"I Just Believe the Bible" | Theocast

Theocast

Subscribe

Download

Share

00

00:03

Hi, this is John, and have you ever been in a conversation with somebody and they use the phrase, well,

00:09

I just believe the Bible. Well, Justin and I are going to have a conversation about that phrase and really what it's called is biblicism, isolationism, where we take proof texts and take them out of context to make our point.

00:21

We're going to talk about how that leads to heresy and theological controversy throughout history.

00:27

So we hope you enjoy this conversation. It's lively, a little bit more academic, but I promise you it's going to be helpful in helping you understand how to properly understand your

00:37

Bible and love God's word. Stay tuned. If you'd like to help support Theocast, you can do that by leaving us a review on iTunes and subscribing on your favorite podcast app.

00:47

You can also follow us on Instagram, Twitter, and Facebook. Plus, we have a Facebook group if you'd like to join the conversation there.

00:54

Thanks for listening. Welcome to Theocast, encouraging weary pilgrims to rest in Christ, conversations around clarifying the gospel and reclaiming the purpose of the kingdom from a

01:16

Reformed and pastoral perspective. Your hosts today are Justin Perdue, pastor of Covenant Baptist Church in Asheville, North Carolina, and I am

01:24

John Moffitt, pastor of Grace Reformed Church in Spring Hill, Tennessee. And Justin is not in Asheville today, but he is in a beach house, a condo, getting some time away to rest and read.

01:40

And I am definitely jealous and I am looking forward to do the same very soon. But before we get started, go ahead.

01:47

No, it's good to be with you, man. This is the second year that I've done this. Our elders decided that it would be good for me to take a week, a year to go away and read and study and write.

01:58

And so I'm thankful to be able to do it. It's a full week. I work hard, but it's also a nice change of pace and it allows me to dig into stuff that I would not have time for otherwise.

02:07

So last year I wrote some things for GRN and a paper for our own church on baptism and read a lot about confessionalism through history.

02:15

This year, doing some small writing projects, but then I'm also doing a deep dive into confessional

02:21

Baptist history, like practical ecclesiology of our forebears from 300 years ago, like documents from the

02:27

General Assemblies back in the day in London, England, and all these kinds of things. And so I'm thankful for this time, man, and I hope it's profitable for my church and for the

02:36

Grace Reform Network and for various things that we've got going on anyway. For sure. And for those of you on YouTube, you'll see that Justin is sporting a new sweatshirt.

02:45

A hoodie baby. It's comfortable. It's very comfortable. If you didn't know this, we do have shirts.

02:50

I've got one on that says Crush Christ and Calm Down. We've got coffee mugs that say the same thing. We've got Theokas coffee mugs and hats and shirts.

02:56

And I don't know if you like that kind of stuff. Every week, somebody's buying something. It's encouraging.

03:02

You guys should start putting it on social media. What are you wearing? I don't know. Is that weird? It might be weird. I don't know.

03:08

Maybe. It's kind of like when people, I mean, well, no, it's not. I was going to say it's kind of like when people

03:14

Instagram their food, but maybe it's different. Yeah. Who knows? Who knows?

03:20

Anyways, let's get into the topic. Let's not waste any time because we don't have much time to waste.

03:25

So, Justin, today is definitely a particular topic that both of us are affectionately passionate about.

03:34

No, we are. We both have been influenced by the effects of this in our experience in ministry and Christianity.

03:40

So, without further ado, my friend, let's get into it. And we've seen the fallout of it, right? Yeah. I mean, historically and in our present moment.

03:47

You've seen the title of the episode. I just believe the Bible. Or you hear people say things similar to that where they'll say, you know,

03:56

I just want to be a Bible person. I want to speak like the Bible speaks. I'm just saying what the

04:01

Bible says. And these are pious sounding statements.

04:07

They sound good to us. It's like, well, who's going to object to that? I mean, that's right. Of course, we're just going to go ahead and disarm this out of the gate.

04:14

The two guys behind the microphone sitting here talking with you, and we trust everybody that's tuning into a podcast like this.

04:22

Our assumption is that we all want to be Bible people. We all want to be people of the word.

04:29

We all want to speak as the Bible speaks. We all want to track with the word of God. We all want the

04:35

Lord to write his word on our hearts. So that's our baseline assumption. To interject, we believe it's sufficient.

04:41

We believe it's inherent. It's God -breathed. It can be trusted. We all agree. All of that. We affirm all of the above.

