimes

Cultural Fragments: Mattel, Gender, Abortion, and Hate Symbols

Everybody's choosy about something. It might be your favorite snack.

Two scoops of Rocky Road, please.

Your style.

Those earrings look amazing on you.

Or the things you like to do with your best friend. Bark, bark, bark. You can be choosy when it comes to getting a COVID -19 vaccine, too. If you're thinking about getting an updated vaccine, there's more than one type available.

You can find out more at wedovaccines .com. This message was brought to you by Novavax.

With Luckyland Sluts, you can get lucky just about anywhere.

This is your captain speaking. We've got clear runway and the weather's fine, but we're just going to circle up here a while and get lucky. No, no, nothing like that. It's just these cash prizes add up quick, so I suggest you sit back, keep your tray table upright, and start getting lucky.

Play for free at luckylandsluts .com. Are you feeling lucky? No purchase necessary. Void where prohibited by law. 18-plus terms and conditions apply. See website for details.

Welcome to The Wrap Report with Andrew Rapoport, where we provide biblical interpretations and applications. This is a ministry of Striving for Eternity and the Christian Podcast Community. For more content or to request a speaker for your church, go to strivingforeternity .org.

All right, I am Andrew Rapoport, your host of Andrew Rapoport's Wrap Report. This is a ministry of Striving for Eternity, and you can hear this on the Christian Podcast Community. Go to christianpodcastcommunity .org to find all of the great podcasts that we have out there, some great content for your ear holes.

We welcome you to another episode and want to first off give you guys some updates. I will be doing some traveling, so I will be heading out in October. I will be at the Truth Matters Conference, but I will first be out doing some open air preaching with Ray, probably at Huntington Beach.

We usually do that one o 'clock on Saturdays, and so if you're in Huntington Beach area, I will be out there. I should be out there October 12th. So the 14th I'll be doing some filming there at Living Waters for a new project that they have going on.

They're bringing a bunch of us in and doing some quick answers, and so looking forward to that. I'll be at Truth Matters that week, so if you're out in LA, if you happen to be at Truth Matters, please look for me, say hello.

If you listen, make sure you let me know that. It is greatly encouraging to know that people are listening and that they find some value, get some teaching from this podcast. Now that Sunday, actually it's a Saturday after Truth Matters, we will be flying up to San Francisco.

I will be speaking at Grace Bible Church in Redwood City, California. So if you are out that way, please come out and I'll be preaching at the church there. November, I will be being able to do a Bible Interpretation Made Easy seminar, and that will be at Princess Chapel Church.

This is in Ashland, Kentucky, if you're in that area. It will be held there. It will be Saturday, November 9th, starting at 5 p .m., and then I'll be preaching the morning service on Sunday the 10th, and then there'll be an evening session at 6 p .m.

So if you're there, you could come there. Now I will be the November 15th and 16th and 17th. I'll be down in North Carolina. We're still working out all the details, but we'll be doing a revival, some revival meetings down there.

So some last minute things that we didn't really have planned on the schedule, and that may wrap up most of my travel for the year. We'll see. I have some other travel I might be doing. There's a chance I may be, I will be actually, there's not a chance, I will be out in Ohio end of the year, and so there's a chance that I may be speaking somewhere December 29th.

We're still working on that. So folks, and if you're in the Dayton, Ohio area and you have a church that does want to have me speak, I will be there that week. So we are still looking forward to see if there's any place that I would be speaking.

So with all that out of the way, I want to let you know one big thing. We've mentioned this a couple times, but we want to encourage you to sign up to join us to go into Israel. Striving Fraternity is going to be joined by Justin Peters, and we're going to Israel in 2021.

It's a long way away, and because of that, a lot of people are holding off, because they say, well, I don't know where, that's so far, what's going to happen by then? Well, if you register now, you basically, what you'd end up losing if plans change is $125.

So that's the only part that's non-refundable. But we're looking to see that everyone that is thinking about it will actually sign up. So please go to 2021israeltrip .com. Go there right now, check out all the details.

This is going to be a longer trip than most other groups do, and so it allows us to see more things. So I really want to encourage you to do that. Go to 2021israeltrip .com. It's going to be a great time.

Really looking forward to it. So go do that. That is what I have for some announcements to give you guys some things going on. Now, what I want to do, and I do this every once in a while, where we grab a bunch of smaller issues that aren't enough for one show.

