American Gospel Guy, Sean, Makes Some Good Points (Seriously He Does) - Part 5

Fishing, Mood, and the Start of the Commentary

All right, well, let's jump right into it today. I went fishing this morning again. I found some, I found a great spot. I went to my old spot and I got a couple bites, but really nothing doing. So I went downstream a little bit and I found a couple of pools and I did that thing where, you know, if you look on YouTube, how to find trout, you know, you got to stalk them so they don't get spooked.

I kind of stalked them this way and I found a big rainbow trout right here, got him. And then I found another one right here where the water's kind of moving here, kind of floated my bait right down here.

It was, it was awesome. It was awesome. I felt like a real fisherman, a real big boy. In any case, I'm in a good mood. We're going to continue with this conversation. I can't call it a debate. I just can't.

It's not a debate, obviously. You know, I had really low expectations for this whole thing and somehow Gospel Coalition, despite how low my expectations were, somehow they've managed to surpass them. It's like way worse than I thought it would be.

I knew it would be bad. I'm not that naive, at least I don't think so, but it was way worse than I thought it would be. I can't believe it. It's just every time you think something Gospel Coalition does can't get dumber, it does.

I can't believe this. By the way, there's a lot of feminine energy in this whole thing. I posted a screenshot of this and my goodness, it's just, oh man, even the lighting is like, it's like villain lighting, but it's also kind of like soft, like feminine lighting.

It's just hyper-emotionalism. It's just, that's all I'm going to say. I'm going to be nice today. I'm in a good mood. I'm going to be nice. There's no question about it. Let's do this. I'm going to try not to interrupt.

I'm going to try not to interrupt. I'm going to do it. This time I'm going to succeed, but I'll talk over it. I just won't stop it. What about block lives? Do you remember that? Block lives matter. How does what she is saying land on you in terms of both what the term means.

Honestly, Rebecca really does need to smile more. There's a lot of feminine energy here. But also, the church should have been the first one to do that. A lot of scowling going on.

You kind of asked like three questions in a row.

Black Lives Matter, Wokeness, and Public Versus Private Conversations

Oh, before I let Sean, I know I said I wouldn't stop, but I had to do this. Do you remember when Sean had said, he got asked a question and he was like, let me just not answer your question. He was like, Rebecca, I just want to say I'm so thankful for you.

That was such a weird way to say it. It should be, I'm so thankful for you. That's how you would say it. Quite frankly, when you go like this, I'm so thankful for you. It's as if you're seeking approval.

It definitely seems forced. He had to say that at that moment. I know that he's a smart guy, and maybe I'm giving him too much credit, but he's a smart guy, so he knew her whole presentation was complete nonsense.

He knew what she had done, but he has to be winsome. That's why this is so creepy. It's like you have to be winsome, even though she just said a bunch of nonsense. That's why it came out that way. I'm so grateful for you.

That's what I'm supposed to do. Again, it's a very seeking approval, or as if you're asking a question. I'm so grateful for you. Very weird. Very weird indeed. Let's continue. Let's let Sean finish. All right, I'm not going to interrupt.

I'm not.

I'm a sneaky moderator. Let me try my best to pick them apart. First, as far as Christians using the phrase, Black Lives Matter, and then being called woke, I was actually living in D .C. when all of that kind of exploded, and having conversations around dinner tables, and small groups, and after church, and what I realized is that everyone was kind of trying to figure out what was happening in real time, which is really dangerous because everyone has social media, so they're external processing on the internet, and you external process one way, and somebody throws this label on you, and external process the other way, and it's just all bad.

Less Facebook, Twitter, Instagram conversations, more private conversations would probably go a long way, so I remember sitting at my dinner table on the hill with an African-American sister who said something like, yeah, Black Lives Matter.

It's great, and I just that day looked on their website, and the destruction of the nuclear family, and gay and lesbian. I think it was right around the same time where they came out and said like, yeah, we're trained Marxists, and I told her this, and she was like, what?

What are you talking about? No, this is just about Black lives, and so she didn't know that. I just, by God's providence, happened to look at it, and so we had a little back and forth there, and I'm just really glad that that happened in my living room, and not on Twitter, because on Twitter, she would have called me a white supremacist.

I would have called her woke, and we would have gotten nowhere, but by the end of the night, I think we were actually better informed, so now having said that, I downed the law in a place. Let me stop him.