04:49

And so that's the starting place for this conversation. What we're really trying to get after today is this.

04:56

Throughout history, God's people have dealt with the scriptures. Having said that God's people want to be people of the word, there are better and there are worse ways to go about handling the scriptures and interpreting and understanding them.

05:12

So throughout history, there have been people who, with the best of intentions we trust, have gone to the scriptures and aimed to speak in a way the

05:21

Bible speaks, talk like the Bible talks, believe the Bible, and have made grave and serious errors as a result of that.

05:29

We see it in our own day where people are acting as though they're the first people to ever read the

05:36

Bible. We're just going to go in here and we're going to read this and we're going to work to try to understand it and just look at the words on the page in order to do so.

05:44

What we're going to try to talk about today and in one sense contend for today is, hey, there's a better way to do this.

05:51

The Christians through history have dealt with the scriptures 2 ,000 years worth of time where the Spirit of God has been ministering in the church and people have wrestled with the

05:59

Bible. We are not the first people to take the Bible seriously. We are not the first people to read it. So we can look through the history of the church and gain a lot of valuable information in terms of how people have understood the text.

06:12

There's something called the history of interpretation. There's something called the regula fide, the rule of faith. These things really matter.

06:18

There are ecumenical, ancient creeds of the church where people sought, dealing with the scriptures, sought to hammer out doctrine, really valuable stuff.

06:27

We ourselves and many who listen to the show are parts of various confessional traditions where there are confessions of faith that have also been produced in order to deal with the text and say what the

06:40

Bible teaches. And so there's a better way to go about doing this. And we're going to talk about this today and try to expose some of the errors that result from something called biblicism.

06:50

I'll just go ahead and define it for us right now. So biblicism is this posture, this hermeneutical approach, a way to go about interpreting the scriptures where we go and we chapter and verse it.

07:04

We're going to say what's on the page. And in one sense, whether we mean to or not, we are isolating those words.

07:10

We are not taking those words into the context of the entire scripture.

07:16

We are trying to divorce the Bible from theological frameworks and just take it in a vacuum, as it were, and understand it.

07:27

And so this is problematic on a number of levels. You end up creating a lot of tension, a lot of mystery that isn't there.

07:34

You end up, with the best of intentions, pitting one text against another. And again, with the best of intentions, you can draw some really, really bad conclusions.

07:44

Sometimes these conclusions are really bumping up against what we would call Christian orthodoxy.

07:50

And at best, they're misleading and confusing. So that was kind of a long, long teeing it up for us today.

08:00

But let's go, John. Yeah. So I think just to hone in on biblicism, another way of saying biblicism would be,

08:07

I like how you said isolation. It's isolationism. An example of this would be,

08:12

Justin, if you heard me say, you have no idea what the context is, but you're getting this text from someone that knows me and they say,

08:20

Justin, I'm concerned. I heard John say this to his child. If you do not listen to me, you will die.

08:26

Right. That sounds threatening, like he's threatening his children with death. And your first question you would have to ask is, where did he say that and why did he say that?

08:37

Well, you call me and you're like, hey, John, what's the deal? And I was like, yeah, my son was about to step out into the street. And I said, if he's going to do that, he's going to die.

08:43

And you're going, oh, well, that's just a true statement. You actually have affection and concern for your son.

08:49

And there's a context behind it. We do the same thing with scripture. We just drop a verse. We're not thinking about the context.

08:56

We're not thinking about the author. We're not thinking about the greater context. And we're like, this is what it says.

09:02

Another way of saying this is literalism. Well, don't you want to take the Bible literal? Yes, as it was intended to be taking.

09:09

But what we do is instead of taking the author's intention literally, we take the text words literally and we isolate them isolationism.

09:18

We isolate them from the greater context. So we're going to give examples of this and how this has gone wrong throughout history.

09:25

And just to explain this to the way that Justin has, we're not dealing with a culture who's died and a whole entire language that's died.

09:32

And you've got one expert who's the expert on this particular culture and this particular language and these people groups.

09:38

That is not the case. Christianity has not gone away. And we have godly, well -trained men and women who have been studying scripture for 2 ,000 years that we can go back and look at the debates.

09:50

This is why creeds and confessions exist, because we have had debates on whether or not we have interpreted

09:57

God's word rightly and using those debates for our advantage. So we're going to give some examples from scripture, from history, and we've got a great one that we're even going to use where Jesus himself accuses people of isolation and literalism in such a way where they completely missed the point.

