Search: pronouns are ontological

Analyzing…

Generated by AI. Please verify important details.Beta

791 results

1:07:51

Bethel Church and Miracles, Rosaria Butterfield, Gender Pronouns, and the Post-Obergefell World

AOM

Alpha & Omega Ministries

over 6 years ago

50:35

But I try to avoid the use of all false pronouns.

28:00

48 - Anselm's Ontological Argument

AOM

Alpha & Omega Ministries

over 8 years ago

21:37

So God exists in reality as well as in the understanding. So the reason is called the ontological argument is it flows from ontology from the very Concept of existence the existence of the being of which no greater can be conceived and That's why it's called the ontological argument.

1:33:16

Leaving Molinism with Max Andrews (Part 1 of 3)

Revealed Apologetics

over 6 years ago

14:57

So think of you know, the ontological argument is an argument for the metaphysical necessity of God. This isn't really an argument it's just putting forth specific grammatical rules for exegeting reality.

6:14

Brandan Robertson: God Has Non-Binary PRONOUNS?!

FFT

Fight For Truth

almost 4 years ago

1:53

But beyond this, let's revisit his argument. He effectively says that God can be referred to with feminine pronouns because the Spirit of God has always been, quote, gender neutral. And the concept of gender neutrality is fairly self -explanatory.

10:00

Was Deedat Right? Not Quite: John 1:1 Revisited

AOM

Alpha & Omega Ministries

over 18 years ago

7:14

It's a form of I mean. And to be able to identify a predicate nominative and to not turn this into an equative sentence, the subject has the article, the predicate nominative does not. If both had the article or neither had the article, then you'd be making an equation between logos and theos, which would make John 1, verse 1 contradictory with itself.

1:31:46

Theology and Apologetics Seminar Part 2

AOM

Alpha & Omega Ministries

over 39 years ago

1:53

So when you're reading your books, you run across a word that talks about ontology or ontological issues. You're talking about issues of being. And so the ontological trinity is basically the idea that God in his being exists as three persons, Father, Son, and Holy Spirit.

32:31

Presup REFUTED? #presup #apologetics #theology #TAG

Revealed Apologetics

over 2 years ago

15:50

I have to exist, right? These are localized transcendentals you see but but when we're arguing from a presuppositional perspective within apologetics, we're arguing What are the necessary preconditions?

34:15

A Presupper Responds to Dr. Richard Howe

Revealed Apologetics

about 6 years ago

20:28

Rather, we understand that in order to have an adequate epistemology, the ontological situation must be the case. So ontology and epistemology are intricately related, and you can't separate the two. So the ontological existence of God is a necessary precondition for knowledge, as well as the assumption of God is a necessary precondition of knowledge.

40:49

Trinitarian Salvation - Brandon Scalf

HCT

Heritage Church Tulsa

about 2 years ago

13:50

Or are they different? So what is the ontological Trinity more in -depth? The ontological Trinity or as other theologians have called it the eminent Trinity is who God is in himself. There are two words here that I know you'll forget because I forgot them many times as I was studying through this over the years.

2:30:04

The Trinity | w/ Dr. Brant Bosserman

TAD

The Apologetic Dog

about 3 years ago

2:14:54

And you have all of these problems of change, mutability, metaphysical non -being, gradations, all of these things that make something not an ultimately personal context, but someone who is himself fraught with impersonality.

3:53

Can Presuppers Escape from Brain in the Vat Scenarios?

Revealed Apologetics

about 5 years ago

1:24

Given your system, I don't see, by just positing arbitrarily, I exist, I don't know what I'm composed of. You don't even know if you are matter in motion. There's no way for you to know that. Your ontological starting point is based upon an arbitrary picking of an axiom.

2:00

Does God have the right to select His pronoun? | Rapp Report Daily 0152 | Striving for Eternity

ARR

Andrew Rappaport's Rapp Report Daily

almost 8 years ago

1:09

He has selected a male pronoun. Therefore, if the liberals want to be consistent, they should call God he, and not try to rename him she, because he identifies as a he and not a she. This is the thing that you end up seeing, is that they want to recreate the pronoun for God based on what they want it to be, but they want to use their own pronouns when it comes to what they want it to be.

10:26

Jesus is Risen

TreasureChrist

over 3 years ago

3:36

To tell them that it's okay because it isn't well. Our issue isn't that gender neutral pronouns are difficult. Our issue is that they're simply not true. Next let's learn about neopronouns. What are.

36:47

Prologue of John

AOM

Alpha & Omega Ministries

over 11 years ago

17:00

Now, when you hear me use theos or theon, those are not two different words. Those of you who know other languages other than English know that there are such things as case forms. And so, you have a genitive, you have a dative, you have an accusative.

43:50

None Greater (part 3)

BBC

Bethlehem Bible Church

about 5 years ago

22:41

Really infinite because even being able to talk about him is that not in some way putting boundaries around him or defining him or you? Know any of those types of things. And so they they bicker back and forth remember the the the ontological argument from from Anselm.

9:57

Did Ahmed Deedat Truly Know Greek?

AOM

Alpha & Omega Ministries

over 18 years ago

7:16

You can see that ha is for the nominative, and ton is for the accusative. But theos is a nominative form, and theon is the proper accusative form. Didot simply has it completely wrong and does not seem to even recognize this.

24:52

JWs and LDS are Wrong About Jesus

Apologia Studios

over 7 years ago

13:26

Not a voluntary subordination, but an ontological or on the level of being subordination. What it ended up casting light on is the relationship of the Father and the Son and what those words mean when you take them out of what we might call human language use.

1:56:30

John’s Testimony to the Deity of Christ: John 1:1-18, 8:24, 58, 20:28

AOM

Alpha & Omega Ministries

over 5 years ago

1:04:59

This is a masculine. Its antecedent is the logos. Now, if the prologue is going to tell us that the logos is personal, then there is no reason on the planet to render this as it or that thing or whatever else.

3:51

Is God Masculine?

ARR

Andrew Rappaport's Rapp Report Daily

almost 7 years ago

2:17

So therefore, anybody who believes that we should respect the identity that someone is using the pronoun they prefer, they should respect the pronoun that God prefers and he calls himself a male. Now this does have, I'm sure, to do with federal headship and why he created man first.

31:35

DEBATE: Should Christians Use Preferred Pronouns?

Wise Disciple

almost 2 years ago

25:26

Pronouns. We'll get there. I'll let that settle. We can come back to Jesus or Paul, but I do not think either of them would in any circumstance, period. I can't think of hardly any chance where I think Jesus or Paul, especially in a public setting like that, would use a preferred pronoun.