We put them together and kind of do a show that covers a whole lot of cultural issues. And I want to deal with them now. The first one I want to deal with is, maybe you heard Mattel, the Barbie line, they make Barbie and Ken dolls, if you remember those dolls.

Now, first off, if you don't know the history, the Barbie doll was a doll that was really, I mean, it seems tame for today's standards, but back then it was a sex doll of that time. And it was something to project women as using their bodies as sex objects.

And that was really the goal of Barbie. And to then have Ken that would be this, just always looking after Barbie. So we see a change. Some time ago, they decided to have a Barbie that would have the Muslim garb on and try to reach out to the Muslims, because they were obviously offended by a Barbie that was very undressed, shall we say.

Well, to keep with the culture, well, not really actually, because it's not keeping with the culture, it's really these companies trying to push the culture and prey on our children. Well, Mattel has changed again.

The giant toy company has now come out with a gender inclusive doll line. And what you end up seeing in this, and by the way, if you're looking for where to get this information, I got this from Discern.

Discern is a Christian news organization. It's disrn .com. It's pronounced discern. So if you could go out there, they used to be the, I forget what the old name for them was, but I could probably find out.

But it was like the Christian daily news or something like that. But anyway, so discern, d-i-s-r-n .com. They're the ones that I saw this article, and they talk about these toys that are, they come with a variety of clothes that they can wear, wigs that they can wear.

And the whole idea of this is the blurring of the lines between male and female. This is constantly pushing interculture. So now what they want to do is get dolls that of course they encourage both boys and girls to play with, where the object now is to change what you're wearing.

You change them from boy clothes to girl clothes, back and forth, so that there's really no discernment anymore. That's where they're trying to get with this, that there's no discernment from children to think that now you can just, you could change genders like playing with a doll.

You could just change from, now I'm a boy, now I'm a girl, look how quick I change, it's as quick as changing, you can't call it Barbie anymore, but changing my doll's clothing and hair, and suddenly a boy becomes a girl, a girl becomes a boy.

It is very confusing for a young child to have to figure through these things. Now, as we talk about this, I want you to hear from the makers of this and why they are doing this. So let's listen to some clips from them.

I think that we have hit a moment in time with a product of its time for children that are deeply in need of this kind of self-expression without rules and without labels.

Okay, so did you hear that? They think that there's a need. Who's begging for this? Are the children begging for this? Are there children out there saying, I really need a doll that I can use, that could be both male or female, and it could change gender at will because I have that need.

I can't live without that. Is this coming from your three-year-old? Is this coming from your four-year-old? No, this is coming from the culture pushing it on the three and four-year-olds. But did you hear what they want?

No rules. That's what this is about. They need to know that they can be in this world where there's no rules to sexuality. There's no rules to gender. They can decide. Now, I want you to think through what they're saying and what's going on here.

They want to teach children that there are no rules. Is that really good for parents to be teaching? I mean, when they get to school, are there rules? When they get to jobs, are there rules? Should we be teaching our children that there's no rules?

Or should we be teaching our children that there are rules? No, we should be teaching children that there's a right and there's a wrong. But you'll end up seeing, especially in this next clip, that the real thing that is going on is they are catering to trying to make the claim that children are right.

Now, this is something our culture is going on. If you're paying attention to the news recently, you have this girl, Greta, who is this young girl, and she's the face of climate change. And what's everyone doing?

All of these young kids want to put themselves out there. Now, first off, they said that, oh, look, there's all these millions of kids marching for climate change in New York City. Yes, they were given the day off from school.

You take any teenager and say, you have a choice. You can stay in school or you can go march for climate change.

Yeah, duh.

It doesn't take a rocket scientist to figure out which one they're going to choose. They're going to march because they get out of school for a day. They're basically allowed to cut school for a day. So they go and march.

That's exactly what you see going on. And then when they get criticized, it's like, how dare you criticize us? We're children. No, you're pawns. You're pawns in a game, a political game. You're being used.

Now, if you're allowing yourself to be used, well, what comes with that is you're going to be criticized. So the reason that this is going on is that they want to throw children out there so they can't be criticized, so they must be right because, what, they're children?

How much science have they done? How much have they studied these things? I mean, if we're going to put them in control, well, we've got to trust them because they're children and they understand everything about climate change.