10:17

So, Justin, that's my additive to it. We can go ahead and jump in. Yeah, and not to bury the lead, in the interest of clarity, like public service announcement time, we are saying that everybody has a theological system.

10:32

Everybody has a theological framework, and we've done an episode on this in the past. The question is not, do you have one?

10:38

The question is, is your system, is your framework any good? Because even to say, I just believe the

10:44

Bible or, you know, no creed but Christ, no confession, but the Bible in and of itself is a confession.

10:51

It is a creed, right? And so it's not actually a tenable position to say that I'm just a

10:57

Bible person, because everybody has a hermeneutic, a method of interpretation. Everybody's got a framework.

11:03

And so what we want to do is have a good one. And our argumentation over the years has been that the scriptures actually present these things to us and give us these frameworks and give us these things, these tools that we can then go back to the text with and better understand it.

11:17

So here we go. I mean, the safe way of saying this is we're trying to use the same examples and systems the

11:24

New Testament writers are using. That's our argument here, is that we aren't using systems that a man outside of scripture has given us.

11:32

We believe the system that we're using has been given to us by scripture itself. So if the key has been handed to you in the text, you should use that key as, as Chad Bird calls it, the

11:43

Christ key. I think we should pay attention to how the New Testament authors interpret the Old Testament and use that as a method going forward.

11:51

Absolutely. I could talk about that for the next 30 minutes, but that's not pointedly the emphasis of today's show. We're going to give you a practical application of that.

11:58

I think we could start by highlighting how this has occurred in different ways through history, old, like more ancient history, if we even want to use that language, on up through today.

12:11

We could give a lot of examples here, but we're just going to give maybe two or three. So let's start with one that was a prominent heresy in the early church taught by a man named

12:22

Arius. So Arius is reading the Bible. He's reading the scriptures, he's piecing things together, where he's reading in the

12:35

New Testament, like 1 Corinthians and other places where Jesus is referred to as wisdom from God or the wisdom of God. Then he's also reading texts like Proverbs 8, where wisdom personified, which we all would understand to be about Christ and those things.

12:51

So he's looking at this stuff and he's taking certain words on the page, and he concludes that there was a time when the

13:02

Son came into existence. In other words, there was a time when the

13:08

Son was not. And so he begins to teach that the

13:14

Son and Jesus in his incarnate state is a created being, the first and greatest creation of God, albeit, but still a created being.

13:24

So the deity of the Son and the deity of Jesus is called into question, obviously.

13:32

And this had to be dealt with in the church in that day. And we could talk about Athanasius, we could talk about other fathers, but there are also several creeds that were produced in this era of the history of the church.

13:49

People will know that in 325, you have the Council of Nicaea. In 381, they met in Constantinople.

13:56

But from those two councils and the creeds produced by them, we have what we often refer to today as the

14:04

Nicene Creed. The one in 325 is most explicitly about the Son, but the one from 381, which is the one that we use in our church once a month, is more robustly

14:14

Trinitarian. There were more material added on the Father and the Spirit, etc. To add to that, because the Apostles' Creed, which is older.

14:21

Correct. Circa second century rather than fourth century. Right. And so because this debate arose, it's not that the

14:29

Apostles' Creed is not helpful or we don't love it, but it's not as pungently

14:35

Trinitarian. So Athanasius had to step in and say, all right, listen, Eris is using the

14:40

Apostles' Creed and subverting this very important nature. Because let me do this,

14:47

Justin. Sometimes people, just to add to what you're saying, sometimes people are saying, you guys are getting so nuanced in your theology.

14:55

You're missing the greater part. And if you read the history of Eris, he was an

15:01

Orthodox theologian. I mean, you read his other parts of his theology that were sound.

15:08

And so people would say, John, he's so sound in all these other areas. Why are you taking aim at him in this particular area?

15:14

Well, Athanasius was saying, because I have to take aim here. This isn't a debate over something that is not eternal.

15:20

This is a debate over something that is eternal and therefore it matters. Brother, anytime we're dealing with the person and the work of God, the

15:29

Son, the only mediator between God and man, there is no such thing as splitting hairs. I mean, literally heaven and hell hang in the balance when it comes to these things, because he either is who he says he was or he's not.

15:40

He either is God and man, truly both, the one mediator between us and the

15:45

Lord, and he either then was able to accomplish atonement and satisfaction for sins and the fulfillment of the law and resurrection and all those things, or he wasn't.