I.

Accidentally paused the recording instead of the video. All right, I have to stop in there, so I really hate, and Sean is buying right into this, this false story. There's two parts to it. Number one, that the internet, the internet and real life are two different things.

Well, of course it is, but people that are quick to call you a white supremacist on the internet, or to call you woke inappropriately on the internet, they'll do that in person too. I get this sense that a lot of these guys haven't met these people in real life, these kinds of folks in real life, but they're just as horrible in real life as they are on the internet.

The internet and real life are two different things, so that's the one part of the false narrative. Number two, it presents this idea that so many of us just were like, oh, I guess we're just calling people woke now if they care about race.

Oh, wow, I guess I'm going to do that, as if they put no thought into it. It's so disrespectful to common people in the pews, and Big Eva is known for this. They just have so much disdain. They think we're just a bunch of idiots.

It just didn't happen this way. It didn't happen this way. They have a false narrative, these woke folks, and Sean is buying into it too, that anyone who talks about race in the church is labeled woke instantly.

I've talked about race in the church many, many, many times. Many times. I've talked about racism many times in the church. I've never once been accused of being a Marxist, never once been accused of being a critical race theorist, never once been called woke.

It's not about talking about the issue, it's how you talk about it. So many of us, I've said this a few times in these responses, we were long-suffering. We heard some things that didn't make sense. We asked questions.

We had back and forths. We inquired. We wrote letters. We did it in private. We did it in public. We did it in person. We did it in the internet. The responses we got were so insane. They were so socialist.

They were so obviously emotion-driven Marxism that we came to the conclusion that some of these guys are woke. We didn't just say, oh, you're talking about race? You think racism is bad? Well, you must be woke.

See, that's the lie. That's the fantasy narrative that unfortunately Sean is participating in here. That's not what happened. If you could see my inbox, you would see so many situations. Man, my pastor said this, and I went to talk to him about it, and he said that I just was blinded by privilege and this and that.

All I did was ask a couple questions. I asked my pastor about this woke church book by Eric Mason, and he was like, he just raged at me. It's like people are having these conversations in real time, and they go just as poorly as they do on the internet sometimes.

Let's stop pretending like people are totally different on the internet than they are in real life. It's not the case. It's not the case at all, number one. Number two, stop pretending like we just have a hair trigger.

Everyone who talks about race is woke. That's not the case at all. So many of us have been long-suffering. We've asked many questions. I just hate when they put this false narrative forward, and Sean, you know better, man.

You know better, because you know you get called a white supremacist all the time, no matter how thoughtful or winsome you think you're.

Being. It just doesn't happen the way you're saying. Now where we should be able to recognize what's happening, and we should be able to say, I believe that black lives matter, and then in the very same breath say, but I do not in any way support this organization or what it stands for.

If you do that, you will always be a white supremacist in their eyes, because it's not about not being racist. It's about their socialist policies. It's about their supporting everything that they say.

It's about doing all this Marxist stuff that they say. You know that full well, Sean, and you could have said that, because the reality is that's what's dangerous in the woke church. It doesn't matter how much I don't discriminate against blacks.

It doesn't matter how much I give to blacks, even. All that matters is that I support them getting their drip. They gotta get their drip in there. If I don't support the drip, then I'm a white supremacist racist to them.

If I don't vote for someone who's going to give them a bunch of stuff, then I'm a racist. It doesn't matter. None of that matters, and that's the dangerous part, and that's why they chose you, Sean, because you don't go for the jugular.

You're like, well, yeah. Of course black lives matter. Well, obviously. I can support a sliver of what it.

Stands for if you define it in a very particular way, and then what was the other part of the.

Question? Should the church have been, the white evangelical church, have been at the forefront.

Of both the civil rights movement and then more recently? Yeah, yes. Yes, comma. I think we were actually making a lot of progress. I know that's not a very cool thing to say. Good for you,.

Sean. Good for you. I'm going to stop him. I know I said I wouldn't stop him too much, but hopefully he doesn't take it all back in the next sentence. Sean, come on, man. Do me a solid. It's weird that I'm asking him that, because this was recorded a long time ago.

In any case, good for you. Good for you, because nobody, it's not cool to recognize any progress whatsoever. If I even mention racial progress and I say, you know, really racism is not as much of a problem as it used to be, you'll see in the comments, there's a few people, so when did racism end?

