Search: radioisotope dating

Analyzing…

Generated by AI. Please verify important details.Beta

824 results

1:33:03

Journey to Novarupta (HD)

Genesis Apologetics

over 2 years ago

42:01

It was a blow to radioisotope dating.

11:26

Debunking Evolution - Radiometric Dating (Lesson 2a)

Genesis Apologetics

over 10 years ago

5:48

Right. A radioactive half -life. So, when they discover a rock, they can measure the amount of parent material and the amount of daughter product, and using a chart like this, determine how old it is.

1:18:31

Nuclear Chemist Dr. Jay Wile on Dinosaur Soft Tissue and Carbon 14

Creation Fellowship

about 6 years ago

55:33

So for example, the radioactive dating technique that's mostly used to give us hundreds of millions and billions of years is the potassium argon dating technique that's used on lava. The potassium argon dating technique assumes that when the lava is still liquid, all of the argon gas has bubbled out of it.

4:49

Genesis Impact Clip - Radiometric Dating and the Age of the Earth

Genesis Apologetics

over 5 years ago

0:48

These methods are useful for dating Igni's rocks, which are formed when hot, molten rock crystallizes and solidifies. Radiometric dating is also useful for dating the ash layers in which we find the dinosaurs.

14:38

Age of the Earth-IAC Training Video

Genesis Apologetics

about 9 years ago

8:36

Now the next teaching object we have here is a copy of the book Radioisotopes in the Age of the Earth. This is the first volume in a two book series. This study, the Radioisotopes in the Age of the Earth study, that was put on by the Institute for Creational Research and the Creational Research Society, uncovered several lines of evidence that indicate that radiometric dating really doesn't work the way the evolutionists say it does.

58:25

The Age of the Earth and the Bible (Genesis Apologetics Presentation)

Genesis Apologetics

over 2 years ago

36:27

But when they crank these radiometric dates back into millions of years, it requires faith and historical science. Here's the formula for radiometric dating. I won't go over all of the details there, but in this formula, it assumes that the starting amounts of the parent and the daughter element are known.

2:12:47

Informal Debate with "Secular Humanist Atheistic Jew" David Neff, Part 2

Apologetics Live

over 5 years ago

15:09

This has a half -life of 49 .23 billion years old. It is an isochron dating, so what we're doing is we're actually measuring two ratios. We're measuring the ratio of Rubidium -87 to Stronium -86 and Stronium -87 to Stronium -86.

0:57

Radiometric Dating (Classroom Series)

Genesis Apologetics

about 3 years ago

0:36

For instance when radiometric dating is used on known rocks like volcanoes. It's always wrong often by millions of years. What are you saying? Well, if it's wrong in the ages of known rocks, why are we trusted with unknown rocks?

35:45

Discerning Truth: Dialog on the Age of the Earth - Part 5

BSI

Biblical Science Institute

over 5 years ago

25:16

So no, that just doesn't work. The results have been published in Radioisotopes and the Age of the Earth. Volume 2 is the one that has the discussion of background radiation and its inability to recharge C -14.

1:19:38

Dr. Jason Lisle Astrophysicist Astronomy in a Young Universe

Creation Fellowship

about 6 years ago

30:45

Now this relates to another topic that I think is really powerful evidence of the biblical timescale, and that's carbon dating. A lot of people have the impression that carbon dating is what the secularists use to give the millions of years, it isn't, they use other methods like uranium lead, potassium argon, and so on.

30:08

Discerning Truth: Dialog on the Age of the Earth - Part 3

BSI

Biblical Science Institute

over 5 years ago

1:46

So that's where I get the 6 ,000 years. Is there science that lines up with that? Absolutely. How do we make scientific age estimates? Usually the way it's done is there's some process that's going on in the present that happens not necessarily at a constant rate, but at a predictable rate, like radioactive decay.

1:22:58

Debunking the Seven Myths about Genesis, Creation, and the Flood (Dr. Biddle, Genesis Apologetics)

Genesis Apologetics

over 1 year ago

58:49

There's all different types of radiometric dating. This kind of radiometric dating called relative dating usually works just fine. It's where you can stack up a whole bunch of layers of rocks and you can date the ash layers between them and you can know that we'll stack pancake one was laid down first and number two, number three, number four.

1:59:54

May 24, 2017 Show with Gregg Davidson on “The Grand Canyon: Monument to an Ancient Earth”: Part One of a Two-day Discussion of the Age of the Earth (Old Earth)

ISI

Iron Sharpens Iron

about 9 years ago

48:47

Now for radiometric dating doesn't work or isn't trustworthy or if radiometric You know radioactive decay rates were changing or variable in the past We have no reason to expect that that's going to give the same number that we're measuring with our GPS unit.

1:59:59

September 4, 2020 Show with Dr. Jason Lisle on “Taking Back Astronomy”

ISI

Iron Sharpens Iron

almost 6 years ago

1:34:40

I cannot know why some geologists said to Dr. Lyle that radiometric dating was backed up by astronomy. I am a geochemist and the age of the earth was determined from the decay of uranium 238 to lead 206.

54:34

Does the age of the Earth matter?

Creation Fellowship

almost 6 years ago

48:52

Therefore, dating by this method is at best a hypothesis concerning the age of a rock sweep or material mineral. It is certainly not a scientific fact. Then John Reed, PhD in geology states, but there are many problems with all these methods.

1:59:47

December 8, 2020 Show with Dr. Tim Clarey on “Dinosaurs: Marvels of God’s Design (the Science on the Biblical Account)”

ISI

Iron Sharpens Iron

over 5 years ago

1:56:34

Right. They have to project back into time, but most of the time they're using radioisotope days of assumptions that we don't have time. They're basing on things they're claiming. These are accurate.

1:39:43

Dating, DEI, and Dope

CTM

Conversations That Matter

11 months ago

1:36:47

As I like to say, uh, let's, let's see, we're out. We're on the date. I don't know if I want to take too many more of the dating stuff. J .R. says dating is so different than even when I was in college, older people don't realize how much it has changed and how much dating apps have thrown a wrench in the equation.

25:52

Courtship or Dating (Part 1)

NCR

No Compromise Radio

over 7 years ago

1:54

K -Rock, that's a Los Angeles radio station. So today we're going to talk about singleness, dating, courtship. What do we do when it comes to dating and courtship? Is it proper for a Christian to date?

1:18:07

#47 UNDERSTANDING BIBLICAL vs. SECULAR TIMELINES + Dr. Robert Carter

Biblically Speaking

over 1 year ago

41:46

And it's funny because the archaeologists know this problem and they're stuck. And the scientists know the problems. Oh, we will come into the rescue. We will put scientific dates on these artifacts. But the most common one they use is carbon dating.

1:59:39

August 27, 2025 Show with Dr. John P. Marcus on “How Biochemistry Relates to Creation”

ISI

Iron Sharpens Iron

10 months ago

43:51

So I'm not going to trust some radiometric date that a scientist gives when they can't even get it right for a volcano that's erupted in modern history, when I know what scripture says. But there are other clocks, if we look through scripture, that show the age, for example, of the human race.