15:55

And so, yeah, this stuff is critical. So then, in addition, you have the

16:01

Council of Chalcedon, so you have the Chalcedonian definitions of Christology coming up even in the fifth century after this.

16:10

So you see, I mean, there's a couple of centuries where the church is dealing with, in the aftermath of Arius and this kind of teaching and the stuff that is being propagated around, the church has to deal with it, and they have to hammer this out.

16:24

Doctrine of the Trinity is systematized, it's formalized in good ways so that we can now succinctly articulate it, teach it, hand it down.

16:36

A definition of Christology, the person and work of Christ, is also hammered out.

16:41

It's articulated, it's systematized so that we can better learn it, teach it, pass it down.

16:47

These things are valuable, and these creeds have been affirmed by Orthodox Christians for centuries and centuries and centuries at this point, and we do ourselves a great disservice and we put ourselves in great peril if we ignore these things.

17:02

And so, to act as though these saints were not dealing with the scriptures, not trying to deal with the text in faithful ways, but also trying to take into account everything that the

17:12

Bible taught about the Trinity or taught about the Father, Son, and the Spirit, taught about the Son, His person, and His work, is to misrepresent them.

17:21

Because these people, John, they were trying to be Bible people too. Yeah, well, they would quote things like, well, it says here

17:26

He's the only begotten Son, which means at one point He was not begotten. At one point,

17:32

He was not. We have to look at that and say, all right, why did the author choose in that context, in that culture, within that language, why did he choose to use that?

17:44

Like Psalm 2, today I have begotten you. Right. Is that the best English translation? Because if you've ever spoken or learned the language, as you do know, there is not always a clear one -to -one translation between one word to the next.

17:57

We would all love a literal translation of the Greek and Hebrew and Aramaic into the

18:04

English, but you actually probably would have a hard time reading it. So, we have to be careful in this.

18:09

This is why when we interpret Scripture and we get to something like, wait a minute, this sounds anti -Trinitarian, only begotten, you should stop and step back and go, all right, why do

18:23

I feel this way? Who else has thought through this? What do I not know that I need to know?

18:28

I've never really met an evangelical who truly is an evangelical, right? They understand the gospel, who doesn't read

18:35

Scripture from a Trinitarian mindset, like when you read Genesis 1, you're putting Trinitarian theology into the text, right?

18:42

Because you understand that God is not just one.

18:50

He is three and one. He's three, right. But you don't learn that from Genesis, right? Well, you see it.

18:55

I agree with you, because you have in the beginning God, and then we understand from other portions of Scripture, this is exactly what we're talking about, from John 1 and other places, we understand that the agent of creation is actually the second person of the

19:10

Trinity, the divine Word, the Son. Then you also have the Spirit of God hovering over the face of the deep in Genesis 1, and so, yeah, with a proper

19:20

Trinitarian framework from all of Scripture, we can then read Genesis 1 and say, yeah, it's there.

19:26

This is proving our point in one sense, that this kind of systematic theology that's done in creeds and done in confessions is actually really helpful for us to be faithful students of the

19:40

Scriptures. That's right. So when you read things like begotten, you have to ask yourself, okay, is this a cultural issue, what's going on, why is he using that language?

19:49

Because it would seem one verse would counteract the rest of Scripture. When Jesus talks about being eternal, eternal with the

19:54

Father, one with the Father, one verse can't squash all other ones. We do this all the time.

20:00

We do, brother. It says it here. Yeah, but all these other passages say the opposite. So let's find a balance here to figure out, you know, what are we missing?

20:08

Exactly. If you're new to Theocast, we have a free ebook available for you called

20:15

Faith vs. Faithfulness, A Primer on Rest. And if you've struggled with legalism, a lack of assurance, or simply want to know what it means to live by faith alone, we wrote this little book to provide a simple answer from a

20:27

Reformed confessional perspective. You can get your free copy at theocast .org

20:32

slash primer. If you read something that is causing you to draw a conclusion that is outside the bounds of historical orthodoxy, you need to pause, you need to ask yourself the question, like, maybe

20:46

I'm wrong here. And also I need to then think about this verse in its context and maybe the immediate context of the paragraph or the book that it's in, the

20:55

Testament that it's in, the era of redemptive history that it's in, and also in the context of the whole scripture and come to a place where I can understand this verse in a way that does not contradict all of that.

21:06

While we're here, let's just go ahead and talk about a contemporary example along these very same lines. There's been a lot of dust up on Christian Twitter.