Hmm? What do you say? There's no racism? How could you say that? It's like, are you, are you insane? Honestly, are you insane? There's one person in particular, I forget, forget her name. I think she actually is insane.

And she's, she's in the comment section. And just recently she said, what do you, how could you say there's no racism? Like, you're insane. That's what I, that's how I respond to that. You're insane.

And metrics are hard to come by on this. I wrote an article, which you should definitely not look up on the internet because it was probably really poorly written. But I tried to use some metrics and list out like 10 or 15, this was like 10 years ago, try to list out 10 or 10 or 15 different ways that white evangelicals were actually trying really hard to make progress from giving out scholarships to as many African-American students who wanted them to, like every church I know was like, yeah, we need more diversity on the leadership and we want to be in solidarity.

And I was seeing churches integrate across several different lines of diversity, not just, you know,.

Black, Asian, white. Why do we need more diversity in leadership? We just do. I mean, it's just,.

Otherwise, what are you racist? Quota thing. And I really believe that the backwaters, academia, critical theory, the way that it has trickled down has actually reversed that. So in my, where I talked about kind of losing 50 grounds of progress along racial lines in the church, I really do think that we are moving forward.

Were we moving forward fast enough? That's a judgment call. Was everyone repenting as much as they should have or lamenting as much as they could have? Probably not. But it felt like... Definitely not.

If you're in Big Eva, you've.

Definitely not lamented enough. I said this on Twitter the other day, or actually just today, that Big Eva does everything in their power to rob you of as much joy as possible. They want you lamenting, they want you sad, they want you nervous, and all that stuff.

Don't take the bait, guys. Don't take the bait. If there's anything that you learn from the A .D. Robles YouTube channel is to have the time of your life. Laugh as much as you can. Fight and enjoy it.

And they're going to be like, the thing about you, A .D. Someone said this to me. He got his holy robes on him. He got them all straightened out. He said, the problem with you is not that you care about this issue.

It's just that you're having too much fun. And I just remember looking at that. He wrote it down. It was an email. And just laughing. I was like, that's why they hate me. Because I'm having a good time laughing at their nonsense.

I don't apologize. And I'm going to do it again. It's great. I love doing it. It's fun. It's fun to fight in the Lord's side, man.

We were going in a good direction. I have brothers who are sitting here in this room who would tell me that in their church, they were like, man, God is moving. I can feel reconciliation is happening.

And then boom, this stuff kind of exploded on the scene and everything got way, way worse. Good for you.

So that's kind of my perspective on it. Good for you, Sean. Listen, I could quibble with almost any statement in a Big Eva presentation. Of course I can. And I'm not saying that was a perfect, it wasn't a perfect phone call like Donald Trump's phone call with Ukraine that one time.

It was a perfect phone call. Oh man. But I have to give credit where credit is due. Sean is exactly right. And I don't pretend that it doesn't take guts to say what he said. Progress was being made. There's no question about it.

Anyone who denies it is completely out to lunch, right? Progress was being made. When I was a kid, there was less racism than there is right now. Because this whole project of critical race theory and woke church is to increase the strife as much as possible.

Everything they say is to ramp up the strife, to ramp up the suspicion, the anger, the jealousy, the covetousness, all of it does that. And so Sean, it takes guts to say this. Things were moving in the right direction.

And then people got woke. And all that progress was thrown in the garbage can. And here's what Sean won't say. And it's lots of people at this coalition who were involved in that. It's Thabiti Anyabwile who undid so much progress.

It's Eric Mason who undid so much progress. It's Matt Chandler. It's Tim Keller. It's these guys that are participating in unraveling so much progress. And they did it to serve their political aims. They did it so that they could get pats on the back and look like cultural thought leaders.

You see, that's the thing. They don't actually care about black lives. They care about looking like they care about black lives. And in order to look like you care about black lives, you've got to vote Democrat.

You've got to at least support Democrats, or you at least have to tolerate Democrats. That's how you look like you care about black lives. You keep a bottle of hot sauce in your purse like Hillary Clinton.

That's how you look like you're caring about black lives. That's not how you care about black lives. It's just that simple. Black lives. It's just that simple. Good for you, Sean. Pat on the back. I don't have, I'm not going to say anything else negative about that statement, except for the fact that he should have taken it a step further.