They know all the science behind it, right? Oh, no, no, not at all. So why is it that Mattel is creating these? Let's listen from another person that works there that created these dolls.

A collection like this just knocks down every barrier to play. The greatest lesson of parenting is to get to know your child and honor who that child is and try to make them into the best adult human you can while keeping them safe and healthy.

Okay, did you hear that? The goal is to let them, you know, teach them everything there is to be a good adult while keeping them safe and healthy. Really, but that beginning part, let's listen to that again because, you know, this is really, should be shocking to us, okay?

Listen to what she said.

Every barrier to play.

That's right. They want to remove every barrier to play. Who is in control in this? In what they put out there, who's in control? Well, it's the child. The child is the one that should be making all decisions.

Think about this, if you would, as we look at these dolls and things like this. You have, for example, in my state of New Jersey, if you go to a public school, a child cannot take any kind of medicine for a headache.

They're not allowed without parental permission. So if the child goes and says, I have a headache, the nurse is not allowed to give an aspirin or Tylenol or Advil or anything to a child without parental permission.

But you know what else a teacher can do in New Jersey? In fact, if a student was to say to a teacher, as happens in New Jersey, if a student says to a teacher, I'm pregnant and I want an abortion, the teacher must help that child get to an abortion clinic and know the parents are not allowed to know.

The teacher is not allowed to tell the parents, oh, by the way, I took your child to get a medical procedure. Think about that. No Advil or Tylenol, that's too dangerous. We need to make sure we get a parent's permission on that one.

But I can take you to go get an abortion and I'm not allowed to tell the parents. Does this make any sense? This is where we're at, folks. They want to say the children are in charge. The children, five and six year olds, they know enough about everything to be able to know their gender and be able to figure this out, to have no boundaries.

Now let's think about this. You have to be 21 years old in this country to drink alcohol.

Why?

Because alcohol will affect your senses and your discernment, and your thinking, and your judgment, and therefore dangerous things can happen if you drink alcohol. And so in large amounts, and what happens?

They say you must be a certain age to where you're more mature and can handle these things. You're not allowed to smoke cigarettes until you're 18 years old.

Why?

Because they're bad for your health and we can't trust that before 18 you are thinking through these things in a mature enough way to be able to make these decisions. You can't vote until you're 18. Why?

Because we think that you're not mature enough to be able to understand these things well enough to vote and pull a lever. But at four or five, you understand everything about sexuality, your future, what's going to happen as an adult, and whether you want to have kids.

You understand all of that to be able to decide whether you're male or female. Is this insane or what?

It is.

This is where our culture is. This is Romans 1. I'm sorry, but people sit there and ask the question all the time. Do you think that God is judging America? Do you think God's going to judge America?

No. No.

I don't think He's going to judge America. But when you look at Romans 1, He is judging America. This is the judgment. We've already given over to the foolishness of the world. It says that in verse 24 of Romans 1, therefore God gave them up to the lusts of their hearts, to the impurity, to dishonoring of their bodies among themselves because they exchanged the truth about God for a lie and worshiped and served the creature rather than the Creator who is blessed forever.

Amen.

This is the judgment of God what we see in our culture. This isn't God's going to judge us for this. This actually is God's judgment on America. He's passing it right now. And so we see this in the insanity that we have before us of people that can't figure out that a 4 and 5 year old should not be making decisions on something that affects the rest of their life.

That, oh, I feel like I'm a girl today. I feel like I'm a boy today. And then they're reinforced by this and now people are being taught in schools and they're given towels to play with all to reinforce that they can have fluidity in gender.

I'm sorry, but this is a simple matter of science. You either have an X or a Y chromosome. That's it, XX, XY, you're done. That is science. Now for the evolutionists who argue there is no immaterial nature to anything and we're just pure chemical reactions, a product of evolution.

Well, if we're just chemical reactions then all boys should act like boys because that is their biology. All girls should act like girls because that is their biology. There is nothing else that you should see here where it's, well, I feel like a boy, but today I feel like a girl.

There shouldn't be a change in that because the chemicals are not changing. You see, this is the way the chemicals are. It either is that you're a boy or it is that you're a girl. There is no idea that you have the biology that can keep shifting back and forth.

