Developments in the US, Some Tweets I Forgot Tuesday

Opening Reflections on Water, Weather, and the Day’s Mood

So you remember the movie Signs and the little girl with all the half-drunk cups of water around and she wouldn't drink them because they were stale? Well, I've got to get my nice, cold, yummy stuff out of the refrigerator to have for the program and here's one of her red cups.

And you know, it does sort of taste a little stale. I mean, it's just water, but maybe it's the film of dust. I live in the desert, you know, and I bet you anything it has, some of this has dehydrated.

It has evaporated. And so it's probably more salty. I mean, there's a lot of stuff in our water. There's much, much stuff. I remember when Summer came back from Georgia. She was like, I'm back in Arizona and water has a real taste.

Uh-huh.

Yeah.

Oh, yeah. I'm going to need my thing is in the door of the refrigerator there, brother. Please. Unless you just want to put music on for a second while I go get it. There's no reason to do that. Anyway, so Twitter always distracts me right before the program starts.

Government Spending, Transgender Ideology, and the Need for Reform

I like most people in the United States. If you're outside the United States, I apologize for this, even though people outside the United States often follow what's going on here. There is a effort underway.

Yes. There is an effort underway to, I don't know, sort of. Thank you. Yeah, yeah, I'll be best.

That'd be best.

Water a plant with it, though. You know, let's just do something. Do something positive with it. Because the heat's coming. Believe you me, I've felt the sun the past few days. It's gotten up like 87.

So it's like, ah, come on. It's only February. Give us a little more, please, before it starts all over again. There's an effort going on to maybe bring some responsibility to government spending. The United States is $37 trillion in debt.

And most other nations are in similar levels of debt in comparison to GDP. And we've all known that when we pay our taxes, that money is being used by the leftists to promote their own causes. They have to.

People don't support transgender ideology, this kind of stupidity. The standard American goes, no, I do not want a male competing against my daughter in track and field or anything else. The only way you prop that stuff up is to have plenty of money to promote it and convince people that this is what we're all about and this is good and all the rest of the stuff.

And so all this information is coming out. About everybody who's been on the dole, Christianity Today. We're praying for Meg Basham, who wrote that excellent book last year. She's fighting cancer now.

And so we're praying for the Lord to give grace and healing. But she was exactly right as to what's been going on. And it's not just government money. There's money coming from other sources, going into seminaries and Bible colleges and all sorts of ERLC type organizations.

Why the Southern Baptist Convention still even has the ERLC, I have no earthly idea, outside of deep state. And man, if this isn't the year, I forget where they're meeting. I saw it recently. But if, was it Dallas?

If this isn't the year where the SBC pulls the plug on that stuff and gets rid of that stuff, it's going to be all over. Because I mean, it's happening politically in the nation. And a lot of people are very happy about it.

When you find out the amount of money that we have been spending to promote transgenderism in Zambia, this kind of stuff, you're just like, really? Now might be the time to realize that Russell Moore was, as Tom Buck said, a democratic operative and always has been.

And he took a lot of people for a ride and fooled a lot of people. But the people, the ERLC are still his people. And man, it's just time to start fixing this stuff. But look, I'll just be honest with you.

I just don't know if there are enough adults left in the country to turn this ship around. I'll just be honest with you. There's going to have to be some painful decisions made. And there's got to be some sacrifice made.

And there are two nations, minimally two nations, maybe more, living within the borders of the United States. And that other nation has no intention of sacrificing for the future of this country. They want to destroy this country.

They want to be a completely different country. They want to be aligned with the CCP and things like that. So they're not going to sacrifice. And so I just, I get all the vibe stuff that people are talking about right now.

Well, that vibe hit a really sour note this morning. The first thing I see when I get up this morning and hit the computer is Paula White being chosen by Trump. Pastor Paula White. Those words do not go together.

Try impastor Paula White heading up something that Trump is starting on faith or whatever. And I'm just like, oh man, how does, I just think, I just think he chooses her because he thinks she's cute. That's, I don't see any other reason for it.

He has the spiritual discernment of, I don't know what. But anyway, be that as it may, we just, we are seeing lots of stuff. I love seeing the executive order. And I love, man, did you see how fast the NCAA responded?

It's like, oh, okay. All right. No more guys. Oh, no kidding. No more guys in women's sport. What a bunch of cowards. I mean, honestly, if you believe the stuff you were saying before, if you believe the stuff that you were putting out six months ago, you're just going to roll over now and go, oh, okay.