21:14

There's always dust ups on Christian Twitter. But people are like, well, brother, I mean, which one? You know, depending on the day or the week.

21:22

Over the last, let's say, six months, there's been a lot of metaphorical ink spilled, digital ink spilled on Twitter about the doctrine of the

21:32

Trinity, in particular, how God the Son relates to God the Father. So there's a lot of talk about EFS, ESS, so it's eternal functional subordination, or the eternal subordination of the

21:43

Son, and these things are calling into question historical, creedal, like Nicene, Chalcedonian definitions of the

21:52

Trinity and the person and work of God the Son. The reason where this comes from, in part, and people that are articulating things about God the

22:01

Son and how he relates to God the Father that are problematic, comes from this biblicism perspective, this biblicistic, if I can even use that word, where we're isolating verses and we're just trying to say what the

22:13

Bible says. We're just trying to speak like the Bible does. Hey, I just want to believe the Bible. Guys, we'll go to the

22:19

Olivet Discourse where Jesus will say that no one knows the day or the hour of his return. The Father only knows.

22:28

Now, the way that we understand that, John, without going off into the weeds and getting mired in the minutia here, is that that is a reference to Jesus in his humanity saying this.

22:39

It is not that God the Son, who is fully God, equal with the Father, doesn't know the plan.

22:47

It's that Jesus, in his humanity, because he is truly human, and he has, in one sense, limited himself, emptied himself, to use the language of Philippians 2, and has become truly human in order to represent humans.

23:02

He is saying nobody knows, only the Father knows. We could go into that maybe at some other time if we needed to, but what guys are saying these days is, well,

23:12

I mean, it says only the Father knows. We just want to be Bible people. There is this eternal, functional subordination, this eternal subordination of the

23:20

Son, where there is this way that the Son has always related to the Father, and then this has all kinds of ramifications for how authority and hierarchical structures work for us, and how women are to submit to men, and all these kinds of things.

23:34

We're just like, hey guys, let's pump the brakes for a minute, because the things that you're saying about God the

23:41

Son seem to contradict Nicaea and seem to contradict Chalcedon, and also seem to contradict a boatload of other verses, other passages in the

23:51

Scripture about the divinity and the deity of God the Son being equal with the Father. Maybe you need to pause and ask yourself, is my interpretation of one verse in the

24:03

Olivet Discourse contradicting all of this other stuff, this avalanche of testimony that exists out there?

24:10

Our answer to that is, yeah, we think it does. At times there can be kickback against creeds of confession, saying, well, those are just man -made documents, to which

24:20

I would agree. They actually are man -made documents, but there's a reason why they exist, and there's a reason why the

24:27

Church has affirmed them for so many years, because they are biblical. They're a biblical defense against heresy.

24:36

Sometimes people are like, yeah, I understand what that says, but it's wrong, and I'm like, well, you should be really cautious sometimes about calling something the

24:43

Church has affirmed for hundreds of years, almost 2 ,000 years, and saying it's wrong. Not to say that we can't do that.

24:51

There's a lot of things in Church history that we call wrong, that some Christians have affirmed, but I do find it interesting how there's an aversion at times to history.

25:05

It does feel like there's arrogance and there's pride. I know we take a lot of shots at John MacArthur, so I'm going to take a shot and then give a compliment at the same time.

25:16

John is not confessional. He's not creedal. In his early years, he was preaching through the

25:22

Gospels, and in doing so, he ended up denying the eternal relationship of the

25:27

Father to the Son. He basically denied the eternal Sonship of Christ. I'll link the article here.

25:35

In the article, it basically asks the question, is it true that John MacArthur has reversed his position on the eternal

25:40

Sonship of Christ? The answer to that is yes, and then they provide a statement of why and what happened, but it's a great example.

25:48

I'm super thankful that John put a public statement out there. It's all there for the read, but it's a great example of what can happen when you isolate yourself in a particular text and you're not allowing the greater context, and I would just say allowing history, other people who've wrestled with the text to help inform you so you don't fall into the same heretical issues.

26:09

If John would have held that position and continued to hold to it, that's an issue, right?

26:15

Yeah, that's a heterodox position. Yes. Thank God he recanted and publicly said that, and amen.