And there is such confusion that, let me give you, and I'm going to tell you this right now, I do this, torture myself for your benefit. I'm getting this from the Gender Reveal Podcast. I'm going to play just some clips, but I listen to this stuff so that I can bring this stuff to you guys so you don't have to listen to this nonsense garbage.

But there is, it's interesting because these gender podcasts are huge. I mean, thousands and thousands of downloads per episode. And it's nonsense stuff. I mean, it's just non-common sense. But here's a big thing that they were thrilled with, that the dictionary now is validating them.

So here's just a little clip from the Gender Reveal Podcast.

You may have seen headlines this week that Merriam-Webster, the dictionary, added the non-binary pronoun they to the dictionary. I've heard three main reactions from this. One is, why do we care? Because the Oxford English Dictionary is the definitive source of the English language.

And that's true, but the OED generally focuses on history. Like, for example, the fact that we have been using they as a singular pronoun since 1375. And also, you can't access the OED without a $250 subscription on the Internet.

And so, I can't. We can't talk about it. The second point, people.

Okay, so let's start with the first point. Before she gets to the second point, I didn't even bother playing the clip of the third. But notice what she says. The Oxford Dictionary, which is the definitive dictionary, that's the definitive one.

Why? Because it looks at words in its history. Why do they like to go to the Merriam Dictionary? Well, they like to go to that one because it's more fluid. It's the one that's more dealing with cultural changes.

And that's the one that allows them to keep playing games with words. Words have meanings. When you remove the meanings of words and you say that it can mean one thing today and tomorrow it means something totally different, then the words become meaningless.

This is 1984. Go read that book by Orwell. That's exactly what you have. You have Newspeak, where things can have one meaning today and then all of a sudden they go, oh, no, no, we got to change the past.

Because in that book they say whoever controls the past controls the future. That's exactly what we see going on. People are trying to rewrite history and now what they're trying to do is control language so that they can control the thinking that people have.

And so they want to go to a dictionary and say, well, see, now that this dictionary is going to vindicate us. But the reality is the historical word for they has always been there in the Oxford Dictionary.

Yeah, it could be used in the singular, but not the way they want to use it today. This is what you end up seeing. Think of the word racist or racism. It's changing. It used to mean something when you show a prejudice toward people of a certain ethnicity.

Now it has to do with economics. Really? Totally different.

Why?

Because they just got to change the word. Now, let's listen to her second reason.

...making is, didn't Merriam-Webster already have singular they in the dictionary? And yes, they had third person singular they in the dictionary. But now, not only does it say that you can use they as a pronoun for one person, it also says that they can be used to refer to a single person whose gender identity is non-binary.

And then there's an example sentence that says, I knew certain things about the person I was interviewing. They had adopted their gender neutral name a few years ago when they began to consciously identify as non-binary.

That is, neither male nor female. They were in their late twenties. So, not only do we now have the dictionary on our side that they can be a singular pronoun, but we have the dictionary on our side that non-binary people, one, exist, and two, use they-them pronouns.

Okay, so does the dictionary prove they exist? Well, they do exist as either male or female. Either XX or XY. Now, when they claim they identify, how could they identify something other than their biology unless, of course, there's an immaterial part of them called a spirit.

That part they want to deny in evolution, the part that they want to deny in all of their evolutionary atheistic thinking, the reality is they're appealing to an immaterial part of them. So, you end up seeing here, they're going, oh, look, the dictionary vindicates us.

No, the dictionary is not vindicating. It's saying that this is the way people are using these words so that people understand the usage of their constantly changing language. But I want you to get an idea from this podcast of how they view themselves.

Now, I'm going to play the context, the first part of this clip. Now, I've clipped out some of the middle because I want you to hear the beginning context of the situation they set up. And they talk about how this beginning part is so aggressive.

If you don't call someone by the right pronoun, you're so aggressive. Listen to this.

Any thoughts on dealing with being misgendered by strangers? The grocery store manager called me young lady and I want to scream. Yeah, it does suck. I'm really sorry that happened to you. People have this thing, too, where a lot of people, like including me, don't correct people at their jobs because they're like, this person is just trying to do their job and they have enough to deal with without customers complaining that they misgendered them.

And I hear that, but also if that employee is making you feel unsafe in that store or unwelcome in that store, I think it's okay to politely be like, hey, what's up? Or like one time I went to a movie with a bunch of non-binary people and we got aggressively misgendered and I just emailed the manager later and I didn't name anyone.

