132. Sex Education (Ten Reasons Why Voting Democrat Is A Sin - Reason #8)

The very fact that our public school systems embrace this kind of sick and twisted legacy shows just how far we have strayed from moral sanity. Hello, everyone, and welcome back to the broadcast where we prod the sheep and beat the wolf.

This is episode 132, 10 reasons why voting Democrat is a sin.

Reason eight, sex education, everyone,.

And welcome back to the broadcast and welcome back to our series called 10 reasons why voting Democrat is a sin. We are in a highly contentious and consequential election season where the future of the country is on the ballot.

And my goal has been to cut through all of the lies and all of the bleeding heart propaganda in order to equip God's people with 10 concrete reasons for why it would be immoral, for why it would harm our nation and for why it would be a sin against God to vote for the democratic party.

Unless they experience a come to Jesus moment and repent of almost everything that makes them who they are, then there's no way for a Christian without serious moral pretzeling to vote for such a morbidly wicked party.

Now, don't get me wrong. I don't believe that many, if any of the listeners of this show, we're going to be stuffing the ballot boxes full of Kamala Harris votes this.

November.

Your long lost ancestors who live in cemeteries may be voting for her to this election. But to be honest, the goal of this series was not to persuade you, the audience, not to vote for Kamala. I already assume that that is true.

My goal,.

However,.

Is to equip you with the information that you need in order to help other people who are struggling in this area. I want to equip you to be a good apologist for this material. There are Christians who are wrestling with this question and who are prone to fall hook line and sinker for the charades and the lies that the Democrats are playing and telling compared to the bombasticism of Donald Trump.

They seem cooler headed at times. They pretend like they're more mature and most of their policies are lathered up with a thick spread of fake empathy that can fool many people. Now I made this series so that you and I could share this information with people who are struggling, whether that means sharing this video on X or on Facebook or sending someone that you know a text with the link to these episodes.

My goal in this series is to help you have a good and biblical reason for why you're rejecting the democratic party so that we collectively can start a movement that's going to help other people see who they really are and end the demonic party once and for all and retake this nation for Christ.

My goal on the show is twofold. I will either be talking about post millennial and eschatological hope that's coming to the world as a result of the victory of Jesus Christ or I will be talking about the enemies that are still left to be put under Jesus's feet.

I'm either going to be talking about the Abrahamic blessing that all of the world's families are going to come under the blessing of the seed of Abraham, which is Christ or how all those who reject him are going to become a footstool for his feet.

In this series, I'm going to be calling out the enemies of God. I'm going to be giving you lots of details. I'm going to give you lots of ammunition so that you can help others see the truth and reject the Democrats lies as well.

Now to do this, to help other people understand these things, I would ask everyone who is watching this show to take a moment to click the like button. When you click the like button, you help videos like these get prioritized by YouTube.

It helps the algorithm, which means that they will go further up on the watch list. They will spread wider and further than we could do it without it. So I would ask you to click the like button. I have a good reason to believe that this series in particular is being throttled by Google and by the underlords at YouTube who are actively suppressing the reach of these videos.

We are, as I said earlier, in a highly contentious election season. We just saw this week how Amazon is not giving the answer on why you should vote for Trump, but they will give the answer through their Alexa app on why you should vote for.

Kamala.

We have every reason to believe that the tech giants in Silicon Valley are going to block this content. So how do we combat it? We like it. We share it. We do our part by clicking the subscribe button and sharing these videos far and.

Wide.

We can beat them at their own game and own their own platform and show them that this is precisely the kind of content that you and I want on the internet, that we're not going quietly away in the dark, that we are here to stay and that this content is what we want to continue seeing.

So with that, please help me by liking and sharing this content. It really does help the channel. Now we also debuted broadcast memberships to the channel last week, which is going to help us take this content to the next level, which is going to be awesome and it's going to help us reach more people.

Making these videos is costly in a holistic sense. It takes a lot of time to write them, edit them, film them, audio, produce, video, produce, upload to the various channels, which is on top of the other responsibilities that I have as a pastor.

Now,.

If you want to help support this channel and help us raise funds so that perhaps I could hire a production helper in the studio or that I could advertise this show and spread the content further faster than we could on our own, please consider signing up to become a broadcast member.

You can choose from three membership tiers with unique perks that are associated with each level. And by doing this, we can reach more people with great biblical content that is a little snarky, super salty, but full of truth.