26:22

Praise the Lord. Justin, some other issues that I don't think are heterodoxy, they can be if you take them to the logical conclusion, but people will do this with things like Calvinism and specifically whom to whom

26:37

Christ died for. We will say, well, is it limited or is it unlimited? They'll use particular passages out of context and say, well, see here,

26:45

Jesus died for the sins of the whole world. It literally says those words, so John, you guys are not taking the text literally.

26:53

You're taking your system and you're imposing it on the text. I hear that argumentation saying, okay,

27:00

I am taking what all of Scripture says and allowing it to inform what

27:05

I see in this particular text. And then people will say, well, you're allowing logic and theological systems to be what causes you to come to these conclusions.

27:15

Same thing with John 3 .16. It says, for whosoever believes, that means that you're imposing

27:21

Calvinism. You're imposing this onto the text. These are great examples for those of you that may not be in the

27:26

Trinitarian debate, but some of you who are listening probably are in the Reformed Calvinistic debate. As an example, this is where Biblicism and isolationism is an example, or I would say proof texting, where we're just going to pull one phrase from one verse and say, see,

27:40

Jesus didn't die for just a select group of people. He died for all. That's a great example of how dangerous

27:47

Biblicism can be because you are ignoring the entirety of everything that Scripture has said for one verse.

27:53

Justin Perdue In my mind, it immediately goes to John 6 .37. It doesn't serve our purposes so well right now, but I just want to say it. All the

27:59

Father gives me will come to me, and whoever comes to me I will never cast out.

28:05

There you have this. Jesus in one sentence is effectively summing up a lot of that. There are certain people that the

28:11

Father has given to him, and whoever comes, he'll never cast them out. Justin Perdue I wouldn't lay my life down for my sheep.

28:17

Justin Perdue No, amen. I mean, there's a lot there. It's a good example, though, of how we tend to isolate certain verses and build a theology outward from one verse, when in reality what we need to do is work from the whole, what's main and plain in the whole, to help us understand individual verses.

28:33

Many people have said this through history. I have, in listening to some Martin Lloyd -Jones sermons, heard him speak this way, so I often will reference

28:41

Lloyd -Jones when I say this. If we do not understand the whole, we will do terrible things with the parts.

28:47

That's the way we need to work. We don't need to invert that relationship and work from the small and the more obscure outward.

28:54

We work from the whole to the individual parts, and that helps us be better interpreters of Scripture.

29:01

So let's talk about Jesus for a minute. Justin Perdue Absolutely. So just to give an example from the

29:08

Scriptures, we're going to look at a couple of different passages and quote some stuff for you here from the mouth of Christ himself to demonstrate that there is a way to go to the

29:18

Scriptures and look at them and study them and be doing it all wrong. Even Jesus said this.

29:25

So it's not enough to simply just be a Bible person. The question is, are you rightly understanding those

29:33

Scriptures? So John chapter five, famous words. We quote them often.

29:39

It's one of the most important passages for our hermeneutic,

29:45

John. Jon Moffitt Can we just say Jesus was the first to call out biblicism? Can we just go ahead and say that?

29:51

I mean, I think there were probably, I mean, John the Baptist maybe too, but I agree with you.

29:57

For the purposes of our episode today, yes, Jesus, the first to call out biblicism.

30:03

So John chapter five, many will know it. Verse 39, verse 46 are the two that we're going to cite. We'll probably also jump over to verses in Luke 24.

30:11

So Jesus says to an audience of people who were students of the Scriptures, studied the law for,

30:17

I mean, it basically gave their lives to this and were trusted to interpret it rightly.

30:22

He says to them, John 5 39, you search the Scriptures thinking that in them you find eternal life, but it is they that bear witness about me.

30:34

Then in verse 46, again, John five, he says, if you believed Moses, again, who wrote the

30:40

Pentateuch, first five books of the Bible, Genesis, Exodus, Leviticus, Numbers, and Deuteronomy. If you believed Moses, you would believe me because Moses wrote about me.

30:50

So what's he calling out there? He's calling out a way of studying the Scriptures that is of no value.

30:58

And he is saying there is a way, a particular way that you need to study and understand the

31:05

Scriptures. And here he's talking about the Old Testament in an appointed way. He talks about the book of Moses in verse 46.

31:11

He says, you need to understand these things, these documents, these books, these Scriptures as a testimony about me.

31:19

And it's only in me that you're going to find eternal life. And this has always been the plan. So he is saying, you're not just a

31:26

Bible person. You're not just going to say what the Bible says. There's a way you should understand it. And that's not new information.

31:33

It's not like, oh, mic drop. Oh, this is so new. No one's ever heard this before. It's supposed to be about Jesus.

