Keep sharing good news without ads.
Eli welcomes back Sye Ten Bruggencate to the Youtube scene to talk about presuppositional apologetics, doubt, and related topics. To watch my past interview with Sye, click here: https://youtu.be/BYGbHwi1JhM
Welcome back to another episode of Revealed Apologetics. I'm your host Eli Ayala and today if you saw the thumbnail that is correct I have my special guest with me Saiten Bruggenkate who has been missing in action for a while but he's gonna share a little bit about what's been going on with him and then we're gonna jump right into our our topic and of course we're gonna be touching on other more broader issues relating to presuppositional apologetics.
So as you guys know who follow my channel we talk about apologetics in general presuppositional apologetics in particular and today presupp is going to be our main focus. So if you've been blessed by the content of this channel please like the video, share the video, go on iTunes, write a positive review if you enjoyed the podcast all those things are super helpful for me personally and encouraging to know that folks are really finding the content beneficial.
I just real quick by way of announcement as much as I'm super excited about my guest today on February 16th I'm also excited about my guest Brant Bosserman who was on the show a while back but he is gonna come on with me to talk about the philosophical problem of the one and the many and so Bosserman is an expert in the area of the Trinity and how that relates to presuppositionalism and how that relates to like the transcendental argument and demonstrating how we know it is the triune God that we're demonstrating when we're using presuppositional forms of argumentation and things like that so you are not gonna want to miss that episode that is February 16th I believe 9 p .m. Eastern so definitely tune in for that.
Now real quick before I invite I invite Sai on the screen with me as always I'm going to be taking questions so if you have any questions put them in the comments and preface your question with question or cue something that will help me differentiate the questions and the comments so I know that folks who haven't seen Sai for a while you probably have a billion questions or maybe a couple of questions but he'll be more than happy to address them so without further ado we've got a few people watching now and let me invite Sai on the screen with me.
How's it going brother? Doing well brother. Okay so all right so you and Bigfoot hold the championship the title for hide-and-seek right can't find Bigfoot folks haven't seen you around either and I'm sure folks are super curious as to how are you how you doing you know what was going on you can share as much as you'd like or you know you don't have to go into too much details but why don't you tell folks where you've been how you've been and and then we'll take the.
Conversation from there. Well it's definitely been a roller coaster over the last year for sure and I'd first I want to start by thanking Eli for having me on today. I know that there's gonna be some people that are gonna be upset to see me and but by the response that I've been getting on Facebook and that the majority are very thankful to see me again and I want to tell people that through this ordeal I know that Facebook is and can be a cesspool but my Facebook friends most of whom I've never met have shown me a far greater support than people who have been close to me who I would have expected it from and you know when the news broke almost a year ago to the day it was my Facebook friends who came forward and at the time the support for me was 100 and they had no idea what had happened why I had stepped away from ministry and to this day many people have no idea why I stepped away and yet they supported me they trusted me and I'm so thankful for those people.
You have no idea I mean I saved all the comments before I deleted my page and I have them and I'm just so thankful for the support that people have shown. And one thing I want to preface like I have no qualms with people knowing exactly every to the minute detail why I stepped away.
But there are people who'll be very upset that I did and I really don't. You know I don't want to upset them but I am an apologist. An apologist gives a defense now one thing that I've found in this year of being away is that when you give a defense of things that are false that people tend to think that you're not repentant of that which is true.
So that's why I'm very reluctant to give a detailed account of what happened and what my defense is because then there are elements out in the society who say that well you know you're not not repentant what was actually the case but you know in a summary and some of this I've shared in my statements first of all I want to say that I am here with the full support of my session and my new pastor and when I say new pastor I've seen atheists and people online think that I left my church that I left my church that I'm under a new church now and that they're much more easy on me than my previous church was.
That's not the case. I am still attending the same church but the pastor and session have changed since then for reasons that right now will be unnamed but but they left and but as far as the details go almost a year ago I was contacted by people that I didn't know and they had brought up a relationship that I had which started five years ago and they said that there were things that happened in that relationship most of what they alleged was false and some of what they alleged was indeed true but what they had done is they took these false allegations and the true ones and they shared them with dear friends of mine who are quite influential in the Christian community and they said to me that if you do not end your ministry we will go public and these people are you know these friends of mine are fully behind this exposition of you of being whatever and if you don't if you don't step down immediately we're going to destroy you destroy your minute what you know whatever the case was and I said to these to this fellow I said look um you're not my authority.
The people that you have contacted are not my authority either. You have to get in touch with my pastor and I gave him my pastor's information and my pastor sat down with the pastor that I was dealing with in Texas and my session and they thought based on the accusation that they had heard which I hadn't even seen like the actual accusation from the person I hadn't seen and I didn't actually see it for actually over a month but they said that I should come home and the statement that I posted on Facebook was that I was disqualified from ministry and what I want to say is the statement that I posted was verbatim what my pastor asked me to post.
I wanted to say so much more but I was not allowed to and as much as that bothered me at the time. In retrospect I'm very thankful for the Lord you know he works wonderfully because one thing that I think that if I had said more then it would have appeared as though I was giving a defense against that which was true and that I was not repentant of that which was true and so the fact that I didn't say anything a lot of people came to my defense a lot of people who know the details and I know that you know the details as well came to my defense and that's why.
Again why I want to thank Eli because you have been there from the beginning I mean we've talked we've had conversations and it's been really wonderful but so this was about a relationship that I had now one thing I want to as well say to the people you know who have followed me who have loved me through this and I'm so thankful for that.
But I want to tell people and the reason that I want to give this little bit of detail it's not in defense because I am guilty of that which I'm guilty and I'm 100 responsible of that which I'm guilty of.
But you know there are people who thought that my sin occurred while I was out doing my apologetics work that I might be doing a talk one day or debate one day and then go and sin the next day. That was not the case this woman that I had met and many of you know and it was not my last relationship you know she was actually wonderful during this process although our relationship had ended prior to that.
But so this the accusation that this woman that I had met I had given up my apologetics work to marry her we were in a committed relationship that does not excuse our sin at all. It does not excuse our sin.
But we were in a committed relationship and we sinned we failed sexually morally we failed and we repented of it at the time in tears and that is not to give anybody license to sin. It was wicked and and and I think you know I can sympathize with people who think that fornication deserves a permanent disqualification from ministry.
I sympathize with that but one thing I want to state is that I'm not a pastor and I'm not an elder and I'm not a deacon and I submit that I want people to show me in Scripture why me as a and as somebody who answers apologetic questions or defends the faith in the public forum cannot do this after a sin that I've repented of and I I can sympathize with people who believe that that's the case.
But I submitted 100 to my session. My session called me back to Canada and the process was actually quite long. You know they were doing investigation they were looking into allegations and I think that they were satisfied that the allegation that the majority of them were not true but the fornication was indeed true and they wrestled with whether I was barred permanently from doing anything with apologetics and you know if they had said that from the beginning clearly people who know what's going on they didn't see the statement from my pastor or the session from the beginning that that that was the case so they wrestled with it and then sadly shortly after my session actually was removed from the church there was a statement made that I was no longer repented.
They don't. They'd already given the public statement that I had repented and there was a bit of a blow-up at my church and it was a really a sad situation still a sad situation. But then it was handed over to the new session and the new pastor and the blow up in my church had nothing to do with my situation but I sat down with the new pastor new session and they were very kind and you know they loved me and they they went through this as well and they affirmed that I was repented of this sin from you know however many years ago and so I mean I was already restored from the previous session and they they gave a statement recently and I'm actually on I have built a website in which I gave a defense of the false accusations but I haven't shared publicly and I have no intention of sharing that publicly.
If you go to Proverbs 1817 .com that's Proverbs 1817 .com slash statement you can see the statement from my pastor and session from the last meeting that I am restored now as far as how ministry looks going forward first of all the one thing about my denomination is that what I do is not technically ministry because I'm not ordained so I am just a regular member of my church.
I'm not a pastor I'm not a deacon. So the question is can you prevent regular members from going on YouTube and making a video or evangelizing and somebody pulls out a camera and making the video. Now there are some people who would argue that biblically that I'm disqualified from doing that and I sympathize with that.
I simply disagree with it and you know they might cite that the elder and deacon which I am NOT needs to be beyond reproach but I submit that that cannot mean without sin because then nobody could be an elder or deacon.
Now I'm one thing I shared with my previous pastor if that means I'm disqualified permanently from being an elder or a deacon although I would disagree with that I can sympathize with that. But so with my church now I'm a member in good standing and I asked my pastor specifically if I could have this conversation online about doubt and yeah he was actually enthusiastic about me going online now.
Eli you're a dear friend and a dear brother you might get people come out and say no sigh you should be out of the scene permanently. You know I sympathize that you might get you know even these friends of mine who have some influence might come out with a public statement.
That's fine. I mean they can do that. And I what I don't know people are what I shared with these people is to is that they will never be my enemy. Sure. And um and the thing is people cannot make me feel worse about myself than I already do.