You know what that means? Is when the Democrats win the next election, whenever that will be, I don't know. It just goes right back again. Just you can never, that's why I said starting on inauguration day.

I love the defunding of Planned Parenthood. I love the Mexico City policy. I love, wow, you can actually protect a border. Isn't that amazing? Could have been done for the last four years. It was being purposefully kept open by the Biden regime to change the nature of the United States of America.

There's no question about this. No one can argue that. All you can do is scream at people when they tell the truth about that. Yeah, that's all good stuff, but it's not supposed to be being done this way.

That's my problem. You mark it down. You write it down from inauguration day onward. What I'm saying is if this Constitution and this nation is going to survive, we can't be doing it the way it's being done right now because we aren't electing a president.

We aren't electing a Congress. The Congress, because the left will not be bipartisan, hates the Constitution, violates their oath of office, rights left and center, makes money off the stock market, and all sorts of money laundering in the process.

Because almost half of the elected officials, really more than that when you include the RINOs and all the Republicans that have other priorities other than the nation, the legislative branch is functionally defunct.

So its role has been picked up by the judicial. It wasn't ever supposed to be that way. In essence, every four years we elect a new king. The greatest disadvantage that the United States has over against Russia, over against China, other rising powers like India, the biggest disadvantage that we have is that we can't think long term.

We think in four-year blocks, maybe even two-year blocks. We don't think long term. And they do. They're playing the long game. We play the short game. And as long as it keeps functioning this way, there's nothing we can do about it.

Because all you have is a short game. You can't look at your allies and say, five years from now, this is what we'll do. Because they know you got no idea what your nation's going to be doing five years from now.

Or even worse, in the last two years of Trump's administration, you can't tell somebody that the United States is going to do something consistently 18 months down the road. You can't function that way.

You just can't function that way. We were able to do it once because half the nation wasn't made up of traitors. But this is where we are. So I'm watching some of this stuff coming out. And just the insanity of the left.

What did I say last year? How long would it take before the Democrats would be talking impeachment? Now, I said that if they won the House, that they would be filing charges of impeachment against Trump.

During the inauguration. That's basically what happened. It took them three weeks before you've got this wild eyed crazy man in the House, drawing up articles of impeachment. Why? Because Trump said, well, maybe we'll take over Gaza.

I don't think he really means that. And if he does, he's thinking about making... What did I say? I saw a cartoon. Gazalago. Making it a European holiday destination with casinos and stuff like that. He wants to get it all sort of leveled off so that when he gets out of office, he can sort of take that over and make Gazalago.

Something like that. But that's not impeachable. He hasn't done anything. He talks out loud. He's already taken more questions from the press in three weeks than Joe Biden did in four years. There's no question about that.

So he talks out loud and they're going to... We're going to get him on... Just, I'm sorry. I just don't think we have a functional government. This is not how it's supposed to work. And you can go, yeah, but it's working okay now.

Okay.

Sorry, I think long-term. Once you have kids and once you have grandkids, you start thinking a little more long-term. That makes you go, I'm not so sure about that.

Yeah, yeah, boomer.

It's like, well, okay, you're all still kids too. So anyway, I'm just watching this stuff and it's just absolutely... The stuff they've come out with and the people who have taken money, the churches, what are they doing with it?

Are you talking millions of dollars?

Well, why...

Did you know that we could apply for millions of dollars, Rich?

Why weren't you...

What were you thinking? That's your job, man. I mean, we're sitting here, you know, and it's like, well, it's COVID and it's ugly and people don't know what they're going to do. And hey, let's just go to the government.

And we're not even talking loans, grants, government grants.

Really? Seriously?

What did they have to do to get that money? That's what I want to know. Or what will they do? Yeah, yeah, yeah, yeah, yeah. Always follow the money. You know, someday in eternity, we're going to see all the bank accounts will be turned over to the heavenly doge.

And we're going to see where the money came from, where it went. And I'm just glad that this is still a small ministry. Big reach, but, you know, it's just me and Rich. And we don't have properties and all the rest of that kind of stuff out there.

It's just us and our little old office. And so we're not owned by anybody. And that allows me to say what I need to say, even when that makes a lot of people really not happy at all. So anyways, I forgot a couple things on Tuesday.