That's the only thing I'll say. But all in all, very good. I know that takes guts. God bless you. Let me take it from maybe an older buzzword to a newer buzzword. CRT, intersectionality, these are terms that you referenced in your argument.

When you look at those, when you hear those terms used, is that something the church should throw out altogether,.

Critical Race Theory and Intersectionality as a Totalizing Worldview

Or are there... Throw out as in use or throw away?

Throw away the whole, everything encompassed in CRT and intersectionality. Chuck it in the garbage bin. I don't even talk about critical race theory on my channel. I just, I don't bring it up. I don't mention it in my book.

I don't care what you call it. I don't care about the specifics or the, you know, where it came from as much. What I care about is what is being said that comports with the scripture versus what is being said that's against the scripture.

It's just that simple. And every person who's been influenced by critical race theory ends up saying a bunch of nonsense about the scripture that's just not true unless you're a Marxist and you're twisting the scripture in a certain particular way.

So chuck it in the garbage bin. It's not helpful. It's not, you know, winsome. It's not biblical in any way. Chuck it in the garbage bin and let's start from the scripture. Or do you find helpful things in CRT in the academic study and application of CRT or.

Intersectionality? Yeah. So first, let me just make a quick point of clarification. I find it very common that when we talk about wokeness or critical theory, which I sort of use synonymously, that we always end up talking about CRT and intersectionality, but CRT is just one manifestation of wokeness.

Critical theory is a totalizing worldview and it's fundamentally cynical. It wants to look at all power structures and it can do that. And anyway, so what it tries to do is it tries to do it through the lens of every point on the intersectional spectrum.

So you have various manifestations. You have critical race theory. You take out the race. It's just critical theory. You have critical education theory. That's critical pedagogy. You have critical queer studies.

You can just kind of apply it to all various and sundry things. Okay. So the question is, do I find any point of critical theory useful for the church? And I think the answer to that is kind of, don't all heresies and bad ideas have a germ of truth in them?

You know, Mein Kampf, which you can't read because it's banned. Hitler says one or two true things in there, you know.

He says more than one or two true things in there. And this is the thing. It's like, it's like you could have, what's her face? Rebecca, Dr. McLaughlin said, you know, something about how, you know, yeah, you can't throw away, like something about Black Lives Matter and how it's not perfect and stuff like that.

They have a lot of good things that they're doing. You got to support the good. Whatever, whatever it was that she had said. Was it her? A lot of people say that. I'm not going to attribute it to her because I don't know that she said it.

But a lot of people say, you know, look, they're doing a lot of good things. They can't be perfect, blah, blah, blah. And you could have said the same thing about the Nazi party. They said a lot of things that people would really like and stuff like that.

And obviously you wouldn't want to support them because they're trying to undermine society, right? You wouldn't want to support that. And it's the same thing with Black Lives Matter. You don't need it.

Everything that critical race theory accidentally gets correct, it's completely on accident. And you could still have it if you chucked critical race theory out the window. See, that's the thing. This is the scam.

It's like, if you don't need it, why have it? The scripture is sufficient. The scripture is enough to deal with how do you forgive people? How do you deal with people that need to reconcile? How do you reconcile?

How do you deal with government? What's government for? What's government not for? The scripture is totally sufficient for all of these questions, right? And so if critical race theory accidentally gets one or two things correct, you don't need it.

Chuck it out the window because there's so much poison there that it's not even worth it. It reminds me of that fish in the Simpsons. Remember Homer was eating all the fish and there was this like specific fish.

It was called like the Fugu fish that had like the most delicious meat of all time. But it was just like this little piece and the entire fish, the rest of it was poison. It was the episode where Homer was going to die or something.

And he ends up reading the Bible in that episode. That's a weird thing to remember. In any case, why even risk eating the fish if there's just a little bit of meat, but it's almost all poison? Why do it?

Why do it? It's totally worthless. We don't need it. Chuck it out the window.

I'm not going to drink a bucket of water just because it only has a few drops of bleach in it. My main thing that I say to people when they say, well, doesn't CRT make

It's the opposite though. Stop. Don't make it seem better than it is. You don't drink a whole gallon of poison to get the two drops of water. That's what it actually is. It's not a whole thing of water with a few drops of poison.

Critical race theory is all poison, except maybe there's a little bit of water and people are trying to get that water. Meanwhile, God has provided us an entire ocean of water. That's weird because it's salt.