And we can take back this world from the devils who are currently squatting in it. So I commend that feature to you. If you want to sign up to become a member of the broadcast, well then follow the link that I give in the comment section below and join as a member.

You can sign up for any of the three levels. There's a plan for two 99 called the insiders. There's a plan for six 99 called the defenders. And there's a plan for 24 99 called the prod squad. And I would welcome any support in any one of those levels that you feel led to give.

But I do have one qualification. If you are not tithing to a local church, which means that you are not giving 10 of your income to the body of Christ, please do that before you give a dime to this show.

We are not a local church and while I'd love to be your pastor, I'm not your pastor. I'm a pastor. Well, maybe I am if you're from the shepherd's church and you're watching this, but if you're not, I'm not your pastor.

I pastor a particular people in Chelmsford, Massachusetts. So all of that to say, please give faithfully to your local communion and support your local pastor. And then after doing that, if you still want to support this content, we would have a hearty yes and amen and a great big thank you for that.

So keep that in mind. Now onto today's episode is we're going to be covering reason eight on why voting Democrat is a sin and that is sex education in public schools. Part one, the secular foundation of education.

Aristotle once remarked, the citizen should be molded to suit the form of government under which he.

Lives.

His insight highlights a very stark reality that education is never neutral. Education always shapes individuals to fit the values of the society that is governing them. Now you contrast that with the vision of the early Puritans in America who understood that education is not meant to be used as a tool of the state for conforming us to the worldly powers, but education was a sacred duty that was centered on the family and on the church for them.

For the Puritans, literacy was not a path to success in society or, or a cookie cutter mold so that we could cut and make sure everyone looks like the state. But it was a gateway to knowing God. It was a gateway to knowing God through the scriptures.

See, their goal was not to produce citizens molded by earthly governments, but to raise up God fearing men and women rooted in biblical truth and prepared to lead lives of virtue under the authority of Christ.

Biblically, the Puritans understood, and we should as well, that the responsibility for educating children falls squarely, not on the state, but on the parents with the help of the church scripture, scripture.

In fact, maybe this is controversial to you. Scripture doesn't give any authority of this sacred task to the state. The scriptures don't ask the state to do anything when it comes to education. So think about it like this.

If you are looking for scripture to try to help you understand whether or not you should send your kids to public school, the scripture is silent on the government having any authority whatsoever. It has none, but that's not true of the family.

The family, it is explicitly stated that they are the ones who are responsible for the education of the children. And that doesn't mean deciding to let the government do it for you. For instance, Deuteronomy six, six through nine is clear.

It says this, these words, which I'm commanding you today shall be on your heart and you shall teach them diligently to your sons. Here God commands parents, not the government to teach their children his ways.

And this is echoed in Ephesians six, four where fathers are told to raise their children in the discipline and in the instruction of the Lord. As first Timothy three 15 puts it, the church's role is to be the pillar and the foundation of truth in order to come alongside of the families and help support them in the teaching of their children, but not to take over the parent's primary responsibility.

So in this design, what we're talking about biblically, you have three spheres of authority. You have the government, you have the family and you have the church in this design. The family according to God in his word is the primary educator of the children with the church as the partner and the helper to the family.

The state in the Bible is never mentioned as having any role in the education of young people. Nothing. Even in the ideal world, a Christian nation with a Christian leader, Christian school teachers and Christian curricula.

The Bible does not hand the job of educating Christians to the state. It just doesn't. It leaves that responsibility to parents with the church assisting. So you ask yourself the question, should Christian send their children to public schools?

No, because educating children is given to the parents, not the state. So the very foundation of a public school education is unbiblical at its roots. Now you might ask yourself the question, what about Christian schooling?

What about pub private school? Okay. Christian schooling is acceptable, but it must involve parents who are engaged parents who are being guided by the.

Church.

And I think that the Christian school needs to be connected to a local church because it's the local church that supports the family. If you just have an independent private school, I don't think that meets the scriptural qualifications.

According to the Bible, the parents are the primary educators of their children and the church is playing the role of support. So if you want to send your children to a Christian academy, which I think is a good idea, the parents must be involved in integrated into it so that the church is playing the role of support through the, through the academy and the family is the one who is playing the primary role of educating children.

If that's not the way that you are educating your children, it's not the biblical model. Now, unfortunately this model of state sponsored education is pretty much the primary to where no one even questions it today.