You know that's what Spurgeon said when people speak ill of you don't be angry because you're far worse than anything they can allege. And I believe that to be the case. And people have said well what is your engagement with atheists gonna look like in the future when they bring up this sin of yours.
And you know even my pastor he said because they had a website they had a email address available for anybody to email and with any if there any other allegations which there were none. By the way it was this isolated incident and he said how should I respond to these people.
I said share the gospel with them. I said a wonderful opportunity to show what sin repentance and restoration looks like and I believe that's the case as well. So if I go to a university campus and engage unbelievers and they bring this instance up I have no problem with that.
I mean prior to my the this apologetic work I call it now absolute apologetics. Prior to that I used to call it sinner ministries and it was that I was engaging sinners is that I was the sinner and my logo was a big eye with a plank in it.
And then people said well you're not a sinner anymore and they said technically you're a saint who sins. And so I changed the name of the ministry. But I mean you cannot speak worse of me than I already feel about myself.
So you know that doesn't bother me. If people want to go online and say I'm this I'm that. But I have a passion for sharing my faith. I have a passion for teaching explaining to Christians how to share their faith biblically at that if they feel that you know because of my sin they don't want to hear from me anymore.
They don't want me to talk to that's fine. But most of my Facebook friends for example have been 100 behind me and I want to. I won't don't want to share the name of the family on whose property I'm now.
But they have been incredible for me they have been so loving and so kind and I really don't know what I would have done without them. So if they're watch end up watching this I want them to know how much I love them and thank them for this and a lot of this you know my patreon friends and my patreon friends actually they've supported me through all this and well 25 of them have and and I and the people who have left my patron support you know I I don't you know because one thing that I said from the beginning is I never want to be a charity case.
So when I do apologetics I want people to support me for the work that I do and the Lord has said no you're gonna be a charity case. So I hope that that's not the case for for the future. But my patron friends know that this is not the only struggle I have in my life that I looked after my mother for many years and after she passed away well she decided to leave the estate to me.
The estate you know that's just the name of it doesn't mean that it's a huge amount but four of my six siblings decided to sue me for my estate for it for my mother's estate. I should say okay that case is ongoing.
It was actually supposed to be heard last month and because of kovat pushed to October so you know it's it's been a roller coaster and it's been tough. But one thing I want you to tell I want to tell you is that God is good throughout all of this my faith never wavered.
And one thing that I want to share with people who said that the biggest struggle that I've had in my Christian walk throughout my life other than complacency is the idea that God loves me. And this struggle this this more than anything else has shown me that God does in fact love me because he could have left me alone he could have left me doing my apologetics talks you know around North America he could have left me with the support that I was getting but he said no.
So you're coming home and I and I'm gonna put you through this trial and I don't want to make it sound as though God is putting me through this trial. I'm 100 responsible for my sin that ended me in this trial.
Sure. And when I read scripture too I think of the trials of Job and people like that and I can't relate to that because they were righteous people. And I know what I am you know I just I just it did not affect my faith even the day that I got the phone call from these people that I don't know the day that I got that phone call it was filled with.
I believe were you know many false accusation of course some true ones I got on my knees that night and I thank God not only in the trial but for it. I don't know what he's doing and I don't I may never know what he's doing.
And it may be that I'm ostracized by the Christian community from now on doesn't matter to me. I love Lord. And for people who think that this has shaken my faith it hasn't it's only strengthened it and so um you know experientially as far as that goes I'm very thankful to God for you know allowing me to go through and like this was years ago and I think I already shared with you but I was not.
I gave up my apologetics work and I didn't resume the apologetics work until after this sin was dealt with. And one thing I want to share for with anybody who happens to be in some kind of sin I never shared it with my pastor.
I mean I was out of the country too but I never shared it with the pastor in the session because it's really embarrassing when you embarrassing and I grew up in a community where that wasn't done and I have a dear friend actually where they often speak of their sins publicly to the church and people are revolted by it and I'm thinking man how how much that would have helped me even not to fall into sin for one but to not have the problem four years later when this let this sin was brought up if I had already shared it with my pastor my session so if anybody's involved with it I know it's a very difficult thing but share it with your pastor and your session the session in the Presbyterian Church is the elders and the pastor so I don't encourage them to do that.
And I know I've been rambling for quite a while and I probably said more than I wanted to say but um I just want to reiterate again is that redundant. I think it's probably redundant. I want to reiterate online have meant so much to me and notes of encouragement have meant so much to me over this time and I love them.
And if I am ever able to get into the u .s. again and again it has nothing to do with my ordeal. My situation has to do with the fact that you have to show proof of vaccination to cross the border and I'm not one person who's gonna say that I'm on Vax or whether I'm Vax but I believe there's a right to privacy you know with regards that people can figure it out anyways you know what I am but currently if you cannot prove vaccination you cannot get into the u .s.
You know things are happening in Canada now with this trucker convoy and you know for people who are watching this it's it's been amazing but I encourage people not to put their trust in the convoy or in the government and put their trust in God.
I think God can and is using this but I have no idea where where it will turn but if it is the case that I can travel to the u .s. again in my current state without having to disclose vaccination status then I hope to go back to the US especially where it's a little bit warmer and started to do ministry not necessarily to do public speaking because I don't even know if the Lord has that in the future for me I don't know if that's something I'll do but what I want to do is meet people who have been with me from the beginning.
I want to be them and thank them for their continued support. Because part of it like I don't say that I have depression but I think that that because of this and the response of this that the way I felt is very akin to the symptoms of depression because I have patreon followers and friends have been supporting me and I haven't been updating them because I haven't felt like it sure no because it's very disheartening.
So the fact that you have me on here today is um you know one of the nicest things that has happened for quite a while. Other people have asked and I've kind of put them off for a while because Eli I wanted to be on your show first because because of your regular phone calls and your regular support and your trust and your understanding.
And I should add that for all of those who put their trust in me first of all you know that's a mistake. Don't you put your trust in man. But I want to apologize to you. I want to apologize to you for my failing and you know I hope and I pray that the Lord will keep me steadfast going forward.
And yeah and I guess that would my statement hopefully that gives people enough details and if people want to email me directly and and ask for more details or you know something that that would be fine but I'm hoping that after this that I can just refer to this video and people can watch it.
You know as far as my response goes because I want to put it behind me and if those who are against me want to make a big deal of it I hope and pray that I won't have to make a public defense of everything that's happened.
Because I will hmm I should I shouldn't say that I will. I would talk to my session and they were probably dissuade me from doing it but I would just prefer that that if these people just leave it alone let's go for and but I'm not afraid I trust the Lord.
You know in my future however that's going to look whoever's gonna have me speak or do anything. I trust the Lord in that and you know I respect those who think that I shouldn't and I just respectfully disagree with them but I'm open to the to the argument open to the discussion but I am under the authority of my session right now and.
I'm in good standing with my church. You think about it. Whether you know before this all this stuff happened you had people talking bad about you anyway before this happened. I remember I had you on.
You were like well come on. But if you want to lose some subscribers you're gonna hate. You might as well. Just roll.
With it man. That's something I'd come up with my session as well. They actually cited an atheist website who had said something. I said they said this stuff about me before. You know it doesn't bother me at all.
And you know the thing is I've shared this with you before. But I would go to a conference and I see the good-looking speaker get up there and up. You know they show a slide of their beautiful wife and their beautiful kids and they gush about it.
And I have no problem with that. But I'm also sitting there thinking why should I live in to you. Why should I listen to you. Your life is perfect you know. And and so you know if people engage me they could say well his life isn't perfect.
It's been tough. And you know I of course I don't share the same kind of trials that other people have. I have hope. There are people who have lost loved ones even you know because of the virus and because of the vaccine I get that and there's hope in Christ.
But there's people who have lost things forever. You know I trust the Lord going forward. But you know people can look at me and say well he went through all that and he still loves the Lord. You know.
And I'm not saying that. That's something that's gonna persuade them because always the work of the Holy Spirit. But you know yeah I used to think too if you get somebody who's speaking on drug addiction you got somebody who's never been on drugs.
You think why should I listen to you man. But the people have been through the trial and I hope when I talk to unbelievers as well. Unbelievers who are in unrepentant sin can know that there's a Savior and that they can be free of their sin.
Well thank.
You so much for sharing that I just looking at the comments there everyone seems to be in support of seeing you again and they understand and it's easy to understand because all of us have sinned all of us stick around brother.
Stick around see if they're all in support but like I say these people have been they've been wonderful. Yeah I'm not gonna lie people on this channel the.
Comments that have been pretty cool and you have every now and then you have you know a person take a jab here and there but for the most part I I want to say thank you for people who watch whether you're a believer and unbeliever.
Thank you for your engagement and being respectful for the most part and and even just having sigh on. I see a lot of people just giving so much support. So we're glad you're back. We don't know what that means as you said but you know hopefully God's will is that he will continue to use you.