Pretend it was fresh. And we're like, oh no, no, I'm going to get the poison cup with the little drop of water. Meanwhile, there's gallons and gallons and gallons of water over here. We're over here focused on this.

And it's like, again, are you insane? You see the damage this is doing. Why even try? Why even try? You don't need to redeem this. God's provided everything we need.

Back here with this ocean of fresh water. Good points. I would just say I can make those same points without all the destructive stuff that comes along with CRT or with this or that other aspect of critical theory.

I don't think I need intersectionality to be able to recognize that oppression can happen along identity lines. That's well said.

Yeah, that is well said. Of course, you don't need it. It's nonsense. Why do it? It's developed by pagans for pagan reasons in service of paganism. Don't worry about that stuff. Don't worry about that stuff except to refute it.

This is garbage. By the way, somebody in the comments yesterday said that Sean was out of his depth in this debate. And it was because of some of the stuff that he had done previously. I don't think Sean was out of his depth here.

I don't. I really don't think that's what it is. I think that Sean was handicapped because for whatever reason, he got it into his mind that he needed to be so agreeable. He needed to be agreeable. And unfortunately, that's a feminine trait.

And I don't think that Sean imbibes that feminine trait in his normal life. But he agreed to essentially be feminine in this debate by taking them up on their offer for a winsome good faith debate. See, the thing is, a debate is not supposed to be agreeable.

You're supposed to clarify your differences and poke holes in what the opponent says. You're not supposed to be like, oh, I'm so grateful for everything you said. When clearly everything she said was nonsense.

Nonsense. So anyway, I don't think Sean was out of his depth here. I think the last two answers Sean gave were pretty good. And they show that he's not out of his depth at all. I think he was just trying too hard to be winsome.

It doesn't come naturally in this kind of a context. And so it ends up handicapping you. It ends up castrating you is really what it does. And you say things like, I'm so grateful for you. I was already wanting to talk about this, but hearing you two argue, coming back to defining terms, because you both have flanks where people on your flanks aren't necessarily defining terms, they're weaponizing terms.

And you both define terms. Interestingly to me, it kind of highlights the challenge because you define the terms different. You both did. I remember I probably first became aware of the term woke maybe five or six years ago when it was.

Right. But but you see this and this is why a debate needs to be non-agreeable. Right. Because the way Rebecca defined woke was so stupid because I'm woke, according to her definition, because I acknowledge the racism of the past and I don't like it and I lament it and all of that.

And I am not woke. So so in a debate, you have to say, Rebecca, you said that being woke is acknowledging the racism of the past, being aware of it, being alive to it, awake to it. And it's like, how can you say that if there's there's tons of people that you would never call woke that fit your definition?

That's nonsense definition. You're sidestepping this debate. And so in a real debate, you get to challenge that kind of stuff. Maybe it'll happen. We'll see, because it sounds like he's about to talk about defining terms.

So I'm sure at some point, Sean or the moderator is going to say, Rebecca, your definition of woke doesn't make any sense because according to that, like everybody's woke. I would have defined it the way that you defined it.

I was talking about I guess we're not getting any help from the moderator. He likes her definition, which makes no sense because it obviously doesn't define anything. If everybody's woke, according to your definition, then it's nonsense.

There's nobody that denies slavery of the past. There's nobody that denies racial discrimination of the past. Everyone acknowledges it. Maybe some people like it. I mean, I'm not saying there's not people out there that don't like the racial discrimination of the past, but at least they acknowledge it.

Right. At least they acknowledge it. And so that was what her definition was. How can that be the definition of woke? I just, it boggles my mind. So we're not going to get any help from this guy, whoever he is.

Maybe Sean will help us out here because that's the key issue. You only, I don't know if we're gonna get help from Sean because he's trying to be winsome and he's so grateful for her definition. I'm so grateful for you.

Awake to social injustices. Sean's definition of the term, if I can find it, is a bunch of failed Marxists trying to bring Hegelian dialect back to life by fusing it with Freudian psychology, Gramscian philosophy, postmodern epistemology, black feminism, and intersectionality.

Defining Woke and the Challenge of a Real Debate

Yeah, I think the opening statement was a big disaster for Sean, unfortunately, because that's not helpful. Nobody really knows what it means. And it's not, it doesn't, it doesn't provide any additional clarity, right?

