Program change or you you called it genetic recombination?

Or you called it genetic recombination?

Our book lists the sources of genetic variation.

might arise in separate individuals, their descendants might then mate, affording an opportunity for genetic

And it's because there's noise when it comes to recombination and transmitting your genetics from your grandparents. So for example, like, you know, I know someone who's 18%, one great grandparent, okay.

This idea that God creates an initial pair with differences between them and within them, we'll call that term, the technical term is heterozygosity. So this is an idea that has massive consequences in modern genetics and virtually all of our genetic discussions.

Mutations is what is in each one of our genes from generations before us. But when we marry someone more distantly related we are less likely to have the same copying errors and can slow down the degradation of the human genome.

Genetic variation is recombination of existing genetic information.

Here's another one. We could consider a bad mutation. A whole set of genes, a whole set of instructions can break off and attach themselves somewhere else, even to another chromosome altogether. It just jumps and goes somewhere else.

So we just done and wave genetics but now looking at Having been in creation science and genetics research from a creationist perspective for 12 13 years I'm now coming around more to perhaps we are at a threshold where there's been enough mutation since Adam and Eve where there is a lot of There are a lot of genetic diseases that are arising now because we've run out of compensatory good versions.

Of the problem. Okay. So we have a comment on Facebook and it, and it goes to Bill's first question about genetic testing before reproducing. And it might be more of a comment, but maybe you want to also comment on it, but he says, isn't it the case that cells have the ability to fix mutations such that if one spouse has in some place and the other doesn't, then there, when they're combined, it can be removed.

Here's what we now know, according to the research that's been done by population geneticists. The human mutation rate is at least 100 nucleotide substitutions per person per generation. It's very likely it's as high as 300 mutations per generation.

The human chromosome fusion site has been totally debunked. Don't let anybody tell you that they think there is a fusion site. It's genetically impossible. Finally, you have a giant wait time problem to change even a little snippet of chimp DNA.

It certainly makes sense that just counting up the number of genetic changes doesn't really tell us that much about how similar or different two creatures are. Indeed, human DNA and gene level comparisons are frequently made to other mammals, such as mice, cows, and even dogs with high levels of overlap.

Increasing functional genetic information to the genome. All's we find mutations do is they recombine? Information is already present or Have a net loss of information. Usually it's both. That's the issue and Patrick look you study cancer, right?

They can't avoid using that terminology at all. I go back to the to the article the hopeful thing is that molecular biologists today slowly, but surely and perhaps despite themselves are Increasingly being driven to enlarge their understanding through a reckoning with genetic context as a result.

Well remember I said at the very beginning, I'm going to define mutation, in the way that most people are defining mutations, and that it's a copying error, it's a damage to the DNA, it's a type of genetic mistake, and so no, I am not referring to those kinds of things, I am referring to just specific genetic changes, without characterizing them as mistakes, or copying errors, they're genetic changes, that until proven otherwise, there are mechanisms, which can direct those genetic changes, to the right place, and at the right time, when needed, that's not to say that accidents don't happen, but I am saying that the genetic changes, that are adaptive, that allow organisms to adapt, and I would cross out that word micro evolution, expunge that from my vocabulary, and I would say that organisms have, highly regulated genetic changes, which enable them to express the proper traits, at the proper time, in order to solve the problems that they're facing, due to highly regulated control systems, within their bodies.

Okay, so, well, a mutation is a mistake in your DNA. And it can happen when the DNA is being copied, right? So you have mechanisms in your cells that when the cells split, they duplicate the DNA. It's amazing.

Look at what it says. Some mutations, such as those that cause genetic diseases, may be lethal. Other mutations may lower fitness by decreasing an individual's ability to survive and reproduce. Still, other mutations may improve an individual's ability to survive and reproduce.

Last for tonight is the subject of genetics, and this just carries on the same idea. With the rise of the ability to manipulate human genetics, newer and sometimes frightening ethical dilemmas come, are seemingly coming on the horizon.