I know that the reason why a lot of people support you is because you have impacted them by God's grace. Of course you've impacted them in powerful ways through your ministry. So I'm sure people are very appreciative of that and are ready to be open and understanding.
Hopefully. But I'm glad to have you on and thank you for sharing that. And so without without further ado then so you guys got you got all of the the info there and you can rewatch the the first 25 minutes of this video to get kind of the full-length explanation there as to where he's been and what he's been going through.
And if you want to you know share your support you can share them in the comments you can message him I'm sure he'd be encouraged by that but without further ado let's jump into some apologetics. Okay now I gotta be careful all right.
Because Sai is a very practical guy so I'll ask him a complicated question and I'm thinking that my question is gonna is gonna provide the foundation for this expanded conversation. You know. And sometimes he's just that's the answer and I'm like all right.
Okay kind of like how can I know that that God exists. Right. You would say what. How would you say Sai if someone said that. How can I know if God exists. I would say you do.
Know that God exists. I was thinking I was actually shared with the family that I'm with here the other day a story that I used to buy the book mere Christianity in bulk and you know there were some very good things and there's some things that I would now disagree with but I used to hand it out in bulk.
And I remember I was at work one day and one of the guy he's quite a clown and you know we had a lot of laughs together and I kept trying to give him mere Christianity and he would never take it. And one day I said to him well if you have a wobbly table just stick it under one of the legs and maybe one day you want to pull it out and read it.
And this guy like I say he always clowned around but he got real serious and he looked me in the eye. He said I will never take that book. And I said to him why not. And he said because I'm afraid it's true.
Hmm. And I wasn't a presupposition at the time but if I was I would have said no.
You know it's true. Hmm. Yeah. See you got those you drop those bombs bro. And it's like what do you. What do you say. It's like. Hey but but here but there is a main question that I wanted to address now first I want to ask you the the a question related to the main topic we want to discuss.
And then perhaps we can talk about how. Because because I've actually had private conversations with classical apologists I'm some good friends who are respectful of the presuppositional approach. They kind of see the value in it.
But then they're kind of a someone brought up to me what. Like how do you deal with people who are doubting. It seems like you have such a certainty that there's no room for sympathetic. You know people to be sympathetic towards people who are struggling with with doubt.
And so yeah it looks good when you're arguing and you have all this confidence and certainty. But how do you engage the Christian who is who is struggling. And we do know that people struggle for various reasons and things like that.
So I would like to address the main topic of the thumbnail and then maybe perhaps go into a more practical application as to how someone with a presuppositional mindset applies the biblical teaching to someone who is a believer but comes to you with these questions of doubt and things like that.
So maybe we can kind of take it from there. So the name of this video was why doubting requires God. And that sounds weird. But why is it the case if someone says you know I doubt that God exists. How would you show that the fact that they're doubting actually requires the God that they're doubting.
Yeah I would say as far as a Christian expressing a doubt like that that's very problematic because if they doubt the existence of God then it turns out that they're the judge of whether he exists or not.
And so people who are true believers I think you know that they can be a plagued by something like this in which you know they still profess belief in God but that there's so much pressure from the outside that you know they might express a doubt that they don't really have.
And I think that when I share the fundamentals of doubt with them for some of them it's very comforting and for others I've shared this foundation of doubt with them it's not been comforting at all. I'm not saying that they are not believers but I find it very problematic when you know I share this with them and it does not provide some comfort because I would submit that the doubt in that scripture talks about is not about the existence of God it's about the providence of God.
So when people doubt the existence of God you know I would submit that that is problematic because they are elevating themselves over God that they are they are the authority on whether or not he exists.
But one thing I like to share with them I like to break down the constituents of doubt and I know it's a philosophical argument but I would say well first of all scripture says that everyone knows for certain that God exists.
I say what is necessary for doubt. If you doubt something you're doubting the truth of something or I guess the falsity of something you're doubting a fact you're doubting the truth of something. When you doubt something you're using logic you are employing logic to whether to find out whether or not this fact is true or not.
And you're also depending on the uniformity of nature if anything can happen then there's no reason to doubt anything because anything can happen. So you're so those are only three elements truth logic and the uniformity of nature.
And those who follow you know the work that I've done know that each of those elements require God. You cannot make sense of the concept of truth if you're if we're just evolved pond scum not make sense of universal abstract invariant laws of logic without God.
And you cannot make sense of the uniformity of nature without God the fact that the future will be like the past. None of those things can be made sense of without God. So the the constituents of doubt require God.
So when I tell people that if you are a doubting God do you know what you're doing. You're actually borrowing from God to doubt him. You cannot doubt God without the foundation of God. Now some people might suppress the truth about that foundation but it is there.
And when people realize that for some people has been very comforting and for some people it does nothing for so. Okay. So and now this is a big.
Criticism that I often hear and I have heard about you when you make those comments. Is that it's yeah well no well I mean I get criticized for no I'm.
Kidding just in my state. So a presuppositional list will be accused of.
Making assertions so it's very easy. And I and I keep telling presuppositional we need to learn to go beyond this. I mean obviously we don't have time to go into the details and unpack every aspect of this.
But we need to go beyond the mere presuppositional platitudes. Like you know the truth of the Christian worldview is that without it you can't prove anything. I believe that but saying it doesn't prove it.
So how would you begin to unpack. Someone who says hey sigh I'm doubting. And then you say well the doubt what's required. The preconditions for the intelligibility of your doubting requires these other things.
How would you kind of unpack and connect the dots for someone who who's struggling with doubt and show that they are in fact borrowing from God to even engage in their doubting. How would you unpack what that looks like and why.
That's the case for the person as far as a Christian saying something like that. And I get emails along that line. Or I've gotten emails along that line. And what I often ask them I say well what does your pastor say about it.
Because I'm not a pastor I want to reiterate I'm not a pastor and I am unqualified to give pastoral advice. And a lot of these questions for Christians are pastoral questions. Okay and a lot of will say to me.
Well well I don't have a pastor. You know I just so you contacted a stranger online to talk about your doubt. I think your problem is not that your problem is that you need to find a sound church and you need to talk to your pastor about this.
But then I will share with them the constituents of doubt. You know I'll say first of all the scriptures say that you know the Bible says that everyone is certain that God exists. And then I was you know show them up.
But let's look at what doubt is. You're doubting the truth of something. You're using logic. You're depending on the uniform of nature. And I might explain those things to people. I say that all of those things require God.
And why that. That's my question. So okay for example truth. The very concept of truth I asked you know I'll ask people on the street where do you get truth from without God. And they'll say well I get truth from evolution.
And I get again this is philosophical because I think and I find that women are very good at this. Well this is what the Bible says. The Bible says that you need it. And the more that I do this especially you know what the trials I've been through the more I get away from the philosophy.
And I appreciate there are people that explain these things. And you know I but the more that I do this the less I'm likely to do. Because they're not gonna be on there with their head of their pillow thinking about the philosophy at night.
But you know as far as the explanation goes I don't mind giving the explanation. If people have an evolutionary worldview then what are our brains. Our brains are basically evolved. Meat computers meat machines.
And what are our thoughts. Our thoughts are the the product of the firing of the synapses in your brain. You know it's a electrical chemical reaction. Doug Wilson actually has a really good experiment or a thought experiment.
He says imagine getting a bottle of Mountain Dew in a bottle of dr. pepper and shaking them up and opening them and watching them fizz. And you'll say which of those fizzes is true. And I actually said this to people on the street and they say well it's just fizz.
Neither of them are true. I said well according to an evolutionary worldview you're fizzing atheistically and I'm fizzing theistically. And you want to say that my fizz is false and your fizz is true.
So you're actually borrowing from the God that you know exists in order to criticize my world. You're borrowing truth from God because you cannot be you cannot make sense of the concept of truth without God.
So I just showed that you know their worldview just cannot justify that. And you know are we are just justified as scripture. So now okay so what would you.
Say because because I would imagine someone would say you know if you say everyone is certain that God exists. And someone's like no but I I'm trying to believe. Sigh. I I there's a doubt in me. I don't know if God exists.
How would how would you address that. You know. Obviously people would would say things along those lines. Right. I tried this to who tried to refute you a lot years ago. I made a video and they say it was a terrible argument but they they said something to the effect that the number one way to disprove a presuppositional list who says that everyone's certain that God exists is just to tell them I'm not certain.
Like you can't. You you're not privy to my internal thought life so I don't know God exists. Riff. Yeah. Did you know. How would you engage that. It's.
Like the number one way to prove that you're in speeding down the highway is tell the cop you weren't speeding. You know it doesn't doesn't make much sense. But if you know and I actually I watched our previous encounter just prior to coming on here so I didn't repeat a lot of things but you know some of it like I'm not a man of many words but if somebody says that they don't know that God exists I say well the Bible says you do.
Hmm you know and there's a fellow actually a dear fellow a Christian a friend of mine that I met through really miraculous circumstances but he went to school for four years to become a biologist so he could be a better apologist.