31:39

It's a rebuke. He actually tells the leaders of Israel, you should have known this.

31:45

You should have seen this, and I'm rebuking you for not seeing it. So it's not that all of a sudden

31:51

Jesus introduces a new hermeneutic. He's like, it's always been this way. And if you understand and you listen to the writers of David and David's words, you can hear that David actually understands these words.

32:04

He's looking for the Son. And yes, there's metaphor and there's poetry, and you can see a lot of symmetry and typology.

32:12

But you understand that the New Testament writers start going back. I mean, James does this a lot too. They go back and say, see, it said it here.

32:20

Here's the fulfillment. Here's the example of it. Jesus does this, even using the illustration of Moses raising the serpent up in the wilderness.

32:29

So it's helpful to understand that there is a way that we are told to read scripture.

32:38

And thankfully, we are not left alone that the writers of the New Testament help us make sense of the old.

32:45

Once we do that, we then flow through the whole Bible with that hermeneutic, with that system that's given to us from Christ.

32:53

Oh, Christ becomes the point. So when we start in Genesis, we understand from John, he's the creator.

32:59

He then becomes not only the creator, but he becomes the substitute. And he becomes the king.

33:05

He's the promised redeemer and all those things. You start seeing he plays all of these roles from creator, redeemer, priest, king, prophet, and you just realize the whole thing is a flow from him.

33:16

So Jesus shows up on the scene and says, you didn't get it. You missed it. No, 100 percent.

33:22

I remember preaching through Genesis. It was striking to me how people from the very beginning were looking for that promised redeemer.

33:29

They were looking for the seed of the woman who would be their deliverer. That's clear. This past Sunday, I preached the first message in a series in Romans and dealt with the

33:40

Old Testament because of what Paul says there about the gospel of God that had been revealed through the prophets and the

33:45

Holy Scriptures concerning his son who descended from David according to the flesh. It's all there, man, to your point.

33:53

Also, to pick up on something you said that I think is a very good observation, Jesus is rebuking his audience. It's not that he's saying anything new.

34:00

He's saying, you should have known this. Luke 24 bears that out as well. People know that account. The Emmaus Road, Jesus is walking with a couple of disciples.

34:08

They don't know who he is. He says to them after they relay to him everything that's happened and all that stuff about the death of him, his own death, and all that stuff.

34:17

He says, O foolish ones, and slow of heart to believe all that the prophets have spoken.

34:24

He's saying, you should have known this from the prophets. Was it not necessary that the Christ should suffer these things and enter into his glory?

34:31

The prophets talked about it. You should know this. Then, beginning with Moses and all the prophets, he interpreted to them in all the

34:38

Scriptures the things concerning himself. Again, there's a way in which we read the Scriptures. One other example,

34:46

Peter's sermon in Acts is a great example of this as well.

34:51

He rebukes them. They should have seen this. Acts 13, Paul, same deal.

34:59

People know verses 25 to 27 of Luke 24 pretty well, but there's another verse, verse 32, that's remarkable.

35:07

In the breaking of the bread, they knew Jesus. That's huge, Lord's Supper. Then, verse 32, the disciples, once they know who he is, the people that have been walking with him on the road, they say this.

35:18

Did not our hearts burn within us while he talked to us on the road, while he opened to us the

35:25

Scriptures? Again, there is a way in which we read the Scriptures, in which they are opened up to us, and in particular here, it's a

35:32

Christ -centered hermeneutic. It's a Christological hermeneutic. These are a testimony about Jesus.

35:39

He does the same thing, John, in the Sermon on the Mount, when he preaches the law, because he says that he didn't come to abolish the law and the prophets came to fulfill it, all that.

35:48

There's nothing in the law that's going to pass away. Then he says that you need to have a righteousness that's greater than that of the scribes and the

35:54

Pharisees, and then he goes on to preach the law. He grabs a couple of the commandments from the

35:59

Decalogue. He says, you've heard it said that you shall not murder, but I'm telling you that if you have anger in your heart towards your brother, you are liable to the fires of hell.

36:09

He does the same thing. You've heard it said you should not commit adultery. I'm telling you that if you lust after someone, you've broken the law and you stand liable in the judgment.

36:19

What's he doing? Is he saying something new? No. He is preaching the law to the hearts of men the way that it should have always been understood.

36:27

It should have never been understood as some mere external conformity. It should have always been understood that this law actually crushes you in your sin and drives you to the only one who could fulfill it.