No one even questions whether or not the Bible gives us license to send our children to public school. It is pretty much the norm. It's the norm that we grew up in. It's the air that we breathe. And the rise of the secular education in America has destroyed the biblical vision for how to educate our children, which is probably why Christianity is so weak and the culture is so bleakly evil.

All of this began to change in the 19th century because of enlightenment thinkers like Horace Mann. Mann was a strong advocate of secularism. He pushed for government control of education and he wanted the schools to take away the God given role of parents and the church in the education of children.

His vision of universal education was not built on biblical principles, but on a desire to mold children into citizens of the secular state, echoing Aristotle's idea that the state should shape its citizens, not the parents.

Mann's work laid the foundation for today's public school system, which has drifted further and further and further into promoting Godless values and moral confusion. Now, that's not all. The state also has become a weapon of indoctrination.

Since the time of Horace Mann, the public education system has increasingly fallen into the hands of secularists who are transforming it into a tool of state sponsored indoctrination. This shift was not accidental, I argue.

It moved away from the biblically grounded curriculum to one that deliberately promotes secularism, relativism, Darwinian evolution, and atheism. For instance, John Dewey, who's often called the modern father of or the father of modern day education was an outspoken atheist and a socialist.

So the foundation of this thing, this public school education was made by a socialist and an atheist. He believed that education should be used for social engineering rather than cultivating moral virtue.

Under John Dewey's influence, American schools became laboratories for progressive ideology, replacing God's timeless truth with the ever shifting doctrines of man. And one of the clearest examples of this indoctrination is the removal of prayer and the Bible from public schools in the 1960s driven by landmark cases like Ingle versus Vital and Abington school district versus Shemp.

These rulings didn't just remove religious activities. They signaled the state's unholy intent to push God out of the classroom, leaving a vacuum that was inevitably going to be filled by secular humanism.

Now today, public schools have gone even further. Children are now being taught that gender is a social construct, that marriage isn't reserved for a man and a woman, and that sexual freedom is merely an expression of self identity.

Programs like the comprehensive sexuality education or CSE promoted by guess who planned parenthood and endorsed by the guess who United Nations, another great organization are exposing young children to explicit content.

They're grooming them for a life of sexual immorality, which is abhorrent. In some states, this curriculum is introduced as early as kindergarten, which is the very definition of grooming, teaching ideas that not only contradict biblical truth, but also destroy the innocence of the children.

I mean, think about it. No parent who goes to a playground and sees a weird loner named Chester with a pencil thin mustache. No one feels comfortable with that guy. Playing with your children. And yet we've sent our children to the Chester to the biggest Chester of them all to have them pervert and destroy the innocence of our children in public schools.

These are the foundations that I'm talking about. Whether we like to admit it or not. For instance, take Massachusetts as an example, state law mandates that sex education programs that teach children about contraception, abortion access, and alternative sexual lifestyles are mandated.

Planned Parenthood,.

A central figure in shaping this disgusting curriculum has infiltrated schools nationwide. Think about that. Planned Parenthood is the one who's writing the sex ed curriculum, which tells you their true agenda.

Their true agenda is not to help. Their true agenda is to normalize sexual promiscuity, to undermine traditional family values. Why? So that they can create lifelong customers. If they can turn your children into a sexual deviant, it's almost guaranteed that your daughters are going to end up there having abortions.

The whole thing is a money racket, has absolutely nothing to do with health and absolutely nothing to do with help. The public school system has been weaponized by the godless state to shape children into the same pink haired lesbian citizens who reflect it's disgusting secular image, not the image of God.

They want to make your boys wimpy, weak and gay, and they want to make your girls lumberjack lesbians who have no idea what it means to be a mother. Schools have ceased to be places of learning and nurturing and have become battlegrounds for the heart and the mind of the next godless generation.

The message is loud and clear. Your children belong to us. You'll remember the gay choir in San Francisco during COVID singing the song, we're coming for your children. They believe that. And yet, I don't care really what they believe.

It's a lie straight out of the pit of hell. Our children don't belong to the state. Our children belong to us. When Jesus said, render unto Caesar what is Caesar's, he was not talking about our children.

He was talking about taxes. Our children belong to God. Who's entrusted us to parent them and raise them. We are not to send our children to Caesar. We are to raise our children in the fear and admonition of the Lord.

And guess what? If that means that mom needs to stay home and that dad needs to work a little extra hours to make sure that the family has the resources that they need. So be it. Don't send your children to Caesar and then be surprised when they come back as.