He loved the Lord so much. And he he saw his grandfather who grew up learning to read by reading the Bible. He never spent a day of school in his life. And people would say don't to his grandfather I don't believe your Bible.
His grandfather would say you must believe the Bible. That's foolish not to believe the Bible. And he said he was sitting in university watching his grandfather and saying how naive his grandfather was he says now after he became a presupposition as he says he realizes his grandfather was doing it right the whole time.
Hmm you know because one thing I tell me when I taught apologetics is I don't teach people how to defend their faith. I teach them how not to and if I have to give an argument to to justify the preconditions of intelligibility then I think you know which I did quite often.
And like when I hear people who have learned from me doing that on the street makes me want to throw up because I say I don't think that the Apostle Peter would be talking about the preconditions of intelligibility if he was talking to an unbeliever so you know I will state biblical truth to them.
The Bible says you know and you know I might. I don't know. I think I was I might have mentioned on the last show but I was in a park here a number of years ago and this fellow was talking with an unbeliever for quite some time and I was within earshot and he was using this you know site and bring Kate presuppositional methodology.
And they're going on for about half an hour. I was listening and my stomach was turning because he sounded just like me and I want to throw up and he was. He was having difficulty in the conversation.
So he called me over and I looked the unbeliever in the eye. I said so why do you hate God. He said I don't hate God. And then we talked about that but the conversation changed immediately. Because most of this I learned from philosophers.
And you know I don't doubt that they engage people on the street but I never heard them engaging people on the street. So what I learned in the philosophy lectures I would take on the street and philosophy with people talk about epistemology.
They have no idea what you're talking about. So you know I I want to be able to share the faith with people that if the Apostle Peter was standing beside me he wouldn't be tapped me on the shoulder and say so what are you talking about.
Sure but and I know we.
Spoke about this before and I agree with what you're saying because what I see you doing is taking what you've learned and contextualizing it to the person you most likely would be engaging he'd be engaging with.
So I get it. I'm not. I don't see you saying oh philosophy that's too complicated to leave it over there. I think you do value what that brings to the broader system. Right. But in terms of the everyday person you're gonna be engaging it.
You're not gonna be talking about those things. And so I think that's probably why you take the approach that more direct approach. However if you know Vantill when people read Vantill I got some some Vantill over there I was flipping through the introduction to systematic theology.
Here's a spoiler alert. It's not an introduction. It's pretty complicated although it's probably one of his one of his best books that and defense of the faith. But be that as it may one might read Vantill and say I don't understand what he's talking about.
He uses weird he's bringing in these different you know conversation partners and philosophy. But Vantill I know that you know this spoke the way that he did because he needed to speak the language of the philosophers because that is who he was engaging.
Right. So the average person on the street is not going to be a philosopher and so you're gonna talk to them in a different way. The truths you're saying are still the same. But you're gonna you're not going to be using the language however going deeper with the philosopher.
I think sometimes it is necessary and so it is important to kind of have your feet in both worlds being able to simplify it and really just strike to the heart of the conversation and then also be able to grapple with some of those bigger concepts and show yeah no you're borrowing from the Christian world.
You even when you're super smart you think you're not. So I think there is a place for for both of those things. Because I think it's important when you say that's not what the Bible says. That's true.
But that's not just a bare assertion you can demonstrate if the context was provided you can demonstrate why. That's not what the Bible says is relevant to the discussion. It's not just an assertion. Without grounding.
What would you agree with that. Or in your.
Perspective. No I I suppose I would agree with it but with my experience of engaging people even people you know of the higher academic learning that a lot of time it's you know they're looking for me who is not a philosopher to slip up so that they can bolster their unbelief.
Sure. So you know and I think that I have engaged people in the past but I'm not a philosopher I'm not a logician and as you know I'm a factory worker. I'm a boiler operator by trade you know which is no you're a dude.
You're a dude with a website. Yeah but I think you know I think there are things that we can have in our back pockets. The problem is that there are people who have this in their back pocket but they use it all the time and and they don't get.
And I know I shared on the last show that if people say well say how do you get to the gospel from here. And I would hear that so often then I and I thought I'm doing it wrong if they have to ask me how to get to the gospel from here.
Because I think that the proper apologetics should be a gospel proclamation. And I know since I just listened to your show the previous one but I remember an instance in England when I was doing some witnessing on the streets there and my friend Robert Gray who was engaging a couple of philosophy students it was like they were actually a couple a man and a woman and I had approached the group and he was saying that I would pray I was praying that you'd come here.
Was you know one of the greatest experience of my life. Actually that it was. It was really cool. But I talked about on the last show but they had many philosophical objection to the truth of Christianity and I dealt with all of them presupposition Lee philosophically.
And they seemed quite satisfied with my answers. And then I gave them back to Robert and Robert shared the gospel with them. And as I said in the last show I said you know Robert said sigh I really wish that I could do what you do.
And I said Robert when they put their head on their pillow tonight what are they going to be thinking about. Are they going to be thinking about what I shared with them the philosophy. Are they going to be thinking about what you shared with them.
And Robert you know he's one of my dearest friends he nodded knowingly that they were going to think about what Robert shared with them. I said you don't have to be able to do what I do. And I think a lot of times is a detriment now I'm glad that people you know study these things because I want to know them for myself you know and I want to have these things in my back pocket.
But the more that I do this the more that I find that I've been spinning my wheels. And what I've been trying to do actually is trying to take out the middleman the years of being out there engaging people and spinning my wheels and to get to a you know a sounder gospel proclamation.
And what I found is that it's almost impossible to cut out the middleman that people almost have to experience it themselves you know in order to realize the futility of it now is there a place for it.
Sure but I'm you know the fact that people are engaged in that I am just not interested in anymore for me a waste of time. And I appreciate that for people it's not a waste of time. And of course you know there's things that I'm interested in learning.
But when I see these philosophical people arguing with what scripture calls a fool you cannot make sense of anything we're doing exactly what the evidentialist does you know rather than you know the evidential is being duped by giving evidential arguments to try to prove to the person that God exists.
And the presuppositions is duped by philosophy to trying to convince them that God exists rather than being consistent with the scriptures that they know and share the truth of Christ with them. Because they could get hit by a bus you know.
So I'm I'm not saying that that field is not important it's just I'm not.
Interested in it. So okay. So when people might be listening to you and you're saying stuff like scripture and then you're saying philosophy as though those are diametrically separate how do you understand the relationship between Bible theology and philosophy.
Because I know some people see it differently. Some people would say hey you need philosophy but philosophy of course is within the boundaries of scripture so you can do philosophy biblically. And so in that case there's nothing wrong with using a lot philosophical terms.
I mean philosophical vocabulary can just be a more sophisticated way of capturing a biblical truth with respect to say a metaphysical question or an epistemological question. How do you understand the relationship between I.
Think that I think that's fair. But the problem that I that I see for myself is that a pop a lot of people say this is a biblical argument. Doesn't sound like a biblical argument. It doesn't sound like a biblical argument.
It sounds like a philosophical argument. Now if people want to say that this philosophical argument is derived from scripture I'm all ears. I say go nuts. You know it's probably way over my head. But if you use biblical truth you're using the laws of logic in order to expound those biblical truths to people.
So you know philosophical views that might be the case as well. But the problem that I've seen is that a lot of these arguments that are supposedly biblically derived don't sound anything like it. And you know and that's what I tell.
Even evidentialist I say I don't care what you call the apologetic methodology. If you can show me how you share evidence with an unbeliever in a way that honors God. I say go nuts. I'm opposed to that.
Like I if an evidentialist came to me and say say I don't give them evidence to convince him that God exists. I give evidence to expose their suppression of the truth. I say praise God. It's just that I not run into anybody that does that see.
When you see I've had.
Conversations with people and say well I don't you know I don't think man is neutral I think man knows God and when I present evidence you know I don't assume those things and I'm like all right. Cool.
You're a presuppositionalist who uses.
Evidence. Presuppositional presupposition. That's fair people say I do believe that. The problem is that when their apologetic is inconsistent with that. And that was my case as well. I can't tell you like before I became a presuppositions how often I read Romans one and then went out and tried to prove that God exists to people.
So I you know I believed it in my head but I was not consistent with that belief that I believe that to be the case. But I never took it to heart you know. And so by the grace of God you know I believe what his word says.
And if people can give evidences or philosophical arguments being consistent with Scripture and not denying the facts of Scripture I say go crazy. I who am I. And that's you know with all of this is going on.
Who am I. You know I'm trying to do the best that I can in the service of my Lord and engaging unbelievers and talking to believers. Who am I. You know I go and that's one thing I say. I got that from my friend Tony Meano.
You know when he does a lecture he says I don't want you to approach this with an open mind. Approach it with an open book. And that's what I want people to do with me as well. You know if they disagree with anything I say anything at all come to me with Scripture because that's my authority.
Okay. So I hear you. So I'm.