Just talk like a normal person. Do you interact with that definition? And how do we as a church move forward when, again, credit to both of you, you're trying, you're defining terms, which a lot of people aren't doing.

How do we move forward from here? And what do you do with.

That definition? Yeah, I think what I was trying to say was, there are different definitions of this term. And in order to talk meaningfully, we need to know which one we're using in any given conversation.

And I gave as an example, what I understand to be the sort of origin of that term, which seems to me to be, broadly speaking, an extremely valid lament and mark of awareness of what's been going on. And likewise, and think, think about how much think.

About how awful this woman thinks the church is, because if she accepts that definition of woke that she gave as an alternative to what Sean did, and then she's saying that there's a lot of people in the church that that that don't acknowledge the sins of the past or the races in the past, think about how horrible she thinks the church is, honestly.

That's like that, that's just, it's just so it's, this is, listen, this is what Big Eva thinks of you, they think that you're completely deplorable. It's a shame, it's a shame that, that the shepherds, just, just, they look at the sheep with disgust so often.

It's gross. It's really not that not that she's a shepherd, at least I don't think so. But she acts like one. There you go.

I'm not an expert on critical race theory. But likewise, I think if we're to look at what is the germ of truth that, from which a lot of this has grown, it's the realisation that changing the laws doesn't necessarily change people's hearts and behaviour.

We shouldn't be surprised by that as Christians. Actually, we should think, yeah, we expected that. And when schools were desegregated, we saw a sudden upspringing of many Christian schools, schools with the name Christian or church in their title, which were private schools where you could take your white children so that they didn't have to go to school with little black boys and girls.

This is recent. And folks who were looking at that observed that, oh gosh, you know, we changed a law here. But actually, we didn't suddenly magic away the horrific racial prejudice that people have been raised on over generations.

I mean, if your grandparents took your parents to watch lynchings as like Sunday afternoon fun, you're not suddenly going to wake up one day and say, well, the laws change. So now I see black brothers and sisters as, you know, just like me.

And so I think we need to reckon with that history. And again, that history, which is our history. And I'm going to let her finish. We need to reckon with the fact that, yes, there have been things that have been sort of built on that, that have gone in very different directions than any of us who believe the scriptures would want to go.

But actually, we need to be talking about those things. We need to be acknowledging those things. Like if we're critiquing critical race theory as an academic discipline, we need to have some sort of understanding that we're actually using within our churches that isn't just pretending like it didn't happen.

And sadly, I think all too often,.

That's what we're doing. So where do you think? So I'm just going to stop there for right now. For right now, I did that just like Sean. Anyway, you know, I don't even have words for that because there were some decent stuff in there, I guess.

And then she said that, you know, if your grandparents took their children to a lynching of black people, just as a bit of Sunday afternoon fun. And I just have to question her truthfulness, really. Because what she's making it seem is just like there's a bunch of Christians out there in the past that when there was a lynching, that was fun to them.

That was like a sporting event. That was like going to the Mets game on Sunday, you know, just a bit of fun, just a bit of afternoon fun to watch a lynching. Bring your children, you know, we can sell some popcorn and perhaps some cotton candy.

That's the impression that she was giving you. But that's how evil they were. Yeah. Anyway, I'm going to stop it right there because not in a good mood anymore. So I just don't think that, I think that her, I think her, I think the war in her heart really has shown through there.

That's as evil as any lynching was. To pretend like the Southern Presbyterians treated it like a baseball game or like, you know, a day of bowling or something like that. Or a kid's party, you know, birthday party.

Oh yeah, what kind of entertainment are you going to have at your birthday party? You know, you're going to have a pinata? You're going to go bowling? Nah, nah, nah. We're just going to go lynch a few blacks and there'll be tea and cakes afterwards.

So, you know, it'll be great, like that's the impression that she gave there. And, you know, the actual history is bad enough. You don't have to make stuff up, you know what I mean? And the fact that she's doing that and she's giving off these kinds of impressions is, again, at a time where tensions are high, she's decided to lie.

She's decided to shade things in the worst possible light. And the thing is, we know about what the Presbyterian, the Southern Presbyterians were up to and we get it, you know, we get it. We understand that many of them, you know, were doing wrong.

But to make them seem like this, like, oh yeah, it's a bit of fun, you know? Like, that's, yeah. Anyway, I'm going to end it there. I hope you found this video helpful. God bless.