Romans.

And when you could have just stayed at home with them and done what the Bible says, the Bible never ever once gives us license to send our children to the state, especially brothers and sisters, a state that is founded by atheists and has pushed such radical sexualized agendas on our children.

It would be like sending your children to John Wayne Gacy for him to be their babysitter. It would, no one would do that. So why would we send our children to such an horrible institution as the public.

Schools?

Now public schools, as I said before, have become a weapon that has been wielded by an authoritarian state and they're seeking to mold children into loyal subjects of a secular, godless regime. That is not an exaggeration.

The evidence is overwhelming. Schools across the country are pushing conformity to state approved values on gender, sexuality, race, and politics while they're punishing those who dare to dissent from their approved party narrative.

For example, many school districts now require teachers to use preferred pronouns, even if it contradicts their personal religious beliefs. In states like California, parents are often not even informed if their children decides to identify as a cat while they're at school.

This aggressive push for ideological conformity has silenced many who stand against these mandates. Take the example of a middle school student in Massachusetts who was punished simply for wearing a t-shirt that said there are only two genders.

Despite this being a scientific fact, the school deemed it so offensive, they punished him. Even though he was expressing his Christian belief and the belief of actual real science, they punished him because he didn't fit the party narrative.

This incident is not an isolated case, but it's a part of a larger trend to marginalize and suppress Christian beliefs in the public square. The public school system has become antithetical and openly hostile to truth, advancing ideologies that directly contradict the gospel.

The result of this indoctrination is devastating. Many Christian parents send their children to public schools hoping that they're going to be salt and light. And they'll say things like if we don't send our children to the public school within, if we just abandon the public square, then it's going to become more evil.

Brothers and sisters, you don't send your children to fight a culture war. You don't send your children as missionaries. You train them up and then send them out when they're adults. No general would ever send a soldier into battle without first sending them through rigorous basic training, AIT and everything else.

Children are not our warriors that we're going to send out and fight the culture war in school. They're not. You're sending them there and you're expecting them to be salt and light. And yet they're being converted by them.

We can't expect to send our children into a hostile world, unprepared and unequipped and believe that they're going to be successful. Studies have actually shown that children raised in Christian homes who attend public schools are more overwhelmingly leaving the Christian faith when they turn, when, when they become adults, the system is designed.

Public school is designed to turn your children away from you and to turn them away from God and the church and ultimately to make them citizens of the state. It's time for us to recognize that public schools are not neutral.

They are enemies of God and they're enemies of you. They are battlegrounds where the state is seeking to steal your children right out from under your nose and turn them into a thoroughgoing secularist.

We can't hand over our most precious resource, our children to Caesar, especially when the Bible calls us to take responsibility for their education, to raise them up in the fear and instruction of the Lord with the church's support.

Anything less than that's a betrayal of sacred trust that God has given us as parents. And it honestly just defies common sense. I don't understand how anyone can send their children to a place that hates God, hates your children, and it's actively trying to steal them out from under you.

That is as foolish as I could think of anything. So let's not do that. Now as Christians, we also have to be concerned about the love of neighbor, but I want to speak about the love of neighbor and perhaps a different way.

This love doesn't compel us to send our children like sheep led to the slaughter with a group of wolves. This love compels us to protect our children and also to seek on how we can protect children whose parents are blind, who are sending them into public school and who are sending them to the slaughter.

To truly love our neighbor means taking action. It means working. It means maybe Christians becoming politicians and ending the department of education. We need Christians who are willing to go to the highest levels of United States Senate, maybe even the presidency to end the public school education's reign of secular tyranny and return education where it belongs, the home.

We've got to help people who don't yet see how these schools are driving our society's children off a moral sexual cliff. And the democratic party is the primary one at the saddle who is whipping the horses ready to go over the edge.

We've got to do something and that's why I'm doing this series. Now I want to go even deeper. We've now talked about in general, we've went an inch deep. Now I want to talk about how the public schools became so sexualized.

Now we've just scratched the surface right now. We've only gone about an inch deep, so I do want to go a little bit deeper and I want to also show where the hyper-sexualization came from. And really you need to understand the names of two people.

There's so many more that we could talk about, but two very important people when it comes to the sexualization of public education. And that's Margaret Sanger, the founder of Planned Parenthood and Alfred Kenzie, who performed disgusting ritualistic science upon children.