Trying to understand how you understand the relationship though how philosophy fits in. So like if the Bible uses logic I mean because language presupposes logic wouldn't it be fair game to use logic and fit whatever content in logic right in argumentation.
And that can be considered consistent with biblical categories. You can do it without being neutral. You know anything along those like using deductive arguments and all like deduction and induction those are the words don't appear in the Bible but we can see examples of that.
So so when we do use those sorts of arguments I'm just trying to understand why it seems like you call that like philosophy. But I want to stick over here. It seems like.
They're they're all together. Does that make sense. Yeah so here's my question to.
What end. To what end. Yeah. Well I mean I would say that arguments can help expose more clearly and succinctly the knowledge of God that the person's suppressing. So yeah. So yeah. So kind of like my authority to go nuts you know.
You don't need my authority for that but I I just know the type of arguments that turn my stomach that people seem to be you know not being in tandem with Scripture but making an argument wholly apart from Scripture.
And you know and the thing is when people are converted they have to be converted to something. You know they're converted when they're converted to something they're converted to the gospel the truth of the gospel and I don't see that in many philosophical arguments it can be there and people can do that and go.
Now who am I to criticize like I say this is what I do this is what I do when I engage people and I don't do it well and I fail. But I think for a lot of people who don't share their faith at all and don't know how to that I think that this method is is comforting to them and like I say you know because I if I need to be encouraged to share my faith or to tell people how to share their faith all I have to do is watch 90 of the videos out there if not more of people engaging unbelievers talking about a God I don't believe in and so I mean it's just that a lot of these philosophical arguments seem to indicate that God is not necessary for them and sure you know I like I said I'm the priest up Nazi you know and I grew up in a Christian home.
And you know I talked about complacency as well that that's an issue too when you can't stay at a time when you don't know that Jesus is your Lord but one thing that that also afforded me is a respect for the Lord.
Of course whenever I sin you know that that you know that there's also a slap in the face of that respect but I respect the Lord enough that when I hear an argument that seems to dishonor him it makes my skin crawl now people can do that people can do that effectively and the Lord has used that to save people.
I just don't like it. I got you now I want to get a little.
More into doubt. But let's take a couple of questions. There's some fun ones here. So Alyssa Scott asks question asks I. To give an example of a philosophical argument. That's perfect. So. So let's make you steal your stomach turn.
When you say some arguments make your stomach turn. What do you mean by that. So folks can kind of see. Okay. Yeah. I can understand. You know why he says that. Hmm. Yeah. Well.
I don't know I really can't think of any examples but for instance the the very foundation of the presuppositional argument. I think a lot of people they say that incorrectly. You know they say God is a necessary precondition for logic.
You know there is or for intelligibility there is intelligibility therefore God exists now. That is a well and good argument but I think that it also misses something. You know. So I might have that first premise.
God is the necessary precondition for intelligibility as he has revealed in his Word. You know. And people don't like that but I'm not there to make them like that you know. Because the Bible is my foundation so I think that these arguments that are devoid of the scriptural backing you know they're valid.
They're true. You know a lot of the evidential arguments are good. Some of them are terrible. But you know when I find them devoid of the authority of.
Scripture then. I don't like them. Okay. Victory Street ministry said says Paul wasn't strictly precept in Acts 17. He was an evidentialist. Well we beg to differ. How could you. How could you. By the way if folks are interested let me see here.
I have a copy here. This is kind of the updated version of always ready. Great. Now if you throw out this entire book and just keep the appendix it's still worth the money. The appendix of this book. Of who you know.
Victory Street ministry whatever your real name is. If you're interested if you get this book there is an appendix. It's pretty extensive. It's kind of it's pretty long. I think it's the longest section independent section in the book and the appendix is entitled the encounter of Jerusalem with Athens where dr. Bonson goes into great detail as to why.
That's not the case thing which I have. He does.
There's a whole section on Acts 17 but you know I always find that interesting because I tell people you know it's the same Paul that wrote Romans 1 that wrote Acts. You know. Sure you know. And this is the question that I asked them.
I say okay. Let's say Paul's about to go to Athens and just before he gets there a meteor hits Athens and kills everybody there. Where would Paul say that they're going. Where would you say that they're going.
So Paul. Romans 1 there. Without excuse. Right. So it's not a different Paul who believed that they needed evidence to be convinced that God exists. It's the same Paul who wrote Romans chapter 1. For that they were without excuse for the suppression of the truth.
About the God that they know all right here's another question. It's it has to do with philosophy. You can share your thoughts and I can. I could chime in because I have some thoughts on this as well and I think these questions come from not so much to put God to the test.
I think people who who learn presuppositionalism and they see the power in it they also want to be able to explain to others why those criticisms don't work you know to justify that. Hey.
What we're doing is biblical. I'm sorry. Let me step in there for a minute because I think this is and I'm not gonna say it's an error but when people say power of the apologetic and I might speak like that as well but it the apologetic has zero power and I know that you agree with that it's the power of the Holy Spirit and he could use that argumentation.
But what I think when you argue peace opposition it's not about the power of the apologetic. It's being faithful so that even if it falls on deaf deaf ears at least you can walk away and say I was faithful.
But the reason that's powerful is because I believe it's faithful to the Word of God. Sorry for nothing. No no worries. No.
Worries. Okay so here's the question so what would you guys say about the claim that presuppositionalism is influenced strongly by Kant's philosophy. Kant's thought all right. Do you have any thoughts on that and if so share them if.
Not I have thoughts on it. No that that's fine. I know that that bonds and often quoted Kant but I don't care. You know I I think like I say examine this with an open book see if it's biblical. And you know the justification that I have for the apology it's not from Kant it's from Scripture.
Now if people who came up with the formulation of certain arguments you know relied on Kant I don't know. Maybe they did. Maybe they didn't and you know. And maybe in some way they did. But I'm saying look at Scripture.
And I think you also have his book presuppositional apologetics stated and defended. I remember a friend of mine he was interested in the apologetic and he read a book on evidential apologetics and one on presuppositional apologetics by Bonson and he said the evidential book.
He was like almost through the book more than halfway through the book not one scripture verse and Bonson's book it was loaded from the first page with Scripture references. And I think you know that that's really the difference that I don't care.
You know where their influence is a formulation of some of their arguments. The basis must be in Scripture otherwise I'm not interested.
Mm-hmm. Gotcha. Yeah I would say that it's it's it's influenced by Kant but not in the way that the critics want to make it. So for example as we may mentioned before has I was mentioned that Psy is does a really good job at contextualizing the apologetic to bring to kind of like the person the person you're most likely going to engage with.
You understand. You watch YouTube and you hear the interactions and the arguments in the debates. That's not what normally happens with the average Christian. Right. You can't have a YouTube debate apologetics mindset and think that that's the way your conversations are gonna go on the street.
So it is important to contextualize what you're listening to on YouTube. You know that a lot of helpful content out there you want to contextualize it so that you can you can speak to the people that God is placed in your life.
But Vant Hill was a philosopher and so the language he uses the people that he's interacting with are the philosophies of Kant the theologies of Barth. I mean this is the reason why he tends to use for example the language of philosophical idealism he's been accused of being an idealist.
He wasn't but that was the language he spoke because those were the types of people he was speaking to. If you are interested in kind of more detail as to why he wasn't a Kantian or a an idealist you can read from Vant Hill's own work defense of the faith.
Or you can go to analogical thoughts. Dr. James Anderson has some in some articles there where he unpacks why Vant Hill uses that language but is not himself guilty of adopting you know idealistic philosophy.
Okay all. Right. Let's see here there was something here victory Street ministry says real apologetics. Please let's. I know I love him as a brother in Christ. How can we donate to help him get on his feet.
I'm not sure if you're taking donations or there's a place you can point people to but if there is feel free to give a quick commercial as to how people could.
Help you out if you're looking for that sort of help. Well I'm again I'm humbled by that and like I say I have not been doing any. There's the first thing I've done in almost a year. And you know my living situation is such that I don't know if I'll be putting out a lot of content or any for the next little while.
I hope to still do some interviews. The thing is I will go out and evangelize when that I mean it's cold up in Canada now. I have a new a new to me vehicle that needs a lot of work before I can put it on the road but once that's the case I hope to travel again if I can't go to the States and through Canada.
And I do want to evangelize again and I do appreciate. I mean there's been a number of people who have supported me this whole time and you know there was even thought that I should cancel my patreon because of this and I didn't.
You know hopefully I'm not in sin for that but I didn't but I believe that the Lord has used that to support me to sustain me during this time and I'm very thankful for it. My patron is patreon .com slash psi 10 B and I have a PayPal as when as well as contact that proof that God exists org and like I say I'm humbled by.
It I'm thankful for it. And yeah can you can you say that patreon one more time. Slowly. If someone's trying to like get a sticky pad and jot it down. Patreon .com.
Slash psi 10 B s y e t e n b .com. And if you call the number on the bottom of the.