I apologize. I forget what the context was, but... Oh, just a few hours ago, I was following a link on Twitter, Tony Costa. I did an hour and 45 minutes, I think, with Tony last night on the Septuagint, Masoretic Text, stuff like that, live on YouTube.

And I reposted the link, if you want to catch all that. And Tony was responding to somebody who had asked him, he had made a comment about a Lutheran who had said something about the Septuagint. And I knew he was talking about Corey Mahler.

We talked about Corey Mahler. And so I was following up on the comments of that, and I ended up on Corey Mahler's timeline on Twitter. And I made the comment, because I started reading through, the racist, and I mean just the old standard definition of racist, color of skin based animus.

I had seen somebody posting stuff about what they were saying about sub-Saharan Africa, and they were mocking black Africans. And I mean, these people, what I commented, I said, Corey Mahler is clearly running for the Grand Wizard of the KKK.

Because you just read his timeline, just today, just past 48 hours. And it's just filled. I don't know how, I think he has been shut down by Twitter in the past. But he keeps coming back. Evidently, you can say whatever you darn well please on Twitter right now, and you're not going to get shut down.

And that's what he's doing. But someone, in responding to that, a couple of people, and this is why it's significant to me, a couple of people responding to what I'd said, which is just simply a factual observation of the vile stuff that Corey Mahler spews on a regular daily basis, while claiming to be a Christian and bringing the word of God to the people, and all the rest of this cultic blather that he does.

A couple people said, so why are you doing the same thing and lying about Stephen Wolfe and saying he's the same thing as Corey Mahler? And when two people say that, that are allegedly not the same people, I start going, huh.

Because no rational person says that. A rational person knows I've not made that connection. I've not made that accusation. When I responded to Stephen Wolfe on Tuesday, I put the entirety of his statement in big, bold letters on my screen, read all of it in context, and never once said this is the same thing as Corey Mahler.

So it's a lie. And so you sit there and you go, okay, why do people start lying? Were they told to do this? Is this how this works? Is, okay, we don't want to respond to what he said. So what we'll do is we'll start a narrative, a new narrative, to sort of blow smoke across the real issues that were brought up.

Maybe that's how it works. So maybe these people, I didn't spend the time to go look. I can pretty much guarantee there were sub 200 follower and on accounts. But it does make you wonder if that's not exactly how it works.

Stephen Wolfe on Climate Change and Biblical Theology

Okay, we've got a problem with that last program. It's going to be really hard to respond to it in any meaningful fashion. In fact, we'll never do that. Wolfe has said a couple of things. But again, not interacting with the substance.

He can't interact with the biblical substance. He would never do that. He knows better than to do that. And so all you get from Wolfe since Tuesday is, I'm the one representing the historic reform perspective.

That's all he wants to give. He's not going to engage text to scripture. He's not going to engage anything else that I said in defending a Christian worldview analysis and the necessity of doing that in a secular world and the consistency of doing that from a reform perspective.

Any of that stuff. He's just not going to go there. Was there something that I... No? Okay. So you just, but you have to say something just enough to keep your followers going, yeah, yeah, but without actually doing the work of doing any kind of interaction with it.

But I did find it fascinating. So there were two screens, I even left them up since Tuesday, that I forgot to get to on Tuesday. Would have made us go somewhat longer, but it would have fit better then.

But I want to get to them today. And I apologize for having forgotten them. They're back behind my Accordance Bible software. Out of sight, out of mind. So I closed, I dropped the Accordance window, I was like, oh, forgot that.

One was a Stephen Wolf tweet where he says, in my judgment, the claims of climate change are exaggerated. And the policies proposed to fix it are absurd. But we Protestants, it's a rather general term there.

You know, I should put those someplace, like out of the camera view. Because the problem is, yeah, yeah, there, see, it doesn't look quite as...

Yeah, there you go.

I have these things in my ears now, which means I can't put other things in my ears now.

Do you need me to bring my wife down here and have her tidy?

Yeah, sure, sure.

You realize you don't need to.

Could you bring her to the RV that Monday?

You realize you won't be able to find anything for the rest of...

Trust me, trust me, that's my life at home. The reason I have 10 of everything is because the first nine were put in a good place that I would never ever think to look.

You forget, we all know where my wife puts things.

That's true, that's true. They're in the Phoenix City dump.

Or the Goodwill.

Oh, okay, yeah.

Goodwill loves my wife. They call and go, is she all right? We haven't seen you for a while.

We have a Goodwill near us, and yes. Yes, the Goodwill near us knows us and the Ross near us has a single lane that says Kelly on it. It's just for returns.