I was just like, hey, everyone in my group got aggressively misgendered by your bartender.

Aggressively misgendered. So if you call someone by the wrong pronoun, that is now being called aggressive. Think about that. I mean, how snowflakey are they? I mean, think about this. This is like, you're threatening me.

I don't feel safe. I mean, that's what they're talking about, safety. I don't recommend listening to this podcast full of foul language. But what you end up seeing in it is they talk about safety. It was amazing.

They sit there and they say how they have to feel safe. They don't feel safe going out on a date with someone of the same sex because someone may kill them. I don't see that in the news. I'm not reading that very much about people just going on a date and being killed because they're going on a date.

Oh, wait, there was the Muslim guy. He wasn't a Christian guy, by the way. There was the Muslim guy who shot up a gay bar in Florida, I think it was. Yeah, but he wasn't Christian for sure. But not seeing that very often.

And they try to say how it was unfair because the courts are so biased against them. And I'm like, oh, really? I think it's the Christians who are being sued left and right for not promoting same-sex marriage.

They never challenge the Muslims who have a much harder line or position against homosexuality than Christians do. Christians only want to share the gospel with them. Muslims want to throw them off buildings.

Hmm, a little bit of a difference, shall we say? And yet they come after the Christians. No, folks, this is demonic. That's right, I said it. It's demonic. This is a demonic activity against Christianity.

It is an attack and a constant attack that they use this stuff to go after Christianity. It's not going to stop anytime soon. And this is something that we have to be ready and prepared for because this stuff is what we see in our culture.

That they feel that if you call them by the wrong name, that that is aggressive. There's people who maybe they'll call someone by a nickname and people don't like that nickname. A shorter of your name, if your name's Robert and you don't like Bob.

Okay, what do most people do in that case? Hey, my name's Robert. Oh, okay, sorry. And it's not a big deal. There's no aggression there. Saying sir or ma 'am is being polite. And the fact that they want to claim that there's something different than the way they dress.

Well, how are we to know? How do we know other than looking at someone? That's why they say you have to call everyone a they because you're not knowing, but you shouldn't give them a wrong pronoun. Well, that's just crazy to think about in a culture where how are you going to be polite?

Because that's really what it is when you say ma 'am, miss, sir, gentleman. These are terms used in a way of showing respect to someone. And they want to take that and say no. And so what do we do? We're constantly seeing in our culture a watering down of respect and politeness to where the only thing that's going to rule is rudeness.

Abortion, Local Government, and the Value of Unborn Life

Now, this is one area, but I want to give you another area that we see more of this stuff going on, and that's going to be the issue of abortion. I want to cover that just after this message. Did you know that Striving for Eternity provides speakers and seminars that we would come to your church and disciple your people?

We have seminars on the Bible interpretation made easy, creation science, evangelism, presuppositional apologetics, even on sexual abuse. These are just some of the many things that we could provide for your church.

Consider inviting one of our speakers to your church. You can contact us at speaker at strivingforeternity .org. The good news is Striving for Eternity would love to come to your church to spend two days with your folks teaching them Biblical hermeneutics.

That's right, the art and science of interpreting Scripture. The bad news is somebody attending might be really upset to discover Jeremiah 29 11 should not be their life verse. To learn more, go to strivingforeternity .org to host a Bible interpretation made easy seminar in your area.

All right, well, thank you for that, Todd. And now I want to deal with the issue of abortion, because here was very interesting. You have a mayor here, and he was having the town council, and what ended up happening at this meeting is someone got up and wanted to, and they often have this at their town council meetings, you have a time for a regular session where anyone can get up and speak, and this is what ended up happening at this one with Mayor Robert, oh, let me see what his name was, B-R-U-C-H-E-Y, Robert E. Bruchini II.

And I want you to hear what happens. Someone comes up. It's a little hard to hear when the gentleman comes up to the mic, but he comes up to the mic and wants to talk about an atrocity that's happening in their town, and soon as he mentions the murder of children, watch how quickly the council members move to shut the meeting down.

And when this guy tries to speak, they stop him and say, sorry, we're having a motion and you have to wait until it's done, and the motion is to end the meeting. Listen to this.

All right. So now we're moving on to say some comments. Harold King and Boones. Barr, please step up. Give us your name and address, please. Okay.