Screen. We will send you a special vial of water from the Jordan River. You get anoint the four corners of your house and prosperity will come your way. And I'm just kidding all right. Scott Terry. Thank you so much for $20.
Super chat. Man. I love this quote. Nothing in my hand I bring simply to thy cross. I cling. I love hearing redemption stories and people coming now. It's it's tempting to just want to hear the dirt on someone.
Right. Just for the sake of hearing like oh what happened. But I have to say when I do see someone expose kind of the details of their sin and how they've been restored it is very encouraging. Obviously we shouldn't seek to want to know everyone's business but when someone is as transparent as you've been just lay it out there.
People have seen you from a perspective like man it's I and he got into some some issues here. I think it's encouraging when people can hear some of those details you express and see that like the gospel lived out namely that we're all sinners and we all we all need the forgiveness of Christ.
And so you gave a wonderful example of what that looks like. Especially someone who was doing apologetics many people looked up to. And you know you're human. You're a sinner. Just like all of us we struggle.
And I think a lot of people resonate with with that struggle and appreciate your transparency. So so yeah. Thank you for that. Thank you so much Scott. I appreciate that man. Jacob Spear says love you.
Sigh. No matter what happened you have the support of your true brothers and sisters. People fall have issues and sin. You are honest open and confessing of what happened. Thank you for your preserving through the trial and praise God for getting you.
Through it amen. Yeah appreciative of that. No I'm I'm so thankful for that because yeah I you know I am I feel for other people who have gone through similar things and you know I just hope that they've had the same kind of support that I have and like I say I you know I hope this is the end of it.
I hope I never have to speak about it again. You know I hope that those who there are people who clearly do not like me there are those who love me as well who feel that you know I shouldn't even be on here now.
I think you're okay. I think you're okay and I hope that you don't get any backlash from it. But yeah and like I say I'm not the one who's keeping things quiet. You know I think it's important that the Lord is honored in all of this and if it honors him better that this never hit the light of day like the the intimate details of it then that will be the case.
But if it needs to hit the light of day because yeah and I should probably I should probably leave it at that because I want the Lord to be best honored. I don't think he's honored with false accusation.
But again the problem is when I defend myself against things that are false so often I've heard over this last year that it makes me sound unrepentant of the things that are true that's not the case. I know what I am I know what I did I know what I deserve and I have a wonderful Lord who who saved me and you know who's restored me and who loves me and who has provided me with a lot of dear loving friends who who love me as well friends who I've never met and and that's you know.
And and that's one thing when I left and I you know I still had my page up on Facebook for a day or so. It's not that the support was 95 or you know it was 100 supportive. You know now you know reading the comments on your page I said I would say it's about 98 supportive but when I left it was 100 supportive.
And that meant so much to me it you know it I was so thankful for.
That. Hmm. Well that's awesome Chad. Homonym says. Sigh thanks for coming back. I've been watching a lot of your content lately and I've been thinking about you. My question is is every debate with atheists.
Worth having. Chad homonym. That's pretty good. Is that like ad homonym. Yeah I. Good point you know. And I shared with it again the last time I was on with you as well. Is that one of the biggest the compliments that I get from an atheist.
They're actually trying to insult me. They say he didn't come to debate. He just came to share the gospel. He just came to preach and I say amen. So I would say that a lot of the debates are futile. They're not worth it.
But a lot of times you will be able to share a gospel method message with people who will never darken the door of a church. And I would say for that reason alone it's worth it. But I think a lot of the debates and maybe even people see the engagements that I've had in the past have been far too philosophical.
And I would say if you can share the gospel with a number of people like that debate with Matt Delahunty has over a million views on YouTube alone and you know I give a gospel presentation in there. How that debate went.
You know that's for whoever watches it to decide. But there's over a million people who have had a gospel present and that's on Facebook alone. It's also been on other forms so I'm thankful for that. But I would you know I would say that many debates that I've seen have certainly not been worth it because first of all they haven't been debating for the God that I believe in and they didn't honor him.
So um and would I encourage everybody to go into debate. No. Absolutely not. But if you can go there and you know get the platform and debate someone and share the gospel.
I said you know amen. Mm-hmm thank you for that. Alyssa says a question when you say they want you to slip up. People who want you to slip up so that they can.
Bolster their unbelief. What does that look like. Let's say okay I'll give you an example it's an evidential example but that's the only one I could think of because it's one that I used to use. It's when you're let's say arguing for the age of the earth and then they talk about something and you say well carbon 14 dating can only measure something within thousands of years and the person happens to be an expert on radiometric dating.
He says I was talking about a different isotope. I wasn't talking about the carbon isotope. I was talking about this and it can and then you're lost you know because you have an argument that that's you know well beyond your scope and yeah and I think what was the question.
So I mean you start talking about a field that you're not that familiar with because you have heard it repeated many times that carbon dating only measures things in the thousands of years. And then they come up with something that that you know makes you look like an idiot because you're not versed in that.
So I you know if you if you make a mistake and I'll give you another example that's that's closer to home and I wouldn't even think it's a mistake. But in my debate with Matt Delahunty I gave a premise and I think it was about is belief in God rational and I gave some premises that were really a tongue-in-cheek joke more than anything that I said it's reasonable to believe things that were true that are true it's true that God exists.
Therefore it's reasonable believe that God exists and people eviscerated me for that syllogism when it was a tongue-in-cheek you know fun kind of thing so and so they focused on that rather than on the existence of God.
And you know that's what they're looking for. They're looking for any kind of now. Yeah I don't even know I think I still think it's a decent argument but I didn't mean it to be a decent sound argument.
I meant it you know it's true that God exists and that's what I was saying you know and in a weird kind of way and I you know a person that you've actually recently when I look at Eli's right there when you recently engaged he brought up that argument a Christian a professing Christian I should say brought up that argument and said how philosophically it was unsound.
I said yeah I don't care. I didn't really mean it for a sound argument. It's like a tongue-in-cheek God exists. Okay actually the person I was debating actually did focus on the very thing I wanted him to focus on which was a second premise it's true that God exists.
Mm-hmm all right.
Evolution. False. Sigh. Is it true. It's a true that darts talking. Can bench press more copies of the defense of the faith. Do you bench press. Do you go to the gym.
At all. No actually I'm I told. I shared with my patreon friends though but I was able to do to help a dear friend of mine with a renovation product. I do a plumbing and electrical and stuff like that.
Two months I was helping them renovate an apartment and I think I lost about 20 pounds so that was great. But no I don't see the point of lifting a weight for no purpose other than building muscles. I'm glad that people do that.
I'm just not interested. Listen I I when I die I want.
To die with a donut in my hand and some snicker bars in my pocket. You guys can sweat at the gym and you know you could drink all your healthy shakes. I'm gonna be chilling with my wife we're gonna be having some cheese crackers and cake.
It's gonna be awesome you would die. I'm a deniabetic so there you go. Question.
How do you explain to someone that's hearing this argument for the first time. I guess the presuppositional argument for the first time how it has to be the Christian God over the other gods now I know what you're going to say because that's the only God that exists.
I know I know I know. But how. Because people even people who believe that like yes I believe because it got it the God of Scripture is the only God that exists. But how do you unfold that in a way that it's like yes I believe it but oh yeah okay.
So when you connect this dot man I really I really see that like it's cool to have the conceptual explanation confirm what we believe and see how that fits to get what we know and how that.
Fits together. So how it might be that people are so indoctrinated into having an argument that concludes the Christian God that they misunderstand the foundation. The fundamental principle of presuppositional ism we don't start with the generic God.
We start with the Christian God. We might show how all other worldviews are irrational. Irrational. But you know Psalm 96 5 all the gods of the nations are idols but the Lord made the heavens. So I start with that and I might cite scripture as my support for that that fact.
But we don't get to some generic God. There is no generic God. And what I tell people is that really the only theist is a Christian. All the rest according to Psalm 96 5 and throughout scripture are idolaters.
It's it's not that you know we conclude the Christian God a presupposition. I start with the God of the Bible that that the Bible says everyone knows exists. So I start with that God. I don't start with a generic God.
All right. Thank you for that blue.
Purple and scarlet says. Why do you think precepts don't talk more about the arts and music. The preconditions are used in every field of study. So I. That's a cool question. I mean we talk about logic and transcendentals.
I know Bonson believe that aesthetics. You could if you could start anywhere when you're talking with the unbeliever. Why do you think people don't usually use the arts and music as kind of their you know God needs to be.
God provides those preconditions for.
Even the intelligibility of those things. You know before I was a presuppositionalist and I would say even before I understood reform theology I read a book blue like jazz. I haven't read it since I became reformed.
And since I'm a presuppositions I might hate it now. It might make me want to throw up now. But the book started with something very beautiful. And and he said that the author of the book said he never liked jazz music.
And then he saw a fellow playing a saxophone a busker on the street playing a saxophone for 15 minutes without opening his eyes. Hmm he said after that he loved jazz music. He says sometimes you have to see some somebody loves something that much before you can love it yourself.