But the rule of thumb in our house, remember?

Oh, yeah, if you haven't worn it in six months, it goes by.

If you haven't used it for six months yet, don't need it. And out it goes.

But there is a logical problem there. We live in Arizona. So six months is summer. So there are two months when it can get cold.

Yes.

How do you? No, never mind. Let me get back to what I was doing here. All right, but we Protestants must stop applying, quote, biblical theology, end quote, to questions that can only be understood fundamentally in their own domains.

So this was before the long thing that he wrote. In fact, I would imagine that it was to push back on this. He was attacking the Biblical Theology of Climate Change book that I'm pretty sure was published by G3.

And so he was mocking it. He said it was, yeah, he says in this, this is the tweet where he says it was dumb to say things like that. But we Protestants must stop applying biblical theology to questions that can only be understood fundamentally in their own domains.

So climate change is not a theological question, is what he's saying. Do carbon emissions warm the earth or cause more catastrophic weather events is not a theological question. It's a question of science and to the scientific investigation.

Think that we can dismiss such questions by appealing to theology has frankly made us dumb and also unwilling to enter these fields. Not every question can be answered by simply having the right and then very last word, quote, worldview, end quote.

So this was the background for the longer thing that we examined last time. And so I should have, I don't know, I probably should have brought it up even before the other one and it would have flowed a little bit more accurately.

But again, I defended the Biblical Theology of Climate Change book by specifically pointing out that the domain that is climate science, well, one thing is very obvious, the domain that is climate science is corrupt and it's been corrupted by money.

Oh, and the money is a root of all sorts of evil. Where'd we get that from?

Scripture.

And when we analyze the data and we can go back and find entire months, a hundred years ago, that are warmer than they are today, even though the carbon dioxide level was significantly lower, we need to have an understanding of natural law that comes from creation to be able to even begin to analyze that.

It's not being analyzed right now. It's just being used for political purposes, being used to enrich China, which builds all the wind farms, which take fossil fuels to actually lubricate them and keep them running.

And then when they fall apart, we have to bury them in the.

Ground.

And it's just, it's complete societal suicide. It's ridiculous. But all that could be analyzed on the basis of things like Romans one and why men are doing what men are doing to other men, because that's really what's behind all this stuff.

Mankind has lived since creation, recognizing that God's the ones in control, the wind and the waves. Um, he causes, uh, you, you, you see in scripture, he brings drought and famine as judgment upon Israel.

He's in charge of the weather. Uh, it's, it's not outside of his purview. That's theology. Um, and of course, then you still have this, the standard misrepresentation thing that we can dismiss such questions by appealing to theology.

No one's, no one's dismissing questions by appealing to theology. We're saying that the analysis of the data is under the realm of theology, that when you analyze data as a Christian and have a Christian worldview, and you, you look at God's world as God's world, rather than looking at the world as if it's a random result of natural processes.

And then you try to slather a little bit of religiosity over here in the corner to make you feel a little bit better when you get close to death. Um, that's not the Christian way. That's not the Christian way.

So this really, this was, uh, February 1st. Uh, so this was five days ago. Well, okay. I'll take that back. That's when I screenshot it, whether that's exactly when it was written or not. I don't know.

Um, but you know, when he says it's a question of science answered through scientific investigation, uh, I would like to think that Stephen Wolfe is aware of the fact that one's view of creation has a massive impact on what one even identifies as scientific investigation.

I remember when I, um, I've told the story before, but it's been a number of years when I graduated from college, I was a double major Bible and biology. And, uh, I was department fellow, anatomy and physiology studied genetics, uh, got a, got a decent science background.

It was a long, long time ago now, but I've kept up with some of it. And, um, so one of the first books that I read after I graduated was Dawkins, the blind watchmaker, because it was sort of a, you know, there were a lot of people talking about it and the challenge that it made to, uh, any kind of biblical creationism.

And by the way, someone said, you, you're assuming all this.

Stuff about Stephen Wolfe.

And what they were talking about was, I had said, I asked the question on the program, uh, is he a biologos guy? And no one, no one has answered that. I guess I'm just going to have to put it straight out there.

Uh, is he a biologos guy? Is, is he a creationist? I, I'd like to know it, it, it would be interesting to have that kind of information when we're talking about stuff like this. Um, but, uh, I read the blind watchmaker and I didn't have any Christian responses to it.