36:38

So he's just rightly interpreting the law. Jon Moffitt Here's a great example of this. The rich young ruler walks up to him and says, what must

36:45

I do to inherit the kingdom? He was misinterpreting scripture. This is why he says, in them you think you have eternal life.

36:53

The greatest example of this is the rich young ruler. So Jesus uses the law to crush that. The original intention, the first use of the law, was just to crush him.

37:03

Well, there's much more we need to say, will say, and continue to say. Unabashedly, Justin and I are trying to help you see and argue for a proper hermeneutic.

37:16

Our argument would be that we think scripture teaches a redemptive historic understanding of scripture, that all of scripture is about Christ redeeming for us the kingdom that was lost.

37:26

He created Eden. He created this beautiful relationship between the king and its subjects, and it got destroyed.

37:33

And so what does Jesus promise? I have come to proclaim the good news of the kingdom, the restoration.

37:38

What does Paul say? We are ambassadors. Be reconciled to God. So the whole story is about God reconciling people to himself to restore the kingdom that has been lost.

37:49

And so this is why our tagline is to clarify the gospel and to reclaim the purpose of the kingdom. We think the clearest hermeneutic of that is a redemptive historic understanding of scripture, also known as covenant theology.

38:01

Well, in the notes, we'll put our link to multiple resources that we have to covenant theology.

38:07

We would encourage you to go look at those. Justin, any final thoughts before we run over to a different podcast?

38:14

Justin Perdue No, I do have a thought or two, just to put a bow on this conversation.

38:23

We all want to be people of the word, and we all want to be faithful students of the word.

38:30

We want to handle it rightly. We want to interpret it correctly. And we will not do ourselves or anyone that we know a service if we act as though we're the first people to read the scriptures and we ignore creeds and confessions that have been produced through history that have stood the test of time.

38:47

And so don't wig out. We are sola scriptura, guys. The scripture alone is our final and ultimate authority, and there are a number of helpful resources over a couple of thousand years subservient to the scriptures that help us understand it.

39:05

Don't be allergic to the talk of system. Don't be allergic to the talk of frameworks, because the scripture itself presents these things.

39:12

So take a breath, study the scriptures, study church history. All of this will be of great profit to you, and I agree with you wholeheartedly.

39:21

If you take away anything from today, the entirety of the scripture is a testimony about Christ, His person,

39:27

His work, what He would come to do to reconcile us to God and give us life eternal.

39:33

Justin Perdue Amen to that. Well, for those of you listening, we do have other resources available for you.

39:39

We have a podcast called Everyday Grace, where you can listen five days a week to sermon clips about the gospel from Justin and I, and podcast clips from us and our hosts and our guests.

39:49

You can go to our website to learn about that. We have an entire YouTube channel just dedicated to that, so if you want to share that to friends and family, it's a great way to introduce them to resting in Christ and the sufficiency of Christ.

40:00

We'd encourage you to do so. Justin and I do a second podcast every week. We love this podcast. It's called Semper Reformanda, which means always reforming, where we take the truths of what we talked about today and we help you to apply them in your home, in your life, and also in your church.

40:16

This second podcast called Semper Reformanda is available to our supporters. We have a membership that allows you to help support

40:24

Theocast and what we're doing. You can go to theocast .org to learn more about it. It's called Semper Reformanda.

40:30

We also have an app, and it is growing. That community is exploding. We have lots of new people in there, and I and Justin are doing our best to get in there and answer questions and engage, but it's great.

40:43

Justin Perdue But you guys are answering each other's questions and interacting in ways that are encouraging to me. I jump on there and I look at stuff and I'm like, this is really good.

40:50

Justin Perdue It is. It's a safe place. Facebook tends to get a little lively. We do have a Facebook group. It can get a little hot and heated in there, but SR is a very safe community.

41:00

We're really thankful for that. We're seeing more and more churches get involved with us. More church planting get involved.

41:08

Well, I guess we'll just throw all the announcements in there, but continue to pray for Justin and I. We're working on Grace Reform Network, which is a church planting network slash church network, and we have a lot of exciting news coming for that.

41:20

We have a lot of people joining that. If you're interested in it, you're a Reformed Baptist and you're interested in that, please come and check us out at gracereformnetwork .org.

41:28

All right, we're done. We'll see you guys next week. Thanks for listening, and Lord willing, we'll see you in glory, but if not, we'll have another episode for you.