Presuppositional Apologetics & Traditional Arguments

3 views

Eli asks Dr. K. Scott Oliphint of Westminster Theological Seminary about the presuppositional use of the traditional arguments for God’s existence.

0 comments

00:00
So could a presuppositionalist use a cosmological argument with the background knowledge that we wouldn't, this argument wouldn't work at all without the
00:11
Christian concept, but for the purposes of the nature of the discussion, they kind of throw that argument and kind of have a conversation with the unbelievers.
00:17
Is there a place for that? Because a lot of people think if you're doing presuppositional apologetics, even when you're using evidence, it has to look starkly different than what these classical guys are doing over here.
00:26
What does that look like? Yeah, again, I don't think it has to look starkly different. I just think what's, you know, even
00:33
Cajetan, the commentator of Aquinas, he said, you know, Thomas's proofs bump up against the ceiling of creation.
00:40
They can't, you can't jump in a cause effect argument in the way that it's laid out classically, and let's just say domestically, you don't have within the argument.
00:52
So I'm trying to be careful here. You don't have within the argument anything that allows you to jump to eternity and infinity and immutability.
01:02
Thomas just says this, we call God. And so if people say yes and amen, okay, fine.
01:08
But just recognize you've imported massive content into the argument that's not there in the argument itself.
01:16
So if we're gonna use a cause and effect argument, we're gonna have to get to the point where we say
01:21
God caused the universe. Yes, right. And that does not mean that he's subject to time or space in his causing it, all right?
01:31
So we can't just, so now we're talking about a different kind of cause, aren't we? And we have to acknowledge that or at least know that going in so that if we're questioned who caused
01:41
God, oh, by the way, God is the only one uncaused. He is who he is, period, the end.
01:47
So we just have to be, I think we have to be, you know, Van Til's phrase, we just always have to be epistemologically self -conscious when we engage in these kinds of things so that we recognize from what foundation we speak.
01:59
If we lose that, we're going to lose the biblical import of what we're doing. God may honor it anyway.
02:06
There've been successful natural theological arguments from other theological persuasions. We thank the
02:11
Lord for that. I used to preach an Arminian gospel and the Lord used it anyway. So that's not the point.
02:17
The point is we need to be as biblically faithful as we're able to be, given what God has said to us.