So simple and it should be a forceful denunciation of deconstruction, this whole movement.

That's actually not what's going on in the deconstruction movement.

So, yeah, I mean, it's, you know, the deconstruction movement that we.

want to say that one of the deconstructionists we talked to, cause we were talking about this, like a movement

But the deconstruction movement in particular—. Can I interrupt you real quick?

This is an application of deconstructionism an approach that claims to disassemble beliefs or ideas while assuming their meanings are inherently subjective. So one thing you'll see from these people that they they're postmodern.

Now while critical race theory accomplishes deconstruction, remember Derrida, intersectionality, a sub

If this deconstruction movement is so good for people's faith, then why is it resulting in so many people

According to Daryl Harrison, deconstruction is another woke term. Attributed to Jacques Derrida, a staunch defender of Karl Marx, the evangelical church must be more discerning in this regard. What many call deconstruction, the Bible calls apostasy.

He confronted an earlier iteration of the modernist movement.

This is a massive movement of Christian deconstruction, exvangelicalism.

So I think deconstruction is kind of like that disease. You're gonna pull out your sword and do everything you can do to stop it from robbing people of their faith. But at the same time, you have tears in your eyes for the people who are so confused by the deconstructionists online and the propaganda machine that the social media space is.

People deconstruct from the things that they were taught when they were young and they're under their parents' household. People deconstruct from societal norms and history. We have seen the modern -day Black activist movement deconstruct and reconstruct history in light of liberal ideologies.

And this is where deconstruction comes in. It's a massive movement in the culture right now.

And so deconstruction is not wrong to do. To deconstruct is not inherently bad. But there is a lot that needs to be said about it. We need to be thoughtful in the way that we do it. And to John's point, we don't want to just deconstruct and tear things down and just kind of leave ourselves or other people out in the middle of nowhere just hanging in midair.

I would recommend this website. It says deconstruction is the heading most recently applied to the process of questioning Doubting and ultimately rejecting aspects of Christian faith. This is an application of deconstructionism an approach that claims to dissemble beliefs Or ideas while assuming their meanings are inherently subjective both the trend and its title reflect backlash against the unfortunate habit within some religious circles to Downplay deep questions and ignore those who hold to them to openly investigate the nuances of belief even changing one's conviction is a biblical concept in Practice though deconstruction almost always acts as a polite cover for demolition.

what we mean by recovering fundamentalists, because a lot of people assume that we are some sort of deconstruction

This is about defending sound doctrine against the Deconstruction of American evangelicalism.

And there are some people who actively push for deconstruction, which is what this is, deconstructing society, culture, language, everything for the sake of establishing another power in its place. And the Marxists wanted to use deconstruction, wanted to use these ideas in order to establish Marxism.

There was a couple of other hired guns called Jacques Derrida and Michael Foucault who collaborated with deconstructionism and postmodernism which basically means that nothing written down means what you think it means and nothing that anybody ever said means what you think it means.