Debunking Evolution Clip: Cladograms

1 view

This short feature points out that evolutionary "tree charts" aren't really fact. To view the complete Debunking Evolution series, please visit: www.DebunkEvolution.com

0 comments

00:09
So, we could organize it as simplest to most complex. Or by color.
00:17
See, organization just is not my thing. Once my little sister asked me to organize all her little tiny plastic animals, it took me two days.
00:25
Organizing animals. It's like Carl Linnaeus. Who's that? Yeah, he was the first guy to classify animals.
00:32
Oh, oh, yeah, I remember him now. His motto was, God created, Linnaeus ordered.
00:39
Yeah, his work is the basis for the classification system we still use today. Later, Charles Darwin sketched a diagram to show how life started simple and then branched out to every creature on Earth.
00:50
He said the different branches represent the different levels of classification. A tree of life, if you will.
00:56
Oh yeah, I keep seeing this over and over again in our textbooks. Really? Yeah. Here we go, check out this one.
01:08
Are researchers still trying to figure out how it happened? There are a lot more of these diagrams.
01:13
I think they change as different researchers group them based on different features.
01:19
These charts show groups of organisms they believe share a common ancestor. Yeah, a group like that is called a clade.
01:26
And these diagrams are called cladograms. Hmm, man, and I thought organizing my makeup was hard.
01:35
So do they. Well, not your makeup, classifying animals. Okay, so remember that modern evolutionary classification is a rapidly changing science with a difficult goal, to present all life on a single evolutionary tree.
01:51
As evolutionary biologists study relationships among taxa, they regularly change not only the way organisms are grouped, but also sometimes the name of groups.
02:03
Remember that cladograms are visual presentations of hypotheses about relationships and not hard and fast facts.
02:10
Whoa, whoa, whoa. You're saying our textbooks say that cladograms are based off hypotheses, not facts.
02:18
Yeah, I'll show you why. Flip forward a page. That's because they only have living animals or fossils for certain places on the branches.
02:27
These are real animals or fossils we've actually discovered. But these branching points are just imaginary lines that represent the hypotheses about which animals evolved from a common ancestor.
02:40
No facts support them that can't also support different links, or no links. The transitional fossils they represent have never been found.
02:49
If they were, well, we'd see their pictures here, right? Though evolutionists point to a few examples, there should be thousands.