It we'll talk about in a moment. And that leads me to a little bit of a warning here. The content in this section and then in the next two sections is shocking. And if you are listening to this as a family, you need to just, you'll need to determine whether or not this content is appropriate for your children.

Only you can determine that as a parent. So if you're listening to it with your children, I would say maybe listen to it first before you show it to them. The content is shocking and I wouldn't want you, uh, your children to be exposed to some of the insanity that I'm getting ready to talk about, uh, without you being aware.

So fair warning. Here we go. Part two, the breeding ground for sexual deviancy. Now it is no secret that the public school system has not only failed to uphold moral values, but has actively promoted the hyper-sexualization of children.

What was once a system of basic education has now become a breeding ground for sexual deviance who in turn raise a future generation to continue their unholy cycle. This transformation didn't happen in isolation.

It was the result of deliberate actions by individuals and institutions who were aiming to dismantle the traditional moral values. Now I want us to, for a second, take a look at how all of this started.

The introduction of sex education into the public school was initially justified as a response to public health concerns in the early 20th century. You see, there was a rising rate of sexually transmitted diseases, especially among the soldiers who were returning home from world war one public health officials argued that teaching about sex in schools would help curb the spread of disease like syphilis and gonorrhea.

This push became even stronger during world war one when returning soldiers were plagued with STIs and STDs. And the government used this as a reason to implement broad sex education programs in the public schools.

But beneath the veneer of all of these public health concerns, which is usually how they advance their tyranny, a far more insidious agenda was brewing under the surface. One shaped by none other than Margaret Sanger.

Sanger, if you don't know, would go on to found Planned Parenthood and is often hailed as a pioneer of women's reproductive rights. However, the truth about her life and her beliefs paints a much more hideous and sinister picture.

She wasn't just advocating for sex education to prevent diseases. That's the way she's described. She was using it as a vehicle to promote her twisted philosophy of eugenics, sexual autonomy, and societal control.

Sanger's view of race was horrifying. Even she was a committed eugenicist, which just means that she supported the idea of racial purity and selective breeding so that a fit population would come to bat or come to place.

Like if you think that that sounds a lot like Nazi Germany, it's because it is. She wanted a survival of the fittest, which is Darwinian evolution taken to its logical conclusion. And she wanted a pure race, not like the Nazis called them as Aryans, but she wanted a pure race of people who were white.

That's what she believed. She believed in using birth control and sterilization to prevent certain groups, i .e. black minorities and poor people in the 1920s from reproducing. In her 1922 book, The Pivot of Civilization, she argued that birth control was essential to limit the reproduction of people that she deemed unfit and feeble minded.

She was talking about black people, which is disgusting and racist. Her infamous Negro Project, which was launched in 1939 was designed to reduce the African American birth rate through widespread distribution of birth control in minority neighborhoods.

If you ever wondered why Planned Parenthood always shows up in minority neighborhoods, this is why because they were trying to kill off who they thought were the feeble minded and their founder told you exactly who they thought that was.

She hated black people. She was in, she even enlisted black leaders to help her in this project of helping to, to lower the birth rate of black people, which is astounding. She elicited help from the group she hated to make sure that they had less children.

She even said this, we do not want the word to get out that we want to exterminate the Negro.

Population.

This is your founder of Planned Parenthood who said that she doesn't want the word to get out that she wants to exterminate black people. And yet today she's hailed as this sort of princess of a virtue.

Her obsession with controlling the reproduction of nonwhite populations was so extreme that she openly praised the policies of Nazi Germany, admiring their use of sterilization for racial control. It's not an exaggeration at all to say that Margaret Sanger's ideology shared the very same roots that fueled the Holocaust, but her moral corruption didn't stop there.

Sanger led a life of absolute sexual debauchery. She participated, this is documented history. She participated in orgies. She pursued countless sexual escapades, free sex and swinging. She viewed traditional sexual ethics as oppressive for women and advocated for a world where women could engage in constant sexual encounters without the consequence of marriage and motherhood.

She even abandoned her own children to chase a life of profligate sexuality, provide, or proving that her ideas about sexual empowerment are just nothing more than selfish indulgence. And here's a question.

How could a woman who hated so many people and who rejected her own role as mother, even hating her own children, how could she be put forward as the moral authority to shape the way children are educated about sex?

What you'll find is that the Democrats will take some of the most disgusting people in human history and they'll turn them into patron saints. We saw that with Marx who was an awful, wicked human being and now we're seeing that with Margaret Sanger as well.