Hmm. And I people don't do that because they don't love it to the degree that maybe this woman does. And I've shared with you. I know I shared with this with you on the last show. But often I get people say man I was talking to my sister-in-law and I really wish sigh was there so that I can give this you know this presupposition argument.
But you know what I would love I would love to be in the room with this woman when she shares about the beauty of God's creation with an unbeliever. You know I want to learn from her. I want to hear that from somebody who loves that.
So people don't do that because I think a lot of times they're in debate forums arguing the preconditions of intelligibility and having to smack them on the back for having a good argument. And I think that's that people love that.
Hmm. Okay.
Thank you for that. Reformed YT. I don't know how to print. Okay so Alpha and Omega. Reformed YT. I don't know what that means but gotta love YouTube all right. How should we do an internal critique of the Hindu worldview.
Most of them are armonious so those who know about the presuppositional methodology we. There's a lot of talk on the importance of internally critiquing the unbelievers worldly. Which you do. You say hey if atheism is true where do you get truth that.
That's. That's your attempt at an internal critique to show that they can account for that. How would you engage a Hindu. And generally speaking because you.
Even have variation within Hinduism right now. The thing is with as far as the worldviews goes I'm pretty rusty because I haven't done this for quite a while but if you go to my website proof that God exists org I have a tab that's called other worldviews and there's one on Eastern philosophies and you know I I'd have to actually go back and actually read that.
I did that with my friend Corey McKenna from London and we made those tracks a number of years ago and I think there's a lot of good facts about the the you know Eastern philosophies in there but you know and I know I use I beat this analogy to death.
Let's say you had the apostle Peter beside you and you said I'm gonna go talk to this monk and would he say well I have to study Eastern philosophies before I can talk to him and he probably wouldn't say that now.
Is it good to know Eastern philosophy. Would he want you to know if you know about Eastern philosophy would he want to know the details of sure but I think a lot of times that people get duped by these other worldviews you know because it's very interesting some people catch me on this and they've been very helpful with me because you know I I often say well you're not an atheist you're a professing atheist and then they say well aren't these people actually professing Muslims and professing Hindus and they're exactly right.
As the Bible says that everyone knows the God so does the Hindu so does the Muslim so to all these different worldviews so I think a lot of times because they have a fallback religion we deny the fact that they also know the God and that's why I've had dear friends engaging Mormons and engaging Muslims and I've never heard him say but you're sinning against the God that you know exists and anybody can do that.
So I mean I have a page on Eastern philosophies but like I said in the in the last interview I think it also misses the mark. It gives some facts about it it gives some things that we can ask them it can expose you know some of the folly of their worldview but I think that we need to preach Christ to them because again it's one thing to deconstruct their worldview it's another thing to preach Christ to them.
And if you have one person do one thing and one one person to the do the other what are they most likely to think about when they put their head on their pillow especially if the Holy Spirit is at work in their heart they need to be converted to something and they need to be converted to the gospel.
Mm-hmm all right. Thank you for that.
Arthur bear says. Why do you think atheists. Specifically Tom jump endorses Descartes. I think. Therefore I am. Actually it's I think. Therefore I doubt just a context here. If that question doesn't make any sense some people will respond to the claim that without the Christian worldview you can't have you can't justify knowledge.
Some people say well sure I can I could I know that I exist. That's indubitable to doubt it I have to assume it. So they kind of offer you know an argument along the lines of Descartes position there.
How would you say that I don't believe in your God. I don't know your God exists and I know that I exist. Therefore I have knowledge independent of your God. You know I like.
I said I'm not a philosopher but I would doubt. I would I would counter what he says what the argument actually is that it's not. I think therefore I doubt or I doubt therefore the actual argument is dubito ergo sum.
It's I doubt therefore I am. I thought it was cognitive ergo sum. Yeah. No that's what people think it is. But I think that the original argument is actually dubito ergo sum. Not. So it's actually I doubt therefore I am from my understanding but the original question why Tom jump use it.
I don't know he'll use anything. And I'm you know I'm thankful that you engaged him. He's one of the people that I probably would not because I've always said to him I want to engage you with what you actually believe and he is very reluctant to state what he believes.
And if he was interested in having a discussion where he would state exactly what he believes so we can you know talk about each of our worldviews then I would consider it but I just find that he doesn't do that.
So I think he will use any argument again that he can use to try and trip up his interlocutor. Mm-hmm. All right. Well.
Thank you for that. That's the last question I'm seeing here. Let's try to wrap things up. Getting back to the issue of doubt. So I have spoken with young people before who I they don't understand a lot of if it's true that all men have a knowledge of God but not everyone knows how to process that.
I think in terms of because I've seen people like hey I want to believe in God and I just don't know how to make sense out of all this. How do you encourage and point someone in the direction of of encouragement along that journey.
I mean do we just come out and say hey man you're suppressing the truth or how do you go about that. And kind of. I know you're not a pastor but in a pastor Lee way and a kind of like I'm not your pastor but I want to I want to be there for you.
I know people genuine. I mean the Bible says you know help my unbelief. You know I believe but help my unbelief. How do you. How do you encourage people who are in the position of say that guy in that scripture reference where he's.
Saying I believe but please help my unbelief yeah well I think that's a different person than you and initially talked about but for that person you know I would say there's comfort in reading the word and I would encourage people who aren't in a regular reading of the word to get a Bible plan and what I found too is that Bible plans that don't have the specific date on it.
It's far easier to skip a day and you know to not get caught up again. But I would encourage people to get a Bible plan with the actual date on it so that you know you can read those days and you can keep up with it.
And you know that's that's what I would encourage people to have because you know it's a work of the Holy Spirit. And when people say that I'm really not sure that God exists and I've said this in my talks I say I have one word for you repent and the thing is repent is the gift of God and repentance is a change of mind.
So how does somebody change their mind about their certainty of God's existence. That's the gift of God. They need to get on their knees and cry out to him for that. And you know how long. And I tell people you need to get on your knees and cry out until God changes your mind about that or until he cast you into hell now that's not for Christian of course but you know for the unbeliever.
Because you know I have a friend you know who said that as well that you know he cried out to God until until the Lord finally saved him. And I said keep doing that and till he saves you until he throws you into hell.
As far as you know the person who you know doubts the existence of God. This is one thing that I encourage people with as well and I don't know if I shared it the last time we talked as well but I said I want to talk to the kid who's sitting in church like this you know can't wait to get out of that nut house we're talking about talking snakes and stuff like this I want to talk to people like that.
And a friend of mine I got a nephew like that he grew up in a Christian home and then now he says there's no God and he just you know sits on the couch and his his parents are afraid to talk to him because they think they're gonna push him further away from Jesus.
And I said well this is what you do. And next time you go over there you sit on the couch beside him you put your under arm around him. You say look I love you man I've been praying for you. And you might be fooling your mother you might be fooling your father but you're not fooling me.
You're not fooling God. I know that you know that God exists. The Bible says that you know and I love you and I'm praying for you. And if you want to know how to be made right with him you come and talk to me you want to go shoot you know.
And now that person is afraid of you. And of course you have to do with us in respect because people are in all sorts of different states of depression you know they're in and and sometimes you know you can't give a smug answer but what I say what Christians need to do is love people.
You know and love them because I have had it where I have argued even presupposition times blue in the face. And then you show love to people. And then the response is remarkably different. I remember there's one particular a woman she's an atheist from England.
I think she professes belief now but I was arguing presupposition that is very early on in the ministry till I was till my apologetics work I was arguing till I was blue in the face blue in the face and I finally said to her um are you ever thankful.
And she said yeah. I said who do you think. And of course there was silence and she said that question meant more to her than any of my apologetics work. So I think you know when people are so focused on methodology you know I think that's a problem.
I think that we need to go out and and love people and and even people that are very close to me they think that I've gone soft. They think I've gone Armenian. I said no we have to go out there and love people.
Like even at the abortion clinics before you know those death squirts at the abortion clinic they're used to having Christians in their face calling them murderers. And and it is the fact that they are accomplices to murder.
But I think that they prepare themselves before they go to those claims. They prepare themselves for Christians to be like that to them. But they're not prepared for Christians to go up to them and with a sincere look look in their eyes and say I love you.
I don't know what you're doing here in support of this murderer. I don't know what you're doing here as an accomplice to murder. But I want you to know that I love you. And your only hope is faith in Jesus Christ.
And that's why I'm here today and I think that's what people need to do is to you know it's nice to have methodologies but to get away from that like I say I don't teach people how to defend their faith.
I teach them how not to and what. When I have a conversation with a Christian about defensive faith I want them to walk away and say I could do this all that all along just talk.
About the Lord that I love. Mm-hmm. Okay thank you for that. Well there's just a couple more questions here and I'm gonna stop because uh we were at an hour in 20 minutes and I don't want you to to fall asleep.
How are you doing are you okay is.
It okay to take a couple more unless you're falling asleep. No no I'm fine.