This was before the internet, um, before Al Gore decided that we were going to no longer have any snow. And all the rest of that guys up, um, he was inventing the internet at the time. He was very busy with that.

Um, and, and we all need to thank him for inventing the internet. Um, but as I read Dawkins presentation of neo-Darwinian micromutational evolutionary theory, having just graduated, uh, with a major in biology and only a few months earlier, I had been taking my senior boards, my, uh, biology professors who were not, who while claiming to be Christians were not creationists.

They were evolutionists. They were Darwinian, um, theistic evolutionists, uh, you know, throwing all sorts of questions at me and I'm drawing the Krebs cycle and electron chain transport and all that kind of stuff on the, on the board.

And, uh, had been doing genetics work, uh, only a matter of months earlier as I'm reading Dawkins, I come to conclusion. This doesn't work because biological, um, you know, the structures of the cell body are complex.

They're not made up of just one step at a time. There can be literally in some instances, for example, in the eyes, there can be hundreds of things that have to come together in the exact right way to have the function that you, that you have and the neo-Darwinian model of a, of a mutation.

Um, you couldn't have enough mutations happen randomly to give any kind of, uh, advantage in reproduction. And so you might have amazing mutations take place and there's this one animal in this one species that has, you know, 40 of what it needs to build this new body part.

And it just randomly gets killed by a falling rock.

You know what I mean?

Because again, their person, you know, they, they cannot have providence. You can't have God doing any of this kind of stuff from a Dawkins perspective. And so you get startled over again. And so I had come to that conclusion reading the book.

And I remember I flew over to Albuquerque. I don't remember where I went, uh, but it's one of the first times I've flown to Albuquerque to speak on a, I don't remember what topic it was. And over lunch, um, I was talking with some guys and I was telling them about what I had figured out on my own reading Dawkins.

And they, they said, you're talking about intelligent design irreducible complexity. I said, yeah, what, what? And they introduced me to the first few books on that subject. I had come to that conclusion on my own and I had come to that conclusion, analyzing the data from a Christian worldview and had come to the same conclusion that many other people have come to, uh, along those specific lines.

And so, you know, when it, when Wolf talks about scientific investigation, that is a theological, there is a, there's theological, there are theological presuppositions underneath that. Did you lock the truck?

Oh, you'll do that right now for me.

Appreciate that.

I'm, I don't, I just looked over at my keys and I went, Rich was, uh, working on something in the truck and, um, we live in Phoenix. So, um, all of a sudden it struck me and I'm like, yeah, let's make sure the, uh, the truck is locked.

Um, so sorry about that live program. So anyways, there are presuppositions of scientific investigation. The other tweet, uh, that I had had does sort of fit into something. Um, this was a couple of weeks earlier.

This is, I screenshot this on the 24th. Of, uh, January. And it's from Pastor Eric Kahn up in Ogden. And he says, the PWC crowd, a PWC is the post-war consensus. Uh, Wilson, White, Berry et al, has been imploding at warp speed.

Likely because they are losing so badly and getting desperate. They were relevant for a second because of COVID, but now their moment has slipped away. This is January 23rd, 2025. Now, um, as you know, there is a conference coming up in April and Stephen Wolfe is the, sort of the big speaker at this conference, but, uh, Pastor Kahn's going to be there and Brian Salve, uh, going to be.

There.

And, um, as far as I can tell, Calvin Robinson is still going to be there. As far as I can tell. Now I had, I had a friend contact me and say that he had heard that wasn't the case, but I'm like, I haven't heard that.

And something tells me that if his name and image disappeared off of that website, there'd be a lot of people talking about it. Um, maybe you could look up the, uh, Christ is King defeating trash world thing in Google and see if the current website still has him.

Because last time I checked, he's still on it. Um, I don't know why, what happened with the Anglican Catholic Church, ACC, which in of itself historically is an interesting phraseology. Uh, still there?

Yeah. Rich says still there. Um, I can't see why what happened with his being de-licensed and basically kicked out of the ACC, which I think I didn't take the time to count, count.

It.

I had read the article that he wrote about ordination. I think that was minimally the third group that he's been with in the past two years. And, you know, he could defend that on various grounds, whatever.

Um, but I can't see how what they did would actually impact his participation, um, with the group in April. If anything, it would just make him more of a sort of a martyr figure. Um, because if you're not knowing what I'm talking about, in fact, I don't know whether I talked about this at all, but Calvin Robinson, um, who we talked about a few weeks ago, and he, he went and did a, um, a webcast with, uh, Anthony Catholicism on, uh, on Twitter.