Now, did you hear Harold King and Vince Barr? So there were two people that were supposed to come up, two. You're not going to get to hear from the second one, and you're actually not going to even hear much from the first.

Here we go. Sir, good evening. My name is Harold King. I'm a resident of Boonesboro, Maryland. However, our family does do most of our shopping activities here in Hagerstown, Maryland. We like it a lot here, and I want to thank you for your time this evening.

I'm here tonight to talk to you about the atrocity that has been occurring in Hagerstown for many years, currently at 160 West Washington Street. That atrocity, as you may well know, is abortion, the murder of unborn humans.

Mr. Mayor, I move we adjourn.

See how quick that was?

That's a precedent motion. It is. I need to get a second.

So quickly they moved to make a motion. So did you hear what he said? He didn't want to stay and hear this conversation. So this is a chance for a citizen to be able to speak to their council, and the council, they don't want to hear it.

So they just want to close the meeting so that they don't have to hear a person. The guy starts to try to explain, and then watch what happens. Or listen.

Anybody else have a motion on the floor?

I think, you know, it's... From the moment of conception, there is a developing human life. When you want to... Point of order, Mr. Mayor.

Point of order is Mr. Heffernan's making a discussion during a discussion moments of a motion that was made. Please wait until Mr. Heffernan is finished.

So notice that the mayor just told this gentleman that he had to wait until this discussion from one of the council members is finished before he can speak. And there's a motion. He's not allowed to speak until the motion's done.

Let's hear what this guy has to say.

When you want to change a law, it doesn't do any good to go before a body that has no control whatsoever. I mean, we hear this week after week after week in citizens' comments, or month after month, I should say, in citizens' comments.

And this body has absolutely no control. Even if we wanted to do... If we all agreed to do something, there's nothing in the city charter... There's nothing the city can do. This is a federal...

Okay, now here's the fallacy that guy says. He says, well, there's nothing we can do.

Really?

You guys are in control of zoning laws. You guys are the ones that allow them and zone them so that they can use that building for that purpose. You could stop that. You could change the zoning. You can pass a bill that doesn't allow them to do that.

That's something that they have power to do at a local level. So there is something that they could do. They want to play it off like, oh, it's out of our hands. This is federal. He's not saying, I want you to put an end to abortion.

He's saying he wants you to put an end to abortion to a specific address in their town that they have zoned and allowed to function. And they can put a stop to that for their town. There's nothing that says that they can't do that in their town.

And so, does the guy get a chance to speak? Let's find out.

Part of the reason I'm here is because there are...

We have a motion. We have a second. We have a discussion from the body. Any other discussion?

Okay, so he tried to explain himself to this guy that made a comment. He's trying to explain what the mayor do. Go right over and just go, hey, we got procedures. We're in a procedural thing. Let's go.

On the motion to adjourn, I'll say you. Aye. Aye. Okay, we're adjourned.

Okay, so they're adjourned. That's it. They're done. No more. Everyone walks out. And this guy's left standing. That's exactly what we end up seeing over and over again with folks like this. Let me give you some statistics.

I got this from a podcaster from the Audacity to Podcast. His name's Daniel J. Lewis. And on his Facebook, he had some very interesting statistics. So, I'm just going to read this to you. According to Planned Parenthood's own 2017 to 2018 fiscal year report, they performed 332 ,757 abortions during that period.

He provided the source for that. This is only abortions counted by Planned Parenthood. According to the CDC, 638 ,169 abortions were reported in 2015. That is like wiping out the entire population of Las Vegas every year.

Wow, I thought that was a great way that Daniel J. Lewis explained that. Think about that. Explain that to people. That you are wiping out the entire population of Las Vegas every year. That's how many children are being murdered in this country.

And city council goes, we don't want to hear it. We don't want to hear this kind of talk. Daniel J. Lewis goes on to say, that's 1 ,748 lives snuffed out every day. Let that sink in, he said. And before you think that there's no home for all these children, experts estimate there are 1 to 2 million couples every year waiting to adopt.

And yet fewer than 150 ,000 children are actually placed into these homes yearly. And he provides a source for that as well. So he goes on to say, how can humanity ever hope to solve smaller problems if we are savagely killing off the most innocent of us?

How big do these numbers have to get before people do something to stop the genocide? And in the one minute it took you to read this post, during the business hours, 2 to 3 children were murdered in the United States alone.