Search: Objective Idealism

Analyzing…

Generated by AI. Please verify important details.Beta

863 results

1:12:03

Presup & Objective Idealism: Presuppers Respond

Revealed Apologetics

over 2 years ago

26:21

Subjective idealism is most often associated with Bishop Berkeley and the empiricist tradition.

6:03

Response to TBS on the TAG Argument Pt. 1 of 2

CARM

about 17 years ago

0:55

These laws are absolute, transcendent, and conceptual by nature. Now, we must ask if either or both of the two worldviews in question can rationally provide the necessary conditions to account for logical absolutes.

32:31

Presup REFUTED? #presup #apologetics #theology #TAG

Revealed Apologetics

over 2 years ago

6:30

Existence is metaphysically primary and conceptually irreducible. All concept formation is ultimately grounded in Existence. No God needed. So why don't we need God to ground existence or ground anything else?

28:00

48 - Anselm's Ontological Argument

AOM

Alpha & Omega Ministries

over 8 years ago

22:04

Obviously the the primary Criticism has focused upon the idea that Existence in reality is a great making property as well as the fact that you are utilizing a definition of God that fundamentally says that God is that which no being could be conceived of it would be greater.

10:59

Debate: Does God Exist? # 1

CARM

over 17 years ago

7:42

I propose that logical absolutes are Conceptual realities that do not depend upon human minds or the physical universe for their existence since they're conceptual Absolute and transcends space and time there must be an absolute and transcendent mind from which these logical logical absolutes are derived.

1:44:24

Amillennialism Baptist Covenant Idealism

OAT

Open Air Theology

about 2 years ago

1:04:01

What's what's the difference real quick in idealism and modified historical of idealism? So like in. So just to give you an.

56:14

Argument for God from Logic for DUMMIES

Revealed Apologetics

almost 2 years ago

39:49

And if propositions exist as abstract truths, they must reside in an eternal mind. So the argument goes, a mind that is capable of conceiving and sustaining all necessary and universal truths. And so this point, according to this argument, points directly to God.

31:23

Apologetics Class 5 - Textbook Discussion

SGF

Sovereign Grace Family Church

about 5 years ago

15:31

There are no standards in your world view. Everyone must acknowledge a highest moral norm and where does the highest moral principle get its authority? Impersonal realities, that is a material world, a material universe, cannot create ought since we cannot derive an ought, a prescription from what is a description.

1:08:00

Apologetics Session 4 - Truth - Part 2

Cornerstone Church

over 4 years ago

58:23

The ultimate cause of motion, according to Aristotle, must be rooted in a pure being, pure actuality. It must be eternal, immaterial, and immutable. That is the truth and that is Aristotle's concept of something that is outside space and time and has created the physical world.

7:26

Presuppositional Apologetics Applied to Plato

Revealed Apologetics

about 5 years ago

5:43

We actually, as Dr. James Anderson has said, we have what it takes to pay the bills on the claim. You see, if you posit a platonic presupposition with respect to the idealistic realm and things like that, if you hypothetically grant the truth of that perspective, but you have no revelatory connection between the idealistic realm and the phenomenal realm, then on your own principle, you couldn't even know if that's true.

1:48:37

(Debate): Does God Exist?

Revealed Apologetics

almost 7 years ago

1:38:55

I think we see that once you grant the hypothetical truth of pragmatism Human reasoning and experience is in fact undermined since you can't make any objective Statements about reality yet on the one hand I think the pragmatist does run amok and does make these statements about objective reality.

3:53

Can Presuppers Escape from Brain in the Vat Scenarios?

Revealed Apologetics

about 5 years ago

1:41

Axioms are unjustifiable, and so anyone can pick any axioms. You've just chosen matter in motion, I exist.

4:42

The Failure of Atheism to Account for Rationality

CARM

about 17 years ago

1:09

But, of course, this is not a rational argument, and you and I both know that it isn't. In the Christian worldview, the universal truth statements are derived from God. These universal truth statements, like the law of identity, are conceptual by nature.

1:00:42

Apologetics Session 3 - Truth - Part 1

Cornerstone Church

over 4 years ago

36:16

Pragmatists say they live in a physical world with no concept of absolute truth or morality. We do what we feel is right.

53:45

Practical Presup Explained & Employed Pt. 2

Reformed Rookie

over 3 years ago

16:02

Who's reality? Mine, Hitler's, Jeffrey Dahmer's, Mother Teresa's? Who's reality? If it's subjective, reality is how I perceive it. If it's objective, ah, now we have an obligation. So on an atheistic worldview, who am I obligated to?

14:18

Problems with Presuppositionalism: Two Brothers Talk it Out

Revealed Apologetics

almost 5 years ago

0:29

Yeah, I actually think presuppositionalism would not have come into existence had it not been for post -Kantian skepticism. That would have meant you can't do it. With Rene Descartes, all of a sudden, rather than metaphysical realism, you had epistemological dualism, where you separate your idea of the object, of the perceived object, and the object itself.

9:05

Impossibility of the Contrary Explained

Revealed Apologetics

about 3 years ago

0:51

Now that's the claim, of course, right? But the transcendental argument seeks to do that. But what do we mean? Let's kind of break apart this idea of the impossibility of the contrary. When we say that something is true by the impossibility of the contrary, this refers to the impossibility of, say, truth.

57:53

Materialism Vs. Mathematics: Why Math Needs God!

Revealed Apologetics

over 1 year ago

11:59

That's why Plato would say that these are shadows. They're not the perfect. They reflect in an imperfect way the perfect, okay? Now, Platonic realism does, I think, a good job explaining why universals don't change.

8:16

The Transcendental Argument for the Existence of God

CARM

over 17 years ago

6:53

Besides, if they did stop being true and dependable, then they would not be absolute. To summarize, logical absolutes are conceptual, absolute and transcendent. Now, I need to ask a question. Isn't it logical to conclude that a person's thoughts reflect his mind, that he thinks in a manner consistent with what he is?

10:53

Debate: Does God Exist? # 8

CARM

over 17 years ago

8:25

I defined it. Gave three principles that we have of logical absolutes. Then defined that since these things are transcendent and conceptual by nature, therefore, since we don't have concepts that exist without a mind, we must have a mind that reflects those transcendent conceptual entities.