By promoting contraception, abortion and promiscuity, Sanger led the groundwork for a sexually liberated society, one that separated sex from morality and family and her vision crept into the public school system where sex education was quickly evolved from focusing on health and hygiene to teaching sexual anatomy and exploration under the banner of empowerment.

Sanger and her followers sought to indoctrinate children with the idea that sexual pleasure was right and it was right and good, even divorced from the sanctity of marriage or the responsibilities of reproduction.

By the 1960s, during the height of the sexual revolution, schools began incorporating content from her that not only normalized but encouraged sexual exploration of children. They began teaching that contraception and abortion were acceptable choices and that sexual activity, regardless of marital status, was healthy and natural.

Sanger's dream of a society freed from the oppressive bonds of Christian morality was becoming true and a reality and public schools were the vehicle that were driving it forward. They were the test laboratory that was testing out these ideas on our children.

This shift created a school environment where young people weren't just informed about sexual health. They were being taught that sexual experimentation and promiscuity were the desired outcomes. The moral guardrails that wants to find sexual behavior rooted in scripture and designed to protect the family were systematically dismantled and as a result, public schools became a breeding ground for the behaviors that singer herself embodies, sexual libertinism and a rejection of traditional moral values, teenage pregnancy, abortions, all of it.

She knew what she was doing. She engineered this whole thing and now Planned Parenthood's there. She's the founder, remember to rescue children from unwanted pregnancies, making millions of clients a year.

Even more shocking is how modern day Democrats continue to revere this serial killing Sanger, despite her well-documented racism, her eugenic views, and in her clear, uh, culpability in the million murders that happen per year as through abortion.

In 2009, Hillary Clinton famously said, I admire Margaret Sanger enormously her courage, her tenacity, her vision. Clinton even compared singers work in reproductive rights to the civil rights movement, ignoring the fact that it was Sanger's Negro project that explicitly was designed to curb the rate of black Americans.

But I think it's probably obvious to most people that we shouldn't take moral statements from Hillary Clinton, but such statements nonetheless are not just ignorant. They're hypocritical. And they paint Sanger's entire life work that is rooted in dehumanization of minority populations as virtuous, which is insanity at best.

Planned Parenthood, the organization that Sanger founded continues to carry on her disgusting legacy. It promotes abortion and is heavily involved in shaping sex education across this country. The fact that public school sex education is based on the ideas of Margaret Sanger, a woman who abandoned and hated her own children and promoted racial sterilization and lived a life of sexual indulgence.

That the fact that she should be the one who teaches our kids should raise every sort of red flag and alarm bell imaginable, who in their right mind would allow their children to be exposed to curriculum influenced by someone like her, her life marked by promiscuity orgies, abandoning her children, racial eugenics, all of that should disqualify her from even being in society.

She should have been put in prison yet she's lauded by many as a political hero. The very fact that our public school systems embrace this kind of sick and twisted legacy shows just how far we have strayed from moral sanity.

Alfred Kinsey. Now at the heart of the transformation of sex education in America lies Alfred Kinsey, a figure who's so-called research on human sexuality has profoundly altered the direction of public education and thought about sexuality.

Kinsey is a disgusting, sick and twisted monster. Let me explain. He was originally a zoologist, but he published two significant reports in the 1940s and fifties called the sexual behavior in the human male and the sexual behavior in the human female.

These reports were hailed as groundbreaking at the time, but have since been exposed as deeply flawed, unethical and criminal even in their methods. One of the most disturbing aspects of Kinsey's work was his documentation of childhood sexuality, particularly his grotesque and disgusting claim that children, including infants could experience orgasms.

His infamous table 34 in sexual behavior in the human male recorded the abuse of children and infants, some as young as five months old causing them to have orgasms at five years old and he would detail their orgasmic responses.

This data was obtained through abusing those children sexually by pedophiles whom Kinsey not only interviewed, but he encouraged them in their heinous acts. For instance, one of the people that he used in this study is a man named Rex King who is a known pedophile.

Meticulously, this man meticulously documented his abuse of children for Kinsey's research, touching them, fondling them, abusing them. And Kinsey himself even commented that King had a research spirit about him.

This man was abusing, serially abusing children for the work of this disgusting man. Kinsey's defense of childhood molestation is also disgusting. In 1949 he testified before California's general assembly subcommittee on sex crimes where he argued for the liberation of sex offense statues and he advocated for the immediate parole of every child molester who was in prison.