I'm fine let's see here. So it's a it's a it's a philosophical ish. A lot of people are just interested in it. I know I get what you're saying and it's true that we don't want to always be philosophizing and using terms that are really not gonna communicate.
You know the gospel when we're on the street and stuff. But some of the philosophical issues I think are important. People are curious about that. So so here's one for you. And then I'll chime in as well.
I'll just take like two or three more. I'm truly grateful for the truth I have gleaned from the both of you. Could you please expound upon the reason that there could only be one sufficient transcendental.
I don't know if that's too philosophical but in other words if the Christian God we argue is it provides the necessary preconditions for intelligibility. Why could why must there only be one foundation that provides that you know.
Why can't you have multiple transcendental foundations that equally explain and justify knowledge.
You know the thing is I think that you I've heard you actually answer that question far better than I can so I'll defer to you. But when people ask me that question I'll say well it's not that there can't be more than one.
The Bible says there is only one. And if you want to have an argument outside of Scripture you know then I want your justification for arguing outside of Scripture. So if you want to give a philosophical answer that I mean that is your ballpark.
But I don't say why there can't be. I say there is only one and I know that you've had the argument and you can explain that. A lot better is that if if there can be one. I think if there is one that can only be one and I think I've heard actually bonds and talk about in a lecture way over my head.
I just defer to Scripture the fact that it says that there is only one. But I'll defer the philosophical. The philosophical answer to you. Yeah. Before. Yeah. Well I agree the.
Bible says there is only one. So that's the reason why we we believe there's only one. But I think the reason why by way of kind of a critique of someone who might posit the possibility of there being more than one you run into the problem of kind of a metaphysical pluralism that you have for example two different competing accounts of reality both grounding knowledge.
How is that possible. Since that grounding that's not the same as this other grounding they're not the same. So how are they giving you a foundation to give you accurate access to the way the world is.
You can't have two because then you're you. You'll run into the issue of skepticism. You have these two opposing visions of reality that both adequately account for knowledge. How can they do that if they're both completely different metaphysical schemes different epistemological schemes things like that.
So that's why Bonson argued that if Christianity is one then it follows it's the only one because there can be only one. If you don't believe there can be only one then you're stuck in skepticism. And then we can challenge the validity of any conclusion you draw by assuming that there can be more than one.
So again that's some philosophical jargon that might not be useful for some people. And size probably saying I told you I've.
Heard way before. But the interesting thing right you know the Lord can use anything to say. Right he can use bad arguments to save somebody right you know but that does not mean that we should use better.
And I'm not saying yours was but he can use anything to save people. So I just you know try to be faithful to my Lord. And if people can make those kind of arguments and be faithful to the Lord I say go crazy.
Not that they need my permission because.
They don't very good and you made mention of in passing before we got before we went live. But hey it's Pine Creek. Good to see you. There you go. Thank you so much Doug. It's always nice to see in the comments there.
Well that's that's.
It for the question. Did Doug ask a question. I don't think he asked a.
Question. There were a couple of. There were a couple of and I think people who are not very they don't like Calvinism very much and so there seemed to be some questions that seemed to be a little little click baity so that we got off topic and talked about Calvinism but we're not gonna go there.
Maybe when I have you know a different show we can talk about it but so sorry if I skipped over some of those questions. But yeah Doug has a question you can ask one if.
You're willing to take one from Doug hi to him and let him know that I've prayed for him over the time and I would not be opposed to having a conversation you know with him in the future. I think the conversation we had on his channel you know I'm thankful for it and I would say that even he's been a friend in a.
Way you know. Well if you ever if you ever wanted to have a conversation I'd.
Love to host it on my show be good me as well and I mean yeah just hi. Doug yeah.
Well hello Doug all right. Well that's it for the questions here so I want to thank you so much. An hour and 25 minutes I know that was a lot but I'm sure folks were happy to see you back. We had a pretty nice size audience listening in.
Guys if you have been again if you've been blessed by this content in this conversation you know show size some love and you know in the comments and and share the video. I love I love these conversations.
One of the reasons I did this YouTube channel side is I have my own pocket theologians and apologists so I teach apologetics and I've taught apologetics. And and when I have questions I have a pool of people that I would reach out to and I would have these conversations over the phone.
And I think to myself like man that was the best conversation I ever had. Like why why am I not recording this. This would be so useful. So I was like you know what let me do a YouTube channel I can teach.
I love to teach and just have these like awesome conversations with people so they're useful and beneficial to me and edifying to me and I'm sure others enjoy them as well. So if you like the content share it and thank you so much for your support and you're showing love to sigh.
And we hope we see more of you doing more videos and things like that and looking forward to doing some more.
Stuff with you in the future whatever the Lord wills. And I want to also thank the people who are watching now and who watches in the future for their prayers because I know that people have not only been praying like for this interview which you know it was a little bit daunting to come back and have this discussion but that people have been praying for me over the past year and I covet those prayers and I'm so thankful to God for you who are watching and.
Watches. So thanks a lot. Well I'm sure a lot of people love you. I love you and I appreciate your the work you've done for the Lord and you know his word doesn't come back void. You know we're imperfect people and God still uses uses us for his glory.
So very appreciative and thank you so much for sharing and keeping people updated on what what was going on. So well if there are no any any last words from you brother and we'll wrap things up just again.
Thank you and.
Prayers of you appreciate prayers for our country during this crisis because things are crazy up here and I know it's bad in the States but you know pray that people don't put their trust in convoys or in governments but they put their trust in God.
And you know one thing that I'm thinking to this convoy it's a powerful message. You see brothers and sisters getting together. But I've never seen something like this for the murder of the unborn. And and wouldn't it be cool for there to be a convoy like this.
For you know against abortion you know. And so it's almost like I want things to get back to how they were with the freedoms. But we don't deserve it. Our countries should be in judgment. This world should be in judgment for the murder of the unborn.
So it's almost like I don't want to get to to get better and less people repent of that wickedness. So I mean continue to pray that that the Lord does a work in this and hopefully that he uses this to save people to to bring in his elect.
Well thank you for.
That well that is going to conclude our episode for today. Once again thank you so much guys. February 16th I'll be having Brant Bosterman on to talk about the problem of the one in the many the Trinity the transcendental argument and presuppositional apologetics.
So if that is a topic that is in of interest to you.
Tune in then. But that's it for this episode. Just one. Also encourage people to pray for dr. white for his debate tomorrow.
That dr. James White is gonna be having a debate in Houston Texas on the topic of is Molinism biblical. He's going to be debating a friend of mine Tim Stratton of the free-thinking ministry and so that's gonna be a super interesting and informative debate so you guys definitely want to check that out.
Now there was someone accusing me here dodging a question so I'm gonna take this person's last question as we don't dodge questions. If I don't get to your question it's probably because of time constraints or it gets lost in the.
Comments. I've stayed in his house so he's got to be a little bit nicer to you.
All right all right. Oh okay. There's always one in the comments. He's a super. Why his sign not a Clarkian. Are there. Clarkians still around. I don't know. Do you want you want to answer there. A reason why you're not.
A Clarkian or when I was at his house too and you know I think Clarkians that I engage with are hard determinants and I used to I usually say to them are you a Clarkian because it's true or because you have to be because you're predestined to be and so no he's a he's a dear brother just he's just trying to get my goat but I love him and hey brother well I think I I think Clarkian ism is.
Fideism and fideism just throws you into the basket of some form of skepticism.
And I'm not down I don't think is I am I mean just if I know you know we're extending this but Bonson actually sat down with Clark and they had a discussion and you know I know that there were the differences in the camps and I'm not a Clarkian but I have sympathies to it because I remember in one lecture brilliant he was brilliant.
I remember in one lecture he was at an evidentialist University and they said to him how do we know that the contrary is impossible and Bonson said well the Bible says now to me that sounds a lot like Clarkian ism a lot like fideism and I think that there is something I don't want to open up a can of worms but I know you got me wrong a more grace to the Clark and I think that's what we have to do.
Anyways it just you know love each other more and and there are differences and I think iron sharpens iron. I'm not a Clarkian but I can see some of the. It doesn't mean that I'm on my way there Josiah but can see some of the points are making.
I think there's huge problems with and I think Bonson points out huge problems with it but I love them and I would stay in your house again if they ever let me into your.
Country. Well I'm just going to hold my Bonson collection and ignore the fact that you almost suggested that he adopted some form of fideism when he.
Said you know the contrary is impossible because the Bible says so that's I mean.
Okay I apologize. I'm so sorry we need to end. I'm so sorry all right. I'm gonna have to do a separate episode now. I'm just kidding. I'm not a Clarkian. I'm just kidding. I'm just kidding all right. See what you did there.
Josiah we're done.
Here man Josiah he's he isn't right now laughing probably to the point of fear.
So thank you so much for the question guys that's it for this episode. Take care. God bless. And thanks again Cy for coming on. We love you and we hope to see more of you brother. God bless everybody.
Bye bye.