And they played some clips from the sermon that I did where I used Calvin Robinson as a sermon illustration. It was a hour plus long sermon. And that sermon illustration was, you know, three minutes, but, uh, obviously they hadn't actually listened to the sermon.

Uh, certainly, uh, Robinson hadn't and man, they're just going at it and they're just, just slandering me right, left, and center. I even contacted the Anthony guy on Twitter. I said, will you come on the program and defend what you said about me on your webcast?

I'll think about it. I'll get back to you. Haven't heard a word. Just a poof gone. Um, because it was painfully obvious that neither him nor Robinson had actually listened to the sermon and I don't think they'd want to, uh, to be honest with you.

Um, I was dealing with other issues, but I was dealing with Marian issues and that's something I've been doing for years and years and years. Uh, there's nothing new about that. This was just a modern example of what happens with this kind of stuff.

So anyway, as far as I can tell, he's still on the roster, uh, for, uh, for April, uh, at the, um, at the conference. So, so these, so I have been saying what you're going to see is you're going to see an alignment of the people that are speaking at this conference, uh, against, well, basically the people they used to have speaking at their conferences, uh, so they can make that break.

I've said, I believe sometime in November, December, the, the decision was made. We're not going to have anything to do with those folks anymore. We're, we're going to go ahead and go after them. Now, uh, we're going to send the Anon army after.

Them.

Um, we have said in the past, Doug Wilson, Joe boot, James white. These have been people who've given us great guidance by the law. We're, we're dumping all that. And they are now according to pastor con the PWC crowd.

Now I'll mention it again. Um, that's empty verbiage. It's a glowing screen, glowing letters on a screen that have no meaning. Um, I am no more a post-war consensus crowd member, uh, than I am a loony Democrat.

Okay. Um, so that that's like, what's the term now? Dog whistle. That's the thing that you use to, to get your unthinking followers to start barking. Um, and that's what the PWC thing is, you know, when they define Hitler bad.

Um, okay. Uh, so evidently the PWC crowd is imploding at warp speed. I'm not sure what that's really supposed to.

Mean.

Um, but that that's, you know, you throw that out there, keep your people excited and keep them beating the war drums and doing their Anon stuff and things like that. Uh, and because we're losing so badly and getting desperate, I'm not sure what we're losing at.

Cause I can't get these guys to engage with any kind of biblical argumentation or anything like that. And the reality is what I have predicted is taking place right now. What have I predicted? I've predicted that there's going to be changes, uh, taking place in their own theological formulations.

So as to come together in this movement. And of course, some of them anyways, um, had different theologies in the past and then adopted, uh, a reformed presuppositional post-millennial theonomic perspective.

We're real excited about that for a while. Uh, but now they're moving away from that. And I think, uh, a clip showed up, I think this morning on Twitter that demonstrates that they know that they're moving their theology.

They know they're changing their theology and they're sort of preparing people. They've learned from what Jehovah's Witnesses did when, when the witnesses totally blew the, uh, prophecy, the 75 prophecy, uh, years and years ago that Christ was going to.

Return.

And that didn't happen. They lost a million people over the next few years from their organization. Now they change theology slowly. They prepare people for a change in theology before they actually make the change in.

Theology.

And so I think we're seeing the preparation right now. Well, you know, you, you know, once you're, once you're convinced you were wrong about something, you need to, you need to admit that you were wrong and that you, um, okay.

So I think what we're going to see is a movement toward a Wolfian, um, non-Ventilian, non-presuppositional, non-Christian worldview, non-post-millennial, non-theonomic, um, perspective that will allow you to adopt the sacral Christian Prince type stuff, uh, without the revivalism that Stephen Wolf talks about.

Revivalism, the Puritan hope, stuff that these guys had been talking about not very.

Long ago.

Uh, but I've decided that, um, that Puritan hope stuff, Puritans were a long time ago. They didn't even have the internet. And so, uh, they were really thinking long term and that's just not going to get the clicks, you know, that's, that's not going to keep the Anon army, Anoning, uh, on our side.

And, uh, so let's, let's go a different direction. Uh, and it's, it's going to happen. Just, just watch, just watch. Now, how long that's going to hold together as some type of a movement, I can't imagine it'd be very long because I'm not sure how big it really is.