Search: Lawrence v Texas

Analyzing…

Generated by AI. Please verify important details.Beta

1,019 results

1:25:11

The Striking Down of Roe v. Wade

Your Calvinist

about 4 years ago

1:10:34

Clarence Thomas also said Lawrence versus Texas, 2003, a case that Texas had laws against sodomy, homosexual

1:00:06

Your Liberties and Freedoms: Hanging by a Thread

AOM

Alpha & Omega Ministries

about 14 years ago

10:50

Let me repeat to you again the language from the Lawrence v Texas decision you cannot differentiate between

1:00:13

A Truly Lopsided Debate

AOM

Alpha & Omega Ministries

about 15 years ago

37:34

So the question about Lawrence v, Texas. I will remind you was not about incest.

1:16:36

The Supreme Court & Emotionally-Laden Pastors

Apologia Studios

over 4 years ago

21:43

When Texas did their heartbeat bill very recently, that's exactly what the White House press secretary

1:02:36

Emergency & Controversy In Texas

Apologia Studios

about 7 years ago

16:37

Yeah, Texas law already says that it recognizes human beings from the moment of conception. And so when you have contradictory law that legislates in opposition to what Texas law says already, that you protect human beings from the moment of conception, that's a definite conflict, and you have a big, big problem with that.

44:39

What Dobbs Left Out

CTM

Conversations That Matter

almost 4 years ago

23:59

That's restricted to a man and a woman. OK, fine. You've said I can't have that law. State officials then took that. Along with three of the dissenting justices and said, oh, that means we must issue a license to same sex couples.

2:45

Resisting the Supreme Court's Tyranny

Apologia Studios

over 7 years ago

1:15

The Supreme Court cannot make law. And so the states have the rights to the right to to actually create a barrier between a murderous state and federal government and these children. They do it all the time.

1:35:28

The Work After Dobbs, Lots of Church History, Nicea, and More

AOM

Alpha & Omega Ministries

about 4 years ago

10:09

Okay, but speaking of Justice Thomas, most people have made reference to the fact that there is a section in his part of the decision that he wrote or opinion that he wrote. This is what it says. For that reason, in future cases, we should reconsider all this court's substantive due process precedents, including Griswold, Lawrence, and Obergefell.

1:24:19

Rally For Equal Protection At The Ohio Capitol

Apologia Studios

almost 3 years ago

11:11

Even the Supreme Court recognized this 50 years ago in the Roe v.

32:09

Tennessee Heartbeat Bill: Where Was the ERLC?, with Matthew Nowlin

CTM

Conversations That Matter

almost 7 years ago

25:17

I didn't even think to tell you this. Okay, first of all in now, Tennessee and Florida that Similar to the anti -obscenity laws that the Supreme Court heard in the 60s. I mean they swooped up and heard like just dozens of cases at once and made this mass ruling on them.

59:30

Frozen Road Trip DL: The Supreme Court as a Window into the Degradation of the US

AOM

Alpha & Omega Ministries

over 1 year ago

27:16

Find out what this court has not hesitated to hold laws unconstitutional under rational basis review when they are rooted in Unsubstantiated fears and prejudices. That's exactly what this You are. We think that if we're assuming a similarly worded statute that there still would not be.

1:12:01

Thoughts on SCOTUS and Phone Calls on Today’s DL

AOM

Alpha & Omega Ministries

almost 11 years ago

19:00

worldview, there was no meaningful discussion of the real issues because you see All the way back to lawrence

10:54

Race, Supreme Court, and Slavery

Apologia Studios

about 5 years ago

4:17

That's the only bill of abolition, true abolition, here in the state of Texas.

4:35

How should a Christian view the Roe vs. Wade decision? | GotQuestions.org

GQO

GotQuestions.org

almost 4 years ago

3:16

In doing so, the Court explicitly overturned Roe vs. Wade and another case, Casey vs. Planned Parenthood, 1992. The Bible provides a moral code upon which to build a framework of laws, jurisprudence, and executive action.

1:18:47

Immunity for Trump?

Your Calvinist

almost 2 years ago

1:15:27

There were laws against the mentally unstable or ill possessing firearms all the way back into pre -constitutional times. There was a—it was a fairly well -reasoned opinion. Clarence Thomas disagreed because he said if you're going to take a federal right away, you need a federal trial.

11:21

Their Responses Are Shocking

TreasureChrist

almost 4 years ago

3:40

Third, 13 states had trigger bans that would be put into effect immediately if Roe v.

57:13

Defending Idaho's Anti-Abortion Law

CTM

Conversations That Matter

almost 2 years ago

18:36

I think texas says it's a health exception, but they define health to be essentially a condition that is life -threatening um other states have Broader exceptions and nevertheless, they're being challenged.

20:37

Banning Porn?

AD Robles

over 6 years ago

11:21

Sodomy should be a crime now. I know libertarians are freaking out here and and let let fine. I'm okay with that because this is not me talking. This is the law of God. So so I think it's quite easy to find the general equity of these laws.

5:26

Highlight: Responding to Lawmaker

Apologia Studios

about 4 years ago

2:42

You're arguing to legislators. You can't resist the Supreme Court's ruling like Dred Scott.

1:03:08

Religious Liberty Ft. Ian Huyett

TRUEOLOGY

6 months ago

34:51

It may just be framed as if we're legislating without respect to religion, but it nonetheless is an infringement on your free exercise rights. So a famous case, for example, that illustrates this principle is the case of Lakumi Babalu Ai, which I think is partly a famous case because it's got a very funny sounding name.